- watching these videos, I think I see
the whole picture now:
Full Spectrum Treason -- The Objective force
Future Combat Systems -- The UP and UP http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLROLbkfc5o
Forgive the hastily prepared webpage but I didn't want to take the time
to make it nice.
Add to the above - more succinctly stated:
The key concepts in the documents are "shared situational awareness"
and ubiquitous computing which - if I understand it - is just an obscure
way of saying that 'all the world's a stage' for the war games. It's taking
the gaming environment and integrating it into the 'real world' of the
game players for 'shared situational awareness'.
Both of those things would explain why the Port Authority reported - something
before it actually happened (one of the towers or WTC 7.. I can't quite
remember) and why the BBC reported the collapse WTC 7 before it happened.
With the military link into the broadcasting network, it wouldn't have
been difficult to inject images as well as information into their news
gathering portals. Then with shill supplied supporting videos following
the event, they (thought they) could control the "knowledge flow".
- The Final Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle
- The picture of 9-11 is coming together.
FEMA - DARPA - Naval War College in Rhode Island (War Games)
Naval War College in Rhode Island plans the war games - but they are not
games. They are terrorist attacks against the people of the United States
- and I suspect other countries. Recall the Sarin (sp) gas attack in Tokyo?
After that - using the same pitch line as with NYC, Toyko built a Command
and Control communications center in preparation for a "terrorist
event". The trick is that the Command and Control communications center
becomes the hub for directing local governments from the central control
point. The Central control point is managing both sides - the Special Forces
terrorists conducting "effects-based operations". Local officials
are instructed what to do to prevent "terrorist" attacks - if
they don't do it, then an attack occurs.
DARPA - networked computer systems for "national security" On
Sept. 11, Adm. John Poindexter was in charge of DARPA. TIA was ready to
FEMA - Disasters - training of local officials, implementer of the DARPA
- Art Cebrowski - father of net-centric
warfare taught there.
Thomas Barnett - 1998 - Planning a revolution
Coup d'etat minus 10 years
Philip Zelikow, John Deutch and Ashton Carter -
- "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of
a National Policy" The goal is
to implement "market-based" governance - which is fascist government
to replace the American System of government - effectively dissolving the
U.S. government except for the facade. See Ubiquitous Computing below.
The coup d'etat - "game plan" - the command and control center
- linked to all important agencies of government - would naturally include
the media - broadcasters.
Under the guise of war gaming, terrorist acts are directed against the
American people by the managers of the 'war games'. These are Hegelian
Dialectics - shock the system to facilitate the implementation of solutions
designed for the 'Total Information' police state.
Ex. Virginia Tech Shootings
Following the shooting, a "incident review panel" was convened
with Systems Planning Corporation (Dov Zakheim) leading.
C-Span Morning Session
Col. Gerald Massengill, Chair of Gov. Kaine's Independent Virginia Tech
Incident Review Panel, makes opening remarks at today's meeting. Following
an update by the panel staff, mental health specialists discuss services
to students and the condition of Seung-Hui Cho, the gunman. The event takes
place at George Mason Univ.
C-Span Afternoon Session
The meeting of Gov. Kaine's Independent Virginia Tech Incident Review Panel
continues. This afternoon's panel looks at "Awareness and Strategies
for Families and Survivors." Then the floor is open for public comments.
The event takes place at George Mason University, in Arlington, VA.
6/11/2007: WASHINGTON, DC: 2 hr. 48 min.: CSPAN3
Among the least-known measures
are plans to place the new command center near the twin towers of the World
Trade Center to positive pressure, an idea being promoted by William Patrick,
a leading biological terrorism expert. The $15 million crisis center, city
officials point out, is far less elaborate and expensive than one already
built in Tokyo, which cost an estimated $190 million.
New York officials disclosed details of the first attempt by New York and
federal officials to play out a biological attack. The drill demonstrated
the city's vulnerability to terrorist attack. On Wednesday, 15 April, more
than 50 scientists, government officials and state and local emergency
preparedness teams met in secret on the outskirts of Washington. They were
confronted with a chilling scenario: More than 1,000 people in a 15-story
office building in midtown Manhattan were attacked by a germ disseminated
through the unfiltered air ducts.
Jerome Hauer - was onsite on 9/11 prepared with a story about Osama Bin
Laden - interviewed just hours after the attack to begin the mantra of
the official story of terrorists in Afghanistan.
The ambitious project, which will
sprawl over 46,000 feet in one of the smaller buildings of the World Trade
Center complex, will be large enough to accommodate at least 50 different
city, state and federal agencies, and will allow them to coordinate responses
to a myriad of disasters, from the smallest sewer explosion to the largest
nerve gas attack.
- Among its amenities will be back-up generators
in case of power failures, a storage tank with enough water to last at
least a week, and whiz-bang technology that will include a secure "red"
phone for the mayor and video-conferencing, so he can see and talk to the
president of the United States, if necessary.
- Saying that the facility is "not
a bunker" meant as a safety haven for the mayor, Jerome Hauer, head
of the city's Office of Emergency Management, noted that New York City's
emergency response system had become a model for other cities and said
that the planned center was a natural next step in keeping that lead.
- "This is something the city has
needed for a long time, a state-of-the-art center with a sophisticated
communications system, that is survivable so the city can continue to function,"
he said. "If there is a citywide blackout, a hurricane, a blizzard,
this is the facility that will allow us to keep working, to make sure that
- people are not in jeopardy."
Naval War College - War gaming "shared situational awareness"
ubiquitous computer systems
Live Fire System Test - 2001 matches 9/11 with official
story line of "terrorists" - John Deutch, Director of the CIA
stole files from the CIA. Those files probably included the "Al Qaeda"
database. That's how the pictures of the alleged terrorist network was
prepared in advance by the traitors who pulled off 9/11
Effects Based Operations Model - The computer
system for managing crisis
Institutionalizing EBO is a complex
undertaking that requires the development of new doctrine, the education
of the forces in the EBO concepts along with the development of a common
lexicon of terms, the adaptation of the current command and control processes,
and the development and use of tools that support effects based analysis.
Since 2000, the DoD components have conducted experiments and war games
to develop and test approaches for making effects based operations work
in the real world environments. In most cases, there were no tools specifically
designed to support effects based thinking. A few organizations such as
the Air Force Research Laboratory, IF Division at Rome, NY and George Mason
University have developed prototype tools for relating actions to effects
in a quantitative manner to support the development of models of situations
that can be used to perform trade-off analysis in course of action development
and selection. GMU has had the opportunity to use the tool it developed,
called CAESAR II/EB, in the Navy Title X war games, Global 2000 and 2001,
and the Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) J-9 Joint Experiment, Millennium Challenge
The influence net provides an environment for modeling of the causal relationships
between actions by our forces (Blue) and effects on the adversary (Red).
It uses a graphical representation comprised of nodes that represent actions
or effects and causal relationships between the nodes.
WIGS - Ubiquitous Computing -
- (note: this document is talking about the military but
they will be the "governance managers" behind the scenes - networked
to the private sector institutions of business and visible government (i.e.
militarized police) - see http://www.channelingreality.com/NAU/Transpacific_Multimodal.htm
The U.S. military is in the midst
of a transformation. While business leaders moved quickly to put computing
power in the hands of individuals, the military establishment has been
less responsive. Network Centric Warfare is a current U.S. Navy initiative
to leverage the power of the computer to restructure forces from the bottom
up. Instead of a strict hierarchy where decisions are pushed down, networked
warfighters will cooperatively pursue the strategic goals of the commander
in a much more decentralized fashion. Essential to the idea of Network
Centric Warfare is the proliferation of ever-present information systems,
or Ubiquitous Computing capabilities, where the computer (or rather, the
networked computing capability) is no longer the focus of human attention,
but rather, becomes invisible. This paper summarizes the introduction of
CommandNet, a group support system, into a large-scale wargaming environment
to create networks of concerted actors and develop ubiquitous computing
Knowledge Management and Collaboration in an Effects-Based
New warfighting concepts are currently under development to improve the
ability of future Joint Force Commanders to rapidly and decisively conduct
particularly challenging and important operational missions as they transition
to the fighting force described in Joint Vision 2020. This paper describes
one element that is part of these new concepts: knowledge management and
collaboration as conducted to support effects-based operations. Collaboration
offers great potential to better enable warfighters to plan, monitor, execute,
and assess activities across the spectrum of joint functional areas. Collaboration
is also essential to develop a shared situational awareness among heterogeneous,
distributed team members. Effects-based operations is defined as a "process
for obtaining a desired strategic outcome, or 'effect' on the enemy, through
the synergistic and cumulative application of the full range of national
(military and nonmilitary) capabilities at all levels of conflict."
This paper reports on the results of a survey administered during an experiment
conducted to help refine the effects-based planning process. Suggestions
for improving knowledge management include developing business rules for
working in a collaborative information environment and improved display
capabilities to help planners track information and documents during different
phases of the planning process.
Effects based Operations
- Entities - Last slide of Giambastiani's
Admiral E.P. Giambastiani
What Jerome Hauer was doing in NYC was implementing the 'command and
control' center that fits into the 'interagency' component of the grid.
WIGS - Tenet 3. Communications of the corporate or commander's intent.
Total Information Awareness Systems - implementations underway
Government access to credit and corporate records (including purchasing
Command and Control Systems in local areas like NYC - WTC 7 - and militarized
Premises and Animal Tracking
Real ID - including biometrics - adults and children Chipping Children
Smart Highway systems with GPS tracking, corridors and intermodal commerce zones (i.e. SmartPorts) aka Regional Economic Development Zones
National Medical Information System
Integrated school-Workforce Development system for national labor
9/11 was the shock to the system to allow the perpetrators of the coup
d'etat against the United States government to implement the central command
and control systems that gives them the capability to control the country
behind the curtain. The war in Iraq will give the perps the money they
need to split from the U.S. government and become self-supporting - to
make it a truly global, totalitarian system. The central command and control
center could be at the Baghdad Embassy just as easily as it could be in
Washington DC. (Note: investigation needed to see what kind of computing
and communications systems are being implemented in that embassy).
In fact, the transportation system that is being built supposedly for
trade is just the kind of access needed for Chinese invasion of the United
States - as managed by the traitors who executed the coup d'etat against
the United States government.
- At the same time, they are dissolving
the United States as a nation using the fraud of "free trade"
and the 'Security and Prosperity Partnership - which is a break with loyalty
to the United States and constitutional government