How The ‘Gay’ Jihad Normalized A Filthy Practice
By J. Matt Barber
The public career beheading
of former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich at the hands of pagan sexual jihadists,
coupled with an escalating epidemic of Christian business owners facing
harsh government persecution for merely living out their faith, has startled
awake an America lulled to sleep by the left’s intentionally deceptive,
yet oh-so-sweet sounding serenade of “equality, tolerance and diversity.”
folks have finally begun to recognize that America’s “progressive”
power class of cultural Marxists and left-wing statists really
intends, and always has, to subjugate ideological dissenters through
abject inequality and intolerance, while demanding blind obedience to
an anti-Christian, sexually anarchist sociopolitical agenda.
goals of these homosexualists were clearly defined decades ago.
Still, for any goal to be successfully attained, clever stratagem and
sound methodology must be diligently applied.
so they have.
In their manuscript, After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ’90s (1989, Doubleday/Bantam), Harvard-educated marketing experts Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen meticulously laid out the homosexual lobby’s blueprint for success in what is widely regarded as the handbook for the “gay” agenda.
ambitious project to demolish the America of our founding and raise,
in its place, a twisted hybrid of San Francisco’s Castro District
and Josef Stalin’s Soviet Union is nearing fruition.
Kirk and Madsen devised an insidious three-pronged approach the homosexual lobby has masterfully implemented in subsequent years: Desensitization, Jamming and Conversion.
They summarized their approach this way:
“Desensitization,” wrote Kirk and Madsen, means subjecting the public to a “continuous flood of gay-related advertising, presented in the least offensive fashion possible. If ‘straights’ can’t shut off the shower, they may at least eventually get used to being wet.”
and normalizing aberrant homosexual behavior in our public schools is
one approach. Under the guise of “comprehensive sex education,”
this tactic has had tremendous success. But public education
represents only one mechanism for indoctrination.
the aid of a willing media and a like-minded Hollywood, societal
desensitization has been largely achieved. The film, television and
mainstream news industries have been effectively utilized to foster a
modern-day fairy tale that creates a dishonest and sympathetic
portrayal of a lifestyle that, in truth, is emotionally, spiritually
and physically sterile.
is replaced with fantasy. Gone are references to, or images of, the
millions of homosexual men wasting away in hospice due to
behaviorally related diseases such as HIV/AIDS, hepatitis and
syphilis. (Unnatural behaviors beget natural consequences. As Romans
6:23 warns, “The wages of sin is death.”)
homosexual pressure group GLAAD even offers awards to the television
networks that most effectively carry the homosexual lobby’s water.
The more distorted and positive the portrayal of homosexual conduct,
and the more frequently the networks shows such portrayals, the more
likely networks are to win GLAAD’s coveted prize.
Kirk and Madsen put it, homosexuals should be portrayed as the
“Everyman.” “In no time,” they said, “a skillful and clever
media campaign could have the gay community looking like the
veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization.”
words from two very smart men.
refers to the public smearing of Christians, traditionalists or
anyone else who opposes the “gay” agenda. “Jam homo-hatred
(i.e., recognition of objective sexual morality) by linking it to
Nazi horror,” wrote Kirk and Madsen. “Associate all who oppose
homosexuality with images of ‘Klansmen demanding that gays be
slaughtered,’ ‘hysterical backwoods preachers,’ ‘menacing
punks,’ and a ‘tour of Nazi concentration camps.’”
“In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector. … The purpose of victim imagery is to make straights feel very uncomfortable,” they suggested.
goal of jamming? To make people feel guilty for criticizing the
homosexual agenda, as if they were further oppressing the “victims.”
Jamming is psychological manipulation on a mass scale.
so, words like “homophobia” and “heterosexism” were
manufactured from thin air, not because they have substance, but,
rather, because they were effective jamming tools. Anyone who holds
traditional values relative to human sexuality suddenly became a
“homophobe,” a “hatemonger” and a “bigot.” And it’s
all a mirage. Kirk and Madsen’s most revealing admission came
when they wrote, “[O]ur effect is achieved without reference to
facts, logic, or proof.”
even churches are safe.
can undermine the moral authority of homo-hating churches over less
fervent adherents by portraying [them] as antiquated backwaters,
badly out of step … with the latest findings of psychology. Against
the atavistic tug of ‘Old Time Religion’ one must set the
mightier pull of science and public opinion. … Such an ‘unholy’
alliance has already worked well in America against the churches, on
such topics as divorce and abortion. … [T]hat alliance can work for
how it has.
and Madsen called for “conversion of the average American’s
emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in
the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.”
the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the
masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to
homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex should be
downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social
question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside
the tent and only later his unsightly derriere!”
is it with these guys and derrieres?
as Kirk and Madsen both astutely understood and surprisingly
admitted, homosexual activism is really a big game of hide the ball.
In order to achieve widespread acceptance of “gayness,” they had
to remove the focus from what homosexuality actually is (deviant and
disordered sexual conduct) and, instead, shift it to the cleverly
manufactured specter of “gay rights.”
cut through much of their propagandist sugarcoating, one need only
consider what two men must actually do in order to “consummate” a
so-called “gay marriage.” Kirk and Madsen understood this. Most
people are naturally repulsed by the mechanics of homosexual conduct,
but everyone is for “civil rights.”
America, here’s a refresher. Homosexuality 101: The central,
defining feature of homosexuality is same-sex sodomy, a filthy
practice both from a moral and biological standpoint that
spreads disease, ruins lives and mocks both God and nature.
short, these sexually confused and spiritually lost souls,
particularly males caught-up in this lifestyle, can only “consummate”
a counterfeit “gay marriage” through the squalid, unnatural and
feculent abuse of both the reproductive and digestive systems.
Is it any wonder why these “gay” jihadists want us to focus on the subjective specter of “gay rights” and ignore the objective reality of “gay” wrongs?
is why they terrorize anyone who fails to conform.
Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war.
|Donate to Rense.com Support Free And Honest Journalism At Rense.com||Subscribe To RenseRadio! Enormous Online Archives, MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, Highest Quality Live Programs|