Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com

From The Darkest Recesses
Of Ann Coulter's Soul --
A Confession

By Michael Goodspeed
gspeed2000@gmail.com
10-17 -7
 
Note: Coulter's site was hacked. See
 Coulter Site Hacked - 'My Career' Message A Hoax
and
Coulter Site - Hoaxed 'My Career' Message 

This morning, I nearly choked on my coffee when I followed a link to Ann Coulter's website and read what at first glance appeared to her final valedictory from public life. In her article, An Open Letter to Readers (http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=214) she writes: "I've been participating in a charade for nearly eleven years, now. Quite frankly, I'm sick of it. You have all been a part of a sick joke that I began considering shortly after first getting on the air. At first, it was quite interesting to see how people would react when I would use twisted logic and poorly masked bigotry.
 
"But eleven years is a long time to be living a fake life, and I can no longer tolerate this falsity. Even someone as fake as I tires out eventually."
 
After a bit of rambling rhetoric on the ideal of spiritual unity amongst Americans, Coulter signs off with a promise that seems too good to be true: "And with that, my precious viewers, I bid you adieu. My career as a media figurehead is over."
 
A few moments after waking, my intellectual discernment was not at its sharpest, and I briefly wondered if Ann's statement might not be entirely sarcastic. Perhaps her whole public life really had been a misguided social experiment intended to gauge public reaction to asininity and bigotry. I could see how such an experiment might be useful to the fine folks at the Tavistock Institute; to know the reliable triggers of racial, religious, and ideological hatred in human beings is invaluable information for those who would incite civil unrest and violence for their own nefarious purposes.
 
But alas, Ann is not yet owning up to such a role in America's deliberate destruction. She postscripts her Open Letter to Readers: "Haha, did it again. Oh, those silly web admins...they just embarrass themselves."
 
It's not surprising for Coulter to use witless, unimaginative sarcasm as a means of jabbing at her enemies, real and imaginary. But it is surprising (to me, anyway) that her sarcasm reads as such a frank admission. This lame, unfunny, faux valediction may well offer a rare insight into the purgatorial realm of Ann Coulter's soul.
 
The purpose of sarcastic humor is to parrot ideas in a manner that exposes them as totally untenable. Therefore, to include in a sarcastic narrative statements that no sane could person could disagree with is to risk confusing and thus alienating one's audience. So either Ann does not understand the guiding principle behind sarcastic humor, or one MUST interpret every word of her "open letter" as unmitigated sarcasm.
 
Consider her weird, pretend lip-service to religious harmony amongst Americans:
 
"Here's the truth, I don't care what people believe. Jews don't need to be 'made perfect' as I so arrogantly proclaimed to Editor & Publisher not a half week ago. I don't even care if people are Muslim. Granted, I don't know much about the religion or the people, but they are people. This is something that we cannot forget, they are in an abhorrent situation. These people are in need of education. Perhaps if we did not participate in causing them misery, they would not hate us so.
 
"In fact, does it really matter whether we are Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Atheist, or even Pagan? We are one nation. One. We should not let petty differences separate us, we are all American, and should act in that manner."
 
How does one delineate Ann's sarcasm from her true beliefs in the above statements? She concedes that Muslims are actually people, and that many of them live in "an abhorrent situation." But then she quips, "Perhaps if we did not participate in causing them misery, they would not hate us so."
 
In the past, Ann has made it abundantly clear she laughs at the "liberal" notion that many Muslims justifiably hate America due to the violence and death they've suffered at the hands of our government ("Not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims," from Coulter's syndicated column September 28, 2001. "If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether," from Coulter's website November 22, 2006). Therefore, this comment can only be viewed as pure sarcasm. But what about her other comments, that Muslims are actually "people," that we are "one nation," and "We should not let petty differences separate us, we are all American, and should act in that manner."
 
As horrific as it may seem, one can only conclude that every sentence, every word of Ann's "Open Letter" is intended as sarcasm. She openly mocks the unending misery of Muslims everywhere, denying (through her sarcasm) their very humanity, then she laughs at the lofty ideal of an America undivided by religious, racial, or ideological differences -- an ideal she has always bizarrely identified as "liberal." We can tell that she's being wholly sarcastic because of her unerringly consistent stance on all of the above issues. And if nothing else, Ann IS consistent -- unlike most politicians, she has precisely one note and one message in all company, in every situation.
 
Ann Coulter has made clear she believes in ONE true religion, ONE correct pathway to God, and it is the job of pious people everywhere to ENFORCE it on the entire planet. Her perspective on how America should treat Islamic nations suspected of harboring terrorists is: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." (Source: http://www.nationalreview.com/coulter/coulter.shtml) Such a sentiment is totally unsurprising from a woman who once proudly boasted that she "always agreed" with the late Reverend Jerry Falwell. (Source: http://mediamatters.org/items/200705180003)
 
This is the same figurehead who infamously stated, "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go the New York Times Building." (Source: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/ann_coulter.html). In a cultural climate that saw Don Imus lose a national radio show on the basis of one asinine comment directed at black female athletes ("nappy-headed hoes"), and in a climate where a young man gets tasered for loudly asking a question at a John Kerry rally, Ann Coulter is permitted again and again to step over every line of public decorum, even advocating religious warfare and murder. (The Internet database is so replete with vile, violent, murderous quotes from Ann Coulter that I see no need to enumerate them at greater length here).
 
The saddest element of Coulter's sarcasm is the violent opposition she reveals against her own happiness. She mocks the notion that "we are all American," and "We should not let petty differences separate us." Since she has built an extremely lucrative career on exploiting "petty differences" and inane ideological disparities, it's not surprising that she prefers a nation at war with itself, clearly demarcated along lines of "conservative" and "liberal," the saved and the damned, the good and the evil. Like all miserable people, she demands that the external world reflect the blood-soaked battleground of her internal environment. This makes Ann right at home in the intellectual climate of the media age, where polemical rage usurps sound reasoning and the loudest and most grotesque command the most attention.
 
Miss Coulter, you claim to be a God-fearing Christian who seeks to embody the teachings of Jesus during your time on Earth. You may think your sarcasm is a weapon against your "enemies," but in fact, it is only a weapon against yourself.
 
"Sarcasm I now see to be, in general, the language of the devil; for which reason I have long since as good as renounced it."
--Thomas Carlyle

Disclaimer
 







MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros