|
- Note the first line of text under the credits:
- NEW LINE CINEMA presents in Association with LEVEL 1
ENTERTAINMENT An ANONYMOUS CONTENT production
-
- Have you got the idea who flipped the tab for this box
office money loser from these names? If this is Level 1 Entertainment,
can we imagine what Level 2 is? Is Level 2 about the rack? Flogging? Americans
in POW camps... in America?
-
- So who is the "Anonymous Content" production
company? This company name fits right with the CIA named/owned "Air
America" from the Vietnam War days. Can't Uncle employ someone who
can dream up a production company name which is a little less obvious?
-
- Anonymous Content's history dates back to some ten films
only one year to 2006. It has produced films with Warner, Universal and
Paramount. Rendition is the first time this production company paired up
with New Line Cinema. They are releasing another new film in 2008. [4]
-
- There is also the possibility that Uncle wants to see
if someone detects this mind game being played, too. Uncle employs batteries
of psychologists who do nothing but cook up new ways to manipulate the
public mind and play mind games.
-
- Imagine who also funded, owned and operated the WW2 propaganda
machine known as "Movie Tone News." This sort of thing has been
going on since movies first came out. The US, England, Hitler and many
countries have all done this.
-
- Rendition is all about making the public accustomed to
nasty, Uncle- authorized interrogation tricks such as being strung up,
water- boarded, electrical shock and being shoved into a cramped, filthy
dark cell called "the hole." (They did leave out relentless beatings,
chemical burns and drug injections for some strange reason. Probably some
of that will be in another film like it.) And no, Zell wasn't there holding
a dental tool asking "Is it safe?" But he could have been.
-
- This certainly won't be the last film produced by Uncle's
propaganda department. Think about what WAS censored in the past, like
a simple kiss on film. Censorship today is almost non- existent, which
is the perfect environment for propaganda.
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
- www.data4science.net
- tedtw@frontiernet.net
-
- [1] http://www.renditionmovie.com/
- [2] http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/movies.php?id=3349
- [3] Film poster: http://www.movieweb.com/movies/film/31/4531/
poster1.php
- [4] http://www.themovieinsider.com/prod-company/anonymous-content/
-
-
-
- Comment
-
- I just read a review and commentary on Rendition on Rense.com
at
- http://rense.com/general78/propa.htm
-
- and it seemed that the writer is on a different planet
calling it a CIA production.
- His accurate point was that there is hardly anyone in
the theater and thus this itself speaks against his proposition.
-
- The fact is that the movie in one sentence by streep
is a testimonial that when Bush says we don't torture we do. Today I noted
one commentator playing up this central point from the movie.
-
- If this is a CIA production, then the CIA has produced
an effective effort against Bush's denial that the US tortures. No wonder
the NWO media has hidden this movie as a loser.
- What the movie lacks is action but offers you the resources
to THINK. That has made it an economic loser from the starting gate. Perhaps
one day when people look to THINK again, the movie will receive the greater
attention. However, the review on Rense.com ready surprised me.
- From Ted Twietmeyer
- 11-3-7
-
- Re: http://www.rense.com/general78/hsll.htm
-
- 'Rendition' FILM REVIEWER IS NOT FROM ANOTHER PLANET
-
- I am the writer of the rense.com article which reviewed
the film "Rendition." And I stand by every word of it.
-
- As a defense contractor for more than 20 years.
and having worked with almost every part of the DoD in the government,
I write from experience. It gives one true insight into how Uncle
(the government) thinks. Sorting truth from the BS on the web is not
a trivial matter. I rarely write rebuttals to criticisms, as doing
so is usually a waste of time.
-
- I'll first state I am from Earth like you and
not from a another planet, even if my views differ from your views or anyone
else's. Some films portray Uncle accurately while some do not. Rendition
makes a serious effort to get mainstream America thinking about torture.
It tries very hard to sell the idea as a necessary evil. The film "Enemy
of the State" was a fairly accurate portrayal of current spy
capabilities. Some wish list technology including a tracking device
that worked in a sewer pipe, and 3D re-construction of a paper bag's contents where
no real 3D data existed to perform a re-construction. Other actions in
the film such as instant re-tasking of a spy satellite are not possible,
even today. Like most movies Uncle is involved in (or provides consultants
for) there are usually elements in these films which are still on
Uncle's wish lists. But we must keep all movies in perspective, because
this is big business. Film companies and studios exist only to make
a profit. Exceptions to this could be companies like Level 1 Entertainment
and Anonymous Productions.
-
- Rendition on the other hand, portrays everything which is
easily accomplished today. It will eventually appear on the pay-per-view
TV market, followed by the movie channels/DVD, and finally appear on free
television. This will spread it's message "torture-is-needed"
everywhere into the mainstream.
-
- It wouldn't surprise me to see this film on the ABC Family
Channel. After all we have to get the children thinking "torture is
good," too.
-
- My movie review simply summarized facts and observations,
with only a small commentary from myself. Everything I've ever written
(including my book) lets the reader to decide for themselves. ALL
my writings are intended to get people THINKING
- which is also something you mentioned. It's good we're
both on the same wavelength with that.
-
- Based on hundreds of email responses, it appears most
of what I've written does fulfill that purpose. Contrary to what some readers
think, I am not on Uncle's payroll (nor have I ever been his employee)
and no longer do contracts for DoD systems. I have never had a handler
at any time. ("Handler" is a term used by intelligence agencies
as a job title for a field agent's direct supervisor.) If I had a
handler, all of what I've written would have never been allowed.
My work clearly doesn't support Uncle's agenda, but goes against it. I'm
sure people have told you that you have a handler, too. I do not know that
answer to that.
-
- My real name and real email address are never hidden.
When I began to write articles for rense.com a few years ago, a decision
had to be made as to use a hidden email address and a pen name or my real
name. In other words, would I become a blogger? There is no extra
time for me to waste jumping around websites and typing meaningless
text. This is something others can do better than myself. Since I'm
employed full time and also a caregiver, writing is not considered trivial for
my small amount of spare time. Deciding to use my real email and name did
not take long once logic was applied. How could any of my work be considered
credible if I hid my real identity, and did not give people a way to contact
me? Most of my writings are about freedom. Once we lose what's left of
freedom, we've lost everything.
-
- Those who have taken the time to write me are usually
highly intelligent and well read. There are the occasional cranks, but
these constitute less than 1% of the email received. Cranks have their
own agenda, and usually hide their identity with strange user names and
anonymous email addresses using email services like hotmail.
-
- Intelligent and informed readers have also written
me about my review of the film Rendition. They clearly agree as to
its purpose and who produced it.
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
- www.data4science.net
-
|
