is known as poison and industry doesn't like it. With regard
to the article below, they are funded by FAPESP
. Start researching links and you see Pfizer. Pfizer
it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck, hangs
around with other ducks, and its called a duck, there is a pretty
good chance it is a duck. There is a Chinese proverb: The
beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name. a
Confucius saying. So what is the definition of a poison?
A substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a
living organism when introduced or absorbed.
Let's see if it's a
1. Aspartame was listed with the pentagon in an
inventory of prospective biochemical warfare weapons submitted to
Congress. (Ecologist, Aspartame, 2005:
Studies were done at Ft. Detrick where other poisonous substances are
3. Aspartame travels by Hazmat Placard
like other poisons.
4. The FDA list of 92 horrible
symptoms includes death
Aspartame triggers sudden cardiac death:
It embalms you before you die:
7. Known as a poison even the titles of medical texts
and other books tell you aspartame is a killing machine and has
caused a world epidemic:
"Aspartame Disease: An Ignored
Epidemic" by H. J. Roberts, M.D., 1000 pages of diseases and
symptoms triggered or precipitated by aspartame,
Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills" by Dr. Woodrow Monte,
"Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills" by
neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., www.russellblaylockmd.com
"Aspartame: King of Toxins" by Reigh Parker Burch,
and there are more...
8. Fulfills the definition
of Title 18 of the Domestic Genocide Code:
Referred to as "mass poisoning" :
THE FDA ON FOOD LABELING -
JAMES D. BOWEN, M.D. (over 2 decades
"My statement for the public record regarding
food labeling and the aspartame issue is serious if not somewhat
facetious at times. The reason for this is because I have found
little evidence of honesty, integrity or stability on the part of
Food & Drug Administration officials regarding the aspartame
issue, since its approval in 1981. This attitude is largely shared by
the general public. I come in contact with approximately two new
people each week who are now being or who have in the past been
poisoned by aspartame.
All of them share the same reactions
that it is not worth writing to the FDA or NutraSweet, because you
and your agency have run amuck and are no longer a valid public
The recent revelations about the problems
surrounding generic drug approvals are compelling evidence of what
happens when an agency considered itself above the law in dealing
with these matters. In my opinion, this has resulted in the mass
poisoning of the American public as well as seventy-plus countries in
the rest of the world. Watching FDA officials walk through the
"revolving door" and be further rewarded by being promoted
to other positions of high public responsibility is clear evidence of
a government out of control.
For this reason, I am opposed to
labeling aspartame content of food and drinks. To do so would imply
that the government is taking some sort of responsible action...when
the only responsible action would be to immediately take aspartame
off the market, fully disclose its toxicities, offer full
compensation to the injured, public and criminally prosecute anyone
who participated in the fraudulent placement of aspartame on the
marketplace. That includes those who work so diligently to keep in on
the market as well.
Further, to label the purported aspartame
content of a product would cover a number of toxic flaws in the
product and its allowable daily intake (ADI) as follows:
the amount stated on the label was accurate and factual rather than
theoretical. Aspartame breaks down relatively quickly in solution.
Given the well established modus operandi of the manufacturer, there
is no concern given the ultimate consumer. And cover-ups seem to be
a part of the routine of doing business. The public should be well
advised that the amounts really used in liquid products are relatively
greater than those stated to accomplish a relative compensation for
the loss of product sweetness occurring during storage in solution.
the ADI presently allowed is 50% greater than that expected to cause
a reversal of the phenylalanine/tyrosine ratios in the human brain.
This has profoundly bad implications for the human being, including
dopamine and serotonin synthesis inhibition, causing depression, appetite
changes, mental inabilities, increased susceptibility to seizures
and a host of neurohormonal problems.
known metabolite of aspartame is of marked or questionable toxicity
and patently unsafe for human use. Methyl alcohol is metabolized to
nascent formaldehyde in the eye, nervous system and other metabolically
active organs. It immediately attacks and denatures the tissue structure
proteins in which is metabolized to nascent formaldehyde. This stimulates
specific organ and subcellular autoimmunity which seems to be a preponderant
source of the bad experiences reported by NutraSweet victims. Aspartic
Acid is a neuroexcitotoxic present in damaging amounts, it own right,
at the ADI for aspartame. Simple logic tells one that it will vastly
increase the metabolism of methyl alcohol to formaldehyde attach there.
This corresponds well with the symptomatologies often experienced,
such as Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS), bulbar palsies, neurohormonal
disorders, diketopiperazine issue remains totally unresolved and dangerous.
The amino acids that are released by hydrolysis, form eimers and isomers
that are either not sufficiently studied, or which are known substrates
in undesirable pathological states such as Alzheimer's disease.
is the issue of the approval of aspartame for market, which has violated
every principle of responsible science and responsible government.
Everyone responsible for this hearing should at least completely review
the approval process and the comments of the participants and observers
who have so excellently elucidated all the malfeasance for the public
record, such as Dr. Adrian Gross and many, many others (all on the
light of the above 4 points, I highly recommend that you deny in
every way possible any subterfuge of respectability that the
aspartame people have enshrouded themselves and their product within
hopes of quickly denying its access to the worldwide marketplace. I
write this, not believing that it will do the slightest bit of good
in the sense of affecting the labeling issue per se, but that
instead, it might reach some honest, concerned, conscientious
individuals in the process." James Bowen, M.D.
Documentaries made about aspartame poisoning the world: "Sweet
Misery: A Poisoned World" - you can get a copy from
11. FDA admitted it causes cancer and is against the
law because it violates the Delaney Amendment. Also stated you
shouldn't be able to set an allowable daily intake, therefore there
is no safe dose. No safe dose means poison.
1, 1985, FDA toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress that "at
least one of Searle's studies has established beyond any reasonable
doubt that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors in
experimental animals and that this predisposition of it is of
extremely high significance.... In view of these indications that the
cancer causing potential of aspartame is a matter that had been
established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one can ask: What is the
reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for this food
additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and
The Delaney Amendment makes
it illegal to allow any residue of cancer-causing chemicals in foods.
Dr Gross concluded by asking, "Given the cancer-causing potential
of aspartame, how would the FDA justify its position that it views a certain
amount of aspartame as constituting an allowable daily intake or safe
level of it? Is that position in effect not equivalent to setting a tolerance
for this food additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the FDA
itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect the health of
the public?" Congressional Record SID835:131 (8/1/85). Dr.
Gross made a very good point, that there is no safe dose because aspartame
caused cancer. How much cancer is safe?
12. Aspartame detox centers exist for those who have consumed
it such as the San Francisco Detox Center by Dr. Ken Stoller. Dr. Pauline
Harding has one in Chicago. Dr. Sandra Cabot has one in Australia.
13. Almost 100 per cent of independent scientific peer reviewed
research shows aspartame is not safe to consume. Dr. Ralph
Walton did research on aspartame and funding for "60 Minutes years
ago" : https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8479/b5aaa60a97619f97c8b61cfa0afac6c7d082.pdf
Today studies have shown everything from cancer and obesity to the metabolic
syndrome, strokes, dementia and heart attacks.
14. Aspartame damages the mitochondria and interacts with drugs
so people die from drug interaction. See chapter from medical text,
("Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" on hospital
15. Articles pour in daily warning the world that aspartame is a heinous
In original studies aspartame triggered neural tube defects, spina
bifida and cleft palate for starters. G. D. Searle made a deal with
the FDA to never allow the public to see the teratology studies and
they were sealed until I located them 8 years after Jerome Bressler,
retired from the FDA, asked me to find them. He said pregnant women
were using this poison without knowledge of what it could do to the
the Bressler Report you will see where we added the information back
and where even the FDA noted on their paperwork that aspartame causes
birth defects. http://www.mpwhi.com/complete_bressler_report.pdf
Today there is a class
action on Zofran used for nausea. Doctors gave pregnant women Zofran
for morning sickness. However, there is a difference between Zofran
and the generic where they added aspartame, completely unnecessary
unless its being used as a killing machine., Here is one of the
lawsuit notices. Notice the mention of cleft palate what it caused
in original studies. https://www.gblawyers.com/zofran-lawsuit/ Also
over the years so many babies born with a hole in the heart. The
generic with the aspartame is ondansetron.
I made it public aspartame caused birth defects, the FDA covered it
up and added the sealed documents back to the Bressler Report, the
FDA could no longer deny these FDA records and released to Dr.
Woodrow Monte four studies. They had denied them in the past. He
then wrote the book "While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills".
you can read free the last chapter on aspartame and autism. Dr.
Monte also mentions this deal with the FDA and G. D. Searle. Now the
"Fatal Drugs Allowed" folks have approved Advantame without
a pregnancy warning and its half aspartame. No way for them to now
deny aspartame causes horrible birth defects.
COVER-UP: The propaganda and cover-up has been hideous. You hear
over and over again "there is more methanol in oranges than in
aspartame". What has that got to do with anything? In oranges
there is also ethanol which is the classic antidote for methanol
poisoning. Also, in nature methanol binds to pectin and takes it
safely out of the body,. The Trocho Study in Barcelona by Dr. M.
Alemany, showed the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl
alcohol embalms living tissue and damages DNA. It turns your tissue
to plastic. Formaldehyde is a Class A carcinogen. The molecule
breaks down to diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent, and gave rats
brain tumors in original studies. G. D. Searle would excise the
tumors, put the rats back in the study, and when they died they would
resurrect them on paper.
years ago I lectured for the World Environmental Conference. The
focus was on MS and lupus. Nancy Markle put her name on a post I
wrote and disorganized it. It went viral and I get phone calls to
this day from victims. Industry and front groups claimed it to be a
hoax. The last time they tried to get away with this was this
year. Smithsonian Magazine wrote Aspartame Causes Cancer was a
classic Internet hoax. It was an obvious attempt to get the public
to believe aspartame is not a carcinogen. Somebody obviously ran out
of ideas since FDA scientist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress
aspartame caused cancer in 1985. Dr. Gross headed the investigation
on aspartame and tried to have the company indicted for fraud.
was a dead give away as soon as they mentioned cancer since the focus
of my lecture was MS and lupus. I had just testified to the
Carcinogenic Information Committee weeks before the article having to
do with Prop 65. I asked for equal time to publish the evidence. If
it had been a classic mistake they would have given it to me, In the
article author Kat Eschner said, " Almost
20 years after the letter, people still question aspartame. Out of
all of the substances in our diet, why this one?
" That is so simple to answer - because it wasn't a hoax, it
was and always will be the truth. Aspartame is a chemical poison
and the medical texts list everything I lectured on, giving the
mechanism by which aspartame precipitates or triggers symptoms and
a victim like Cori Brackett who was diagnosed with MS and was in a
wheelchair for years, hardly able to talk or walk. She was diagnosed
with one of the largest lesions ever seen in an MS victim. She read
about aspartame and got off of it. She walked out of her wheelchair
and 8 months later the huge lesion all but disappeared. It just
happened that Cori owned a film company and went on to make the
documentary, "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World". Does anyone
think you could change Cori's mind today, get her to use diet pop
again and get back in her wheelchair?! Multiply this by hundreds of
thousands, and you understand why the aspartame industry couldn't put
Humpty Dumpty together again and sold the company.
told Smithsonian September is Aspartame Awareness Month and they
would be the focus unless they gave me equal time to establish the
facts. It's too late for their cover-up., After 27 years of exposing
aspartame in the US and around the world, and with chapters in 45
countries we have reached critical mass. While FDA says they are
waiting for some science, almost 100% of independent peer reviewed
studies prove the dangers from heart attacks and strokes to cancer,
diabetes, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. In every country I've
lectured in they already knew aspartame is poison.
Eschner who wrote the Smithsonian Cover-up said "The
FDA is a reputable source." That's not what FDA said. In
2009 several FDA physicians and scientists sent a letter to
President Obama that they were broken and discussed not only their
corruption but the fear of reprisal if they spoke out. Here is that
Dr. Arthur Evangelista who is in "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned
World" left the FDA because he said the corruption was so bad he
even saw the employees altering reports in favor of industry.
There was a time many
years ago when FDA was reputable and in the case of aspartame they
set up a task force and tried to have G. D. Searle indicted for
Toxicologist and Task Force member, Dr Adrian Gross stated (Wilson
l985): "They (G.D. Searle) lied and they didn't submit the real
nature of their observations because had they done that it is more
likely that a great number of these studies would have been rejected
simply for adequacy. What Searle did, they took great pains to
camouflage these shortcomings of the study. As I say filter and just
present to the FDA what they wished the FDA to know and they did
other terrible things for instance animals would develop tumors while
they were under study. Well they would remove these tumors from the
task force exposed so much corruption G. D. Searle filed suit to have
the information removed from public record., Be assured we have all
G. D. Searle had to use fraud to try and prove their poison was a
safe additive what makes anyone even question the fact aspartame is
indeed poison. Jana Marie Kinnard is the lady who shredded the
original studies after sending the originals to France. Her
testimony says everything aspartame touched it killed.
recently Dr. Leonard Caldwell published a new book called "The Only
Answer To The Only Cancer Patient Cure". I wrote about 15 pages in
this book starting with page 315. You can read just how corrupt the FDA
can get, Earl Raburn had to sign a paper after paying the FDA $75,000
after buying some herbs and agreeing never to tell what the FDA did. Then
the FDA expunged the record, They had sent the Forestry to kill all the
acres of herbs he had grown just like his father before him. Why? Because
they had been killing cancer. Someone from the Forestry apologized to
Earl and said, "The FDA made us do it, Said they couldn't have cancer
cured." To the FDA that was Earl's crime. He had 800 letters from
consumers who had terminal cancer and were all cured with these herbs,
the formula of which is in the book and named for my mother, Eve Geller".
How hideous can the FDA get, from killing cancer curing herbs to covering
up the fact that aspartame causes horrendous birth defects. Dr. Coldwell
book will be on Amazon,com in about 6 weeks but you can pre-order at http://drleonardcoldwell.com/pre-order/
has been called a poison for over 30 years because it is a poison.
One particular case that comes to mind is about a woman who went to
her home town to buy a burial plot because she said she was dying.
Her daughter was a medical student and while she was gone she found a
bottle of aspartame and it had a skull and crossbones on the label.
She called her and told her mother: "Come home. It seems you
have been using poison, its just they eliminated the skull and
crossbones on the label."
are other articles you can distribute for Aspartame Awareness Month:
Form To Make Sure You Aren't
Aspartame As A Patient - Print Out
Magazine Busted Over Fake Aspartame
- World Environmental Conference 22 Yrs Later - pdf
Aspartame And Your Right To Know About It
Aspartame Causes Cancer - pdf
Outrage - FDA Fights Rescinding Its Own
For Neurotoxic Cancer-Causing Aspartame
Aspartame a duck? What do you think?
Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible World Health
More information on Nutraquack on www.wnho.net,
EXPERTS CHALLENGE 'DEMONIZATION' OF FOOD AND DIGITAL
challenge "demonization" of food and digital influences
the vision of foods like sugars, sweeteners, wheat and oils as "poisons"
is one of the topics of debate of the Congress of the Brazilian Society
of Food and Nutrition, held in SP.
EFESAE AUGUST 31, 2017
NO COMMENTS EMAIL
Experts in the area of food health condemned on Wednesday in SPaulo
the "demonization" of foods such as sugars, sweeteners, wheat
and oils , which are being withdrawn from diets under the pretext
that they would cause illness or weight gain, in some cases by unqualified
influences on social networks.
Demystifying the vision of these and other products as "poisons"
is one of the themes of the 14th Congress of the Brazilian Society
of Food and Nutrition (SBAN), held in SPaulo.
Sugar substitutes in many diets, sweeteners should not be viewed with
fear for healthy eating , according to the greatest expert on the
subject in Brazil, food engineer Maria Cecilia Toledo.
"Some misconceptions are being conveyed over the years about the
sweetener and about sugar. The idea that aspartame causes deleterious
effects to the body is not true, and the age of social networks
helps to viralize these demonizations, "he argued.
According to Toledo, the explosion of digital influencers helps to spread
"misconceptions" about foods like the sweetener, commonly associated
with cancer and what it sees as a "tool in the fight against obesity
Toledo emphasized that the generalization made to these foods is often
the result of misinterpretations of research and research failures,
which has been demystified by regulatory bodies and very strict protocols
for the approval of this type of product.
"It's not poison. We must pay attention to science , not ideology
. That makes the population no longer know what to eat: sugar is bad,
salt is bad, there is a lot of confusion, "he said, noting that the
real problem is the amount consumed .
For the nutritionist Mia Terra there is an urgent need to reinterpret
the inclusion or not of food in the diets, and these should not be treated
as synonyms of restriction .
Regarding fatty acids , Jorge Mancini, professor at the University of
(SP), pointed out that the composition of the various types is very similar,
which puts some types such as safflower and coconut as soybean oil-
like foods .
"The advent of coconut oil broke out with the weight loss
response of the Indonesian population, which had circulation problems,
however this population consumes not only coconut oil, but coconut in
general, so the traditional diet is with low sugar consumption and processed,
and focused more on fish and fiber, products recommended for a healthy
diet, "explained Mancini.
"There is no ideal human diet , man can adapt to different
habitats and consume different foods," emphasized Terra
Tagged with: sugar
Paulo , wheat
Posted in Nutrition