Back to...

GET VISIBLE! Advertise Here. Find Out More




Share Our Stories! - Click Here



 

Aspartame Known As A Poison Worldwide


From Dr. Betty Martini,D.Hum.
9-17-17

 

Aspartame is known as poison and industry doesn't like it.   With regard to the article below, they are funded by FAPESP .  Start researching  links and you see Pfizer.  Pfizer owns aspartame. 


If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck, hangs around with other ducks, and its called a duck, there is a pretty good chance it is a duck.  There is a Chinese proverb:  The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name. a Confucius saying.  So what is the definition of a poison?  A substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed.
Let's see if it's a duck:

1.  Aspartame was listed with the pentagon in an inventory of prospective biochemical warfare weapons submitted to Congress.  (Ecologist, Aspartame, 2005: http://www.mpwhi.com/ecologist_september_2005.pdf

2.  Studies were done at Ft. Detrick where other poisonous substances are tested. 

3.  Aspartame travels by Hazmat Placard like other poisons.

4.  The FDA list of 92 horrible symptoms includes death
http://www.mpwhi.com/92_aspartame_symptoms.pdf

5.  Aspartame triggers sudden cardiac death:  http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_and_sudden_death.htm

6.  It embalms you before you die:  http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_and_preembalming.htm

7.  Known as a poison even the titles of medical texts and other books tell you aspartame is a killing machine and has caused a world epidemic:

"Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" by H. J. Roberts, M.D., 1000 pages of diseases and symptoms triggered or precipitated by aspartame,
www.amazon.com

"While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills" by Dr. Woodrow Monte, www.whilesciencesleeps.com

"Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills" by neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D.,
www.russellblaylockmd.com

"Aspartame: King of Toxins" by Reigh Parker Burch,
www.amazon.com and there are more...

8.  Fulfills  the definition of Title 18 of the Domestic Genocide Code: 
http://www.rense.com/general/asp.htm

9. Referred to as "mass poisoning"  :

STATEMENT TO THE FDA ON FOOD LABELING -
JAMES D. BOWEN, M.D. (over 2 decades ago)


"My statement for the public record regarding food labeling and the aspartame issue is serious if not somewhat facetious at times. The reason for this is because I have found little evidence of honesty, integrity or stability on the part of Food & Drug Administration officials regarding the aspartame issue, since its approval in 1981. This attitude is largely shared by the general public. I come in contact with approximately two new people each week who are now being or who have in the past been poisoned by aspartame.

All of them share the same reactions that it is not worth writing to the FDA or NutraSweet, because you and your agency have run amuck and are no longer a valid public benefactor.

The recent revelations about the problems surrounding generic drug approvals are compelling evidence of what happens when an agency considered itself above the law in dealing with these matters. In my opinion, this has resulted in the mass poisoning of the American public as well as seventy-plus countries in the rest of the world. Watching FDA officials walk through the "revolving door" and be further rewarded by being promoted to other positions of high public responsibility is clear evidence of a government out of control.

For this reason, I am opposed to labeling aspartame content of food and drinks. To do so would imply that the government is taking some sort of responsible action...when the only responsible action would be to immediately take aspartame off the market, fully disclose its toxicities, offer full compensation to the injured, public and criminally prosecute anyone who participated in the fraudulent placement of aspartame on the marketplace. That includes those who work so diligently to keep in on the market as well.

Further, to label the purported aspartame content of a product would cover a number of toxic flaws in the product and its allowable daily intake (ADI) as follows:

  1. That the amount stated on the label was accurate and factual rather than theoretical. Aspartame breaks down relatively quickly in solution. Given the well established modus operandi of the manufacturer, there is no concern given the ultimate consumer. And cover-ups seem to be a part of the routine of doing business. The public should be well advised that the amounts really used in liquid products are relatively greater than those stated to accomplish a relative compensation for the loss of product sweetness occurring during storage in solution.


  2. That the ADI presently allowed is 50% greater than that expected to cause a reversal of the phenylalanine/tyrosine ratios in the human brain. This has profoundly bad implications for the human being, including dopamine and serotonin synthesis inhibition, causing depression, appetite changes, mental inabilities, increased susceptibility to seizures and a host of neurohormonal problems.


  3. Every known metabolite of aspartame is of marked or questionable toxicity and patently unsafe for human use. Methyl alcohol is metabolized to nascent formaldehyde in the eye, nervous system and other metabolically active organs. It immediately attacks and denatures the tissue structure proteins in which is metabolized to nascent formaldehyde. This stimulates specific organ and subcellular autoimmunity which seems to be a preponderant source of the bad experiences reported by NutraSweet victims. Aspartic Acid is a neuroexcitotoxic present in damaging amounts, it own right, at the ADI for aspartame. Simple logic tells one that it will vastly increase the metabolism of methyl alcohol to formaldehyde attach there. This corresponds well with the symptomatologies often experienced, such as Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS), bulbar palsies, neurohormonal disorders, diketopiperazine issue remains totally unresolved and dangerous. The amino acids that are released by hydrolysis, form eimers and isomers that are either not sufficiently studied, or which are known substrates in undesirable pathological states such as Alzheimer's disease.


  4. There is the issue of the approval of aspartame for market, which has violated every principle of responsible science and responsible government. Everyone responsible for this hearing should at least completely review the approval process and the comments of the participants and observers who have so excellently elucidated all the malfeasance for the public record, such as Dr. Adrian Gross and many, many others (all on the public record).

In light of the above 4 points, I highly recommend that you deny in every way possible any subterfuge of respectability that the aspartame people have enshrouded themselves and their product within hopes of quickly denying its access to the worldwide marketplace. I write this, not believing that it will do the slightest bit of good in the sense of affecting the labeling issue per se, but that instead, it might reach some honest, concerned, conscientious individuals in the process." James Bowen, M.D.

10.  Documentaries made about aspartame poisoning the world:  "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" - you can get a copy from
www.sweetremedyradio.com

11.  FDA admitted it causes cancer and is against the law because it violates the Delaney Amendment. Also stated you shouldn't be able to set an allowable daily intake, therefore there is no safe dose.  No safe dose means poison.

On August 1, 1985, FDA toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress that "at least one of Searle's studies has established beyond any reasonable doubt that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors in experimental animals and that this predisposition of it is of extremely high significance.... In view of these indications that the cancer causing potential of aspartame is a matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one can ask: What is the reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act?"

The Delaney Amendment makes it illegal to allow any residue of cancer-causing chemicals in foods. Dr Gross concluded by asking, "Given the cancer-causing potential of aspartame, how would the FDA justify its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame as constituting an allowable daily intake or safe level of it? Is that position in effect not equivalent to setting a tolerance for this food additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the FDA itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect the health of the public?"  Congressional Record SID835:131 (8/1/85). Dr. Gross made a very good point, that there is no safe dose because aspartame caused cancer. How much cancer is safe?

12.   Aspartame detox centers exist for those who have consumed it such as the San Francisco Detox Center by Dr. Ken Stoller. Dr. Pauline Harding has one in Chicago.  Dr. Sandra Cabot has one in Australia. 

13.  Almost 100 per cent of independent scientific peer reviewed research shows aspartame is not safe to consume.   Dr. Ralph Walton did research on aspartame and funding for "60 Minutes years ago" : 
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8479/b5aaa60a97619f97c8b61cfa0afac6c7d082.pdf Today studies have shown everything from cancer and obesity to the metabolic syndrome, strokes, dementia  and heart attacks. 

14.  Aspartame damages the mitochondria and interacts with drugs so people die from drug interaction.  See chapter from medical text, ("Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic"  on hospital form: 
http://www.rense.com/general96/hospform.html


15. Articles pour in daily warning the world that aspartame is a heinous poison. --

http://www.livehealthyforless.com/aspartame-a-heinous-poison/

16. In original studies aspartame triggered neural tube defects, spina bifida and cleft palate for starters. G. D. Searle made a deal with the FDA to never allow the public to see the teratology studies and they were sealed until I located them 8 years after Jerome Bressler, retired from the FDA, asked me to find them. He said pregnant women were using this poison without knowledge of what it could do to the newborn,

In the Bressler Report you will see where we added the information back and where even the FDA noted on their paperwork that aspartame causes birth defects. http://www.mpwhi.com/complete_bressler_report.pdf

Today there is a class action on Zofran used for nausea. Doctors gave pregnant women Zofran for morning sickness. However, there is a difference between Zofran and the generic where they added aspartame, completely unnecessary unless its being used as a killing machine., Here is one of the lawsuit notices. Notice the mention of cleft palate what it caused in original studies. https://www.gblawyers.com/zofran-lawsuit/ Also over the years so many babies born with a hole in the heart. The generic with the aspartame is ondansetron.

Once I made it public aspartame caused birth defects, the FDA covered it up and added the sealed documents back to the Bressler Report, the FDA could no longer deny these FDA records and released to Dr. Woodrow Monte four studies. They had denied them in the past. He then wrote the book "While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills". On www.whilesciencesleeps.com you can read free the last chapter on aspartame and autism. Dr. Monte also mentions this deal with the FDA and G. D. Searle. Now the "Fatal Drugs Allowed" folks have approved Advantame without a pregnancy warning and its half aspartame. No way for them to now deny aspartame causes horrible birth defects.

THE COVER-UP: The propaganda and cover-up has been hideous. You hear over and over again "there is more methanol in oranges than in aspartame". What has that got to do with anything? In oranges there is also ethanol which is the classic antidote for methanol poisoning. Also, in nature methanol binds to pectin and takes it safely out of the body,. The Trocho Study in Barcelona by Dr. M. Alemany, showed the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and damages DNA. It turns your tissue to plastic. Formaldehyde is a Class A carcinogen. The molecule breaks down to diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent, and gave rats brain tumors in original studies. G. D. Searle would excise the tumors, put the rats back in the study, and when they died they would resurrect them on paper.

Twenty-two years ago I lectured for the World Environmental Conference. The focus was on MS and lupus. Nancy Markle put her name on a post I wrote and disorganized it. It went viral and I get phone calls to this day from victims. Industry and front groups claimed it to be a hoax. The last time they tried to get away with this was this year. Smithsonian Magazine wrote Aspartame Causes Cancer was a classic Internet hoax. It was an obvious attempt to get the public to believe aspartame is not a carcinogen. Somebody obviously ran out of ideas since FDA scientist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress aspartame caused cancer in 1985. Dr. Gross headed the investigation on aspartame and tried to have the company indicted for fraud.

It was a dead give away as soon as they mentioned cancer since the focus of my lecture was MS and lupus. I had just testified to the Carcinogenic Information Committee weeks before the article having to do with Prop 65. I asked for equal time to publish the evidence. If it had been a classic mistake they would have given it to me, In the article author Kat Eschner said, " Almost 20 years after the letter, people still question aspartame. Out of all of the substances in our diet, why this one? " That is so simple to answer - because it wasn't a hoax, it was and always will be the truth. Aspartame is a chemical poison and the medical texts list everything I lectured on, giving the mechanism by which aspartame precipitates or triggers symptoms and diseases.

Take a victim like Cori Brackett who was diagnosed with MS and was in a wheelchair for years, hardly able to talk or walk. She was diagnosed with one of the largest lesions ever seen in an MS victim. She read about aspartame and got off of it. She walked out of her wheelchair and 8 months later the huge lesion all but disappeared. It just happened that Cori owned a film company and went on to make the documentary, "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World". Does anyone think you could change Cori's mind today, get her to use diet pop again and get back in her wheelchair?! Multiply this by hundreds of thousands, and you understand why the aspartame industry couldn't put Humpty Dumpty together again and sold the company.

I told Smithsonian September is Aspartame Awareness Month and they would be the focus unless they gave me equal time to establish the facts. It's too late for their cover-up., After 27 years of exposing aspartame in the US and around the world, and with chapters in 45 countries we have reached critical mass. While FDA says they are waiting for some science, almost 100% of independent peer reviewed studies prove the dangers from heart attacks and strokes to cancer, diabetes, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. In every country I've lectured in they already knew aspartame is poison.

Kat Eschner who wrote the Smithsonian Cover-up said "The FDA is a reputable source." That's not what FDA said. In 2009 several FDA physicians and scientists sent a letter to President Obama that they were broken and discussed not only their corruption but the fear of reprisal if they spoke out. Here is that letter: https://www.finance.senate.gov/ranking-members-news/letter-to-president-obama-from-fda-physicians-scientists. Dr. Arthur Evangelista who is in "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" left the FDA because he said the corruption was so bad he even saw the employees altering reports in favor of industry.

There was a time many years ago when FDA was reputable and in the case of aspartame they set up a task force and tried to have G. D. Searle indicted for fraud. FDA Toxicologist and Task Force member, Dr Adrian Gross stated (Wilson l985): "They (G.D. Searle) lied and they didn't submit the real nature of their observations because had they done that it is more likely that a great number of these studies would have been rejected simply for adequacy. What Searle did, they took great pains to camouflage these shortcomings of the study. As I say filter and just present to the FDA what they wished the FDA to know and they did other terrible things for instance animals would develop tumors while they were under study. Well they would remove these tumors from the animals."

The task force exposed so much corruption G. D. Searle filed suit to have the information removed from public record., Be assured we have all the records.

If G. D. Searle had to use fraud to try and prove their poison was a safe additive what makes anyone even question the fact aspartame is indeed poison. Jana Marie Kinnard is the lady who shredded the original studies after sending the originals to France. Her testimony says everything aspartame touched it killed.

Just recently Dr. Leonard Caldwell published a new book called "The Only Answer To The Only Cancer Patient Cure". I wrote about 15 pages in this book starting with page 315. You can read just how corrupt the FDA can get, Earl Raburn had to sign a paper after paying the FDA $75,000 after buying some herbs and agreeing never to tell what the FDA did. Then the FDA expunged the record, They had sent the Forestry to kill all the acres of herbs he had grown just like his father before him. Why? Because they had been killing cancer. Someone from the Forestry apologized to Earl and said, "The FDA made us do it, Said they couldn't have cancer cured." To the FDA that was Earl's crime. He had 800 letters from consumers who had terminal cancer and were all cured with these herbs, the formula of which is in the book and named for my mother, Eve Geller". How hideous can the FDA get, from killing cancer curing herbs to covering up the fact that aspartame causes horrendous birth defects. Dr. Coldwell book will be on Amazon,com in about 6 weeks but you can pre-order at http://drleonardcoldwell.com/pre-order/

Aspartame has been called a poison for over 30 years because it is a poison. One particular case that comes to mind is about a woman who went to her home town to buy a burial plot because she said she was dying. Her daughter was a medical student and while she was gone she found a bottle of aspartame and it had a skull and crossbones on the label. She called her and told her mother: "Come home. It seems you have been using poison, its just they eliminated the skull and crossbones on the label."

Here are other articles you can distribute for Aspartame Awareness Month:


Hospital Form To Make Sure You Aren't
Given Aspartame As A Patient - Print Out


Smithsonian Magazine Busted Over Fake Aspartame
News - World Environmental Conference 22 Yrs Later - pdf


Deadly Aspartame And Your Right To Know About It

How Aspartame Causes Cancer - pdf

Egregious Outrage - FDA Fights Rescinding Its Own
Approval For Neurotoxic Cancer-Causing Aspartame

Is Aspartame a duck? What do you think?

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible World Health International
www.mpwhi.com
770 242-2599

More information on Nutraquack on
www.wnho.net, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame, www.aspartamekills.com

HOME > NUTRITION > EXPERTS CHALLENGE 'DEMONIZATION' OF FOOD AND DIGITAL INFLUENCES
HEALTH FOOD
FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+

Experts challenge "demonization" of food and digital influences

Demystifying the vision of foods like sugars, sweeteners, wheat and oils as "poisons" is one of the topics of debate of the Congress of the Brazilian Society of Food and Nutrition, held in SP.
EFESA
E AUGUST 31, 2017 NO COMMENTS EMAIL THIS POST


Experts in the area of food health condemned on Wednesday in S
Paulo the "demonization" of foods such as sugars, sweeteners, wheat and oils , which are being withdrawn from diets under the pretext that they would cause illness or weight gain, in some cases by unqualified influences on social networks.

Demystifying the vision of these and other products as "poisons" is one of the themes of the 14th Congress of the Brazilian Society of Food and Nutrition (SBAN), held in S
Paulo.

Sugar substitutes in many diets, sweeteners should not be viewed with fear for healthy eating , according to the greatest expert on the subject in Brazil, food engineer Maria Cecilia Toledo.

"Some misconceptions are being conveyed over the years about the sweetener and about sugar. The idea that aspartame causes deleterious effects to the body is not true, and the age of social networks helps to viralize these demonizations, "he argued.

According to Toledo, the explosion of digital influencers helps to spread "misconceptions" about foods like the sweetener, commonly associated with cancer and what it sees as a "tool in the fight against obesity ."

Toledo emphasized that the generalization made to these foods is often the result of misinterpretations of research and research failures, which has been demystified by regulatory bodies and very strict protocols for the approval of this type of product.

"It's not poison. We must pay attention to science , not ideology . That makes the population no longer know what to eat: sugar is bad, salt is bad, there is a lot of confusion, "he said, noting that the real problem is the amount consumed .

For the nutritionist Mia Terra there is an urgent need to reinterpret the inclusion or not of food in the diets, and these should not be treated as synonyms of restriction .

Regarding fatty acids , Jorge Mancini, professor at the University of S
Paulo (SP), pointed out that the composition of the various types is very similar, which puts some types such as safflower and coconut as soybean oil- like foods .

"The advent of coconut oil broke out with the weight loss response of the Indonesian population, which had circulation problems, however this population consumes not only coconut oil, but coconut in general, so the traditional diet is with low sugar consumption and processed, and focused more on fish and fiber, products recommended for a healthy diet, "explained Mancini.

"There is no ideal human diet , man can adapt to different habitats and consume different foods," emphasized Terra
Tagged with: sugar , sweetener , nutrition , congress , nutrition , oil , Sao Paulo , wheat
Posted in
Nutrition