- Freedom as described under the US Constitution has been
under intensive fire since the Reagan-Revolution turned our individual
freedoms and our right to challenge the government, into outdated and powerless
claims that have finally become meaningless in the real world of 'The Risen-Fall
of Justice'.
-
-
-
-
-
- This image became the new-standard of practice during
the Reagan years, and has more recently become far more dangerous because
the Freedoms of Americans have now have come under fire from two foreign
groups that, if they have their way and are supported by congressional
complicity: Will mean the end of the real freedoms that Americans always
thought they had.
-
- The first of the two groups is the American-Israeli Political
Action Committee (AIPAC) that has taken control over the elective choices
of congress and the government in general. This has allowed AIPAC to overwhelmingly
determine and control national policies for the US, which are not in the
best interests of the United States. The Chief of Staff for Obama is an
Israeli-American; not an American-Israeli; this distinction is not about
semantics-rather it indicates which nation shall hold sway over the individual
that claims the legal privileges of dual-citizenship.
-
- No person that is not American should be part of the
decision-making cabinet level offices in the US government. This is not
about discriminating against those people that are not Americans-it's about
being certain that the American government represents American citizens
first. Americans need all the help they can get now, so why is so much
of our money going to the still unfinished state of Israel; and how much
of these decisions depends upon AIPAC's illegal influence? Why are Obama's
White House staff and Cabinet over-represented by these quasi-affiliates
of a foreign government?
-
- Is this why all American political candidates for all
the major posts in government must publicly bow to AIPAC, if they expect
to be elected to anything? Pelosi, Hilary Clinton, Obama, Cheney, and Bush
virtually all of them and many more, routinely appear before AIPAC's
televised gatherings to renew the obscenity of their solemn pledge to "Israel-first!"
How large a role has this publicly-held bias played in passing things like
the USA Patriot Acts, the National ID Card, and Thought-Crime Legislation.
(1)
-
- All political organizations that represent foreign nations
must register with the Department of State as representatives of a foreign
power-except Israel. If AIPAC had to register as an agency of a foreign
power, which it is, then their contributions to Senators, to congressional
people, and to candidates for any national office would be just as illegal
as it is for nations like China, or Russia, or any other foreign power
that seeks to influence US political life-except for Israel.
-
- The second threat to American Freedom comes from the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which is itself a borderline racist organization;
rather than a defender against such racial policies, as they seem to decry.
- "The Anti-Defamation League Director for the Plains
States Alan Potash, has just declared war against our First Amendment right
to freedom of speech:
-
- The bill, which was approved in the House last month,
would equip local law enforcement officials with tools, training and resources
to investigate and prosecute bias-motivated crimes.
-
- Like acts of terrorism, hate crimes can hurt more than
the individual victim. They can instill fear and insecurity within an
entire community."
-
- The Hate Crimes Prevention Act recently passed the Congress
and is now on its way to the Senate, where it is likely to pass and signed
by President Obama. The Anti-Defamation League has been at the forefront
of promoting hate crime legislation, and openly advocates for their model
anti-hate law. In 1988 the ADL gave out an award to law student Joseph
Ribikoff for writing a proposed hate crime bill that would criminalize
hate speech against gays and minorities.
-
- On the ADL's website they state their mission is "to
stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair
treatment to all." That sounds fair enough but the organization has
gone out of its way to vilify anyone who disagrees with their political
agenda. On a number of occasions as I have pointed out they have opposed
the right to freedom of speech. The ADL has smeared as anti-semites, Professor
John Mearsheimer for his book critical of the Israeli Lobby and former
President Jimmy Carter for his book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid".
-
- The ADL claims to be fighting the defamation of the Jewish
people but they are doing a grave disservice to Jewish Americans who believe
in liberty and freedom of speech by claiming to advocate on their behalf.
The ADL has also tried to stifle dissent within the Jewish community such
as in the cases of Tony Judt and Norman Finkelstein." (2)
-
- ADL was created to stop people from legitimately investigating
historical events that involve the plight of Jews before, during, and after
WWII, among other things. One of their key interests now has been 'protecting'
the validity of events and numbers involved, in what the Nazi's apparently
did to the Jews, as well as to the other people they used and often killed,
in a variety of ways during WWII.
-
- While History tends to be written by the victors, it
is not the sole property of any one people or nation; as the record of
events in all cases has a direct effect upon how the people of today can
come to realistic understandings' of the past that should improve life
for everyone, both now and in the future.
-
- For far too long the Zionists in Israel have tried to
dictate what others can think or write about, when it comes to events in
the past, which belong to everyone alive today: not just to those that
were persecuted. The same is true of the Zionist's attempt to claim special
status because they experienced a "Holocaust." Many, many other
peoples have occasionally experienced something comparable with what happened
to the Jews and to others during the Second World War. Yet to this day
none of those others have successfully prohibited scholars, archeologists
and researchers from investigating the events of years and decades past-to
determine what actually took place-except for the Zionists in Israel.
-
- The various tribes of the Americas come to mind; and
their near annihilation at the hands of their European conquerors. Their
numbers of dead and dislocated, not to mention the efforts that were made
to erase them from all of history were part of a four-hundred year record
that is still being collected-and those that disagree with what is scientifically
found, along with those that conduct these investigation; are not branded
as criminals for looking into the events that shaped the history of so
many people in not just the Northern and Southern hemisphere's of North
America, but of the world.
-
- What needs to be ended is the hate-speech being preached
by the ADL and its supporters because in the end the reality of events
will come out anyhow: Because in the end the truth always does, as those
trying to stop the torture photos from being released, are about to learn
the hard way.
-
- The final chapter in this note about FREEDOM under FIRE
belongs to the end of the right of the American people, to Freely Assemble.
-
- "Although you may not know it, this is an historic
day in history. Your rights under the First Amendment to free speech,
redress and assembly in the U.S. is finally dead. It has joined the many
annulments to your constitutional rights in recent years like warrant-less
access to your private information, the enactment of the soon and upcoming
police states, socialism, and the growing list of other achievements under
the--and to the delight of--the New World Order elites.
- To my knowledge, I am one of the only people in the U.S.
that has been organizing true first amendment assemblies over the past
20 years. Ninety-nine percent of the population, including activists really
don't know what that is. In brief it means, citizens assembling in an
all-free, non-commercial fashion, peaceably to redress political issues
on public or private property by free will. Unknown to many, all that
was required was to notify the municipality in which it was to take place.
If the municipality chose to impose police detail or costs, fees, bonding,
and the many things they come up with, it could be challenged in court.
There have been many rulings on this issue in the U.S. Supreme Court favoring
the citizen. For the average U.S. citizen exercising this right for this
process is grueling, which I have done many times successfully." (3)
-
- The irony here is that the Constitution was written to
protect the rights of the citizens to confront their government, especially
when that government no longer represents them as citizens. Meanwhile all
kinds of petty ordinances and laws were allegedly tacked onto local and
state documents to regulate 'protests' so that the city, county, or state
could recoup the costs which such gatherings might incur. Except-the agency
controlling these rallies is often part of the government that is being
protested against-and when the costs of the licenses and fees results in
prohibiting the free-exercise of the rallies; then this has to fly in the
face of the US Constitution, (which ought to trump all petty civic ordinances
to the contrary)?
-
- One of the reasons we pay taxes is so that government
will provide the services needed to insure that citizens can confront a
corrupt government, and finally be heard. The first line of this 'right'
was suppose to be through the congress-but they represent Israel now and
not the USA-so working people must spontaneously take their complaints
into the streets, just to be heard. The entire process of "permitting"
and/or "licensing" such protests totally destroys the capacity
of people to complain in this way; of a system of government that has systematically
closed all other avenues-to those that the 'government' supposedly represents.
If government makes civil demonstrations impossible then they shall be
insuring the natural anger that will be the result: Thereby creating the
one thing they claim to be trying to avoid which can only lead to more
anger, and possibly to public chaos.
-
- One must wonder just how courageous people really are,
when they allow a simple piece of paper to prohibit them from confronting
a government which they believe is and has been committing major crimes
against them and their loved ones for nearly five decades. . . Someone
suggested that 'this new legislation would not prevent people from finding
out about their right to hold free and public assemblies because
such knowledge was still available in library books,' but knowing about
something is far different than participating in them, for the world to
hear and see.
-
- kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net
-
- 1) The System Has Been Destroyed http://www.kirwanesque.com/politics/articles/2005/art29.htm
-
- Our CRIMINAL-Justice System
- http://www.kirwanesque.com/politics/articles/2005/art30.htm
-
- 2) ADL Director declares war on freedom of speech
- http://www.examiner.com/x-9462-LA-Independent-Examiner~y
- 2009m6d1-ADL-director-declares-war-on-our-right-to-freedom-of-speech
-
- 3) End of Live Free or Die Rally end of free assembly
for America?
- http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11517
|