- A new interesting article by our friend Eric Walberg
promises us "a new, leaner, meaner Russia picking up the
Soviet torch". Is it so? Well, up to a point. We would like Russia
to take its central place among defenders of human dignity against the
Judeo-American Empire; but it is not there yet. Russia objects but plays
ball with the US - in Korea, in Iran, in Palestine. Though sympathetic
to these issues, Russia still does not dare to oppose the superpower in
strong terms, it does not use its right of veto, and it tries to be a constructive
opposition within G8. Though Putin's Russia is much, much better than its
predecessors, Gorbachev and Yeltsin's Russia, it can't do much yet. So
in a way, Eric's line is rather wishful thinking, but it has some power
of its own. This is pity that Putin seems to be sure to retire next year,
and it is not clear who will take his place.
-
-
- Cold War Lite
by Eric Walberg
-
- A new, leaner, meaner Russia is picking up the Soviet
torch. Watch for the fireworks, predicts Eric Walberg...
-
- It's official. As the US proceeds with its new world
order in the Middle East, the world at large and even space, Russia, resurgent
with its oil revenues and booming economy is again taking on the G8 coterie
on all fronts. No apologies and no looking back.
-
- The bid to control space, once openly referred to in
Reagan years as "Star Wars", accelerated this spring with anti-missile
deployment plans in Poland, the Czech Republic and even Georgia, and the
triumph of Nicolas Sarkozy in the French presidential elections, who publicly
supports this development -- "trying to reach your left ear with your
right hand", as Russian President Vladimir Putin put it. The Star
Wars talk, of course, is long gone -- this gives too much away.
-
- Instead of highlighting this dangerous subtext, Western
media has loudly been shaking its collective finger at... yes, Putin, for
using Cold War rhetoric to score domestic points. Putin has also said he
would likely suspend the 1988 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty
negotiated by former presidents Reagan and Gorbachev in the heady days
of perestroika which basically gave the US what it asked for. The West
of course portrays this as another sign of Russian sabre-rattling, but
it in fact is thoroughly defensible in light of what the US and NATO have
been up to.
-
- As usual in the US political system of "checks and
balances", a treaty signed by a president must be ratified by a 60
per cent majority in the Senate. The 1988 treaty, modified to try to ensure
Senate approval in 1999, was, even 11 years later, never ratified by the
Senate. Like many other treaty partners in the past, Russia was sold a
bill of goods. The only countries that ratified the treaty are Russia,
Belarus and Kazakhstan. The US never honoured the treaty, so why should
Russia?
-
- And what's wrong with the treaty? At the current arms
control talks in Vienna, Russian delegation head, Mikhail Ulyanov said
it did not take into account the extraordinary expansion of NATO since
then: first Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, plus seven more in
2004 -- all former members of the socialist bloc. Ulyanov said the treaty
prevented Russia from deploying substantial forces along its flanks, particularly
in the northern Caucasus, where NATO bases are popping up like daisies,
with the US establishing large bases in NATO member countries Bulgaria
and Romania, right next door, with Georgia lining up.
-
- In a speech given at the 43rd Munich Conference on Security
Policy in Germany in February, referring to the Cold War days, Putin reflected:
"there was an equilibrium and a fear of mutual destruction. And in
those days one party was afraid to take an extra step without consulting
the other. And this was certainly a fragile peace and a frightening one,
but as we see today, it was reliable enough. Today, it seems that the peace
is not so reliable."
-
- There's an irksome commonality between US-Russian and
Israeli-Palestinian relations here. In a negotiating strategy straight
from Israel's war plans, US assistant secretary of state for European and
Euro-Asian Affairs, Daniel Fried downplayed these new bases (read: settlements)
though he added that NATO was prepared to consider Russia's concerns after
it withdrew its troops from Georgia and Transnistria. "Let's solve
Transnistria, let us ratify, and then we can talk about the flanks,"
reasoned Fried. Do I hear: "Let's have unconditional recognition of
Israel by the Arabs, and then we can talk about a Palestinian state. Oh,
and in the meantime we'll just build a few more settlements?" Nice
try, Fried.
-
- Among their many locations around the world, US troops
are patrolling Kosovo in the NATO "peacekeeping" mission to carve
a second Albania out of Russian ally Serbia's southern province. The only
thing stopping this are Russian vetoes, though the writing is on the wall.
Pop star President George W Bush just returned from a tour of Albania itself.
And, in classic Cold War tit-for-tat, threats to recognise Kosovo unilaterally
have been met with threats by Russia to recognise Georgia's breakaway Abhazia
region unilaterally, where citizens have already been granted Russian citizenship.
-
- On Star Wars, disarmament and Kosovo, Russia is just
not willing to go along with US imperial plans. So the Western media to
the rescue! The increasingly vocal criticism of Russia is dressed up in
totalitarian, authoritarian rhetoric which neatly sidesteps the real issues.
Funny how early post-9/11 neo-con boasts about the US as an empire have
long ago been silenced, as the grim side of empire has come to the forefront
in Afghanistan and Iraq, and US plans in Europe make it unseemly. But dropping
Star Wars and imperial rhetoric doesn't change the facts on the ground
(or in space).
-
- Meanwhile, US attempts to continue its control of the
world financial institutions is also under threat from this newly confident
Russia. At the recent World Economic Forum (WEF) in St Petersburg, dubbed
by Russia as a Davos for the emerging markets, and clearly timed to undermine
the recent G8 circus, Putin attacked international economic institutions
for protecting the interests of a select few developed countries and called
for a new global economic order that would give rapidly growing developing
economies a bigger role. Putin said they "look archaic, undemocratic
and awkward "as they protect the interests mainly of developed economies.
Today protectionism, which the WTO is intended to fight, often comes from
developed economies that set up this structure." He cited the Doha
Round of global trade talks which have been bogged down for the past six
years because of disagreement between rich and poor countries over eliminating
agricultural subsidies, and called for the creation of new regional trade
bodies.
-
- Russia remains the only major economy outside the WTO.
To give its green light to WTO membership for Russia, among other demands,
the EU wants Russia to loosen control over its energy sector and export
duties on raw lumber, which are intended to spur processing capacity at
home. But just as in Cold War days, when many Western companies were happy
to do business with the Soviet Union, the world of dollars and sense goes
its merry way with or without the WTO stamp of approval. At the WEF, a
multibillion dollar deal between Boeing and Aeroflot was unveiled, with
delivery of 22 Boeing 787 Dreamliner jets to begin in 2014.
-
- Confounding Western criticisms of Russian recalcitrance
on international economic issues, Putin went on the offensive with regards
to EU criticisms, saying that many developed economies were guilty of blocking
investment. "It turns out that foreign investment is not always considered
a good thing. Russia, quite to the contrary, wants to establish the most
favourable regime for foreign investment." Putin also called for "the
creation of several world currencies, several financial centres."
Maybe Putin's crystal ball has revealed that the WTO is a paper tiger,
along with the WB and the IMF, and he's making other plans.
-
- Russia is looking very much like the old Soviet Union
these days, but leaner and sharper, stripped of its east European baggage,
with a decisive leadership and alliances with Belarus, Central Asian nations,
Iran, and China, however cynical. We can only await the next withering
quote from the newly confident Russian bear about the emperor's new clothes.
Too bad there is no one to blow the whistle so clearly for the Palestinians,
though Putin's forceful calls for charting a new anti- US imperial course
can only help lay the groundwork for everyone outside Disneyworld.
-
- http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2007/851/in2.htm
|