- What do you suppose it is like to be elected president
of the United States only to find that your power is restricted to the
service of powerful interest groups?
- A president who does a good job for the ruling interest
groups is paid off with remunerative corporate directorships, outrageous
speaking fees, and a lucrative book contract. If he is young when he assumes
office, like Bill Clinton and Obama, it means a long life of luxurious
- Fighting the special interests doesn't pay and doesn't
succeed. On April 30 the primacy of special over public interests was demonstrated
yet again. The Democrats' bill to prevent 1.7 million mortgage foreclosures
and, thus, preserve $300 billion in home equity by permitting homeowners
to renegotiate their mortgages, was defeated in the Senate, despite the
60-vote majority of the Democrats. The banksters were able to defeat the
bill 51 to 45.
- These are the same financial gangsters whose unbridled
greed and utter irresponsibility have wiped out half of Americans' retirement
savings, sent the economy into a deep hole, and threatened the US dollar's
reserve currency role. It is difficult to imagine an interest group with
a more damaged reputation. Yet, a majority of "the people's representatives"
voted as the discredited banksters instructed.
- Hundreds of billions of public dollars have gone to bail
out the banksters, but when some Democrats tried to get the Senate to do
a mite for homeowners, the US Senate stuck with the banks.The Senate's
motto is: "Hundreds of billions for the banksters, not a dime for
- If Obama was naive about well-intentioned change before
the vote, he no longer has this political handicap.
- Democratic Majority Whip Dick Durbin acknowledged the
voters' defeat by the discredited banksters. The banks, Durbin said, "frankly
own the place."
- It is not difficult to understand why. Among those who
defeated the homeowners bill are senators Jon Tester (Mont), Max Baucus
(Mont), Blanche Lincoln (Ark), Ben Nelson (Neb), ManyLandrieu (La), Tim
Johnson (SD), and Arlan Specter (Pa). According to reports, the banksters
have poured a half million dollars into Tester's campaign funds. Baucus
has received $3.5 million; Lincoln $1.3 million; Nelson $1.4 million; Landrieu
$2 million; Johnson $2.5 million; Specter $4.5 million.
- The same Congress that can't find a dime for homeowners
or health care appropriates hundreds of billions of dollars for the military/security
complex. The week after the Senate foreclosed on American homeowners, the
Obama "change" administration asked Congress for an additional
$61 billion dollars for the neoconservatives' war in Iraq and $65 billion
more for the neoconservatives' war in Afghanistan. Congress greeted this
request with a rousing "Yes we can!"
- The additional $126 billion comes on top of the $533.7
billion "defense" budget for this year. The $660 billion--probably
a low-ball number--is ten times the military spending of China, the second
most powerful country in the world.
- How is it possible that "the world's only superpower"
is threatened by the likes of Iraq and Afghanistan? How can the US be a
superpower if it is threatened by countries that have no military capability
other than a guerilla capability to resist invaders?
- These "wars" are a hoax designed to enrich
the US armaments industry and to infuse the "security forces"
with police powers over American citizenry.
- Not a dime to prevent millions of Americans from losing
their homes, but hundreds of billions of dollars to murder Muslim women
and children and to create millions of refugees, many of whom will either
sign up with insurgents or end up as the next wave of immigrants into America.
- This is the way the American government works. And it
thinks it is a "city on the hill, a light unto the world."
- Americans elected Obama because he said he would end
the gratuitous criminal wars of the Bush brownshirts, wars that have destroyed
America's reputation and financial solvency and serve no public interest.
But once in office Obama found that he was ruled by the military/security
complex. War is not being ended, merely transferred from the unpopular
war in Iraq to the more popular war in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, Obama, in
violation of Pakistan's sovereignty, continues to attack "targets"
in Pakistan. In place of a war in Iraq, the military/security complex now
has two wars going in much more difficult circumstances.
- Viewing the promotion gravy train that results from decades
of warfare, the US officer corps has responded to the "challenge to
American security" from the Taliban. "We have to kill them over
there before they come over here." No member of the US government
or its numerous well-paid agents has ever explained how the Taliban, which
is focused on Afghanistan, could ever get to America. Yet this hyped fear
is sufficient for the public to support the continuing enrichment of the
military/security complex, while American homes are foreclosed by the banksters
who have destroyed the retirement prospects of the US population..
- According to Pentagon budget documents, by next year
the cost of the war against Afghanistan will exceed the cost of the war
against Iraq. According to a Nobel prize-winning economist and a budget
expert at Harvard University, the war against Iraq has cost the American
taxpayers $3 trillion, that is, $3,000 billion in out-of-pocket and already
incurred future costs, such as caring for veterans.
- If the Pentagon is correct, then by next year the US
government will have squandered $6 trillion dollars on two wars, the only
purpose of which is to enrich the munitions manufacturers and the "security"
- The human and social costs are dramatic as well and not
only for the Iraqi, Afghan, and Pakistani populations ravaged by American
bombs. Dahr Jamail reports that US Army psychiatrists have concluded that
by their third deployment, 30 percent of American troops are mental wrecks.
Among the costs that reverberate across generations of Americans are elevated
rates of suicide, unemployment, divorce, child and spousal abuse, drug
and alcohol addiction, homelessness and incarceration. <http://www.truthout.org/051209J?n>http://www.truthout.org/051209J?n
- In the Afghan "desert of death" the Obama administration
is constructing a giant military base. Why? What does the internal politics
of Afghanistan have to do with the US?
- What is this enormous waste of resources that America
does not have accomplishing besides enriching the American munitions industry?
- China and to some extent India are the rising powers
in the world. Russia, the largest country on earth, is armed with a nuclear
arsenal as terrifying as the American one. The US dollar's role as reserve
currency, the most important source of American power, is undermined by
the budget deficits that result from the munition corporations' wars and
the bankster bailouts.
- Why is the US making itself impotent fighting wars that
have nothing whatsoever to do with its security, wars that are, in fact,
threatening its security?
- The answer is that the military/security lobby, the financial
gangsters, and AIPAC rule. The American people be damned.