 The central unasked question
now is can non-violence actually end the Barbarism of the State that is
imposing itself upon this nation by force?
-
- This is SANCTUARY ~ CROSSROADS and it typifies the complexities
we face between what many seek versus what has come to pass. Notice please
that the stairways do not connect us, nor do the pillars support either
end of this equation; because it up to us as individuals to unravel these
very different types of survival.
-
- I've made some notes from a feature length film called
UNGRIP which is massively illuminating in scope; but which is very problematic
for most Americans to ever actually fully embrace. These 'notes' are not
literally what is said in all cases; you'll need to watch the film to understand
this fully. What I tried to give the public are a few of the most critical
points contained in the study, which is also the life of the man who made
the film.
-
- 'Confrontation with the massively-armed state must include
believable responses to naked tyranny. "Consent requires us to say
either yes or no to 'government' whenever this government begins to act
against those that have made government 'possible.'
-
- 'YES' all of what is happening to us now is because in
reality we have responded as 'children' to an authority that chooses to
ignore us entirely. So we must either govern ourselves or chose to be governed
by 'others.' This is part of what's at stake in the OCCUPATION of WALL
St. In many ways we cannot let this effort fail, because it is perhaps
our last chance to stop this defacto-takeover of NOT just this place; but
of our lives as well.
-
- These events, combined with everything that has led to
this confrontation, are completely dependent upon our CONSENT to be governed.
We gave USI the corporate-right to inject their corporate mindset into
every facet of our lives: Without realizing that we are not compelled to
comply with any government direction, so long as we are natural persons,
instead of corporately owned assets.
-
- Perhaps the only way to end these defacto corporate practices,
with dispatch; would seem to be to revolt against the Corporate-State of
USI.
-
- The English Magna Carta was the basis for our human rights.
But since it was signed under 'duress' its dictates were called into question
early-on. The interesting part in all of this is that because of those
rights, many believe we received from that document-corporations around
the world have been making war upon the Magna-Carta since it was signed
in the twelve hundreds.
-
- The US was founded by corporations, (59 million natives
died as a result of that war). These things happened so that this land
could be colonized. The British North American Act (BNA) of 1867 was never
voted on by those directly affected by it: And yet that act has been the
source of the same criminality that so many are now opposing on Wall Street
and elsewhere.
-
- In 1776 the Americans declared their independence from
the BNA, in our War for Independence. But the Admiralty legal system that
came with BNA still operates here, as the Courts system inside USI. This
Admiralty system is also a military system, so that each American taxpayer
is a registered military part of this system. The proof lies in the fact
that every document from your birth certificate to your death certificate
attests to the fact that you are an owned property of the State.
-
- However all of this was done by slight of corporate-double-speak
using very confusing word play what they dared NOT ever attempt to do openly.
What we must do now is find a way to end this defacto-corporate-charade
because none of this has ever been approved by the people that have become
illegal subjects of the corporations that own USI. Instead we have all
been captured by corporate manipulations that have already stolen everything
we thought we already owned. In its own way just as the magna Carta was
illegal, because it was created under duress: Then the entire control of
Admiralty Law is illegal because it got its powers without the consent
of the governed through deception, trickery and lies.
-
- The term "Defacto" means "Illegitimate
but in effect."
-
- This is how things like TSA and DHS came into existence
and are still unchallengeable even today, under the so-called "laws"
of this place.
-
- To escape from this tyranny each of us must refuse to
be governed by the defacto corporate state of USI. You must investigate
and discover exactly what governs over you: morally, emotionally, consciously,
and spiritually. There are choices that involve moving away from this system;
and if we choose NOT to move away then we shall probably be crushed.
-
- These Admiralty Courts (our system) were not set up to
deal with natural persons; they were set up to govern over corporate entities.
The country of Canada for instance is not a country, but is instead just
a corporation that is owned by USI, and therefore must register each year
with the US SEC, as a corporation.
-
- Anything that one "fears" could be construed
as a 'Master." But that also means that whatever we create, is meant
to serve us. So when we, in theory, created governments, corporations,
etc., all that we created was created specifically "to serve us"
and not the other way round.' (1)
-
- The shortest course to ending all of this would be to
support a Nationwide General Strike that could crush the corporations if
that were to last an entire week. This would allow us to reconfigure our
lives in such ways as to allow us to begin to act as individuals, instead
of mere children. Choices are always out there. We must choose to act to
change it all in our favor, instead of allowing the power to remain with
the private corporations that have ruined life all over this planet. And
we must learn how to "WAGE PEACE"!
-
- Here's how Chris Hedges put it this morning:
- Chris Hedges, Op-Ed: "There are no excuses left.
Either you join the revolt taking place on Wall Street and in the financial
districts of other cities across the country or you stand on the wrong
side of history. Either you obstruct, in the only form left to us, which
is civil disobedience, the plundering by the criminal class on Wall Street
and accelerated destruction of the ecosystem that sustains the human species,
or become the passive enabler of a monstrous evil. Either you taste, feel
and smell the intoxication of freedom and revolt or sink into the miasma
of despair and apathy. Either you are a rebel or a slave."
-
- Against this backdrop I also received the following cautionary
note that I will answer here with comments.
-
- READER: A running theme in your articles, it seems, is
a call to action.
-
- There is also a "call to action" element in
V for Vendetta. It should be noted that that "call to action"
is delivered by the Masked Man: a direct representative of the Illuminati
themselves. You noted the connection of the Guy Fawkes mask to my notation
that gargoyles are an Illuminati Signature Symbol.
-
- k) The figure behind the mask (quite literally in the
film) is someone whose entire life has been one long confrontation between
the evils of the Illuminati, and the justice that is required by ordinary
people. Masks are only symbols if you want to know what they might mean
in any given circumstance you need to look deeper!
-
- R) As such, the "call to action" given in the
film must be taken as a prediction of false calls to action yet to come
-- as well as an admission that past "calls to action" have been
false of substance.
-
- k) That's a blatant lie!
-
- R) That's hardly a revelation. This technique of creating
and guiding apparently genuine but ultimately illegitimate "calls
to action" is described in the Protocols of Zion.
-
- k) That may be, because the Protocols of Zion was and
is founded on deception and lies; ergo, what for you seems obvious, because
of your affiliation with the Protocols, is for the general public something
completely different.
-
- I'm not saying that YOUR calls to action are illegitimate.
I'm saying that, within the space of V for Vendetta, the call to action
-- however "successfully" it unfolds, in the film, is not to
be taken as legitimate.
-
- k) You are as entitled to your opinion, as I am to mine:
However I am not familiar with your written record, when it comes to either
observing or commenting on these kinds of events. Maybe that exists when
it comes to films: But this is not about a movie; this is about real life
imitating a film; after the film was made.
-
- The real action in the film lies in the character of
Evie, who is the one that makes the decision to deliver the explosives.
-
- I assume you are familiar with the film. Evie undergoes
an intensive psychological re-setting program, involving torture and deprivation,
in a one-to-one parallel with punishment tactics delivered by the prison
warden in The Count of Monte Cristo (a film the Masked Man says is his
"favorite"). Her torture and re-programming is planned, structured,
and delivered by the Masked Man.
-
- Evie is released from torture only finally when she is
willing to destroy without regret, even if it means self-destruction.
-
- k) Lovely, except that for purposes of the film, wherein
the character of the young woman needed to have an experience that rivaled
that of the Masked figure: If you had experience with creating film characters
(I have) then you would understand the cinematic need for those scenes?
-
- R) You said,
- "Americans failed to GET the connections between
Guy Fawkes Day, '1984' and our current dictatorship. The English got it
but not the Americans."
-
- Did they? I mean, The English? Did they get it?
-
- k) I don't know; but the film audience in England for
this film was far greater proportionally than it was received here: Which
is what I based that statement on.
-
- R) I mean, maybe they got it, but they didn't get it.
They never will. Nor will anyone else but a very few.
-
- For all good ethical reasons, keep up your calls to action.
For all realistic reasons, please do not have false hopes. The people will
not rise; the Illuminati will not be exposed and [will] subsequently fall.
If the people "rise" and if the "illuminati" "fall",
it will have been an orchestrated event of tremendous effect, to their
own ends.
-
- I write my articles for only one reason: I see what is
happening, and I can't keep my mouth shut.
-
- k) Okay, that's reason enough for anyone to write; but
please don't attempt to predetermine any of the possibilities that could
literally affect billions of people. Because, it makes it appear that you
believe that the ILLUMNATI are impregnable which they ARE NOT!
-
- R) Barring spectacular interposition by greater powers,
I see no reason to doubt the eventual success of the plans of the so-called
"Illuminati". There is always the possibility that we will be
surprised, of course.
-
- Thank you for your work.
-
- k) This is precisely why I write, in order to mitigate
the well intentioned but completely misguided people that have come to
believe that this flawed creation of the few corrupted creatures; that
have chosen to represent themselves as immortals could ever fail.
When in fact, while they have been around for centuries: they have never
actually succeeded as themselves: Because they have always chosen to hide
behind others, until now: That is why they will lose, because too many
people can now see exactly what they stand for, and we can also see that
if they succeed then we must all die!
-
- kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net
-
-
- 1) UNGRIP the full length movie 1 hr, 11 min film,
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tScuHwVtRcY&feature=player_embedded
-
- 2) NationofChange info@nationofchange.org Chris Hedges
|
