Multiculturalism provides the seeds for destruction of the culture,
language and cohesiveness of any country that fools itself into
displacing its own culture, language and way of life.
The current president, Barack Obama and the U.S. Congress continue
flooding 1.2 million legal immigrants into America from disparate
countries from around the world. The American people continue
accepting a flood of humanity as if the deluge of numbers won’t
affect the future of their country.
The sheer numbers will drive the U.S. population to add 100 million
people by 2035 and 138 million by 2050. All those people will
be competing for water, food, energy and shelter. Can the
United States survive such a future? Has multiculturalism
succeeded in Australia or Europe?
Australian Professor Blainey stated: "Recent governments emphasize the
merits of a multicultural society and ignore the dangers. And yet the
evidence is clear that many multicultural societies have failed and
that the human cost of the failure has been high. Many of our refugees
actually come from multicultural societies that are faltering or in
disarray. Also, Professor Loring Danforth has admitted that "Ironically,
Australia's own commitment to multiculturalism may also encourage immigrants
to involve themselves in the national conflicts of their homelands.”
This policy of multiculturalism ... defines people in ethnic categories
and makes it possible for them to maintain their identities as Italians,
Greeks, or Macedonians. Multiculturalism, with its emphasis on community
languages and ethnic media, promotes the development of these ethnic
identities and impedes the development of a strong Australian national
The same consequences grow in Europe and Canada. The British
are displacing their language, culture and themselves. The
same goes for France, Norway, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, Denmark and
During this presidential run, we must demand that GOP candidates
answer these questions:
1. Do you support English as the official language of the United States
and the only language to be used in all official publications, proceedings
and ballots at all levels of government?
2. What actions are you prepared to take to achieve that goal?
3. Will you immediately reverse Clinton’s Executive Order 13166 that
subverts English in favor of an immigrants language at a cost of
billions of dollars?
4. Will you deny citizenship to any immigrant or other person who
cannot demonstrate true fluency in written and spoken English rather
than the knowledge of just a few words or phrases?
5. Politicians have been promising to secure the borders for many
years. What concrete steps would you be prepared to take by
executive order or such other means as may be necessary to achieve
6. Our northern border is 3,987 miles long and the southern border is
1952 miles. To secure the borders with a minimum of one border patrol
agent per mile would require 5920 agents per shift or at least 17,760
agents in addition to the existing staffing at the official border crossing
points. Are you prepared to support that level of staffing or would
you choose the approach in 7 below instead?
7. We have spent a great deal of time and money to secure our
borders with no appreciable and attributable decline in the number
of illegals in the U.S.? Would you support a totally new approach
that would secure the borders by assuring that all illegals are
quickly apprehended and deported at their own expense or that of
8. If we deny illegals the opportunity to get a job, they will stop
coming and those who are here already will return home with a little
prodding. Will you, by executive order, institute mandatory E-verification
across the board for all employers public and private and all employees,
both current and potential new hires?
9. Do you support a legislative action or executive order to clarify
the 14th Amendment to exclude the offspring of illegal aliens,
foreign students, and tourists from birthright citizenship?
10. Would you support the appointment of federally-sanctioned, state
appointed immigration justices of the peace (IJOPs) to relieve the immigration
judges of all but the most difficult immigration cases?
11. Would you support a rigid set of criteria to be used by these
IJOPs to enable a decision within 24 hours of apprehension with only
one week for appeal?
12. Would you support a compensation plan for privately-operated
detention facilities that is based mostly on throughput rather than
13. Would you support an executive order that defines an illegal alien
as anyone who cannot produce current authentic evidence of his or her
bona fides within one week?
14. Would you issue an executive order defining the inability to
produce legal evidence of immigration status as prima facie evidence
of illegal entry and presence in the U.S. subjecting the individual
to immediate deportation without recourse?
15. Some candidates indicated that they favor a simplification of
immigration rules to facilitate legal immigration, hoping that that
would reduce the number of illegals. Would you be willing to take a
different direction based on a national objective of the
stabilization of our population within 20 years based on new
immigration and tax policies?
16. What do you consider to be the optimum population for the U.S.?
17. At what level of population will our quality of life and
standard of living be adversely affected—0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, or 1.3
18. What steps are you prepared to take to forestall that adverse
outcome by limiting population growth?
19. The “limit” of finite natural resources per capita as population
increases without bounds is zero. (The more there are of us, the less
there is for each of us of these finite natural resources.) How much
farther down that road do you propose to go?
20. Do you believe population-driven economic growth is sustainable
over the long run?
21. Are you willing to speak up about the millions of jobs that could
be made available to unemployed Americans if the illegals were expeditiously
removed from our country? Why isn’t this a part of your jobs plan?
Blainey finished, “We do not need a crystal ball to see where multiculturalism
will lead us. The future will bring a vast amount of inter-ethnic rivalry
and resultant clashes, even leading to race riots reminiscent of those
clashes in the UK and USA. Australia faces the spectre of being another
disunified "multicultural" society like Sri Lanka, South Africa, Northern
Ireland, Lebanon, the former Yugoslavia, Fiji, etc.; not to mention
the USA and the UK, with their continually strained communities, and
occasional race riots. The prospects of such a disunified nation are
Frosty Wooldridge has bicycled across six continents - from the Arctic
to the South Pole - as well as six times across the USA, coast to coast
and border to border. In 2005, he bicycled from the Arctic Circle, Norway
to Athens, Greece. He presents "The Coming Population Crisis in America:
and what you can do about it" to civic clubs, church groups, high schools
and colleges. He works to bring about sensible world population balance
at www.frostywooldridge.com He is the author of: America on the Brink:
The Next Added 100 Million Americans. Copies available: 1 888 280 7715