Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
 
rense.com

Legal Effort To Force Iowa
'Straw Poll' To Be Honest
Dealing With Diebold At Ames

Edited by Mark Yannone
8-7-7
 
Every August in which the Republican presidential nomination is undecided, Ames, Iowa--a city of 50,000 or so residents about 30 miles north of Des Moines plays host to the Ames Straw Poll, which gauges support for the various Republican candidates.
 
The straw poll dates back to 1979 and is frequently seen as a first test of organizational strength in Iowa by the national media and party insiders. As such, it can be very beneficial for a candidate to win the straw poll and thus enhance his aura of inevitability or show off a superior field operation.
 
Picture This -
 
From 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. next Saturday (August 11, 2007), more than 25,000 Iowa residents will arrive at Iowa State University in Ames. They will be at least 18 years old. They will be there to choose one man from a list of eleven men as their choice to be the next President of the United States of America. Each person casting a vote must pay $35.
 
At one of 60 vote stations they will receive a paper ballot. They will pencil in an oval next to the candidate of their choice. They will enter the paper ballot into a machine that will scan the entire ballot and record the vote. After voting, each voter will place a thumb into a container of purple ink.
 
After scanning each ballot, the machine will deposit the ballot into a "black box" within the Diebold machine. At 6 p.m. each machine and black box are transported to a centralized "tabulation" room. The door to the room will be closed to the public.
 
The ballots are not removed from their black boxes or counted. Instead, a button on the machine is pressed. In response, the machine ejects a slip of paper showing the number of votes recorded by that machine for each candidate. The results are tabulated. Someone then leaves the room and announces the results of the vote to the assembled media representatives.
 
Now Picture This -
 
On Tuesday, August 7, 2007, a letter was delivered to the Iowa Republican Party and the State and County Boards of Elections. The letter is signed by various good-government and election reform organizations and holders of $35 tickets that entitle them to vote in the Ames Straw Poll. The letter says that unless the following 10-point program is agreed to, a court order will be sought to enjoin and prohibit the Ames Straw Poll until the reforms are agreed to:*
 
1. From the time the voter votes to the time the results of the vote are publicly announced, all paper ballots are never out of the view of the public.
 
2. Instead of being deposited into a black box, each completed paper ballot is deposited into a numbered, clear-plastic container that is in clear public view all day. The number on the container matches a number on the machine. The numbers are 4 inches high, black on white.
 
3. Each candidate on the ballot has the right to have an observer present for an inspection by the county of each container. The single inspection is scheduled to take place 9:55 a.m. at each of the 60 vote stations.
 
4. Surrounding each vote station at a distance of 30 feet from the numbered, clear-plastic container is a rope beyond which any person can quietly stand to quietly observe the clear-plastic containers and the number of voters.
 
5. As the voting period ends, each ballot box is set on one of two 72-inch cafeteria-style tables that have been set up at each of the 60 voting stations. There the ballots are separated and hand counted.
 
6. Besides two members of the staff of the county or State Board of Elections, each candidate has a right to have a representative participate in the counting process. All county and candidate counters must agree on the candidate allocation of each vote. Once all counters are in agreement on the allocation of all votes, the result of the count is read aloud to the public.
 
7. The paper ballots are then returned to the numbered, clear-plastic containers, which are then transported to a central location--never out of view of the county and candidate observers or the general public.
 
8. At the central location, the containers are placed inside a roped-off area. Within the roped-off area, chairs have been set up for the county and candidate counters.
 
9. As each numbered container arrives at the central location, the results of the hand-counted vote is read aloud by one of the county observers and entered into a computer for projection onto a screen in the room and for posting on the county and state Web sites.
 
10. After the results of the vote from each of the 60 vote stations is read aloud, the cumulative totals from the hand counts are agreed to by the county and candidate counters, read aloud, and entered into the computer for projection onto the screen in the room and for posting on the county and state Web sites. This process is continued until the results of the vote at all 60 vote stations have been read aloud and added to the prior total.
 
Why Go To Such Great Lengths?
 
Vote fraud is a problem, even in America, where elections have been stolen from non-party favorites by political parties. One such event occurred in Iowa in 1995. See "A House Without Doors, Vote Fraud in America," by James J. Condit, Jr., published in the November 1996 edition of Chronicles Magazine.
 
"Political parties," according to Thomas Jefferson, "are by their nature, corruptive."
 
The Iowa Republican Party will use 60 Diebold computers to record and count the votes.
 
NOTE: A study by computer scientists at the University of California, paid for by the Secretary of State of California (publicized July 28, 2007, in the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times) showed that the Diebold computers were easily hacked, easily rigged, and totally unreliable for conducting elections.
 
The UC study confirmed the results of several other authoritative studies from MIT, Cal Tech, Princeton University, and numerous other sources. A search of "Diebold Princeton University" on YouTube will yield a http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Diebold+Princeton+University
nine-minute demonstration. Adding "Fox News" to the search will yield another http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Diebold+Princeton+University+Fox+News
three-minute demonstration by the Princeton scientists.
 
Los Angeles Times, 7/28/07
"Scientists prove Diebold computers easily rigged and totally unreliable in elections . . ."
 
New York Times, 7/28/07
"Computer scientists from California universities have hacked into three electronic voting systems used in California and elsewhere in the nation and found several ways in which vote totals could potentially be altered, according to reports released yesterday by the state."
 
United Press International, 7/28/07
". . . computer experts . . . found several ways to change the vote totals by breaking the codes to Diebold Election Systems . . . the New York Times reported Saturday."
 
HBO Documentary, 10/06
"'Hacking Democracy' shows actual hacking of Diebold computers in Leon County, Florida"
 
The Diebold computers being used to "count" the votes at the Iowa Straw Poll could be used to steal the election from Ron Paul or one of the other party insurgents by, say, "stuffing the ballot box" with "votes" for party favorites by thousands of phantom voters, or by transposing some set percentage of votes from one or more of the insurgents to one or more of the party favorites, thereby showing the insurgent(s) such as Ron Paul with far fewer votes than he actually received. [http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2007-08-05.htm
Full story]
 
 
* Update 08/07/07: The final draft of the letter does not mention the court injunction, but an injunction is being prepared and numerous classes of plaintiffs are being sought.
 
http://yannone.blogspot.com/2007/08/ames-straw-poll-two-versions.html

 
 
Disclaimer
 







MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros