- To the truthers, "building 7" the third
building in the World Trade Center complex to collapse on September 11
is evidence that the mainstream media is in on the plot. On that
day, the BBC reported the building's fall almost half an hour before it
happened. Journalist Jane Standley was broadcast at 4.54pm eastern time
reporting that the tower had collapsed but in the background, it
was still standing.
- It fell 26 minutes later, seven hours after the Twin
Towers came down.
- When the Standley clip hit YouTube, truthers bombarded
the BBC's website with questions and accusations. Richard Porter, head
of BBC world news, was forced to deny that the broadcaster was reading
from the Bush conspirators' script. He said the BBC had misreported warnings
from fire crews of the building's imminent collapse and instead stated
that it had already happened. He blamed the confusion of the day for the
mix-up. CNN had earlier reported rumours that a third building had either
collapsed or was about to.
- But in the minds of the truthers, this explanation was
undermined by Porter's admission that the BBC no longer had the original
tapes of its coverage.
- Building 7 is the truthers' smoking gun for other reasons,
too. How, they ask, could this modern, steel-framed skyscraper collapse
merely because of fire, without even being hit by an airliner?
- The 47-storey WTC7 fell straight down, at almost free-fall
speed, largely into its own footprint: all the hallmarks, the sceptics
say, of a controlled demolition. Building 7 had some fascinating tenants.
- The main occupant was Salomon Brothers, the bank, but
on floors nine and 10 was the secret service. On the three floors above
that was the Securities and Exchange Commission. The New York Times reported
that the building also housed a secret office operated by the CIA dedicated
to spying on and recruiting foreign diplomats based at the United Nations.
The station's loss had "seriously disrupted" intelligence operations,
- The CIA shared a floor with an office of the Defence
Department and the Internal Revenue Service.
- The collapse of the building also wiped out the operations
centre of New York City's Office of Emergency Management on floor 23, throwing
the response that day into further mayhem.
- Truthers have focused on a comment on the afternoon of
September 11 by Larry Silverstein, the building's owner, to a fire department
commander: he said they should "pull" the building after a faulty
sprinkler system left fires to rage all day. "Pull", the sceptics
claim, is industry jargon for demolish. Debunking911.com points out that
the term actually refers to pulling one building away from another with
cables. Silverstein's spokesman later said that Silverstein told the fire
chief that the most important thing was to protect the lives of the firefighters,
including pulling them out of the building if necessary.
- The US National Institute of Standards and Technology
began investigating the collapse of building 7 along with the Twin Towers
in 2002, but hived the inquiry off into a separate probe, which will not
report until August. This fuelled suspicion that officials were struggling
to come up with a plausible line of obfuscation. NIST says progress has
been slowed by the complexity of the computer model it is using, which
simulates the collapse from the moment it begins all the way to the ground.
Another 80 boxes of documents related to WTC7 have also been found and
need to be analysed, it says.
- NIST's working hypothesis is that fire and/or flaming
debris from the collapsing north tower (which left a long gash in building
7's south face) damaged a critical column which supported a 2,000 sq ft
floor bay. The remaining floor bays were unable to redistribute the loads,
and the whole structure came down on itself. The fact that the collapse
was triggered by an internal failure would explain the appearance of a
controlled demolition with a small field of debris left behind.
- The influence of the truthers can be found in this line
from a 2004 progress report: "While NIST has found no evidence of
a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the
magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural
failure of one or more elements."
- The BBC, meanwhile, has yet to persuade some of its critics.
It had wanted to film the 9/11TruthLA seminar at the Immanuel Presbyterian
Church in Los Angeles but was barred by the organisers, who cited building
The Financial Times Limited 2008