I think the medical information could and should be circulated throughout all ICU-HDU-ER departments of all hospitals. If they've not figured it out or have not been told what's happening to (many-most of) their patients, they need the information to review, consider and incorporate ASAP.
Updated casualty stats, still show NZ remains one of the more stupid nations - locking down their people (5 million) and collapsing their economy for 11 CV deaths, and a total of 1422 cases. That's 0.028% of their population infected = 28 out of each 100,000 of population.
Australia exceeds this, though, with 67 deaths (total), 6,547 confirmed cases from a population of 25.5 million. The Aussies chose to fold their economy, put millions out of work and imprison their people for a 0.25% infection rate, with only 2.6 deaths per MILLION of population.
I'm not insensitive to people whom have suffered and died, and their families. Not at all. I think it's clear, to me at least, that the more widespread damage (orders of magnitude greater), are the people locked in their homes, without liberty, jobs, money and with food shortages already beginning. The US seems nearly certain to initiate a hot war with China (over a virus which they both worked to create).
Statistically, war is not good for either civilians or military, with casualty ration of 2:1 for civilian and military. I guess we'll see soon enough, unless someone can put the brakes on the Pentagram.
BASE INFORMATION
-----------------
2018 was selected for this data because it is a confirmed and complete data-set. Data source: UK ONS (Office National Statistics)
1) 2018 UK population was 66.4-million (0.6% growth rate per annum)
2) 2018 UK Deaths (Jan-Dec) = 541,589 = or 9.67 per 1,000 population...or 0.97% of the population
3) UK 2020 population estimated at 67.4 million (official growth rate)
4) Estimated 2020 deaths @ 9.67 deaths per 100 population...651,758
5) 651,758 per year = 1,784 per day
KEY STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
-------------------------
A) Over a 53 day period (since UK CV deaths began the sustained increase), we could normally expect a total of 94,552 deaths from all causes.
B) Official (UK) CV attributed deaths for 53-days = 15,464.
C) CV has therefore been responsible for +/- 16%...or 1 in 6 of all normal deaths.
D) 84% of deaths have been 'normal'. If CV caused less 1 in 6 of what would have already been expected, anyway,
it hardly qualifies as worthy of collapsing the worldwide economy and shutting down society.
E) Even if there had been an apocalyptic 10x CV deaths (150,000 rather than 15,000), such would have 'only' increased the normal death rate by 164%.
F) As per previous correspondence, 88% of all deaths have been in the over 70 years age group, which confirms and reiterates deaths in ALL age-groups, but predominantly in the senior age group(s).
G) If the correct drug-chemical treatment had been known and available at the outset, my estimate is that less than 10% of casualties would have occurred, if not less. It's not difficult to hand out tablets with a glass of water to people in their own homes.
COMMENTARY
-----------
The virus was (illegally), in collaboration, designed and developed by US, Canada (Winnipeg), UK (Pirbright Institute), Australia and China (Wuhan) - to aggressively attack multiple organs and multiple types of sensitive tissues. While being publicly presented and framed as a 'Novel' organic virus, it is anything but.
It's public, open-source information that aside from development work at University of NC, the US government illegally funded the Chinese Wuhan lab which appears to have been intended as the lone 'bad boy' in all of this, and the false premise for US to go to war with China.
Video - Interview with Dr Francis Boyle, expert in bioweapons and BW policy-maker. This video includes accusations, exposure and the naming of key players.
https://www.bitchute.com/video /KhWH0DxlPGbn/
Wuhan lab Funding article -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne ws/article-8211291/U-S-governm ent-gave-3-7million-grant- Wuhan-lab-experimented-coronav irus-source-bats.html
Therefore, the elderly *in particular* stood, and stand, little statistical chance of survival - IF they develop life-threatening symptoms AND are taken to hopsital, given age and medical conditions (for the most part...but not for all). Pople of all age groups have, tragically, died.
What was seen in early statistical data was largely proven accurate:
a) 4-out-of-5 (80%) infected are OK, need no medical support (if they even know they've been infected)
b) 1-in-5 (20%) will need medical support.
(The fundamental demographics and casualty information (88% under 70) is clearly relevant).
Patients in the 1-in-5 (20%) group were, and are, realistically, entering a clear 'Danger Zone' by being admitted to a hospital where most cases are subject to oxygen support, initially. If oxygen support fails-failed, what would normally be an appropriate escalation to ventilation - was-is or seems to be the critical risk factor and increasingly apparent as the wrong, potentially fatal, mistake for many patients. ECMO machines (blood oxygenated outside body) seem to be a better tactic and protocol?
The recent Project Veritas video also confirmed the basic situation - where the NY Doctor summarized the medical situation as:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOYU2kJQfiA
"95% are fine, but 5% need help" (perhaps a slight paraphrase).
This summarized the overall situation perfectly, although the Doctor also mentioned that 5% of 8 million people is the core problem (f you're trying to ventilate that many people - when the proper treatment should be drugs and chemicals for most cases...which could easily be administered at home for most of them).
DISEASE FUNCTION AND MECHANICS
---------------------------
Source:
https://freerepublic.com/focus /f-news/3825003/posts
(ORF = "Open Reading Frame")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Open_reading_frame
Author - Dr David A Sinclair, Harvard Professor
https://lifespanbook.com/about /
"David Sinclair is a professor in the Department of Genetics and co-director of the Paul F. Glenn Center for the Biology of Aging at Harvard Medical School, where he and his colleagues study sirtuins—protein-modifying enzymes that respond to changing NAD+ levels and to caloric restriction—as well as chromatin, energy metabolism, mitochondria, learning and memory, neurodegeneration, cancer, and cellular reprogramming."
VIRUS SUMMARY
--------------
"SARS-CoV2 attacks pneumocytes in lung, intestine, heart and cells lining blood vessels. In the lung, CoV2 prevents cells from making biological detergents to keep lung passages open. Acute respiratory distress follows. O2 levels fall...but there may be a dangerous underlying process. New work out of China yesterday says COVID-19 might also involve abnormal blood production. CoV genes 1 & 8 are predicted to interfere with heme, the red compound in blood, by kicking out the iron. That would explain why chloroquine seems effective as a treatment #CoronaVirusUpdate
Chloroquine is predicted to prevent orf1ab, ORF3a and ORF10 from attacking heme (red in red blood cells) and inhibiting the binding of ORF8 to heme.
Although 99% of the virus is seemingly stable, what's disturbing is ORF 1 and 8 are mutating the fastest...
Positions nt28144 in ORF 8 and nt8782 in ORF1 are evolving. Samples out of China show they'd mutated 30.53% (29/95) and 29.47% (28/95), respectively. I'm currently figuring out why these are the ones mutating and how that would change the situation..."
REGARDING THE ELDERLY + DIABETICS
---------------------
"It may explain why diabetics and elderly are more susceptible. Blood sugar levels usually increase as we get older, increasing the amount of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (I've tweeted about this before).
The authors suggest these people would be more susceptible to because...the virus could more easily disrupt the heme in red blood cells. If so, the virus is very smart: it destroys the lung so patients can't take up oxygen AND it reduces the body's ability to carry oxygen to the body's cells and major organ systems. (For this & other reasons, you should eat very, very healthily the next 2 years)
These ideas are testable. COVID-19 should correlate with HbA1c levels (seems true). Patients should have abnormalities in heme/porphyrin and they might have higher levels of free iron in tissues & blood. I will update with more info as it comes in. Stay safe.
Below are links... Blood, HbA1c, and chloroquine COVID-19 Disease: ORF8 and Surface Glycoprotein Inhibit Heme Metabolism by Binding to Porphyrin COVID-19 Disease: ORF8 and Surface Glycoprotein Inhibit Heme Metabolism by Binding to Porphyrin.
https://tinyurl.com/w28et45
|
