- The UK paper that was the source for the original photos
seen by me changed the Internet posting after the time I extracted the
originally posted photos. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_
- The one photo with Henri Paul's eyes ablaze with the
strong light in his face and with Diana turned about in the back of the
car without any light on her (original photo seen) with TRJ also in diminished
light from the front shot pointed to the true focus of those involved in
the assassinations (Henri Paul). I received emails saying that the photos
received were the same as posted on the Internet etc. but here is the proof
- Example of original photo posted:
- Photo in same posting amended:
- Ehrlich: They added the numbers. Thus will this open
amendment the photos are openly expressed as amended and changed from the
original story. This new posting of the photos officially condoned the
expression that the photos are not the same as posted.
- Ehrlich: It is hard to beat the Moabites when they focus
their resources on cleaning up a mistake. They did it and obviously the
mistake in releasing that one photograph highlighting Henri Paul as the
target of the intense light with eyes ablaze and Diana not even in the
picture (in terms of the light) was something they agreed needed their
full attention. The photo as I saw it and posted it said a great deal.
- Ehrlich: The disturbing reality for me is that I know
for a fact that while this photo comes off the first email I sent that
this is not the photo I pasted into the email and sent. To compound this
embarrassing assertion is that you will see the same photo in your emails
BUT if you do not then YOU PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
- Ehrlich: First, again, for my sake, please see again
what I pointed out in a recent email that Diana's back of head is doctored
with, and also her body below the neck is missing seemingly covered by
TRJ. Again, please note a concurrent shot of her positioned looking back
but look at her hair and her body is visible as it would be with her head
here it is at.
- EHRLICH; IT DOES NOT MATTER -- REALLY BECAUSE NOW I CAN
RAISE THE NEW POINT THAT THE PHOTO ABOVE IS OPENLY AND APPARENTLY DOCTORED
AND THUS THE QUESTION ARISES WHY? THUS WITH THE INTENSITY OF THE LIGHT
ON HENRI PAUL RESTING MY CASE ON THE SECOND PHOTO BELOW, THEN THOSE INVOLVED
OBVIOUSLY MADE AN EFFORT TO HIGHLIGHT LOTS OF LIGHT ON THE BACK OF DIANA'S
HEAD AND THE QUESTION WHY THE NEED TO DOCTOR THE POINT?
- Ehrlich: Look at TRJ's head compared to the visor. The
right lower part is on direct line with his right eye. Now look at the
doctored photo and he if anything is shifted to more to his right and where
is Diana's body? However, again, it is crystal clear that the back of her
head was doctored to shine brightly to diminish the photo and point I made
in the original email.
- Ehrlich: The question arises as to exactly when the photo
was taken. The question is that vein arises where the heck was the photographer
when the photo was taken. It nearly appeared that he was on the hood of
the car. These are important questions and issues re the photo.
- INSERT: SEE ALSO PART II THAT ACCOMPANIES THIS EMAIL
- From SenderBerl web page
- September 29, 1997
- CONCLUSION: We would think that Dodi Fayed's father will
investigate this entire affair using the resources he has at his disposal.
Do we need a person with vast wealth to guarantee pursuit of the truth?
Do we have to fear governmental powers thwarting an investigation by a
vastly powerful person? Trevor Rees-Jones takes on the power to singularly
oppose a false report. Will his memory ever return? Does he fear it returning?
Why did he put on a seat belt when Diana didn't? There is one piece of
seemingly confirmed evidence that may jog Trevor Rees-Jones' memory. There
is a picture showing Princess Diana turning around and looking out the
back window at a motorcycle.
- What we believe she may have been doing is seeing if
she recognized the motorcycle driver. She was aware - after the many years
together - of the identity of aggressive photographers. Did Trevor Rees-Jones
sense danger when Diana possibly said she did not recognize the person/persons
on the motorcycle aggressively or suspiciously moving about the Mercedes?
The free lance photographers said they were all far back from the car,
while a string of witnesses saw two motorcycles with a black car traveling
next to and/or in front of the Mercedes. Do the French investigators know
who was in the black car and the three persons on the two motorcycles?
If not, more than ever, Brenda Wells statements to date take on critical
importance, and it would be frivolous to leak news that they are going
to point to alcohol and speed (i.e. Henri Paul). If any investigator establishes
that Brenda Wells was impeded from entering the tunnel, then the evidence
points to a conclusion far different than "alcohol and speed."
Where is Brenda Wells? Again, where is Brenda Wells? If Brenda Wells is
a sham, or an illusion, then tell us. Otherwise, produce her!
- Ehrlich: Yes, my own commentary jogged my memory about
it and TRJ first had amnesia and could not remember thus again thrusting
his credibility into account. Moreover, and I have to rely on my own memory
after these ten years the photo of Diana looking back was not the photos
now released, it was a photo taken from behind the car or to the side of
the car but not front to back. However, the point is not whether this was
a photo front to back but the issue is whether the photo was the cover
for the strobe light directed at Henri Paul to disorient him. Moreover,
the reason they must have been looking the way they do in the central photos
above is that they both were reacting to the fact that a motorcycle cut
RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM to implement the dual design of the cover of a photo
but the deed of blinding Henri Paul. Thus, the photo must have been taken
just as they were entering the tunnel and with the technology they have
today they can establish the truth of it.
- Update (September 24, 1997) :Brenda Wells may hold the
story of the year and she seems to be missing!
- First, let us directly quote from the story appearing
09/21/97 from Agence France-Presse: LONDON, Sept 21 (AFP) -"The Sunday
Mirror meanwhile quoted a British secretary living in Paris who said she
had seen a dark-coloured car following Diana's Mercedes. Brenda Wells said
that she was driving toward the Alma tunnel when she was forced off the
road by two motorbikes chasing a large car and that she then saw a black
car pass her."
- The Associated Press story, the only U.S. report regarding
Brenda Wells, bent the meaning of the AFP story. The AP wrote: "The
Mirror also said that another British witness, Londoner Brenda Wells, 40,
told investigators she was driving back from a party and was forced off
the road by a motorbike pursuing a big black car. Then came the crash.
'The big car had come off the road. I stopped and five or six motorbikes
arrived and started taking photographs. They were crying, 'It's Diana.'
The newspaper quoted her as having testified."
- It is obvious that the Associated Press report and the
Agence France-Presse report say two different things. Thus, we quote directly
from the Daily Mirror: "The whereabouts of a British secretary driving
in the tunnel at the time of Diana's crash were also shrouded in mystery
yesterday. London-born Brenda Wells, 40, told police how she was forced
off the road by a motorbike following Diana's Mercedes at high speed. Ms.
Wells also saw a dark-coloured car - possibly the Fiat Uno which has now
become the focal point of the French probe into the crash. In her statement
she claims: 'After a party with my friends, I was returning to my home.
A motorbike with two men forced me off the road. It was following a big
car. Afterwards in the tunnel there were very strong lights like flashes.
After that, a black car arrived. The big car had come off the road. I stopped
and five or six motorbikes arrived and started taking photographs. They
were crying 'It's Diana.'.' Brenda's evidence calls into question initial
claims that pursuing paparazzi were to blame. She makes the first mention
of photographers AFTER (emphasis in original) the accident when 'five or
six' paparazzi arrived and took pictures. But last night, despite extensive
inquiries in the Paris suburb of Champigny sur Marne where she told police
she lived, Brenda could not be located."
- Brenda Wells may prove to become a witness of equal if
not greater importance to Trevor Rees-Jones. If she was impeded from entering
the tunnel, it is concrete circumstantial evidence of foul-play. The fact
that she is missing and world news stands strangely silent as to what has
already been reported, suggests that Brenda Wells is someone who must be
located. That she cannot be found is highly disturbing. If she is under
the "protection" or "custody" of French authorities,
her "safety" would be further aided by letting the public so
- end senderberl excerpt
- Ehrlich: For Brenda Wells to note the flashes they must
have taken place just after Diana entered the tunnel in accord with my
commentary above. If so, then TRJ was not wearing a seat belt and the fact
that he survived and did not backs up my position all along that Diana
also should have lived but was marked for death as they made apparent to
me in 1997 and as I know for a fact today. They are issuing their misinformation
that Diana was on the pill etc. Whether she was pregnant is not central
to the facts that she was murdered but was further central to the many
reasons for her assassination. My beef with the incident connected with
my proving upset that the elite simply thought nothing of carrying out
an execution right in front of everyone's noses with the expectation that
they could get away with it.
- From the Internet:
- New Eyewitness Claims He Saw Several Men Loitering In
The Tunnel Moments Before The Crash That killed Princess Diana!
- A witness who was too scared to come forward in the initial
aftermath following princess Diana's death told the Official Investigatory
Inquiry headed by Lord Steven that he saw a dozen men standing in a line
against the wall of the tunnel moments before the crash that killed Princess
Diana. This new testimony signifies that SOMEONE HAD PREVIOUS KNOWLEDGE
THAT DIANA'S CAR WOULD TAKE THAT ROUTE!
- After dining at the Ritz Hotel Dodi's and Princess Diana's
intention was to head back to Dodi's flat located at Rue Arsene-Houssaye.
The shortest and quickest way to get there would have been to turn onto
the Place de la Concorde and then make their way along the Avenue de Champ
Elysees. But for some reason they didn't take this most obvious of routes
but took the one that lead the Mercedes through the Point d'Alma tunnel...why
- A Trap Is Set And Sprung!
- (It should be noted that some of the witnesses' surnames
are not available because of the very real fear they had at the time that
they would meet an untimely death!)
- Thierry H: He saw a car blocking the exit that would
have allowed Princess Diana's Mercedes to take the Place de la Concorde
and thus avoid the tunnel at Point d'Alma. The car had several men and
Thierry's assumption at the time was that those men were paparazzi (but
were they really?).
- Brenda Wells: The secretary from London who "reportedly
went missing" following her statement to the French police. She told
them that on her way home from a party with friends, she was forced off
the road by a large and powerful motorbike ridden by two individuals as
she approached the tunnel. The motorbike was tailing Princess Diana's limo
at high speed, in conjunction with another smaller car (Fiat Uno? Although
her account describes this car as dark colored). In her own words: "After
a party with my friends, I was returning to my home. A motorbike with two
men forced me off the road. It was following a big car. Afterwards in the
tunnel there were very strong lights like flashes. After that, a black
car arrived. The big car had come off the road. I stopped and five or six
motorbikes arrived and started taking photographs."
- The whereabouts of Brenda Wells are currently unknown
but what is known is that soon after giving her statement to the French
Police and after both she and her husband were warned to go into hiding
and never speak about what they had witnessedPHUT! Just like that she vanishedfell
off the face of the earth!
- Francoise & Valerie Levistre: Since they were driving
in front of the Diana Mercedes they were strategically located to bear
close witness to what exactly happened in the tunnel. The following account
was recorded by Reuters on September 4th, 1997 from their home in Normandy
- "I said to my wife that there must be a big shot
behind us with a police escort. Then I went down into the tunnel and, again
in my rearview mirror I saw the car in the middle of the tunnel with the
motorcycle on its left, pulling ahead and then swerving to the right directly
in front of the caras the motorcycle swerved and before the car lost control,
there was a flash of light but then I was out of the tunnel and, but did
not see the impactI immediately pulled my car over to the curb but my wife
said 'Let's get out of here. It's a terror attack.'" (Reuters, Paris,
Sourced from Internet 4/9/97).
- Levistre also described the motorbike as being ridden
by two individuals.
- Gaelle L: Gaelle and her boyfriend Benoit were approaching
the tunnel from the opposite direction in the opposing lane on the other
side of the tunnel. Here's her account: "As we entered the Alma tunnel,
we heard a loud noise of screeching tires. At that moment, in the opposite
lane, we saw a large car approaching at high speed. The car swerved to
the left, then went back to the right and crashed into the wall with its
horn blaring. I should note that in front of this car, there was another
smaller car. I think this vehicle was black, but I'm not sure. Behind the
big car there was a large motorcycle. I can't be sure how many riders were
- Witness Saw Fiat Uno Driver Cause Crash That Killed Princess
- Souad Mouffakir: Far too terrified in1997 to truthfully
report what she (and her husband of the time) witnessed in the tunnel,
six years after the crash, Souad recanted her earlier testimony with the
following damning account! She stated, quite understandably, that she'd
remained silent for six years about what she witnessed because she'd feared
for her life. Her story was narrated to The People (note no money changed
hands for the story).
- Souad Mouffakir claims that she and her husband (Mohamed
Medjahdi) were in a car that was traveling right in front of Princess Diana's
Mercedes in the tunnel on the night of August 31, 1997. Through the rear
window she noticed a Fiat Uno approaching them very rapidly, but rather
than overtake them it slowed down so that both cars were parallel.
- As Souad put it, "It was very strange behavior and
I got frightened. The white car was only centimeters from ours. I stared
over to the driver and I will never forget him." She then continues
to describe how the man's demeanor and manner appeared very strange as
if his thoughts were farfar away. She describes the man as being of Mediterranean
descent and that she surmised he was short because his head barely cleared
the steering wheel. In the back seat of the car sat what she described
as a huge Alsatian.
- She continues, "I became very scared, I thought
he was a madman and I told Mohamed to speed away. We did that and a moment
later we heard the screech of tyres. I looked round and saw a black Mercedes
sliding out of control at 45 degrees, coming straight at us. I saw the
car impact into the pillar. I did not realize that I had just seen the
crash that killed Diana. I saw the chauffeur thrown forward in to the steering
wheel. I knew he had been killed immediately."
- Plotters Knew Beforehand That Diana and Company Would
Pass Through The Tunnel!
- Jacques Morel: Moments before the crash, record producer
Jacques Morel says he saw several figures (about a dozen) hanging out in
the tunnel for no apparent reason. Driving home with his wife on that night
this is how he described the peculiar scene: " As we entered the Alma
tunnel I looked to my left and saw about a dozen shady figures on a tiny
pavement by the side of the opposite carriagewayThey were all standing
in a long line. The sight was unforgettable. The pavement is less than
30cm (12in or 1ft) wide and next to fast traffic. They would have been
breathing in petrol fumes and it was very dirty down there. It was certainly
not a sensible place to stand around."
- Mr. Morel continues, "There was an almighty bang
and a great big flash of light. Immediately my wife and I realized there
had been a crash. My first thought was that those inside the tunnel were
connected with what had happened. This thought has never left me!"
- Like several other witnesses who also feared for their
lives, Mr. Morel only broke his silence after several years had elapsed
since the accident. Evidently his testimony was taken seriously enough
to warrant being flown to London for a 3-day interview by the Diana Crash
Investigatory (Inquiry) Team headed by former Scotland Yard chief, Lord
- Jacques Morel told detectives he was convinced that Henri
Paul was part of the plot and had been paid to take the tunnel; as he put
it, "I am certain he was paid to drive through the Alma Tunnel. There
was cash in Henri Paul's pocket when he was found dead!" We can only
assume that when he refers to "cash", Mr. Morel is talking about
- Gary Hunter: This London-based lawyer observed, from
his third floor hotel room overlooking the Point d'Alma tunnel (less than
100 yards distance) two vehicles zooming away from the tunnel shortly after
the crash. This is his account as cited by Agence-France-Presse on September
22, 1997: "I was in my hotel room overlooking the tunnel and heard
a car speeding from that directionI jumped up and saw a small dark-colored
car drive up the street with another car practically stuck to its back
bumperthe first car looked like a Fiat Uno or a Renault Clio. The white
car was a Mercedesthey both spun round together and sped off down the street
at a suicidal pace, more than 100 miles per hourI thought it was very strange
that they were traveling so dangerously close to each othertheir behavior
made me wonder what exactly they had been up to in the tunnel when the
- "My own feeling is that these were people in a hurry
not to be there. I am confident that the car was getting off the scene,
it looked quite sinister."
- SUMMARY: These are just a few of the many eyewitness
accounts that punched meteor shower like holes into the official story,
that the crash that killed Dodi Fayed, Princess Diana and Henri Paul, was
nothing but a tragic traffic accident!
- From the Internet (yes, not one road camera among the
17 passed that night was working) (Moreover the exit ramp allowing a car
to avoid the Alma tunnel was blocked closed forcing Henri Paul to take
the Alma tunnel, which many believe he was complicit in taking to his own
regret -- I was asking for the name of the off duty fireman and to this
day his name remains unknown):
- The traffic camera at the Point d'Alma
- Seán Mac Mathúna
- Visit Mohammed Al-Fayed's website and read his account
of Diana's death
- Diana crash inquiry report: Final report by Paris prosecutor's
- MI6 and the Princess of Wales by Richard Tomlinson
- MI6's plot to assassinate President Milosevic of Serbia
in 1992 by Richard Tomlinson
- Why were the traffic cameras not working at the Point
- In April 1998, l took advantage of a visit to Paris to
photograph the site of the car crash at the Point d'Alma which killed Princess
Diana. Prominent in position overlooking the crash site, was a traffic
camera, which on the day he was there, was facing the entrance to tunnel
where the Diana's car crashed. Of course, it is possible that the camera,
at the moment of the crash, it was facing a different direction. However,
according to the <http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk/>Lobster (winter
1999), there are rumours that electricity supplies in the road tunnel were
cut off 25 minutes before Diana's Mercedes entered it. It could be for
this reason, as Lobster notes, that the CCTV cameras covering the crash
site both before and after the crash were not working.
- When Mohammed Al Fayed's lawyers requested copies of
the tapes from 17 cameras that covered the journey of Diana's Mercedes
from the Ritz Hotel to the Point d'Alma, they were told by French police
that no such tapes existed for those cameras. In fact, French authorities
claimed that the cameras were "not recording any images at the time
(of the crash). It was noted by NBC that Paris has the "most sophisticated
video surveillance system of any city in the world", with all cameras
recording to video tape and saved for two days - except on this occasion
. . .
- Source: http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2007450844,00.html
- START EXCERPT
- In one never-before-published shot, the Princess and
her lover Dodi Fayed can clearly be seen in the back seat of their Mercedes
in Paris in the early hours of August 31, 1997.
- Driver Henri Paul stares manically down the lens of a
paparazzi cameraman, while in the front passenger seat, Dodi's bodyguard
Trevor Rees is seen behind a sun visor.
- Moments later the Merc hit pillar 13 in the Alma Tunnel.
- The picture, taken by a freelance photographer, will
take centre stage as an 11-strong jury deliberate on the most dramatic
inquest in British legal history.
- Over the next six months the jury is expected to decide
WHEN exactly the photograph was taken.
- It is claimed the frame was shot as Diana and Dodi left
the Paris Ritz hotel via the rear exit at The Rue Cambon
- end news excerpt
- Ehrlich: Take yet another look at the photo where that
big bright light shines from behind the car...
- ZXst columns in the tunnel thus the picture taken just
as they entered the tunnel. What is that white circular spot? Well, it
could be the same dynamic aligned with the doctoring of the back of Diana's
head and body.
- April 1998 photo of Alma tunnel entrance taken by Henri
Paul the night of the event (notice the column on the left side of the
photo and also notice the drop in elevation in entering the tunnel -- then
look at the dip in the photo above -- if I can connect the dots with limited
resources perhaps those with resources including Dodi' Fayed's father should
do so as well):
- Ehrlich: Sorry Moabites, you could not doctor the dip
in the angle of the car!