- Hi, Alan.
-
- What do you make of this latest spin? I suppose the goal
now is to make people think the virus came from "deepest, darkest
Haiti" not "deepest, darkest Africa." Or was the virus released
in Haiti before the U.S. or Africa, and the idea is to make people think
it originated in Haiti? Is Gottlieb part of the plot?
-
- From the Los Angeles Times
-
- Study Shows AIDS Came To The US Via Haiti
-
- By Jia-Rui Chong
- Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
- October 29, 2007
-
- A genetic analysis of 25-year-old blood samples has outlined
a new map of the AIDS virus' journey out of Africa, showing that today's
most widespread subtype first emerged in Haiti in the 1960s and arrived
in the U.S. a few years later.
-
- The analysis fills in a gap in the history of the virus,
whose migration has been known in only a sketchy form from its origin in
Africa in the 1930s to its first detection in Los Angeles in 1981.
-
- Dr. Michael Gottlieb, an assistant clinical professor
of medicine at UCLA and one of the original discoverers of AIDS, said the
analysis placed the virus in the U.S. nearly a decade earlier than previously
believed.
-
- "It's pretty clear evidence for Haiti as a steppingstone,"
he said. "The suggestion that the infection was further below our
radar than I'd previously suspected is kind of unnerving."
-
- The analysis, published today in the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, focused on a variety of HIV known as subtype
B, which is the most prevalent form in most countries outside of Africa.
-
- Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University
of Arizona and senior author of the study, analyzed five blood samples
collected in 1982 and 1983 from Haitian AIDS patients in Miami. The samples
had been stored in a freezer by the national Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
-
- Worobey and colleagues looked at two viral genes and
compared their sequences with virus samples from around the world.
-
- As a baseline, the used virus samples from Central Africa
that are considered some of the earliest forms of HIV.
-
- Because viruses are constantly mutating, the researchers
could construct a rough timeline of development by measuring how much the
genes in later samples had drifted away from their ancestral forms.
-
- The team found that the Haitian samples were genetically
the most closely related to the African virus, indicating that they were
the earliest to branch off.
-
- Statistically, the researchers found a 99.7% certainty
that HIV subtype B originated in Haiti as opposed to elsewhere, Worobey
said.
-
- Worobey surmised that the virus was brought to Haiti
by workers who had gone to the Democratic Republic of Congo, formerly known
as Zaire, after the country became independent in 1960.
-
- The virus appears to have been carried to the U.S. by
Haitian immigrants sometime between 1966 and 1972, according to the mutation
timeline.
-
- Researchers have debated for years whether the U.S. epidemic
came directly from Africa or through Haiti.
-
- They have also debated whether people from the U.S. exported
the virus to Haiti via a sex tourism trade that flourished in the late
1970s and early 1980s. Worobey said the latest study did "a good job
of settling the debate.... This shows quite clearly that the data is really
only consistent with a Haiti-first origin."
-
- Dr. Beatrice Hahn, a virologist at the University of
Alabama at Birmingham who was not involved in the study, said, "I
think these calculations are as good as the currently available methods
allow."
-
- She cautioned against blaming Haitians or Central Africans
for spreading the AIDS epidemic.
-
- "These viruses are fairly clever and they have to
survive," she said. "They will find niches.... You realize chance
events play a very important role."
-
-
-
- From: Alan Cantwell <alancantwell@sbcglobal.net
- Date: October 29, 2007 5:07:17 PM PDT
- Subject: New AIDS origin story - AIDS came to the US
via HAITI?
-
- Hi Scott -
-
- This LA TIMES story (below) did NOT appear in my print
copy of today's (10/29/07) Los Angeles Times. I checked -- and it does
appear at -- www.latimes.com
-
- After almost 30 years - -the media are now presenting
us with a "new version" of how HIV/AIDS came to the US.
-
- Of course, there was NEVER any evidence to show that
AIDS came to the US from Africa in the first place -- and now we are supposed
to believe American AIDS came via Haiti.
-
- Please note that there was NEVER any incubation period
for HIV in the US -- there was NEVER any stored blood that was HIV-positive
EXCEPT for the blood donated by gay men in the hepatitis B experiment (1978-1981)
. By 1981 over 20% of the men in the experiment were HIV-positive -- by
1984, over 40% were positive -- read my book QUEER BLOOD, page 28.
-
- If Haiti was the "origin" of HIV-AIDS -- how
come there were no proven Haitian AIDS cases until the early 1980s?? And
how come BLACKS -- instead of WHITES were not among the first victims of
AIDS in the US.
-
- The media and the government officials will propose all
these various theories -- and expect us to believe them --- ALL EXCEPT
the most obvious theory of all --- and that is that AIDS is a man- made
disease.
-
- For evidence of this -- Google: Man-made AIDS
-
- Finally, the TIMES expects us to believe that HIV was
"incubating" in America during the 60s and 70s -- BUT THERE WERE
NO AIDS CASES!!!
-
- My God, "they" MUST THINK we are all STUPID!
Is there no end to the fairy tales of AIDS origin??
-
- Stay tuned,
-
- ALAN
-
-
-
-
-
- In view of the latest current "theory" being
promoted that AIDS in America came from Haiti (instead of Africa???????????)
-- You might be interested in the evidence for the suppressed theory that
AIDS/HIV is a man-made epidemic and a covert genocide program.
-
- Some of the evidence for man-made AIDS is contained in
a recent interview by John LeKay.
-
- The interview can be found at:
-
- http://heyokamagazine.com/HEYOKA.9.AlanCantwell.2.htm
-
- Please pass onto interested parties.
-
- Regards,
- ALAN
-
-
-
-
-
- Alan Cantwell M.D.
-
- alancantwell@sbcglobal.net
- http://www.ariesrisingpress.com
- author of, THE CANCER MICROBE
- and FOUR WOMEN AGAINST CANCER
-
-
- The following article appeared in New Dawn No. 66 (May-June
2001)
-
- AIDS: Who is to Blame?
-
- Are species-jumping animal virus experiments responsible
for the HIV Holocaust?
-
- By Alan Cantwell, Jr, M.D.
-
- Since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic there have been
persistent rumours that the disease was man-made, and that HIV was deliberately
"introduced" into the American gay and the African black populations
as a germ warfare experiment. This so-called conspiracy theory was quickly
squelched by virologists and molecular biologists, who blamed primates
in the African bush and human sexuality for the introduction and spread
of HIV.
-
- In the fall of 1986 the Soviets shocked the world by
claiming that HIV was secretly developed at Fort Detrick, the US Army's
biological warfare unit. Although the claim was dismissed as "infectious
propaganda", Russian scientists had worked hand in hand with biological
warfare scientists in the transfer of viruses and virus-infected tissue
into various non-human primates (monkeys, apes, chimps) during the 1970s
before AIDS appeared. With improved international relationships, the Russian
accusation vanished.
-
- Although evidence supporting the man-made theory has
never been mentioned in the major US media, the theory continues to be
ridiculed. For example, in the San Francisco Chronicle, ("Quest for
the Origin of AIDS", January 14, 2001), William Carlsen writes: "In
the early years of the AIDS epidemic, theories attempting to explain the
origin of the disease ranged from the comic to the bizarre: a deadly germ
escaped from a secret CIA laboratory; God sent the plague down to punish
homosexuals and drug addicts; it came from outer space, riding on the tail
of a comet."
-
- AIDS certainly did not come from the hand of God or outer
space. However, there is ample evidence to suspect the hand of man in the
outbreak of AIDS that first began in the late 1970s in New York City.
-
- Creating AIDS in Animals Before the Epidemic
-
- Lost in the history of AIDS is evidence pointing to HIV
as a virus whose origin traces back to animal cancer retrovirus experimentation
in the "pre-AIDS" years of the 1960s and 70s. Evidence linking
the introduction of HIV into gays and blacks via vaccine experiments and
programs in the late 1970s has been totally ignored in favour of the politically
correct theory claiming that HIV originated in chimpanzees in the African
rain forest, and that HIV "jumped species" into the African population
around 1930 or even earlier.
-
- Conveniently overlooked is the series of outbreaks of
AIDS-like epidemics that broke out in US primate centres, beginning in
1969. A decade before AIDS, the first of five recorded epidemics of "simian
AIDS" erupted in a colony of stump-tailed macaques housed in a primate
lab at Davis, California. Most of the macaques died. Two types of primate
immunodeficiency viruses were eventually discovered as the cause. A few
silently infected monkeys transferred to the primate colony at Yerkes in
Atlanta subsequently died of simian AIDS in the late 1980s. Veterinarians
claim the origin of the simian AIDS outbreak is unknown. However, one obvious
possibility is the experimental transfer of viruses between various primate
species, which is common practice in animal laboratories.
-
- In 1974 veterinarians actually created an AIDS-like disease
when newborn chimps were removed from their mothers and weaned exclusively
on virus-infected milk from cows infected with "bovine C-type virus."
Within a year the chimps died of leukemia and pneumocystis pneumonia (the
"gay pneumonia" of AIDS). Both diseases had never been observed
in chimps before this virus-transfer experiment.
-
- Also downplayed is the laboratory creation of feline
leukemia and "cat AIDS" by the transfer of HIV-like cat retroviruses
in the mid-1970s. These experiments were conducted at Harvard by Myron
(Max) Essex, later to become a famous AIDS researcher. All this man-made
creation of AIDS in laboratory animals directly preceded the "mysterious"
1979 introduction of HIV into gay men, the most hated minority in America.
-
- Nowadays, scientists hunt for "ancestor" viruses
of HIV in chimps in the African wild and ignore all the immunosuppressive
viruses that were created in virus laboratories shortly before AIDS. No
consideration is given to any of these lab viruses as possible man-made
ancestors of the many "strains" of HIV (and HIV-2) that jumped
species to produce AIDS in humans.
-
- The Gay Experiments that Preceded AIDS (1978-1981)
-
- Scientists also discount any connection between the official
outbreak of AIDS in 1981 and the experimental hepatitis B vaccine program
(1978-1981) at the New York Blood Centre in Manhattan that used gays as
guinea pigs shortly before the epidemic. Curiously, the exact origin of
AIDS in the United States remains unstudied. Health authorities simply
blame promiscuous gay men, but never adequately explain how a black heterosexual
African disease could have transformed itself exclusively into a white
young gay male disease in Manhattan.
-
- Researchers claim HIV incubated in Africa for more than
a half century until AIDS broke out there in 1982. However, in the US there
was no incubation period for gay men. As soon as homosexuals signed up
as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments,
they began to die with a strange virus of unknown origin. The hepatitis
B experiments began in Manhattan in the fall of 1978; the first few cases
of AIDS (all young gays from Manhattan) were reported to the CDC in 1979.
-
- Scientists have also failed to explain how a brand new
herpes virus was also introduced exclusively into gays, along with HIV,
in the late 1970s. This herpes virus is now believed to be the cause of
Kaposi's sarcoma, the so-called "gay cancer" of AIDS. Before
AIDS, Kaposi's sarcoma was never seen in healthy young men. Identified
a decade after HIV, in 1994, this KS virus is closely related to a primate
cancer-causing herpes virus extensively studied and transferred in animal
laboratories in the decade before AIDS.
-
- Also downplayed to the public is a new microbe (Mycoplasma
penetrans), also of unknown origin, that was introduced into homosexuals,
along with HIV and the new herpes virus. Thus, not one but three new infectious
agents were inexplicably transferred into the gay population at the start
of the epidemic (HIV, the herpes KS virus, and M. penetrans).
-
- In his book, Virus [2000], Luc Montagnier (the French
virologist who co-discovered HIV) blames promiscuous American gay tourists
for bringing this new mycoplasma to Africa, and for bringing back HIV.
He provides no evidence for this homophobic theory. Nor does he mention
the various mycoplasmas that were passed around in the 1970s in scientific
labs, and the fact that these microbes were frequent contaminants in virus
cultures and vaccines.
-
- Why are all these simultaneous introductions of new infectious
agents into gay men ignored by scientists? Surely a credible explanation
would be important in determining the origin of HIV and AIDS.
-
- Why are scientists so opposed to the man-made theory?
And why do they believe so passionately in the chimp theory? One explanation
might be that scientists don't want the public to know what happened to
the tens of thousands of imported primates who were held captive in laboratories
throughout the world in the decade before AIDS.
-
- The Forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1977)
-
- Rarely mentioned by AIDS scientists and media reporters
is the fact that surgeons have been transplanting chimpanzee parts (and
chimp viruses) into people for decades. When Keith Reemtsma died in June
2000, at age 74, he was hailed as a pioneer in cross-species organ transplants
(now known as xenotransplantation). By 1964 he had already placed six chimpanzee
kidneys into six patients. All his patients died, but eventually Reemtsma
succeeded in many successful human-to-human organ transplants.
-
- Much more likely to have spread primate (chimp and monkey)
viruses to human beings is the largely forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program
(SVCP). This research program was responsible for the development, the
production, the seeding, and the deployment of various animal cancer and
immunosuppressive AIDS-like viruses and retroviruses. These laboratory
created viruses were capable of inducing disease when transferred between
animal species and also when transplanted into human cells and tissue.
-
- The SVCP began in 1964 as a government-funded program
of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland. Originally
designed to study leukemia, the program was soon enlarged to study all
forms of cancer. The scope of the program was international and included
scientists from Japan, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel, and Africa.
The mission of the SVCP was to collect various human and animal cancers
from around the world and to grow large amounts of cancer-causing viruses.
As a result, thousands of litres of dangerous man-made viruses were adapted
to human cells and shipped around the world to various laboratories. The
annual reports of the SVCP contain proof that species jumping of animal
viruses was a common occurrence in labs a decade before AIDS.
-
- The SVCP gathered together the US's top virologists,
biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, and epidemiologists,
to determine the role of viruses and retroviruses in the production of
human cancer. Many of the most prestigious medical institutions were involved
in this program.
-
- Connected with the SVCP were the most famous future American
AIDS scientists, such as Robert Gallo (the co-discoverer of HIV), Max Essex
of "cat AIDS" fame, and Peter Duesberg, who claims HIV does not
cause AIDS. Gallo and Essex were also the first to promote the widely accepted
African green monkey theory of AIDS. This theory was proven erroneous as
far back as 1988, but was heavily circulated among AIDS educators and the
media until the theory was superseded by the chimp theory in the late 1990s.
-
- Biowarfare Research, Primate Research and the SVCP
-
- Also joining forces with the SVCP at the NCI were the
military's biological warfare researchers. On October 18, 1971, President
Richard Nixon announced that the army's biowarfare laboratories at nearby
Fort Detrick, Maryland, would be converted to cancer research. As part
of Nixon's so-called War on Cancer, the military biowarfare unit was retitled
the new Frederick Cancer Research Centre, and Litton Bionetics was named
as the military's prime contractor for this project.
-
- According to the 1971 SVPC annual report, the primary
task of the now jointly connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer
Research Centre was "the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-
causing) and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing
basis." Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged
African source of HIV) and "the successful propagation of significant
amounts of human candidate viruses." Candidate viruses were animal
or human viruses that might cause human cancers.
-
- For these experiments a steady supply of research animals
(monkeys, chimpanzees, mice, and cats) was necessary; and multiple breeding
colonies were established for the SVCP. Primates were shipped in from West
Africa and Asia for experimentation; and virus-infected animals were shipped
out to various labs worldwide.
-
- By 1971, a total of 2,274 primates had been inoculated
at Bionetics Research Laboratories, under contract to Fort Detrick. Over
1000 of these monkeys had already died or had been transferred to other
primate centres. (Some animals were eventually released back into the wild).
By the early 1970s, experimenters had transferred cancer-causing viruses
into several species of monkeys, and had also isolated a monkey virus (Herpesvirus
saimiri) that would have a close genetic relationship to the new Kaposi's
sarcoma herpes virus that produced the "gay cancer" of AIDS in
1979.
-
- In order to induce primates and other research animals
to acquire cancer, their immune system was deliberately suppressed by drugs,
radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances. The thymus gland
and/or the spleen were removed, and viruses were injected into newborn
animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were injected
with malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed.
-
- The US is the world's leading consumer of primates, and
55,000 are used yearly in medical research. Primates (especially newborn
and baby chimpanzees) are the most favoured lab animals because they are
similar biochemically and immunologically to human beings. Humans share
98.4% of their DNA with chimpanzees. Chimps were extensively used by SVCP
because there would be no official testing of "candidate" lab
viruses on humans.
-
- In the decade before AIDS, Gallo was a project officer
of a primate study contracted by Bionetics that pumped cancerous human
tissue, as well as a variety of chicken and monkey viruses, into newborn
macaques (a small species of monkey that carries a close relative of the
KS virus).
-
- Recorded in the 1971 SVCP report (NIH-71-2025), Gallo's
project notes state: "Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity
of candidate human viruses will not be tested in the human species, it
is imperative that another system be developed for these determinations,
and subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measures of control.
The close phylogenetic relationship of the lower primates to man justifies
utilization of these animals for these purposes."
-
- Researchers at Bionetics injected human and animal cancer
material into various species of monkeys to determine the cancer effect.
Newborn and irradiated monkeys were injected with blood ("using multiple
sites and volumes as large as possible") taken from various forms
of human leukemia. In other studies, tissue cultures infected with various
animal viruses were inoculated into primates. How many "new"
and "emerging" viruses were created and adapted to human tissue
and to various primates is not known.
-
- Some primates were released back into the wild carrying
lab viruses with them. The possible spread of these lab viruses to other
animals in the wild has been ignored by scientists searching for the origin
of HIV and its close relatives in African animals.
-
- Cats were also bred for leukemia and sarcoma cancer studies.
Germ free colonies of inbred mice were established. Mouse cancer viruses
were manipulated to produce resistant and non-resistant strains. These
adapted viruses would be employed in the 1980s in human gene replacement
experiments. Such experiments utilised a weakened strain of the mouse leukemia
virus to infect and "taxi-in" the missing genes to genetically-defective
human beings.
-
- The End of the SVCP and the Birth of AIDS
-
- By 1977 the SVCP came to an inglorious end. According
to Gallo, "Scientifically, the problem was that no one could supply
clear evidence of any kind of human tumor virus, not even a DNA virus,
and most researchers refused to concede that viruses played any role in
human cancers. Politically, the Virus Cancer Program was vulnerable because
it attracted a great deal of money and attention and had failed to produce
dramatic, visible results."
-
- Despite all this, the SVCP was the birthplace of genetic
engineering, molecular biology, and the human genome project. More than
any other program it built up the field of animal retrovirology, which
led to the vital understanding of cancer and immunosuppressive retroviruses
in humans.
-
- As the SVCP was winding down, thousands of gay men were
signing up as guinea pigs in government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments
in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. These same cities would soon
become the three primary epicentres for the new "gay-related immune
deficiency syndrome," later known as AIDS.
-
- Two years after the termination of the SCVP, the introduction
of HIV into gay men (along with a herpes virus and a mycoplasma) miraculously
revived retroviral research and made Gallo the most famous scientist in
the world.
-
- Could virus-contaminated hepatitis vaccines lie at the
root of AIDS? In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed
in chimpanzees. To this day, some people are fearful about taking the hepatitis
B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS.
-
- Was HIV (and the KS herpes virus and a new mycoplasma)
introduced into gays during these vaccine trials when thousands of homosexuals
were injected in Manhattan beginning in 1978, and in the West Coast cities
in 1980-1981? As mentioned, the first gay AIDS cases erupted in Manhattan
a few months after the gay experiment began at the NY Blood Centre. When
a blood test for HIV became available in the mid-1980s, the Centre's stored
gay blood specimens were reexamined. Most astonishing is the statistically
significant fact that 20% of the gay men who volunteered for the hepatitis
B experiment in New York were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980 (a
year before the AIDS epidemic became "official" in 1981). This
signifies that Manhattan gays in 1980 had the highest incidence of HIV
anywhere in the world, including Africa, the supposed birthplace of HIV
and AIDS. And epidemic cases in Africa did not appear until 1982.
-
- Although denied by the AIDS establishment, a few researchers
are convinced that these vaccine experiments served as the vehicle through
which HIV was introduced into the gay population. My own extensive research
into the hepatitis B experiments is presented in AIDS and the Doctors of
Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic [1988], and in Queer
Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot [1993]. These books also debunk the
preposterous "Patient Zero" story of 1987, which claimed a promiscuous
gay Canadian airline steward brought AIDS to America. The highly implausible
story was sensationalised in the media and served to further obscure the
origin of AIDS in America and blame gay promiscuity. Even Montagnier is
doubtful that the US epidemic could have developed from a single patient.
-
- Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp theory is
the fact that the New York Blood Centre established a chimp virus laboratory
in West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian
Institute for Biomedical Research in Robertsfield, Liberia, was to develop
the hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. A few years later this vaccine was inoculated
into gays at the Centre. Chimps were captured from various parts of West
Africa and brought to VILAB. Alfred Prince, Head of Virology at the NY
Blood Centre, has been the director of VILAB for the past 25 years. The
lab prides itself by releasing "rehabilitated" chimps back into
the wild.
-
- Also closely allied with "pre-AIDS" development
of a hepatitis B vaccine is the little publicised primate colony outside
New York City called LEMSIP (the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and
Surgery). Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists
with primates and primate parts for transplantation and virus research.
-
- Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated with the New York
University Medical Centre, where the first cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's
sarcoma were discovered in 1979. Researchers at NYU Medical Centre were
also heavily involved in the development of the experimental hepatitis
B vaccine used in gays; and the Medical Centre received government grants
and contracts connected with biological warfare research beginning in 1969,
according to Leonard Horowitz, author of Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola
[1996].
-
- Scientific Disinformation and the 1959 HIV-Positive Blood
Test From Africa
-
- By predating HIV back to the 1930s, the chimp theory
effectively discredits the man-made theory of AIDS, which dates the introduction
of HIV to the late 1970s. Only time will tell whether the chimp theory
will hold up to further scientific scrutiny.
-
- Conspiracy theorists believe some wildly popular AIDS
origin stories in the press that reek of scientific disinformation. One
example is the Patient Zero story. Another is the media blitz surrounding
the English sailor who supposedly contracted AIDS in 1959. This now-disproven
story made worldwide headlines in 1990 and obviously served to contradict
the underground conspiracy theory (particularly among African-Americans)
that AIDS was man-made.
-
- The New York Times (July 24, 1990) declared: "The
case also refutes the widely publicized charges made by Soviet officials
several years ago that AIDS arose from a virus that had escaped from a
laboratory experiment that went awry or was a biological warfare agent.
The human retrovirus group to which the AIDS virus belongs was unknown
at the time. Nor did scientists then have the genetic engineering techniques
needed to create a virus." Several years later, the case was discovered
to be not a case of AIDS because the sailor's tissue remains were accidentally
(or deliberately) contaminated with HIV.
-
- In 1998 the media alerted the public to further evidence
that AIDS started in Africa. The proof consisted of an old 1959 stored
frozen blood specimen discovered to be HIV-positive. Researchers claimed
the tiny amount of serum contained fragments of HIV "closely related"
to a virus found in three chimpanzees in the African wild and in the frozen
remains of a chimp named Marilyn, discovered in a freezer at Fort Detrick.
-
- The 1959 specimen was obtained from a Bantu man living
in Kinshasa, the Congo. His name and health status were not recorded. Details
of the history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the "world's
oldest HIV-positive blood sample") are recorded in The River: A Journey
to the Source of HIV and AIDS [1999], by journalist Edward Hooper who theorises
that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine programs in
the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine was prepared using chimp
kidney cells contaminated with the ancestor virus of HIV.
-
- When tested for HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood
sample was the only specimen out of 700 stored frozen Congo bloods that
tested positive for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller
grant, the African sample was one of many sent to the University of Washington
in Seattle and used for genetic testing and included in a report, "Population
Genetic Studies," published in 1966. Around 1970, the remaining 672
frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta for further genetic
tests.
-
- In 1985 the specimens again changed hands, this time
for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias, a virologist and animal researcher associated
with the Yerkes Primate Centre at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested
along with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in sub-Saharan
Africa between the years 1959 and 1982. Initially over 90% of specimens
taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test. However, these
HIV-positive tests were later determined to be false-positive. After the
examinations at Emory, the specimens were shipped to Harvard University
in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex' lab.
-
- Three specimens initially tested HIV-positive, but finally
only the 1959 specimen from the unidentified Bantu man was confirmed HIV-positive.
Around the time of these examinations, Essex's lab was unknowingly contaminated
with primate viruses.
-
- In 1986, Essex discovered a new "human" AIDS
virus that later proved to be a contaminating monkey virus. The source
of the primate virus traced back to a captive monkey at a primate centre
in nearby Southborough, Massachusetts. This primate contamination at his
lab resulted in the erroneous green monkey theory, heavily popularised
by Gallo and the media.
-
- Also unpublicised is the little known fact that Gallo's
lab at the National Cancer Institute was plagued with contamination by
primate viruses. In 1975 he reported a new human "HL-23" virus
that eventually proved to be three contaminating ape primate viruses (gibbon-ape
virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims
he has no idea how these viruses contaminated his research.
-
- In 1996 Hooper convinced Nahmias to turn over the remaining
1959 specimen to David Ho of Rockefeller University in Manhattan for PCR
testing. In 1996 Ho was named Time magazine's "Man of the Year",
at a time when few people had ever heard of him. Ho is also the director
of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Centre, affiliated with Rockefeller
University since 1996. The Diamond Centre is also now connected with the
New York Blood Centre, home of the gay vaccine experiments that gave birth
to AIDS.
-
- Ho determined the tiny amount of the remaining specimen
did not contain live virus, nor was the complete virion of the virus present.
Instead, some fragments of the virus (about 15% of the total genome) were
tested and presented to the scientific world as the oldest specimen of
HIV in the world. Ho's PCR results cannot be confirmed by independent investigators
because the 1959 specimen is now totally used up.
-
- When published in the journal Nature on February 5, 1998
("An African HIV-1 sequence from 1959 and implications for the origin
of the epidemic"), Hooper's name appeared on the report, along with
Ho, Bette Korber, Nahmias, and others, The report was heavily publicised
as proof that HIV existed in the African population in 1959.
-
- Although there are no HIV-positive tissue specimens from
Africa from the 1960s and 1970s, and no proven cases of AIDS either, Hooper
relies heavily on this 1959 test to support his theory that HIV entered
the African population via the polio vaccines programs in the late 1950s.
-
- In The River Hooper quickly dismisses the claims of physician
Robert Strecker, the first whistle-blower of man-made AIDS, as well as
the research in Horowitz's Emerging Viruses, and in my own books, AIDS
& The Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood.
-
- In condemning AIDS biowarfare research, Hooper declares,
"Sadly, supporters of the Streckers have continued to peddle their
ill-informed and outdated versions of the myth, blaming variously the Soviets,
the CIA, the Germans, and the World Health Organisation (WHO) well into
the nineties." He dismisses the hepatitis B vaccine connection to
AIDS by noting that only two of the 826 gay vaccinees had developed AIDS
by 1983. Hooper ignores the fact that by 1981 over 20% of the men in the
trials were HIV-positive and that by 1982, over 30% of the men were HIV-positive.
He dismisses the World Health Organisation's African smallpox vaccine connection
by saying, "there is no reason for either HIV or SIV [simian immunodeficiency
virus] to be accidentally present in the vaccine." Hooper fails to
consider the possibility that the vaccines could have been deliberately
contaminated with HIV. Hooper has been a United Nations official, but no
details of this are included in his book.
-
|