- "Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens
who are not only prepared to take arms, but who regard the preservation
of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing
to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom" --John F.
- Revelations and Awakenings.
- 2008 was the year I finally saw, in all it's ugliness,
the `prison` I had inhabited for the fifty years of my life. My journey
towards this discovery took some ten years or so and the shocking truth
hit me like a hammer, that since the day I was born (1958) and for long
before that, a conspiratorial group of super rich and powerful individuals,
dedicated to the imposition of a Global Dictatorial State, had been working
behind the scenes, manipulating the events which shaped our lives, creating
chaos all around, causing reactions from the unsuspecting majority which
in turn enabled them to advance their agenda by responding with their `ready
- By making diabolical use of the Hegelian Dialectic, or
what David Icke has termed `Problem Reaction Solution`, these conspirators
have slowly but surely brought us all to the point of no return. The decision
is ours now. Do we stand or do we fall?
- For most of last year, as the information and knowledge
which finally put most pieces of the puzzle in place, came to me like an
avalanche, I strived to disseminate that knowledge by writing articles.
Many articles, which, through Henry Makow and Rense.com, along with some
local sites, were, judging by the international response I received, read
by many across the globe and to a lesser degree, here at `home`. My writing
brought me into contact with some exceptional and gifted individuals, nowhere
more so than in Denmark, the small Northern European Country which has
been my home for eleven out of the past thirteen years.
- As our local and international correspondence grew, we
began to `feed` off each other, sharing ideas and possible solutions. This
`group` of individuals, coming from very diverse backgrounds and international
in it's makeup, attempted to spread the `word` far and wide. Since then,
we have been working quietly via the Internet, email and private meetings
to alert our fellow citizens to the `clear and present` danger approaching
- Late last year, we conducted a `leafleting` campaign
here in Denmark, in an effort to inform people about what those strange
`cloud formations` in the sky really were. I believe that over ten thousand
were delivered by volunteers. As I awaited the `fallout`, expecting at
least some mention in the local press, it became after some weeks apparant,
that there would be none. Either people had simply ignored the information
on the excellently designed and printed `flyers`, (<http://www.nylonmanden.dk/>www.nylonmanden.dk)
or the media had put a `lid` on it as usual.
- As the old year ended and the `New` one approached, I
began to ask questions of myself and take stock of what I had achieved
during the past year where this particular `hobby` of mine was concerned.
It dawned on me that for all the research, reading and writing. For all
the correspondence and networking, I/We had achieved very little. The sheer
scale and impact of this realisation was staggering. Another year done,
nothing changed. The EU well on course for Federalisation, the Global Financial
Crisis, `mopping` up countless small banks and companies. State `Mafioso`
style taxation removing ever more the private wealth of citizens globally.
Wars of aggression still raging, Chemtrails across every sky, Tetra Masts
everywhere, ID cards introduced, and the surveillance industry booming
everywhere as even our private phone calls and emails are monitored ever
- In essence, the NWO `Gravy Train ` just kept a` rolling`
and what did `we the people` do about it? Not very much. Most just sat
in front of their TV screens and `sucked up` the official lies as they
had been doing all their lives. In the movie the Matrix, the Morpheous
Character says this;
- "The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is
our enemy. When you are inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen,
teachers, lawyers, carpenters, the very minds of the people we are trying
to save. But until we do, these people are part of that system and that
makes them our enemies. You have to understand most of these people are
not ready to be unplugged. And many are so...hopelessly dependent on the
system that they will fight to protect it." Exactly!
- So for all the hard work and information gathering, the
`enemy` was still firmly and overwhelmingly in control of the `high ground`
if not morally, then strategically. More and more the feeling that positive
action was needed, and this view was shared by some if not all in our group.
A section of our associates still believed that an `awakening` would happen
spontaneously and that all that was needed was more spreading of information.
My friend and associate Peter Clement, an active worker in the fight for
freedom here in Northern Europe also believes that action is required.
In response to the use of the term hero by some in our group, even though
well intended, he writes;
- "We are no heroes, we are just ordinary people.
A hero is somebody who comes into a situation where he or she does something
extraordinary, puts somebody elses life above his or hers own. You don't
know if you are a hero, until the moment arrives. Be humble:-).
- How many of us involved in this area of research have
experienced hostilty when attempting to pass on information we know to
- Next up, we have the `New Golden Boy` as President, and
even if his strings are invisible, you can be sure whose pulling them (Mr
Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski), and absent a `false flag` event, this `man
of change` will on behalf of his masters do everything in his power to
force through the final stages of their `work of ages`.
- So, going back to the turn of this New Year, I began
trying to find Allies. People who although might not have exactly the same
idealogical stance as myself, and those of my `comrades`, still wished
and more importantly, worked for freedom and an abolition of Governmental
control from their lives.
- Here in Denmark, perhaps more than anywhere else in what
we term the `industrialised world`, life is micromanaged down to the finest
detail. This is as my previous articles have outlined at great length,
a model society for the coming EU Superstate, and although the prison doors
may be transparent, they are there all the same and Danish citizens are
more than happy to lock themselves in nice and tight. They call it `tryghed`,
meaning to be secure. That they are and then some.
- What Americans term `Big Government` has been developed
to it's logical conclusion in Northern Europe. Big Government equals `Big`
Control. This is achieved by absolute State/ Corporatist hegemony over
all the avenues of information, so called education, and by the people
themselves whose self regulation has to be seen to be believed. Conformist
and Corporatist. That's Denmark, and it is leading it's citizens to a technological
and idealogical oblivion as depicted in Huxley's novel, `Brave New World`..
- I don't want to live in any such `Prison Society`, no
matter how `cozy` it might appear on the surface.
- "So go home then", I hear the cry from all
those Danish People's Party supporters. The problem is, it's now a Euro
Wide phenomenon and will soon be World Wide unless something is done to
- So what can we do? Edmund Burke wrote this almost two
centuries ago on the subject of State Tyranny;
- "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for
good men to do nothing" .
- Prophetic words and particulary pertinent to the age
we now live in. Have people ever been more apathetic, more indifferent
to their fate than they are today? Locked into a `mind prison` created
by the illusion of affluence and instant gratification, humanity, at least
here in the west appears to have abdicated all responsibilty to the `Professionals`.
The Politicians, Judges, Lawyers, Bankers, Doctors and Professors, and
look where this irresponsibility has led us. On the brink of a `Fourth
Reich` much more terrible than the previous attempt at World Dictatorship,
as it has been done with the apparant consent of `we the people` in the
guise of democratic ellections. We have actually given our enemies permission
to go ahead and enslave us.
- Collectivism or Cooperativism; Is there a difference?
- In his book, `The Robot's Rebellion` (1994) David Icke
speaks of the need for people to form `Cooperatives` (not to be confused
with Corporations). The Anarchists advocate the setting up of `Collectives`
So is there any fundemental difference in the two. The Meriam Webster Dictionary
defines these two terms thus:
- A Collective: A political or economic theory advocating
the collective control especially over production and distribution
- A Cooperative: An enterprise or organization owned by
and operated for the benefit of those using its services collectively.
- In `The Robot's Rebellion`, David Icke describes his
own vision of the futurein some detail.
- "It is difficult to predict with any accuracy what
will happen next, because no-one knows in detail what the future will bring
or how humanity will use its free will to react. But if we are
to end the power of an economic elite we need to move from the big to the
small; from central control to community and individual control; from humans
serving technology to technology serving humans. People who realise what
is going on around them, although still small in number are beginning to
see that dramatic change is necessary when the world economic order crumbles
as many forecast it will soon enough. There is going to be a great deal
of reacting to events and we will have to move very quickly. We will see
that we all depend on each other, and community spirit is going to return
in a very big way. The focus will be on communities coming together to
supply their own needs, and not being dependent on a system over which
they have no control. Self-reliance and self-sufficiency in all necessities
will be the basic model of economics, because that decreases dependence
and gives power back to people. In the `New Peoples' economics we will
need local cooperatives and community-owned companies for food
distribution. It is simply daft for food to be grown in one area and sent
long distances to other communities while those communities send their
produce in the other direction. Food cooperatives will have the role of
collecting the food from local farmers and growers and distributing this
to the local shops and markets.To be truly responsive to local needs, these
cooperatives should be controlled by representatives of ALL the community,
not only the farmers and growers. We will require community organizations,
again with all views and needs represented, to coordinate the production
and distribution of the necessities of life to everyone in their community".
- Does this sounds like a `Collective`?
- He then goes on to propose the following measures of
- A boycott of all banks which create money out of nothing
and charge interest on it. I hope people will withdraw their money from
these banks and even refuse to pay interest on their loans. The latter
decision needs to be well coordinated so that millions do it at the same
- Support for community banks and ethical banking which
invest in projects designed to benefit people and the planet.
- Withdraw all support and investment in the major banks
and Support for community banks and ethical banking which invest in projects
designed to benefit people and the planet.
- A refusal to cooperate with and in schools, universities
and government departments in every country, until we have the free flow
of information about what is really going on in secret and all the knowledge
- Constant sit-ins, peaceful occupation and mass protests
at government headquarters in every country, particularly the key players
like the United States, Russia, Britain, Australia, Japan, the European
Community and the United Nations.
- The peaceful disruption of all occasions of state in
every country until we are told the truth and the closing down, by mass
sit-ins, of roads and entrances to parliamentary buildings.
- Mass peaceful resistance to projects that harm the environment.
If they face such protests everywhere, the authorities will soon have to
re-think and listen.
- The boycotting of all court proceedings that may arise
from such actions and mass sit-ins at the court buildings to disrupt them,
- The bombardment of phone-in programmes and audience participation
programmes with questions and information about the secret government and
what people can do to stop its manipulation.
- Protests and sit-ins at the headquarters of media organizations
until they refuse to be Brotherhood poodles and start to report the truth
to people. Boycotts of system-serving newspapers.
- The same at the headquarters and branches of the Freemasons
in each country and district and the immediate resignation by all members
of the Freemasons and other secret organizations who no longer wish to
be used as a front for the manipulation of the world.
- A refusal to vote for or support any politician who refuses
to disclose whether he or she is a member of a secret society or closely-connected
to anyone who is. A refusal to support any politician who is a member of
any Brotherhood front organization, such as the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Trilateral Commission or, in London, connected
to the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
- Is this `Anarchism` ? Let's read on.
- The Robot's Rebellion was first published back in 1994.
It was in this writers opinion one of Icke's best. Since then, few have
done more or worked harder to expose the Illuminati and their project than
he. David Icke is a `soldier` for freedom. Albeit a non combative and passive
one. The above ideas on how to break down the `Prison Cells` we inhabit
are in the main common sense. Icke's books sell well enough. He has toured
the globe speaking and giving presentations. Yet nothing has changed. Well
very little at least. The above methods have not been adopted, and the
`Agenda` moves ever closer to achieving it's ends.
- Some months ago, I happened upon a website called `Anarchismo`.
Like the title suggests, it's subject matter is `Anarchism`. Now like with
most people, the very word brings forth images of men in `Top Hat and Tails`,
throwing small grenades and the like sometime around the turn of the Twentieth
Century. But having almost exhausted my interest in what I was already
aware of, I decided to have a read. `Shock and Horror`, I was surprised
to discover that there was much that appealed to me therein. At the top
of the page I found this statement;
- "Anarchists believe in a revolution by the working
class which will overthrow the bosses and their governments, and create
a society run and controlled by those who actually produce the wealth of
the world. We believe that it is possible to live without government and
to put in its place councils and assemblies where the "ordinary people"
can decide what happens to this wealth. We believe in the equality of all
and that maximum solidarity is needed between workers and other oppressed
groups if we are to defeat those who live off our sweat".
- So, how different is the above statement in sentiment
to that of Icke's some paragraphs previous. Not very I would suggest. So
is David Icke an Anarchist? Well, on the face of it, I would venture to
say that he is, of a sort at least. What's more, so am I then. There are
some idealogical differences and the emphasis on the `collective` can create
certain reservations, and yet a more comprehensive look at their written
material clearly distances them, the Anarchists, from all the various forms
of Marxism. In effect, they are striving for a society without Bosses.
A society where ordinary people work together in concensus, without any
form of authoritarianism at all. Handing back, or rather taking back responsibilty
for their own lives, to live as they themselves want to live. This is very
similar to what Icke proposes and what I have come to believe is the only
chance humanity has to save itself from slavery. Overthrow the rulers.
Deconstruct all the symbols and `fortresses` of government. Destroy centralisation,
and dethrown what has become the very instrument of tyranny, `Legislation`
and the legislators. The idea of the `Collective` is a good one and a fair
one, and providing it is protected from the abuse of those who would restore
`order`, then it might possibly be our last best chance for freedom.
- Going back to our small group here in Denmark, there
are those with grave doubts about our aligning ourselves with the `A'chists`,
as images of `mad bombers` persist, even though all evidence is to the
contrary. Having spent some weeks reading various essays on the subject,
I will summarise my own impressions in the following Paragraphs.
- The Quest For A Free Society and World?
- "When we read or hear about Anarchists, we are led
to believe that they are mad bombers. The myth is perpetuated that they
believe in violence for the sake of it. The other myth is that Anarchism
is chaos. This idea is propagated by politicians, bosses and their `puppets`in
the media, stating that if there was no government there would be chaos.
But did you ever wonder about society today and come to the conclusion
that perhaps we are already living in chaos?" Anarchismo
- We who are familiar with researching the machinations
of the Illuminati and their `fellow travellers` are more than aware of
what the aims of our `manipulators` are. But so it seems are the Anarchists,
who spell it out clearly. They say it more bluntly and perhaps more simplistically
than we do, but they have identified at least one major aspect of the Agenda; PROFIT! And
why not put it simply. If we want to get the message across to people generally
this is what we need to do, and the Anarchists understand this. They realise
that at the moment we live in a society in which there are two major classes
- the bosses and the workers. The bosses own the factories, banks, shops,
etc. The Workers don't. The only resource people have to bargain with is
their labour, with which they make their living. Workers are compelled
to sell their Labour to the boss for a wage. The boss is interested in
squeezing as much work out of the worker for as little remuneration as
possible so that he/she can maintain high profits. Thus the more wages
workers get the less profits the bosses make. Their interests are in total
opposition to each other. Production is not based on the needs of ordinary
people. Production is for profit. Therefore although there is enough food
in the world to feed everyone, people starve because profits come first.
This is called Capitalism.
- The State
- For the needs of people and the workers to be fully met,
the Anarchists maintain that we must get rid of the bosses. But this is
no easy task. The bosses are organised. They have the media, the police,
the army and the courts on their side. In effect, they have the full support
of the State, and all the resources that go with it. We are of speaking
about the merger of State and Corporate interests here, ie. Corporatism,
or as Mussolini put it; "FASCISM".
- The State (i.e. governments, armies, courts, police,
etc.) is a direct result of the fact that we live in a class society. A
world where the 225 richest people have a combined wealth equal to the
combined annual income of the world's 2.5 billion poorest people.
- The state is there to protect the interests of this minority,
if not by persuasion then by force. Laws are made not to protect us but
to protect those who own the property.
- The Lie That Is Democracy
- People in the west (and especially so here in Scandinavia)
have bought into the lie that the state is run in our interests. There
are elections to ensure that any government not behaving itself can
be brought to task? But of course, in truth, their democracy is about ticking
boxes. We are given a choice all right, but between parties who all agree
with the system of a tiny minority ruling the country. Check how many of
the leading politicians from whichever political party in your country,
are members of either the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commision, Council
For Foreign Relations or one of the plethora of similar organisations all
dedicated to the Globalist Agenda. Again, the Anarchists are in complete
agreement. They can see how `Electioneering` inevitably leads to people
forsaking their principles. These `political` men and women, perhaps initially
of good intention, go along with whatever is popular and ensures they are
elected. This becomes more important to them, than any idealogical motive.
It also means that they look on the mass of voters as mere spectators.
People are seen as voters, not as people who can be actually involved in
politics and bringing real positive change about. But as I have written
above, in the west, the populations, lured by the promise of instant credit
have just handed over all political responsibility to those who would enslave
- Real Freedom and political responsibility cannot come
through Parliamentary means. The Anarchsmo Website explains "If we
look at a country like Chile we can see why. In 1973 the people elected
a moderate socialist government led by President Allende. This democratically
elected government was toppled by a CIA backed military coup. Repression
followed in which the workers movement was smashed and thousands of militants
lost their lives".
- Central to the Anarchist is the belief that it is the
people who must make the revolution. In other words, take back responsibilty
for their own lives. Every member of the working class (workers, unemployed,
housewives, etc.) has a role to play. Only by this participation can it
be ensured that Anarchism is made real. They believe in a revolution that
comes from the bottom up, and is based on factory and community councils.
They maintain that Freedom cannot be given, it has to be taken. As each
week passes, and nothing changes. As the New World Order becomes more of
a reality, I have to agree with them. I cannot see how intellectual dissemination
of the `truth` alone will prevent our `prison` becoming a reality within
the next decade.
- Not Marxists, Anarchists
- Anarchists disagree with what is called the "revolutionary
left", who still hold to the belief that a Political Party is necessary
to make the revolution for the people. Marxist Socialists base their ideas
on Marx and Lenin who believed that workers were only capable of achieving
what they called "trade union consciousness". Both believed
that a party of professional revolutionaries was essential to make the
revolution for the people. What happened in Russia was nothing to do with
true socialism. Power remained in the hands of a tiny party elite. The
state was the boss and the workers were still exploited and told what to
do. Most familiar with the activities of `The Rothschilds` and Wall Street
around the time of the October Revolution will be aware that the so called
`Socialist Revolution` was financed by the very same people who were the
supposed `arch enemies` of Communism, namely the Capitalsts of Wall Street
and The City Of London.
- Making The New Society
- The Anarchists therefore maintain that it is up to ordinary
people to create the `New Society`. The question begs to be asked; "Would
it not be chaotic?" Who knows? But what would you call our current
world situation. The Freemasonic Motto `Out Of Chaos Order` is being well
applied by the `puppet masters` at present, as our world decends into their
manipulated economic chaos. This is clearly designed to provoke the people
into demanding `something must be done`, and then they can implement their
ready and waiting planned response. As things stand at the moment, Capitalism
would collapse without the support of the working class, who produce everything,
and therefore all the wealth. Like Icke, I agree as do the Anarchists that
it is possible to organise production so that the needs of all are met.
It is also possible to create structures that allow everyone to participate
in making the decisions that affect them.
- Anarchists propose that Society would be based on factory
and community councils. These would liase or `federate` with each other
so that decisions could be made covering large areas. Delegates could be
sent from each area and workplace. They would be accountable and `recallable`.
With the new technology now available, it would be much easier to involve
people in the decision making process. Within such a society there would
be genuine individual freedom. Individuals would have to contribute to
society but would be free to the extent that they do not interfere with
the freedom of others. Fundamentally Anarchists believe that people are
good and if they won freedom would not easily give it up or destroy it.
- Avoiding Previous Mistakes
- History is not neutral. What we learn in school is what
is necessary for the perpetuation of government, rulers and capitalism.
So called education is one of the major means by which we are controlled,
indoctrinated and deceived. What they do not teach us though is that throughout
history, it has been shown that organised government is not necessary.
People are not inherently bad. Given the right conditions a spirit of mutual
aid and co-operation can and will grow. The lessons of our past shows us
that Anarchist ideas can work. A new society can be forged with ordinary
people in control (the frontier pioneers in the US did very well without
government). The Anglo Saxon Tythings were devoid of heirarchical `government`
save the `Warlord` who was impotent without concensus, and the early English
communities operated by such concensus for almost a century and a
- But such a society won't happen spontaneously. It must
be planned, built and created. - We must organise for it. Still, many in
our small group here in Denmark cling to the belief that sometime soon,
a great awakening will occur amongst the people. This awakening, will then
as if by magic grow into a worldwide movement for peace and love and that
a whole new ideal will be born out of it. David Icke most certainly has
believed in and propagated this idea for almost twenty years. Icke is a
visionary. A great man, and one of the finest writers in his field. But
he not only has been proved to be wrong in this assertion, he is being
proved wrong right now as as I write, the Illuminati `Golden Boy` is being
sworn in as the 44th President of the United States. He will vow to
uphold the constitution in front of Billions of people, knowing full well
that he has no intention of doing so.
- There will be no spontaneous awakening. That is why the
Anarchists maintain and I have to agree with them, that we need revolutionary
organisation. An organisation that draws together all those fighting for
freedom and an end to tyranny. An organisation that gives us the chance
to exchange ideas, experiences, and to learn from the lessons of history.
An organisation that facilitates our struggle together for a new society.
An organisation that sets aside petty differences and pseudo intellectual
ideologies and as Henry Makow put's it, "Focuses on what we have in
- We do not need more`leaders` and their passive followers.
We do need an organisation working towards mobilising the masses of ordinary
people in the process of making the `revolution`. I conclude this call
for people to revolt, peacefully yet assertively, against the machinery
erected and fortified ever more each day to enslave them, with a paragraph
from the `RAK` (Anarchists Copenhagen) site which I feel explains very
well how a fair and free society could and should be constructed;
- "An anarchic society is in our opinion, overall,
a socially organized community of free people without state capitalism,
hierarchies and privileges. This community will be based on decentralized
organization and consensus decisions. This organization is our declared
goal. To achieve this goal we will use the funds and methods available
which are consistent with our position. Activism is not in itself enough
to create an anarchic society. It is important that we come together in
our common WANT and NEED, rather thatn what we share idealogically. It
is very important that members share this view and make no distinction
between individuals based on their ethnicity, gender, etc. and or ther
personal lifestyle orientation,religion, diet, etc.. The RAK (Anarchists
- David Icke : The Robot's Rebellion. Children Of The Matrix.
- Nikki Rappanna : What is The Hegelian Dialectic ?
- Please address comments to; firstname.lastname@example.org