rense.com

The Red Hand Of Deception
By Ted Lang
Exclusive to Rense.com
5-12-7

Reiterating my basic philosophy of government and its politics, I again offer that there are two types of people: good ones and bad ones. There are people who feel Man is basically evil, and then there are those who see their fellow human beings as basically good. The folks in the former category may conclude that there are some exceptions to their rule, but not enough to change their overall philosophy that big government is needed to force people to do the right thing and to behave. The libertarian view point, and the one I support, offers that people are basically good. 
 
Oddly, the very same people who believe in the inherent evil within each individual also believe that a large group of basically bad people, termed "government," will make bad things go away and replace them with good things. But if one individual is basically bad, how can a large group of basically bad individuals, namely government, make things better when accountability is so easily lost amongst such a bad crowd?
 
That said another point needs to be made. The large group of bad people, government, requires as well the best of the baddest; that is, the large group of bad people needed to keep US honest requires leadership. Government, or "the state," requires leaders and their deputies and appointees to help US all along in finding the right direction to ensure and direct our good behavior. And never mind that this all begins with the concept that each and every one of US is inherently bad to begin with.
 
As a true free and independent source of news and information grows by the day, supplanting the falsehoods and propaganda from the "American" news industry, we are finding out more and more about the astonishing evils perpetrated by our government's leaders and their deputies and appointees. This is a good place to clear up some general confusion regarding the state. Generalities are generally a bad thing ­ they cause an evil to be ascribed to an entire race, or a religion, or all the people of a nation. 
 
There is a distinct difference between the geographic distinctions of a country and its people. There is a difference between a vociferous faction of a people and that same people when taken as a whole. And there is a difference between a government's leadership and the rank and file workers employed in a bureau or office of a department or division of the state. Reflecting upon the latter, please keep in mind those dedicated and loyal agents of the FBI and CIA who desperately tried to warn America about an impending 9/11. 
 
Think of the employees of the state, the Fire Department of New York City, the NYPD, the Port Authority cops, the Emergency Medical and Rescue workers, and so on, who put their lives on the line to protect their fellow citizens. Many of them gave their lives in the service of their fellow countrymen and not for praise and accolades from their superiors. They weren't looking to collect bonuses and special awards. They were just doing what they loved to do, and truly just trying to serve their fellow Man.
 
The distinction between rank and file state workers and the deputies and political appointees they are assigned to, should never ever be lost. I have oft lambasted the FBI, the NYPD, the CIA, and others in this space, and failed to clarify my posture as being opposed to their politically based bureaucratic leadership, especially a leadership corrupted by corrupt "American" politics. If I have offended any state employee by taking such liberties, a position I assure the reader I never intended, I now offer my sincerest apologies. And no, I have not now, or at any time, received an irate letter or e-mail complaining of such callous generalizations on my part. But it is something that needs to be said, as well as remembered, as I continue to attack the corruption and unbelievable stupidity of the state and its corrupt, stupid leaders.
 
That all said, where am I going with conspiracies and the corrupt and stupid leaders of the American state, a government which can now be modified as "police state?" All that is needed to prove the stupidity, incompetence and arrogance of American government and in politics is just the mention of one name: George W. Bush [Moronus horribilis]. Enough said!
 
It is now known fact, that dedicated government workers in the FBI and CIA saw 9/11 coming and tried to stop it. It couldn't be stopped because, as those of US who are informed by the real free and independent press, the Internet, a.k.a. the "alternate media" [AM] already know, 9/11 was planned and executed by neoconservative criminals within the Bush crime machine. And all the Bush crime regime's authority, legitimization, and staggering might are derived from that one sole source: 9/11. 
 
Given the revelations from the Project for the New American Century, wherein a "Pearl Harbor for the 21st century" was a must-do first step, and given the highly planned and organized nature of that prerequisite terrorist act against US, isn't it extremely obvious that this highly secretive and well-executed plot served the real plotters so well? And isn't it even more obvious, given the massive coordinative effort required at all levels of American government, as well as the astonishing technical coordination needed and executed, that a "higher authority" pulled the strings and that the Bush regime is really just a puppet? As Bruce Willis pointed out commenting on the JFK assassination, the real criminals are not only still at large, but seemingly untouchable as well.
 
9/11 was a smashing success for the criminal state. It created the justified terror in unsuspecting citizens, thereby justifying yet more terrorism to be applied against US by our criminal state. It is now a guaranteed and proven catalyst and therefore a vital, standardized function of our police state: create an act of terror, and then propagandize it by offering the people a false flag perpetrator promising the creation of "justice" from the unjust terror created to correct it. And all the while, continue unabated the propaganda from the complicit media that the problem can be solved by the very same bad people who created it in the first place: the state.
 
Alien media propagandists such as Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Hannity can easily solve our problems: vote for the GOP! Republicans are good and Democrats are bad. Or you can follow the advice of Sarandon, Streisand and Baldwin: vote for Democrats because Democrats are good and Republicans are bad. Or maybe we can all accept the truth that BOTH our political and government systems no longer serve our interests. It is that important realization that we are being deprived of by paying attention to the meaningless and mind-numbing blather of stupid propagandists and their self-imposed ignorance. Political label bashing is dangerous because it is a serious distraction which blocks both debate and the process of identifying and solving problems.
 
The media blabbermouths know this and are therefore extremely immoral; they continue to deter corrective action by imposing their political label-based solutions. They are not only distracting and desensitizing US, but actively participating in advancing the deadly and dangerous state that has now enslaved this once great nation of free people. Opening arguments cannot even be presented. Possibilities are immediately dismissed and labeled as absurd because inquiry is falsely and deliberately being relegated to mere rhetoric motivated by partisan political posturing. This hampers and sometimes deprives even a free and independent press of getting at the truth. Media propaganda and pro-partisan government falsehoods are never brought into question, and if they somehow surface, well then the newspaper mentality of the public will kick in and soon all will be forgotten or simply taken in stride as a "fact of life."
 
What is a good conspiracy if not a closely held secret among the plotters and beneficiaries? Isn't the benefit from the plot the objective, and if none other than the plotters and planners benefit, and the fact of their implementing the outcome can be concealed, can't it just be made to look like pure coincidence? 
 
Think of the pure coincidence of the corporate entities run by and employing Jewish office workers that were told not to report to work at WTC on 9/11. Think of the lucky stock traders who sold short airline stocks of the companies whose planes crashed on 9/11. Think of the unheard of lease agreement and corresponding insurance policies signed by Larry Silverstein in which HE would be reimbursed, and not the Port Authority, the public entity that actually owned the buildings. The legal documents specifically referred to this arrangement should a disaster occur bringing down the WTC towers. 
 
Think of the coincidence of him and his lawyers specifically designating "an act of terrorism" as the causative factor in the destruction of WTC allowing him to collect his $7 billion in insurance money. Think of the coincidence of the towers being hit only months after these documents were signed and the ink barely dry! Think of the coincidence of the high-fivers arrested in their van on 9/11, and the coincidence of traces of explosives being found in their van by bomb-sniffing dogs. Think of the coincidence that they were not only aliens from Israel, but all employed by the same Israeli government agency: the Mossad. Now think of the absurdity in their quiet release and return to Israel. Think of the U.S.S. Liberty.
 
Isn't it clear and painfully obvious that evidence and proof are now totally irrelevant? Isn't it clear that even when proof and evidence are astonishingly available and out in the open, the public can be deceived and dissuaded by the likes of Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity and The New York Times, all of whom offer that conspiracy buffs are just politically motivated partisan super freaks? Isn't it obvious that even if there is evidence, hiding behind the alien media and its propagandists, the criminal state can get away with almost anything? 
 
Isn't it clear that in order to determine guilt on the part of the criminal state we must therefore look now as to who BENEFITS?! And isn't it always the criminal state? And isn't it now painfully obvious that we need look only at the collective MORAL CHARACTER of our criminal state to conclude its guilt? Proving guilt is now irrelevant. All that is required to accept the guilt of our criminal state's brutality, depravity, and moral turpitude is its lust for terror, mass murder and torture, and how these will serve to benefit the bad people who rule over US.         
 
Who benefited from 9/11 if not the criminal Bush regime? But to a larger extent, aren't those who profited so much more the behind-the-scenes Bush regime enablers and therefore true beneficiaries? And who might they be? They'd be the same ones Bruce Willis identified relative to the JFK assassination. But why stop there? How about identifying those plotters as the same ones who dispatched RFK and JFK, Jr. also? How about those plotters being the same ones that tried to take out President Andrew Jackson for opposing a national bank, or Abe Lincoln for printing his own greenbacks? Goes back a long way, now doesn't it?
 
Call them what you will, but they've been around a long time in our history and continue to pull our strings and the strings of our government. Our nation was truly free for only a very brief time. Rothschild financed the Hessians who were uniformed terrorists, mass murderers and plunderers, and fought against US during the American Revolution. I guess the international bankers will take credit for bringing US democracy. And in 1913, agents of Rothschild internationalist bankers blackmailed and manipulated President Woodrow Wilson and our Congress to pass and enact the Federal Reserve Act [national bank] and its guarantor, the Income Tax. 
 
Four years later, the Zionist team that coached Wilson was rewarded for their efforts: Wilson declared war on Germany. The means of financing that war were put in place by the debt-serving currency orchestrated by the agents [Warburg, Baruch] of the Rothschild international house of bankers. Bernard M. Baruch made a profit of $200 million for his efforts and expertise in managing America's defense manufacturing and war materiel industries. It is this war profiteer who in all likelihood inspired US Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to write his famous book, "War is a Racket." Butler never identified Baruch, but the reference in his book is unmistakable.
 
The Rothschild international bankers got US into World War I, World War II, and their involvement and their meddling in our affairs date as far back in our history as the American Revolution and the lives of Presidents Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln. Is it too much to conclude that it is they who had a hand also in the multi-assassinations of the Kennedys? Why was theLiberty incident so fervently covered up by Johnson and McNamara, and our rotten, treason-motivated alien press? Why are we in Iraq? Why are we going to go to war with Iran? Why vote when Hillary has already been appointed to the presidency? Who's behind all of this? And who will benefit from the ultimate outcome of endless war? 
 
Who has always benefited in the past as demonstrated all throughout history?  
 
© THEODORE E. LANG 5/13/07 All rights reserved  
 
Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros