- Remember, remember
- The Fifth of November,
- Gunpowder, Treason, and Plot !
- I see no reason
- Why gunpowder treason
- Should ever be forgot !
- -- kiddies' nursery rhyme from my youth, commemorating
Guy Fawkes' attempt to blow up the British Parliament in 1605
- Guy Fawkes' Day dawned last Friday, November, 5th, commemorating
a brave man's attempt back in 1605 to waste the despicable British Parliament.
- November 5 used to be celebrated in Britain and British
dependencies worldwide by kiddies letting-off firecrackers, until recently
that is, when increasing elitist paranoia for the health of their sordid
skins deemed fireworks bad physical and mental programming-competition
to their Pan-Global, New-World-Order State-Terrorism Agenda being foisted
upon us under the lie of "Fighting Terrorism", precisely as authors
George Orwell, Aldous Huxley and others so accurately predicted back at
the beginning of the 20th Century.
- Thinking about Guy Fawkes last Friday, I suddenly remembered
that the attempt at CERN, on the border between France and Switzerland,
to create an odd quark that might rearrange our universe would take place
in a few days' time, namely, on the 9th of November, this coming Tuesday
- On that date, the giant LHC or Large Hadron Collider
- at the European Organization for Nuclear Research at
CERN will try for a particle collision to produce "strangelet"
Quarks, which many scientists believe might touch off a chain reaction
in matter that will spread at the speed of light to all matter in the known
- Guy Fawkes is in no way out of place here ! Indeed, as
true Anarchist, he might be watching from some other dimension, rubbing
his hands in anticipation of how our Planet of Apes will do itself in !
- Unfortunately, CERN, like the Vatican,
- is also beyond jurisdiction of anyone else who might
be affected by what goes on inside them :
- so not much oversight can be got about the ardent young
scientists in there, all attempting to create particles that might change,
not only our world, but our entire Universe as we know it. See :
- CERN affirms LHC has 70% chances to produce strangelets
- wherein this passage appears : (quote) :
- Abstract. We have received and will show in this article
astonishing documents leaked out of CERN internal servers, about the CASTOR
- project, a Centauro and STrangelet Object Research to
hunt for strangelets 'likely'to be produced at the LHC.
- According to those internal documents CERN has been lying
for years to the press and in the suits, since it always affirmed that
it won't produce the ultra-dangerous, ultradense 'strangelets', the liquid
explosive made of up, down and strange quarks, responsible of the ice-9
reactions that cause supernovas (below's graph).
- In those documents CERN affirms there is a 65-70% of
chances of producing negative strangelets, which according to standard
science on strangelets today, will provoke the ice-9 reaction (name taken
from Cat and Cradle's book in which a physicist destroys the world throwing
a new type of water that freezes the planet, since an ice-9 reaction will
condensate the planet in a 15 kilometers ultra-dense strange star).
- Thus CERN has been lying and it is playing with all mankind
a Quantum Russian Roulette game with 4 shots out of 6, 66% chances of extinction.
- [The book referred to is "Cat's Cradle" by
Kurt Vonnegut, see :
- and the metaphor of process referred to in the CERN possibility,
appears in it, one in which a scientist creates a form of water-ice he
calls "Ice-Nine" or "Ice-9", in which water-ice molecules
are stacked together in a special array so that they won't melt at ordinary
ambient temperatures, but only at around 114 degrees Fahrenheit, well above
human body temperature (of around 98.4°F or 37°C), and which has
also the property of turning any water it touches into a similar state,
that is, locking it up at most ambient climatic temperatures on earth and
making it unavailable for life's processes, which, in the book, destroys
almost all life on earth. -- author]
- Trouble is, as the excerpt above points out, many scientists
fear that this new particle intended to be created at CERN on November
9, 2010, will do something similarly permanent to matter in the universe
as we know it, making it all ultra-dense and putting an end to the universe
as we once knew it. We won't survive, of course, and a quick-and-dirty
bit of mental arithmetic will show that the resulting, 15-kilometer world
would have a density of around 3'300 tons or so per cubic centimetre, starting
with an average earth density of, say, around 5.5.
- Now, a mathematician-physicist friend, who likes to go
by the name of "An Iowan Idiot", postulated to me recently, that
the reason we are being visited by so very few extraterrestrial civilisations,
despite continuing discoveries that most suns now appear to possess planetary
systems about them like our own Sun, might not be that, as was proposed
back at the beginning of our own Nuclear Age, they wiped themselves out
in nuclear war : because, as he so correctly points out, at the beginning
of a nuclear age, when weapons are relatively small, they do not have the
potential to trash a planet and its ecology, and by the time they become
bigger, more powerful and more sophisticated, any use of them will so have
shocked their developers, that they would have the sense to prohibit their
- No, he explains, the mathematical probabilities stand
against that idea : Far more likely, is that the abysmal lack of education
of their general public and especially their popularist politicians, would
allow funding of experiments that the politicians might see as increasing
their political power, without recognising the dangers of those experiments
: and in the dog-eat-dog world of acadaemia, all-too-ardent, upwardly-mobile
young physicists would ignore the dangers of unknown consequences at the
mere chance of furthering their careers ... which might also explain some
otherwise inexplicable flashes observed in astronomy in the vicinity of
stars, where planets might be found, as, perhaps, civilisation after civilisation
winks out of existence :
- " ... and now, this is a perfectly safe experiment,
chances of success -- bla-bla --- side-effects (whisper-whisper) -- nothing
to worry about -- let's JUST DO IT ! -- [fame-&-fortune for all] --
and now, Senator Squink, Honorary Prof Emeritus by virtue of funding of
this great project, will throw the switch ! ... " -- SQUISH.
- Couple years back, after CERN went down after an ostensible
leak of a ton or so of liquid helium when a superconducting magnet was
hit and overheated by an energy dump from its coils, friend and self-styled
"Iowan Idiot" (hereinafter II) and I were kicking around the
possibility that a microscopic black hole had really been created, which
had punctured the containment vessels for the liquid-helium super-cooling
of the magnets, in the article we co-authored :
- Strange Incident at CERN
- In a later conversation, after the immense destruction
of that alleged one-ton helium blowout had been publicly announced and
the year or so of time required to repair it, we discussed it again, coming
to the conclusion that this was no mere helium blowout : other, stronger
forces had been at work, there !
- I suggested that if a mini-black-hole had been created,
then it, itself, might have sucked up that missing ton of liquid helium
- Hmmm ... II thought about it, then : "Yes! it makes
sense, because liquid helium is as close to a frictionless superfluid as
one might reasonably come -- so that tiny black hole suddenly became a
one-ton-or-more black hole ..."
- I interjected and said : "If that is so, then I
can tell you what might have happened ... if the collision of two particles
that tiny had really taken place to create that tiny black hole, it is
also very unlikely that any gross mechanical collimation of accelerator
axes could have been precise enough to collide them perfectly head-on,
therefore, if not precisely done, the mini-black-hole created would have
had a spin moment, and if it were spinning, then it might also be PRECESSING,
dynamically nutating, its poles circling about its axis of spin, like a
spinning top when it becomes unstable ... "
- II agreed, then suddenly yelled : "Nobody has ever
thought of that before ! -- that a black hole might be both spinning, and
precessing ! -- and if it did, then that explains the destruction ! --
the -- at first -- tiny black hole, suddenly weighing a ton, would have
its angular momentum vastly increased by the input of all that mass, its
electrons would be stripped away as the heavier helium nuclei were sucked
in first, and that vast outer cloud of electrons -- science says that the
most-efficient way to release matter's energy is to feed it to a black
hole ! -- augmented by that energy release, and also in dynamic precession,
would set up electromagnetic fields so strong, they would have ripped equipment
clear away from the concrete foundations ! At its poles, cutting jets of
pure energy might radiate out ! THAT could explain what happened, the large
scale of destruction and why they are keeping so quiet about it all ! --
if the public ever found out ... and where IS that black hole now, orbiting
and oscillating somewhere inside the earth itself, increasing its mass
as time goes by, perhaps periodically popping up here and there, and touching
off earthquakes and volcanoes ? -- why, the public would lynch them, if
they knew !" So Iowan Idiot.
- Did they learn anything ? Apparently not, and now, they
are at it again !
- Being sceptical of human rationality as especially observed
in the way blatant lies regularly spouted by science or poly-tick-ians
[many bloodsucking insects Gore Vidal] are so blandly accepted by
the unthinking masses, I decided that my or others' worst paranoias could
not be any more insane than that, so I decided to give mine a free run
and wondered if there is any hidden agenda behind these seemingly insane
- What could come of a "changed" earth, was this
some sort of plan to initiate what soft-science, if not soft-headed, New
Agers like to refer to as a "changing of frequencies" ? I remembered
that a friend had once written me, that a certain sculpture, of a whole
earth emerging from a splitting-apart one, had been set up, not only at
the United Nations Building in New York, but also at the Vatican, see :
- which site refers to another take on it, here :
- which has an interesting referral to a long PDF file
regarding planning the future of the European Union, or EU :
- Now here it is again, at the Vatican :
- The artist, Pomodoro (pomodoro means tomato in Italian)
can be found here :
- Arnaldo Pomodoro :
- Well, I wondered, as Dan Brown, who writes on hidden
and Illuminati themes, has a book, "Angels and Demons", that
starts out at CERN and moves smoothly on to the historically-hidden Illuminati
and then the Vatican, is there any chance that the numerological or other
significance of the date might be any indicator of Illuminati intent ?
- I mentioned the upcoming date to my friend Harry Cooper,
Founder and President of Sharkhunters,www.sharkhunters.com, who is himself
an historian, and he immediately replied, saying it was an historic date
indeed, and mentioned the following events that came immediately to his
- November 9 :
- 1923 : Adolf Hitler's Munich Beer Hall Putsch is crushed
by police and government troops ;
- 1938 : Reichskristallnacht, or "Reich's Crystal
Night", after the Nazis came to power, when the windows of Jewish
shops were smashed and lay glittering in the streets ;
- 1989 : The Fall of the Berlin Wall ;
- and now ...
- 2010 : CERN tries to make the particle
- that might destroy the known universe ... ?
- I asked friend Iowan Idiot for his take on this sequence
of events, and he said the common factor in it all seemed to be THE BREAKING
OF THINGS -- obvious to him, but I had not seen it ! What could they break
now ? -- was it the breaking of the earth, as in the sculptures above ?
What would they gain by that ? Their own destruction, along with ours ...
or were they sure that what might pertain for us, might be somehow avoided
by them ? Was it a change in vibration, a madness that perhaps would seize
us while sparing them, perhaps due to some technical means, that they had
developed for their own protection ?
- Pondering these conundrums, I boiled it down to the simplest
known facts : In recent history, at least, the date has, seemingly, a strong
German connection : Was there any further information to be gleaned from
this postulate ? Were the dates somehow numerologically significant, as
the Illuminati like to "sign" their handiwork of destruction
in their own secret coding of dates and intervals :
- Let us take a look at apparent secret-government actions
of the recent past, say, between 9-11 and some other event set up to decoy
people into believing in terrorism and justifying further restrictions
on the world's peoples : the Illuminati/Elite seem to like numerological
- There were apparently precisely 11 years between then-U.S.
President George Herbert Walker Bush's first public speech mentioning a
"New World Order" and the events of September 11, 2001,
- And there were also just 911 days between that 9-11 event
and the bombing of the railways in Madrid, Spain.
- There are many, many more examples to be found, almost
ad nauseum, on the Web.
- Quite incident to the above example, Prescott Bush, GHW's
father, was deeply involved with Nazi banking in the US before WWII ...
- So what might connect the years 1923, 1938 and 2010,
and what might be the German connection common to them all ? As the theme
is one of BREAKING, Hitler's Putsch being broken on that date back in 1923,
then his revenge against his perceived enemies, Jews, on that same date
in 1938 as shop-windows were broken, and finally breaking and fall of the
Berlin Wall beginning German reunification in 1989, is there a Revenge
theme in all this, something Germany did not like once, and might be willing
to break to avenge itself, now in 2010 ?
- Take only the German historic events, then, and in the
manner of calculating the Illuminati's secret more-recent events' time-gaps,
let us look at the German events in their time-gap relationship to 2010
- 2010 2910 2010
- -1923 -1938 -1989
- = 87 72 21
- What do they have in common ?
- Well, there are 3 dates, and all are divisible by 3,
so doing this, they become :
- 29 24 7
- Might there be any significance to a combination of these
numbers into a date ?
- As 7 must be a month, there being no months 24 or 29,
we have two possibilities :
- July 29, 1924,
- July 24, 1929.
- I googled and wikipediaed both as to events, adding the
parameter germany :
- 29 july 1924 germany
- 24 july 1929 germany
- and did not find much on the first one, but on the second
one, I got lucky, but it might just be pure coincidence, so let us just
look at it in that manner :
- KELLOG-BRIAND PACT, final ratification in 1929 :
- One of the references is posted by the Avalon Project
at the Yale Law School :
- and reads, in these two excerpts :
- Treaty between the United States and other Powers providing
for the renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy. Signed
at Paris, August 27, 1928; ratification advised by the Senate, January
16, 1929; ratified by the President, January 17, 1929; instruments of ratification
deposited at Washington by the United States of America, Australia, Dominion
of Canada, Czechoslovkia, Germany, Great Britain, India, Irish Free State,
Italy, New Zealand, and Union of South Africa, March 2, 1929: By Poland,
March 26, 1929; by Belgium, March 27 1929; by France, April 22, 1929; by
Japan, July 24, 1929; proclaimed, July 24, 1929.
- [...] the original of which Treaty, being in the English
and the French languages, is word for word as follows:
- THE PRESIDENT OF THE GERMAN REICH, THE PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS, THE PRESIDENT
OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF GREAT BRITAIN IRELAND AND
THE BRITISH DOMINIONS BEYOND THE SEAS, EMPEROR OF INDIA, HIS MAJESTY THE
KING OF ITALY, HIS MAJESTY THE EMPEROR OF JAPAN, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC
OF POLAND THE PRESIDENT OF THE CZECHOSLOVAK REPUBLIC,
- Deeply sensible of their solemn duty to promote the welfare
- Persuaded that the time has, come when a frank renunciation
of war as an instrument of na tional policy should be made to the end that
the peaceful and friendly relations now existing between their peoples
may be perpetuated;
- Convinced that all changes in their relations with one
another should be sought only by pacific means and be the result of a peaceful
and orderly process, and that any signatory Power which shall hereafter
seek to promote its ts national interests by resort to war a should be
denied the benefits furnished by this Treaty; ..."
- Now, in no way imputing ulterior motives to the much-respected
Yale Law School or inferring in this anything other than my own, rampant
paranoia, I'd like to ask you, Gentle Reader, these questions :
- Odd, eh, that the "PRESIDENT OF THE GERMMAN REICH"
should be mentioned first, isn't it ? -- and by the victorious Allies,
at that ?
- Or that, although I have found other sites with these
same texts, so far only this one site has that particular bit capitalised
in upper-case letters ?
- Or that the home of the Skull-and-Bones Society, of which
the Bushes were members, along with many, many in the secret world of today,
is Yale University ?
- Or that Martin Bormann's revenge project to allow for
German rebuilding after a lost World War Two, which he saw to be imminent
as early as 1943. and to sluice billions of German Reichsmarks out of Germany,
along with German technology, patents, technicians and general know-how,
and carrying the secret code-name "Aktion Adlerflug" or "Operation
Eagle's Flight", was also variously known as ... Project Avalon ?
- Or that Martin Bormann, as reported by Argentine Intelligence,
allegedly arrived in Argentina in 1948 aboard a steamer out of Genoa, Italy,
dressed as a Jesuit monk and carrying a passport issued by the Vatican
- Have a nice week ... at least until next Tuesday !