- Letter from Michael James to the Oberstaatsanwalt (Senior
State Attorney) --- Letter from the Senior State Attorney confirming prior
refusal to prosecute at request of the Jews --- Philosophical objections
to historical narratives --- A victory for justice --- Jews reject Rachel
Corrie donation --- Acknowledgements and the current situation.
- Herrn Claude
- Konrad-Adenauer-Str. 20
- 60313 Frankfurt am Main
- Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 228014/08
- Bearbeiter: OSta Claude
- 20. Juli 2008
- Dear Senior State Attorney, Herrn Claude
- I thank you most kindly for your considered and edifying
reply, following that of State Attorney Frau Niesen, in regard to a polite
theological question I asked the ZJD (Central Council of Jews in Germany)
some months ago, and for this I am most appreciative.
- However, I still take umbrage at the ZJD's claim that
my question was motivated by "Volksverhetzung" -- "Incitement
of the masses (ostensibly against other races or ethnic groups)" --
and I ask myself why they have not apologised to me.
- I know that you are sufficiently conversant with these
matters, but I still feel impelled to set the record straight. I simply
posited an enquiry regarding biblical interpretation and mentioned a number
of genealogical facts that are permissible to utter, even in Germany. The
well-known truism that the six million number is based on a Kabbalistic
numerological interpretation of Leviticus, Chapter 25, Verse 10 was confirmed
and established by learned Rabbis throughout the centuries, including Rabbi
Moshe ben Maimon (Maimonides) and, most recently, by the religious Israel
historian and Haaretz journalist Tom Segev.
- "And thou shalt sanctify the fiftieth year, and
shalt proclaim remission to all the inhabitants of thy land: for it is
the year of jubilee. Every man shall return to his possession, and every
one shall go back to his former family." -- Lev. 25:10
- The Hebrew version:
- Please note that the Hebrew rendition is not accurately
transcribed in European translations, nor is it is published as such in
the form given in the Torah of the laity and would rarely be written as
such even in the Priestly Torah. Other renditions can be found in various
versions of the Remez and the Sod, both works of which deal with hidden
and esoteric meanings. However, notice the markings above and below each
- To the casual reader who does not understand Hebrew beyond
its fundamentals, or the way in which reversals and simple annotations
by Rabbis on just one single letter can change the entire structure and
meaning of a sentence, this verse in the Remez or Sod makes very little
sense. However, the symbolic calibration of this line in many Kabbalistic
versions of the Torah written in Hebrew does in fact change the entire
sense of the sentence to one that states: "The return to the land
will not occur until the Lord has been offered a holocaust [burnt offering]
of six million". (The wording differs in some versions of the Remez
and Sod, although not in the Midrash.) It is, of course a contrivance by
deft of hand.
- Every Jew who has had an intensive education in the Torah,
Talmud and Kabbalah knows this. My Jewish friends at school knew this.
My religious teacher knew this (and, by the way, I was top of my class
in Religious Instruction). However, neither Frau Knobloch nor Herr Kramer
of the ZJD seem to be in any way aware of this well-known theological fact,
which concerns me deeply because, being Jews, they should be in a position
to know. Why didn't they simply write to me and say, "Sorry, Mike.
We just have no idea. Why not teach us?"
- When I humbly ask someone a straightforward question,
I do not expect him or her to call out the National Guard and convene a
meeting of the United Nations Security Council. I simply expect a reply.
That is the English way; and contempt for my English education, English
cultural mores, English sceptical empiricism, and English sense of fair
play is something that can be construed as a form of racism. Perhaps Frau
Knobloch and Herr Kramer bear some kind of animosity toward English people.
What other reason could there be?
- To have originally accused me of the same (incitement
toward hatred of a particular race or ethnic group) appears to be premised
on their belief that I despise every member of their race, the Kazaks.
- Not only is this not true on the face of it -- I have
friends from all ethnic and racial commonalities -- it is intellectually
impossible to hate an entire race or ethnic group. The concept of "group
hatred" does not exist in traditional western jurisprudence, which
has always sought remedies for violation of personal rights by treating
plaintiffs and defendants as individuals. In most pre-EU nations (and still
today in the United States) this was the basis of tort (civil) and non-tort
(private) law. (I was also second in my class in Law, by the way).
- The reason for this was, sensibly, quite simple. It is
philosophically and psychologically impossible for a human being to hate
an entire kindred. One may be given to articulate such sentiments, whether
jokingly, in a moment of peer-group camaraderie, or as a generalisation
intended to make a simple point, but the human psyche is so neurologically
configured that it can only hold feelings of detestation against an individual,
and, even here, not against the individual as a whole, but only an aspect
or a trait of that individual's personality. This was ably demonstrated
by the psychologist Wilhelm Reich, famous for his prize-winning study "The
Mass Psychology of Fascism". No modern psychologist would ever testify
that it is within the scope of the human psyche to bear unremittingly the
emotional burden of hatred for an entire race.
- It is quite common these days to hear people say, "I
hate Turks," yet most, if not all, of them have Turkish friends and
dine with them in Turkish cafes. I, for instance, dislike fruit, vegetables
and grains because I have a digestive intolerance to cellulose, lactose
and gluten, but I love strawberries, which I can eat on occasion. Therefore,
it cannot really be said that I 'hate' all fruit, and I am certainly not
given to verbally insulting apples and oranges or physically abusing cartons
of milk whenever I visit the supermarket.
- The concept of Volksverhetzung was introduced into Soviet
law by Lenin in the early stages of the Bolshevik-Zionist revolution owing
to widespread resentment among the Russian people of the large number of
Zionist-Jews who ran the Politburo and headed the dreaded secret police,
the Cheka. It is therefore born of a communist mindset and is completely
alien to the idea of a modern "Rechtsstaat" (a state governed
by the Rule of Law). I was also the top of my class in history, incidentally.
- Laws against 'incitement and group or race hatred' are
therefore laws premised on the Bolshevik organisation of the state on the
basis of a hive mentality and have no place in a modern, liberal democracy,
or even our current "Scheindemokratie" (illusory democracy).
- These laws, as you know, were designed to reinforce a
particular narrative which requires the support of statutes (statutorily
enforced history), which must be seen in the perspective of solicitation
to perjury for those born after these events were reported to have taken
- No policeman would ever ask someone born in 1959 to stand
in the dock before a judge and swear on the Bible that he had witnessed
a crime that allegedly took place twenty years before he was born. Such
a policemen would surely find himself charged with corruption and the witness
would be incarcerated for perjury.
- Indeed, anyone who forces another person to affirm an
alleged crime he has not personally witnessed is guilty of incitement to
bear false witness, which is a felonious violation of both German law,
the law of Moses and the Law of God Almighty, Jesus Christ. (Aufwiegelung
zur Meineid, Aufwiegelung zur Gotteslästerung.)
- One of my earliest memories was as a child watching the
ceremonial funeral of the war criminal Winston Churchill on black and white
television. I'm almost sure I can say that he did indeed live and die,
but I cannot prove it, for I never met the man, nor did I attend his last
rites at his bedside. In my mind he is simply a story, a picture book narrative
of a man who played (or may have played) a role in the affairs of the world.
I'm inclined to believe that Churchill existed because the laws of cause
and effect indicate that he is one of the many dots that connect us to
our present time.
- I was born on 20 December 1959, but probably only became
intellectually aware of the world around me in a way I could commit to
memory and analytical comprehension at some point between 1961 and 1962.
Therefore, everything that "happened" in the world before 1962
is not true for me. It didn't "happen". It represents nothing
more than second-hand or third-party information transmitted by other people
whom I am told to "trust" or by the electronic media, history
books and newspapers fashioned by those who may sometimes try to be objective,
but either make mistakes or are subject to controllers whose aim is to
propagate a slanted version of reported "events".
- However, I can prove that I was the 1973 and 1974 champion
in the 800 and 1600-metre inter-school South Fylde Olympics, because I
was a witness to my own victory, have personal experiential memories of
the event and the gold medals to prove it. It may not be true for you and
you don't have to believe me (I won't sue you or send you to prison), but
I was there, crossed the line and wrote an additional line in my own personal
- Ever since the dawn of Sumerian civilisation, history
books have been re-written countless times to include new information or
exclude details that were proven false and based on fantastically colourful
myths. My Grammar School history teacher was an honorary professor of Oxford
University who taught me that, in contrast to mathematics, history is a
'moveable feast', meaning that it is always subject to review depending
upon the emergence of new data that comes to light. History is a work in
progress, and it is a book that will remain eternally under the editor's
- We now know that Christopher Columbus was not the first
European to set foot on North American soil. We know that William Wallace
never personally met Robert the Bruce. We now know, by the CIA's own recent
admission, that the 'Bay of Tonkin' incident never happened. We now know
that Marie Antoinette was falsely attributed by Rousseau to have said,
"Let them eat cake." She never said it.
- We now know that Sir Walter Raleigh did not introduce
potatoes to England (they originated in Italy). We now know that Nero did
not play the fiddle as Rome burned, for the fiddle was invented 1,600 years
later. We now know that the Dutchman Abel Tasman discovered Australia,
not Captain Cook. We now know that America gained her independence on 3
September 1783, not on 4 July 1776. We now know that Peyton Randolph was
the first president of the United States, not George Washington. We now
know that the ancient Gaels of Ireland developed Sanskrit and a prototype
of the Hebrew language.
- We now know, thanks to DNA scientists, that the Palestinians
were the original Children of Israel and never left the Land of their Fathers.
We now know that, for all but a minority of the Palestinian Sephardim,
the "Diaspora" is largely a myth created by a people who originated
north of Kazakhstan, converted to Judaism centuries later and then migrated
to Eastern Europe.
- We now know that the world is not flat.
- Why do we now know all these things? Because men and
women asked questions. Incredible, isn't it?
- In England, children are taught: Believe nothing you
hear, only half of what you read and question everything. This is life-saving,
good old fashioned British advice, and I observe it daily. It is an integral
part of my cultural upbringing and is as essential to my being as the very
heart that pumps blood through my veins.
- To recapitulate: No matter what "happened"
before the development of my intellectual facilities in 1962, it didn't
happen. The "world" for me did not exist before 20 December 1959,
and it did not become "real" to me until some point in 1962.
From my perspective, all events prior to 1962 do not constitute history,
simply stories told to me by strangers with unknown motives. Novels and
poetry. A fantasy matrix of moving pictures and scripted political drama.
The Twilight Zone of a world in which video killed the radio star. Bubbles
in my bathtub.
- In a society where intellectual and historical enquiry
is punishable by law, it cannot be said that we are living in either a
democracy or a Rechtsstaat. It is a selective oligarchy that ring-fences
individuals into preferential and non-preferential groups by means of social
engineering and is therefore, as was the case with the USSR and other Bolshevik
regimes, a dysfunctional administrative entity that will eventually implode
under the pressure of its own internal contradictions.
- As you are aware:
- "It remains the case that the German Reich [established
in 1871] survived the collapse of 1945 and did not cease to exist, neither
through capitulation nor the exercise of foreign power in Germany on the
part of the allies; it possesses today, as it always has, legal and judicial
sovereignty. The BRD (Federal Republic of Germany) is not the legal successor
of the German Reich."
- - Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court),
31 July 1973 (Urteile 2 Bvl.6/56; 2 BvF 1/73; 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE 2,266
(277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85) 126; 6, 309, 336 und 363).
- I understand that jurists are under enormous pressure
to square this impossible circle so that it does not become known that
the European Union, by virtue of every treaty signed by the unconstitutional
BRD, is an illegal political construct. When the people of Germany, Britain,
Ireland, Austria, Poland, Italy, France and all other members of the European
Soviet of Zionist States became fully conversant with the truth, there
will follow a period of upheaval in Europe and a return to natural nation-state
democracy. I guarantee it. Because I'm the messenger.
- However, following the reinstitution of the German Reich
in the coming years, whereupon civil servants will be required to reapply
for their positions, please be assured, that since you and State Attorney
Niesen have handled my case with a measurable degree of equanimity, I shall
ensure that the newly-empowered authorities will receive from me personal
letters of commendation that speak very highly of you.
- In addition to my work as a creative writer and editor,
I work very hard for Germany by helping to promote the export of German
goods by means of brochure journalism. Sadly, although you have rejected
the Jews' charges against me and left me free to explore this beautiful
country at will, I am now giving some thought to leaving Germany once I
can afford resettlement outside of the European Soviet Union because I
cannot live in a state that tells me what I can and cannot think and say,
for such prohibitions actually make me feel physically sick to the bottom
of my stomach.
- You cannot imagine how sad this makes me feel, for I
truly love this country and the German people, all of whom have been betrayed
by oafishly incompetent, self-serving politicians who should be stacking
shelves in supermarkets and greedy, money-grubbing lobbyists in Berlin.
- It also angers and grieves me that the ZJD, in common
with the Israeli government and their other sister agencies, have refused
to meet the donation for personal damages amounting to 10,000 euros to
the Rachel Corrie Fund. I encourage you to learn more about this heroic,
beautiful and intelligent young American woman, whose life was wilfully
and maliciously crushed out of her by an Israeli bulldozer as she attempted
to prevent the destruction of the homes and lives of Palestinian farmers
(the genetic descendants of the Children of Israel).
- Despite all the contention of the past few months, I
thank you and State Attorney Frau Niesen for your intuitive understanding
of equitable justice and sense of fair play.
- May you walk in peace with God Almighty, Jesus Christ.
- Yours faithfully
- Michael James
- Letter from the Senior State Attorney to Michael James
- Staatsanwaltschaft b. d. LG 60256 Frankfurt am
- Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 228014/08
- Bearbeiter: OSta Claude
- Durchwahl: 60 78
- Fax: 6285
- Konrad-Adenauer- Str. 20
- 60313 Frankfurt am Main
- Telefon: (069) 1367 01
- Telefax: (069) 1367 2100
- Auf die Strafanazeige
- des Michael James in Friedrichsdorf vom 13.6.2008
- gegen Verantwortliche des Zentralrats der Juden in Deutschland
- wegen Vorwurfs der Volksverhetzung pp
- wird die Einleitung eines Ermittlungsverfahrens abgelehnt
(§ 152 Absatz 2 i. V. m. § 170 Absatz 2 der Strafprozessordnung).
- Aus der Strafanzeige ergeben sich keine zureichenden
tatsächlichen Anhaltspunkte für eine Straftat.
- Die Angezeigten haben den Anzeigeerstatter -- völlig
zu recht -- wegen Verdachts der Volksverhetzung angezeigt (6111 Js 222524/08).
Seine offenbar damit zusammenhängende Strafanzeige enthält nichts,
was einen Anfangsverdacht für ein strafbares Verhalten der Angezeigten
- GESTEMPELT / Beglaubigt / Laudage / Justizangestellte
- Acknowledgements and the current situation:
- Let me first apologise to all my readers who have sent
me heaps of supportive e-mail and letters by permission of my online editors.
I have spent the best part of the last three weeks immersed in German law
books and am concurrently suffering from a form of gastric influenza in
addition to a prolonged bout of CFS. I have not forgotten you. You are
- My very special thanks go out to Ingrid Zundel who not
only sent me a very generous "Nachschub" with which to nourish
my ailing constitution, but also Ernst's latest book recounting his ordeal
in Mannheim ("Setting the Record Straight") and an excellent
DVD ("The Ernst Zundel Saga"), both of which I must eventually
stow away in a safe place lest the authorities decide to raid my apartment
for forbidden literature. Ingrid was also kind enough to give me a special
write-up in her newsletters. I would also like to take this opportunity
to tell Ingrid that I shall complete the assignment given to me once I
have cleared my present backlog and regained a modicum of health, although
some special 'advice' will follow per e-mail (the @bellsouth address bounces
my mails, by the way). Please be patient, Ingrid. I love you.
- Ronnie Lambert, a fellow Geordie and superb musician
and singer for the band "Busker", was also kind enough to send
me a CD of his latest album "Geordieland". This is what I call
real music, straight from the heart, real and raw like you've never heard
before. Ronnie suffers from crippling pain owing to his past work as a
man who made a real contribution to society by helping to build homes.
Please visit his website <http://www.geordiesongs.com>http://www.geordiesongs.com
and order the best music you'll ever hear this side of the Great Wall of
China. I'll be writing to you shortly, Ronnie. May God bless you.
- I must also extend my appreciation to Fredrick Töben
from the Adelaide Institute in Australia, who phoned me twice with messages
of support and e-mailed me some extra courage. I am also the lucky recipient
of a wealth of newsletters and updates he sent me, kindly mentioning my
efforts and mobilising moral support.
- As ever, my soul brother, Holger Haffke, of <http://gnosticliberationfront.com>http://gnosticliberationfront.com
was there as the Good Samaritan to carry some of the weight of my heaviest
downers, and my Christian Orthodox friend Brother Nathanael Kapner took
a massive hit on his phone bill by phoning me thrice from New York to tell
me that he was praying for me and that we would defeat Satanic Zionism
with the power of the Cross.
- So where do I go from here? First I must rest a while
and clear my desk to pay the bills. Then I will pick another fight with
the Dark Powers of International Zionism, perhaps more wisely and with
a better game plan in mind.
- As for leaving Germany, I have agonized over this option
for the best part of two years. But there is something that keeps me here.
- Over the last 16 years I have seen the German people
slowly lose their sense of purpose, their courage, their pride and their
dignity. I have watched these descendants of the fearsome Teutonic warriors
who once scattered entire legions of the Roman Empire and defended the
gates of Europe against a formidable Mongol invasion shrug their shoulders
in nonchalant resignation with the passage of every nation-destroying statute
and anti-German ordinance handed down by the parasitic Zionist elites in
- Most of them have lost the will to fight. But I haven't,
and I never will. I shall show them once more how to fight, and how to
win. For I am reminded of an old paraphrased Jewish proverb:
- "If not me, then who? If not now, then when?"
- Mike James, an Englishman, is a former freelance journalist
resident in Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East
Africa, Poland and Switzerland.