Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!


Jim Kirwan
There is a story that just surfaced that depends upon information that comes from 'WHOIS.' As it happens I am experiencing some of the same treatment in the corrupted system of WHOIS myself.
The story in question is 'WHO' is funding the Occupy Wall Street Movement.
"On the 15th October 2011 begun the worldwide action. For the first time in history, upwards of 15 million people in sixty countries marched together for a "global change". Their official website is:http://15october.net/
Someone decided to find out who owns that domain name by visiting this site:http://who.godaddy.com/ (This is a database with a searchable list of every single domain currently registered in the world).
As you can see from the print screen i took, before the 18th October the registrant was
"Paulina Arcos
866 United Nations Plaza
Suite 516
New York, New York 10017
United States"
Well... Who the hell is she? I Goggled her name and i couldn't find many infos, but i found out that she is Francisco Carrion Mena (permanent representative of Ecuador, chairman of the special committee at the UN) 's wife. Okay. I thought i had no more things to discover. The UN were behind this movement, that's it.
Well, i was wrong... While reading a book ("Freemasonry and Secret Societies" by Epiphanius, edition "Controcorrente" April 2008, page 620 ), i found out that the unofficial Lucis Trust's address is: 866 United Nations Plaza New York, and this information appears just on two books: the one i was reading, and on "Die Netzwerke der Insider" by Peter Blackwood.
Wait a minute.... This must be a joke.
...but here it comes the unbelievable part: On the 19th October, the WHOIS Information is been changed!!!
Wait a minute.... This must be a joke.
...but here it comes the unbelievable part: On the 19th October, the WHOIS Information is been changed!!!"
That story continues here. (1)
In my case there has been a fraudulent corruption of the facts surrounding questions that arose about WHOIS on the account that I've had with Network Solutions since the1990's when my site hosting was established.
Computers then were not what they are now. I know very little about the technical side of websites, but I had a close friend who was very capable and she agreed to help me get started. She set up the site and we applied for and managed to get Network Solutions to host the account. At the time they were the primary in that field and they were good. I pay for this service monthly on my phone bill. I've been doing this, uninterrupted now, for over twenty years. If I had missed any payments they would have dropped me like a hot rock.
Last week during a routine check of information that is needed to maintain accuracy for WHOIS, I discovered that my username and password had been changed (by Network Solutions). When I tried to access my account I was told that I needed to go to the account, enter my username and make whatever corrections needed to be made. I tried to do this but was denied entry because the account entry page informed me that there was "no record of Jim Kirwan anywhere within the Network Solutions system." That in effect, I did not exist.
I tried calling them they hung up on me three times whenever I tried to speak to a representative. They sent me an email that required me to reapply for ownership of the site that I own. I filled out the form and sent the data twice by FAX (required), and twice by email. The email was required because the FAX was illegible when it came to printing my California Drivers License photo which they said was illegible. Apparently the Driver's License photo was good enough for the State of California which serves over 32 million people, but not good enough for Network Solutions that still uses outmoded FAX machines to provide answers to serious questions; precisely so that they can claim that "information" is illegible, and that therefore they can deny whatever is received, by them, because of this supposed fact.
I refuse to accept their decision to remove my site www.kirwanesque.com from their hosting program, because they have failed to do what their part of the contract requires them to do: To keep and maintain accurate and up-to-date information, and to host the site. I have paid these people to do this for over twenty years, without interruption. I have changed the account information twice since it was established. The last change included adding my webmaster to the account so that she could update it and add the daily articles to it. And over the last nine years the webmaster has posted well over 1,000 articles on that site, there is a dated archive that proves this beyond all doubt.
If I am not who I say I am; how can Network Solutions explain the payments made to them for so many years: payments which they accepted willingly until last week? For that matter if I had not successfully changed the information to include the webmaster, and my current address & phone how could she have posted successfully the one thousand plus articles? But now Network Solutions has decided not to answer the questions I am raising here about the rejection of my attempt to prove to WHOIS both who and what I am. Instead they are maintaining that only the initial information is correct and that this is all they have ever had? This is criminal!
Given my own experience with this corrupt organization, I think perhaps whatever WHOIS might be saying now about others might need to be verified by independent sources, before simply accepting "their" word about any of the information they supposedly have to "prove" anything about anyone!
In my case they repeatedly told me that a person that was listed on my site, and who has been gone from the address shown for over twenty years was indeed the owner of my site. And that whilekirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net is my email address; that is not the same thing as KIRWAN ART STUDIOS, which is the name that was used when we opened the account. That name was taken when it came time to get a new email address, so Lisa and I came up with kirwanstudios. Apparently this was a bridge too far, for Network Solutions to be able to cross. I've been living in the same place now for over thirty years and it is not the address that Network Solutions shows on my account. I sent them copies of phone and utility bills to prove my residency, but apparently that made no difference, as far as Network Solutions is concerned I still live at Lisa's old address, because that is what they "show" on the information (Information which they were charged with keeping accurately and up to date).
They also denied that I was the person on my California ID, because they claim that they could not see the picture clearly. I sent them to the site to see a current photo but they refused to go there. So I faxed them an enlarged Driver's License (four times the size), and a photo of me that was also much larger than the one on the site ­ I got this answer.
"ID Illegible
Your photo identification is illegible.
Incorrect Letterhead
Your request must be printed on company letterhead or stationery that matches the account holder name and address that we have listed in our records.
The account information we have on file is:
Account Name: Kirwan Art Studios
Account Address: 722-C Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 US
If you do not have company letterhead, please fax us a copy of your business license.
NOTE: If the address on your letterhead or business license is different than the address listed above, please supply a current utility bill that matches the company name and address, as shown on your letterhead or business license."
I had a business account at the time I opened the website that has since lapsed from inactivity; but no one needs to have a business account to have a website. I do have letterhead stationary that I haven't used in years, because I use the net. It lists my address, phone and website address, along with my professional name. I sent Networks Solutions all of that ­ but as you can see they chose not to accept it. You be the judge about the credibility of the WHOIS system of identification that can be changed with a keystroke at a moment's notice. . .
What happens to my account with Network Solutions hardly matters, I will get on with my life, I simply want the world to know that what goes on behind the scenes, on the web, is NOT necessarily what is true in the real world. In the case of this potentially very important news story regarding WHOIS behind the funding ofOccupy Wall Street, I think that we might still not yet have the complete story!
1) The Lucis Trust Behind Occupy Wall Street ­ UPPDATEDhttp://lalternativaitalia.blogspot.com/201

Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


This Site Served by TheHostPros