Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!


Bill Gates And The SV40 Cancer-Causing Virus
By David Jenkins
The new (GMO-DNA) vaccines contain SV40.
Wikipedia, in an article on DNA vaccination includes this reference to SV40:
"The SV40 promoter was conventionally used until research showed that vectors driven by the Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) promoter had much higher expression rates.[2] ... An example of DNA vaccine plasmid is pVAC, it uses SV40 promoter.
The SV40 Cancer Foundation, however, goes into more detail.
"SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin.
"In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck.
Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa 1961.
"Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's.
Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital said:
"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination." 
Hillerman, chief of vaccines at Merck not only validated Bernice Eddy's discovery but he admitted that all Merck's vaccines contain cancer viruses and other viruses and that their Hepatitis vaccine caused the AIDS epidemic in the US.
Dr. Larry Palevsky, a NY board certified pediatrician, agrees as well that vaccines contain viruses and says that most of the viruses in vaccines can not be removed.
The new vaccines are GMO-DNA vaccines.  The material that they wish to inject has been genetically engineered (thus GMO) using parts of viruses, cancers, animal poxes, and combined, and are then shot or inhaled or injected into the body, to be "taken up by the DNA" (thus DNA) . This material is meant to affect the body in the most fundamental way possible, by affecting the very coding of the body (the DNA) which controls functions for the existence of the person.
And doesn't SV40's potential uptake by the child or adult's DNA present a much graver danger than previously?  Could this cancer virus now become part of the body's coding itself?
SV40 was removed by federal law.  So, is against federal law to introduce it into vaccines again?  And is it not an extreme threat to anyone taking the new vaccines, to have it taken up by their DNA?
Bill Gates wants every newborn on earth registered for vaccination, with cell phones to alert parents as well as locate people.  
The Redmond, Wash.-based company's cofounder and chairman envisioned collecting biometric information on babies via handsets and transmitting the data to a central health registry, which could be used to remind parents about vaccinations. GPS data from the phone could also help guide medical personnel to remote locations to administer vaccines.
Gates imagined trialing the program in areas with low vaccination rates like Nigeria or northern India.
"If you could register every birth on a cell phone-get fingerprints, get a location-then you could systems to make sure the immunizations happen," said Gates. ....
Gate's plan didn't address the privacy implications of a birth database, which could be more or less substantial depending on how the information was structured.
Bill Gates is heavily invested in the new vaccines, that is the GMO-DNA vaccines.  His plan would establish a global tracking system of everyone on earth which includes biometric identity information.  While it clearly violates fundamental privacy rights as a prelude to violating human rights (i.e. giving governments power to inject things into anyone on earth in the name of "health"), Mr. Gates has come up with a unique marketing device for his own products.  His plan arranges to track people down wherever they may be and force his products on them via government agencies.
One sees the downside in terms of health rather quickly.  Wouldn't every newborn, via the new vaccines, be injected with this known cancer virus at birth (or with  Rous Sarcoma Virus RSV- another cancer virus) and then be injected with it or other viruses many, many, many, many, many times more over the course of infancy, childhood, adolescence and adulthood?  
Assuming that almost all parents want to protect their children from cancer, wouldn't Mr. Gates' seeking to vaccinate every newborn on the planet with his GMO-DNA vaccines with SV40, be reason for even more parents and grandparents to reject vaccines.  They are are already doing so, not just because of the studied connection between vaccines and autism, bowel disease, and mitochondrial dysfunction but because of personal experience through knowing personally what has been happening to children of friends, relatives and co-workers after vaccination.
The article quoted above about Gates says "Unfortunately, phones can't fight the ignorance that leads some Americans to leave their children unvaccinated."  Is the writer referring to Robin MacNeil's daughter who said in her father's PBS series on autism that it was after the MMR, DTap and Hib vaccines that her son became autistic?  One would assume she might be leaving her children unvaccinated after that, not out of ignorance but out of direct, unmediated by media, information of what happened after vaccination. 
The article concludes with these words:  "The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has given billions of dollars to charitable causes, making the couple the most generous philanthropists in America."  Philanthropy is defined as the desire to promote the welfare of others, expressed by the generous donation of money to good causes.  But Mr. Gates is doing quite the reverse.  He would be using his money to ensure that viruses proven to cause cancer would be injected into every possible child on the planet and has devised a plan to try to make sure none can escape.  Mr. Gates would be hurting millions, perhaps billions, helping international health agencies funded in fact by himself, to seize their rights to control their own bodies and that of their children, while guaranteeing himself profits with no end in sight.  Were people to become ill, he would make more money from selling yet more vaccines.
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


This Site Served by TheHostPros