rense.com

The History Of Hedge Funds
By Bert Cooper
(c) 2007 All Rights Reserved
Exclusive to Rense.com
4-3-7

There will be no end to the history of "what a hedge fund 'is'" - but it may help to see how they have evolved over the course of history to see what they are, or will become.
 
To the oligarchy (who like reptiles travel as nomads and care naught for the names of their fathers, (who from the 8th century emanated from a line of pre-Chingis Khan Marxists, of Caucasian - Crimean - Ukranian descent, (the philosophical essence of the "Marxist dialectic" being on the left: existentialist patronage (me me, now) - on the right: indifference to human suffering (sodomizing humanity), the "dialectic" itself being a smokescreen for Jewish tree trade and bank fraud, (the essence of bank fraud being the debasement of property (usury); the essence of "free trade" being usurpation of political sovereignty and productive creativity of the Atomic citizen, (where the citizen-male recognizes the advanced cognitive potential in the brain organs of the female and the child, (the proof of which is self-evident - without the poetics of advanced language and the science and harmonics of advanced cooking and music, men would still be living in caves and hiding behind trees, sneaking about in fear of the shadow of the claw of an eagle))))), including the British Royal Family (the Greek "Battenberg" family being the so- called head of (or the "defender of the faith of") the Episcopalian flock (read, Eastern Establishment - Russian - Khazar Jewish pedophiles)), behind "the scenes," the Hedge Funds are the "contractual whatnots" that have over the course of history been ruining the world.
 
The following history, of the hedge fund as an oligarchical archetype, is so short, it has to be written somewhat humorously.
 
About 8000 BC, as a UFO was a'passing by planet "Earth," a genetic accident, a scientific experiment gone bad, escaped out backdoor of one of its poop chutes. It happened that this pack of experimental humanoid-looking reptiles landed in the tall grasslands beyond the outer horizons of human habitation, perhaps somewhere beyond Siberia even. But, because their scales, and their seminal ejaculate, glowed in the dark, they were able to find each other and breed. (Centuries later, primitive human beings wandered up north, to gather up the glowing scales that flaked off their skins, and crooned about their magical powers eventually the glowing flakes from these UFO reptiles became known as llummin.) So, these mongols, or mongoloid reptiles, then began mating with the humanoid snakes that slithered in the tall and damp grasslands, and eventually they began to bred with human criminals and social misfits, and even later, eventually adopted a human-looking appearance, with an outer skin-like covering to conceal the inner reptilian scales. Rapacious nomads in heart and mind, by about 4000 BC, they began to migrate southward, where they invaded, or infested, what it now known as China.
 
The Chinese philosophers soon realized that the infestation of these hard-hearted mongols (like the latter day Mao Tse-dungs, or his genetic predecessors, specifically Queen Victoria, Henry VIII, and Chingis Khan - who are genetic replications of Chairman Mao, right down to the hairy moles on their chins), were not good for science, history, or society. So, they kicked them out. The Chinese pushed the mongoloids back up North - poor things.
 
The Chinese philosophers were so freaked out by these warlord reptiles, that they even built a giant wall, in the philosophical certainty that there must a clear separation between scientific civilization in China, and the nomadic give-a-damn ways of the invading nomadic reptiles. (Now the Chinese will find out that these same mongols, having circled the globe westward, have made their way back into China - inside the Wall via Bertrand Russell's Marxist woodshed. Bertrand Russell, who was not a Christian, had trained his little Mao well, as chamber-pot boy for his intellectual droppings.)
 
Having been expelled from China, the mongoloids then tried to infest the Persian civilization, where there was a thriving science. It didn't take the Persians long to figure out that free-trading, bank fading, contractual-lying anti-family God-hating, family-hating, father-hating ways of these creatures, (who hated music, poetry and science, (including especially astronomy and agriculture, which have to have multi-generational time-lines for development); civilized human beings tending to organize on long-term principles of science, and conscience), were no damn good ... so, like the Chinese from centuries before, the Persians kicked them out. Again - poor little reptiles.
 
Once again, they are on the run. So, they tried invading India. Same story. Got kicked out again. So they head back up north, but by this time, they are starting to figure out that, since they are nomads, since they hate science and civilization, and since they are destined to always be on the run, as liars, thieves and rapacious murders shall always be, they needed a system, a cover, a "contractual means" by which they could "survive" their perpetual diaspora.
 
Meanwhile, the nomadic reptiles were also slowly becoming more humanoid looking, stealing from the gene pool of each civilization they infested, as they moved on, as is their method. They cut their way into the mountain passes of the Caucasus, where they learned to ply their livings by killing each other and by extorting tribute by "controlling the gates of free trade." This extortion racket became the modus operandi of the first hedge fund, as a kind of primitive mafia operation, "capturing" a living for "the Klan" from the "free trade" that was occurring on the silk road, between the Chinese and Persian civilizations to the east, and the Greek and Germanic civilizations of Europe to the west.
 
Greece in its pre-Athenian and Athenian haydays of 400 BC then made the mistake of trying to colonize the Crimean peninsula. Of necessity, this caused them to try to do business with the mongoloids, and that was the beginning of their end. The mongoloids had no concept of the role of honesty in a civilized society. As nomads, they are strictly existentialist businessmen - they live only for now, and for now only. What's mine is mine, Jack, so screw you - the nomadic mentality of a jackal - the opposite of civilization, which in the beginning grows by reason, and then eventually by compassion.
 
So the Athenian culture became corrupted, from within, by the philosophy of free trade, and their currency became debased, by the nomadic - existentialist - Marxist philosophies of the early Crimean - Caucasian mongoloids. The mongoloids realized that they could work a mafioso-type shakedown of the Athenian city-state culture, by seizing control of their food supply, which came mostly from the Peloponnesian peninsula. And it just happened that all trade between the mainland (Athens) and the farmland (Peloponnese) had to pass through a narrow isthmus of land occupied by the city of Korinth. So, the mongoloids seized control of a mountainside which overlooks the city, where they setup a Pentagon-type military base, which they called Delphi. From there they seized control of the city Korinth. They then set up trade banks (the hedge funds are evolving) to control the trade in food for the Athenian city-states. The Persians, who were friends of the Platonic Athenians, realized that their Athenian friends were in distress, as the same mongoloids had only centuries before tried to destroy the Persian civilization. And so, the Persians came to the rescue of their Athenian friends.
 
The Persians did not destroy the Athenian culture. From the more substantive cultural - intellectual perspective, they saved Athenian culture. Modern sirens, posing as historians, financed by Rupert the Murdaah, all sing in unison, "they lost" - but in doing so, the Persians also crushed a totally infested and corrupted Korinthian culture, an infestation of mongoloid swindlers and extortionists, which was not Athenian in any fashion. The Persians crushed a so- called Greek culture that had devolved into a free-trade culture of hedge fund extortionists.
 
So after the Persians pushed the mongoloid infestation out of Korinth, they migrated up the Adriatic coast and in the dark of night settled into the swamp lands of Venice. There, they again they immediately set up an extortion racket, and seized control of the "monetary gates" of international trade.
 
Then along came this divine human being named Christ, who, because of his honesty soon became a threat to the money changers (a money changer is someone who changes something real (a shek, silver; or a shekel, a silver coin) into something not-real (a na-shek, or usury). The Federal Reserve is an example of usury - we create our own roads, farms, schools and factories, etc., so why do we borrow fictitious currency from a foreign power? why do we look to a foreign power, to "hallmark" our own bills of credit? (Are you wearing your own shoes right now? Ok!, you owe me 10%. Is the "dollar" bill the currency of your and my sovereign nation? Ok, so, why do we pay tribute to a foreign power, who lends it back to us, after we print it for them?) Usury is not some number, like 10% or 100%. Usury is a substitution or usurpation of something real, for something not-real, creating a system of illusory "contracts" (hedge fund artifacts) which controls the use of the real object.)
 
So, the Venetian mongoloids realize this dude Christ is a threat to their dishonest way of existence, and so they decide to squat on, or usurp the growing political authority of the growing Christian congregations. So they setup this storefront for Christianity called Rome, and begin sale of all sorts of phenomenon, like indulgences for pedophiles and so forth. The key issue is, the Venetians always maintain control of the emittance of currency for trade, and of credit for new projects.
 
So, the Venetian mongoloids made slaves of the white Germanic Christians for roughly 700 years (Rome was built by white Christian slaves, including its aqueducts, its roads, etc.) until this cat named Charlemagne came trotting along. Charlemagne, because of his Christian honesty, soon became the enemy of the Venetians, and so he organized an army of Germanic Christians and launched a war against Rome. Concurrent with Charlemagne, this similar cat named Mohammad, who also hated the dishonesty of the Venetian usurpers, who called themselves financiers of the Roman Catholic System, also launched his war against the Roman Empire. Without the intelligence and military assistance he received from the armies raised by Mohammed, Charlemagne could never have asserted his main, and quire revolutionary idea, namely that the value of money must be stabilized - that regulation of the stability of money was a political function of government, and that governents must be organized to resist the destabilization of money by free-trading Venetians, who seek profit by making its value go up and down - to quote our Jefferson, "first by inflation and then by deflation" the Venetians will debase our currency and bleed our nation dry, and, after they then devour our children, they will then just move on.
 
The birth of European civilization and the idea of the nation state as we know it could not have occurred without the military assistance which Mohammedan armies offered to Charlemagne in defeating Rome. It was with Mohammed's help in the 700s, that Charlemagne's primitive idea of the nation state was born - whereby mankind suddenly discovered for itself a means whereby the reptilian Hedge Funds of the Venetians might be prevented from destroying their infrastructure and institutions.
 
Much as the Persians saved western civilization by kicking the mongoloids out of Greece, and saving Greek writings on science, the Mohammedans saved European civilization by helping Charlemagne defeat the same nomadic tribes of reptilian bankers in Venice, by crushing their storefront in Rome.
 
So in 740 AD, this mongoloid bigwig, Khagan Bulan (who wore a huge wig made of sheep's wool to hide his genetic deformities), held a conference at a Venetian outpost in Crimea, summoning Christian, Jewish, and Mohammedan leaders, that he might decide which "religion" his people, a Venetian faction called Khazars, might adopt. The Christians under Charlemagne and Mohammad had just joined together and defeated Rome (Venice), so the Jews offered the Khagan (whose reptilian ancestors had been dumped out of the poop chute of a UFO), a deal he couldn't refuse - they agreed that henceforth the Khazars, e.g. the ashkenazi - future Russian Hegelian-Marxist white trash, would be the new and authentic bloodline Jews, sans appellation controllée. (This theft of the name Jewish still goes on today - Abramov, a Russian Jew, puts on a black trench coat, traffics in children, and Ruper the Murdaah's media-zombies brainwash all America into nodding in unison, "Now, that's! what a Jew looks like." Same for Abramov's sex partner, Cjerkoff. They're really mongoloid reptiles, heathen accidents that fell out of a UFO poop chute long ago.)
 
So the Khagan, as new leader of the Jews, realized that this Mohammad dude was a danger to his style of life, so he sent one of his agents off to corrupt the Shi'ia sect, with the intent of dividing the Mohammedan culture, and then destroying it. For the Shi'ia (and for their Wahabbi brethren in the Arabian peninsula), the rule is that, the only possible source for the true political authority of a leader (Mulla) is the ball juice of their chosen ancestors. (Later, the philosophers of the Enlightenment would try to press the same idea, that political authority emanates from the ejaculate or 'llumin of one's ancestors, into "Christianity," but in a slightly different way - they would repeatedly chant that the lamps of the Enlightenment can be illuminated only by the glowing scales which flaked off the skins of humanity's mystical ancestors.) Thus, a citizen of the Shi'ia and Wahabbi sects, who happens to be descended from the politically incorrect ball juices of an un-approved ancestor, has no chance for full participation in his or her society - they are left to "proving" their loyalty to "the Klan" by flagellating themselves in public, and in the hope that their estranged God will "see" their suffering and intervene for them. The authority of political leadership in the Sunni sects, is completely different. A Sunni Mulla acquires his or her authority by public election, based reason and compassion, on personal virtue, and intelligence and understanding. So, while Sunni Mullas are elected, by reason, Shi'ia Mullas are pre-selected, by ball juice. In the Sunni cultures, children learned that science, and thus honesty, is important for civilization. Meanwhile, in the Shi'ia cultures, those children of the correct ball-juice ancestry, learned that honesty, and science, is of little value, in regard of the genetic source of their political authority. In time, it came to be that, Sunni children became smarter than Shi'ia children, and thus the powers of reason in Sunni children became a "threat" to Shi'ia fathers.
 
By the 1400's, Venetian power would again be harangued by Sunni Muhammadans, who by that time had extended northward to Vienna and westward, across North Africa, into Spain. Meanwhile, the power of Rome and its Venetian financiers, under leadership of Russian Khazars, began to decline. Realizing that they had basically "finished their meal" in devouring Europe and North Africa, "the Venetians" pulled up roots, and sought refuge in Amsterdam and London, where they eventually ensconced themselves as the British Royal Family and as its financiers. The British Royal Family (always a Jew, of Russian Khazar descent, though they will admit no names for their fathers) realized that they couldn't control Rome from London as easily as they had controlled it from Venice, so they decided to re-invent a new "religious" storefront, and institutionalize it on Jewish-Khazarist and Roman-Catholic principles. The predatory sexual habits of Henry VIII provided the required smokescreen, for the creation of a new financial empire and legal system, the Episcopalian Church of England, which would always be "protected" by a bloodline Khazar. (A modern equivalent to the Khazarist attempt to open up a new storefront in the outskirts of London might be Walmart Arkansas trying to open up a new Super Store in Afghanistan. Somewhere, some internal resistance would crop up.)
 
An innate characteristic of every Christian, is its immortal desire to refuse the privilege of being usurped by an oligarchical reptile. Thus it was, that when the Christians had been expelled from the shores of the Euxine Sea and the hillsides of the Caucasus Mountains, by an infestation of racist reptiles who under the leadership of the Khagan Bulan stole the name Jewish from the Jews, the Christians got the hell out of Dodge, and moved their families, economies and monasteries to Ireland and Scotland. When the Khazars followed them across Germany, into the English isles, and opened up their London storefront, and again began their extortions of honesty and their raping of children, the Christians again resisted. (A raped child soon grows up to become a cheaper man, or a dishonest soldier, and thus it is that the systematic rape of children, whose molested souls have no choice but to believe in the goodness of angels and the justness of usurpations, serves the needs of an oligarchy of Venetian pedophiles and their cunning priests - the spiritual essence of Marxist "communism" being a catholic alienation of the human soul.)
 
With their backs to the Atlantic Ocean, the Protestant Christians, as they had been dis-labeled by the Jewish - Catholic controlled media of the times, were now cornered. By the 1600s, they were forced into a civil war within England - they knew that without power to open their own bank, Christians would never be able to control their own currency and build their own futures. The alternative, was to surrender forever, to the idea of paying tribute to the hedge funds of hate-filled Jews and their child-molested Roman Catholic soldiers. Thus a "Protestant" named Anthony Cooper, universally hated by Jewish Khazars and their hard-core Catholic priests, secretly joined together with some of his "Protestant" friends and launched an end- run around the Venetian-controlled hedge funds of the time. By purchasing an Earldom for £12,000 (whereupon he took the name Shaftesbury), he gained entry into the totally corrupted halls of powers, and organized a set of intrigues and extortions to corner the wandering and degenerate Royals - the Khazars and Catholics, though they call themselves Episcopalians were really grassland Jews from Russia, had become indolent and gay. Behind their backs, the wily Shaftesbury was able to organize a "Protestant" bank, called the first Bank of England, from whence he was able to finance the founding of the American colonies, as an scientific outpost for Christianity, much as Ireland and Scotland had become a scientific outpost for Christianity in the eighth century. The Jews and the Catholics freaked! How dare this "Protestant" be so honest and clever. For example, his bank financed John Winthrop and the building of the Massachusetts colony, as an outpost for Christianity, where principles of science and honesty might prevail over Khazarist - Catholic principles of priestly smoke and obstinate dishonesty. It is interesting to note that according to the notes of John Cotton, the colony's minister, the penalty for any merchant to plied his way on principles of opportunistic trade, now called "free trade," was death. One of Winthrop's first scientific projects was Saugus Iron Works, which soon outproduced all the English mills combined, producing one-third of the world's iron. This bank, and its steel mills, were a total threat to the Jews of London and the Catholics of Rome. America, founded on principles of science and honesty, as opposed to the Jewish and Catholic principles of creating wealth by extortion and usurpation, had found an honest banker, in the Protest Shaftesbury. To the chagrin of the hungry Jew and the hungrier Catholic priest, the idea of Christianity had again been launched.
 
In launching this flanking operation against the oligarchical hedge funds of the Jews and Roman Catholics, Shaftesbury, who was dissed as "a Protestant," but who was as anti-Khazarist and anti-Popish as it gets, was in reality, just repeating history. In financing the birth of America, Shaftesbury was merely carrying Charlemagne's idea of a nation state forward from the 700s. Unlike the Jews and the Catholics, the Protestants, often German in background, were not racists - and, much as the Germans under Charlemagne had welcomed the assistance of Mohammedan forces in resisting the universal usurpations and systematic child rapes by Jewish bankers and Catholic priests, the early American Protestants also welcomed the Mohammedans. The common goal was the defeat of a Jewish - Catholic controlled oligarchy (oligarchies are controlled by ideas), by organizing a republic based on reason (honesty) and compassion. (The economic principles of Christianity are thus seen as a threat to the economic principles of Marxism, soon to come.) Nor had this ancient Jewish - Catholic oligarchy forgotten the damage that Charlemagne and the Mohammedans had done to their "life style" - they instinctively recognized the threat that this "Protestant" bank represented, and immediately set about for its destruction - for good reasons, Jews and Catholics do not like the idea of Christians opening their own banks and organizing progress free from their unhappy mafia rights to extort and oppress. (Even today, they still go into an instantaneous and uncontrollable rage at the mere recital of this historic Christian flanking of Jewish-Catholic controlled hedge funds.)
 
Much as the Khazars had undermined Athenian Greece from within, and later Charlemagne's Christian nation from within, the Khazars and Catholics renewed their natural allegiances, and set out to undermine Shaftesbury's bank. (Many so called "patriotic"and organizations in America have been similarly undermined from within, by an impenetrable amalgam of Jews and Catholics who have infested the organizations, corrupting them from within by fear and secrecies, which then lead to formation of back-stabbing allegiances that are, shall we say, "other-aligned.")
 
The philosophical leader of this anti-Protestant, or anti-Shaftesbury movement was a man named John Locke, who while pretending to work for Shaftesbury, was constantly working against him. Within a mere fifty years, a transformational amalgam of Jews and Catholics, who adopted the name Scotsman from thin air and then called themselves "the Enlightened ones," had subsumed Shaftesbury's original idea of a "Protestant" bank, run by Christians for science and humanity, to promote the general welfare and flank the usurpations of hedge funds that were run by rapacious Khazars and insular Catholics, for their decadent pre-Marxist oligarchy. These so-called "enlightened Scotsman," being an intentional corruption of the original Christian Scotsman, soon conspired to suck the Christian bank into an array of false wars, and within fifty years of Shaftesbury's death, the bank was turned on its ear, much as Hamilton's replication of Shaftesbury's bank, the National Bank in Philadelphia, was in fifty years or so, turned on its ear, by the later-day John Locke of America, Andrew Jackson.
 
Then, in 1711, the grandson of this now almost unknown man, also using the name Shaftesbury, published a collection of letters, under the title of "Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions and Times."
 
It is simply not possible to find anywhere, a more powerful attack on Hobbes and Locke, and their successors, Marx et. al., by anyone, than this collection of letters, written by Anthony Cooper in 1695-1700. The letters weres so Christian and so powerful, they were immediately republished by their recipients, and then in 1711, by Shaftesbury, as a collection. By 1776, when Adam Smith, the Jew, published his Wealth of Nations as a reaction to Shaftesbury's concept of the Happiness of Christian Nations, Shaftesbury letters were immediately banned, and they have remained since then the most banned set of letters in the history of mankind. (As Shaftesbury has been recently "discovered," modern Jewish - Catholic editors have used footnotes and editorial license to corrupt the deeply cutting poetry within them.)
 
One simply cannot study the philosophical ideas behind the American Constitution, and omit Shaftesbury's deep, and psychologically ripping attacks on Locke and Hobbes, which incidentally also attack their later-day fraudsters, Marx and Freud. Incredibly, Shaftesbury's prose, which is based entirely on raillery and a poetry of humor, was, during the first part of the eighteenth century, 1711-1776, the most widely published book, and the widely read book, in the history of the English language, setting aside only one - the Bible.
 
How the hell can it be that, today, the most widely read and most widely self-published book in the first part of the eighteenth century, from 1700 to 1776, remains almost totally unrecognized?
 
How the hell can that be? Until 1776, the most widely read, most widely published book of the eighteenth century, 'cept only the bible, that rips the shit out of Locke and Hobbes, and nobody knows about it.
 
In a complete reversal of history, today, people think that back then, in the days of our founding fathers, people read only Locke and Hobbes, both of whom were working to undermine Shaftesbury, who in his light hearted and poetically devastating way, eviscerates not only Locke and Hobbes, but also the hard-hearted ways of the Jew and the Catholic. Uh Oh! Thus, in the modern editions, a few British "dons" make every effort possible to conceal Shaftesbury's philosophical humiliation of both Locke and Hobbes, and the Jew and the Catholic, while they try to re-attach him to the frauds of their "Scottish Illuminumisms."
 
Thus, even those who pretend to resist free trade and creation of universal one-world government, invariably also rail against Shaftesbury - look behind any attack on Shaftesbury, and you will find a Tory, a loyalist for a one-world universal government, no Mohammedans, no Christians, no Jews, no Confucians, just zombies for a Khazar or a Venetian wearing a sheep's clothing, operating a storefront of indulgences for their Marxist system of bank fraud. Ask them to define happiness, and listen. They will invariably give you a definition of happiness as "something that you can have" as a monkey might "have" a fistful of rice. Thus, they will say, happiness is immortality, as though immortality is something that could be owned like a marble and carried in a waistcoat pocket. Shaftesbury's concept of happiness is the opposite of such Jewish and Catholic existentialism.
 
As America's first philosopher (who the British even hate today because he was the first to use "American spelling") Shaftesbury took great care to define Happiness as a pre-ordained force of nature. He treats political Happiness almost as a principle of geometry, much as Kepler treats celestial "happiness" in the same way, much as Matthew Hale, a scientist of Shaftesbury's time, treats it, as "a concourse of Atoms." Have you ever known of a dishonest Atom? What then are the Jews and the Catholics, who ply their livelihoods by thievery and usurpation? To this very day, the Jews and the Catholics intend nothing less than total extermination of Shaftesbury, first for having opened a Christian bank and financed the development of America on principles of scientific economy, and then for having proposed the idea of Happiness as a pre-ordained force of nature, giving idea of Christian happiness to the idea of a national bank!
 
I have no doubt that, Shaftesbury's highly controversial work, with its deeply cutting but humorous attacks on the unnatural frauds of Jews and Catholics, was included in the libraries of all our Founding Fathers. Consider for example, the origins of the Jefferson's revolutionary idea, of a nation formed for "the pursuit of happiness." Why is it that Jews and Catholics strain themselves to claim ownership of this "Protestant" idea, as simple expression of a physical force of nature, as opposed to a mafioso force of usurpers and pedophiles? And then, why is it that when you ask them to cite the required reference, to back up their claim of ownership, they suddenly hide the pea of their philosophical proposal under one of many thimbles - the "switcheroo" which then follows is a form of mental sodomy, and it is a clue to their absolute dread of Shaftesbury, and of their deep hatred of his idea of happiness as a scientific force, organized by a principle of compassion, connected to a population, who emit their own currency and open their own bank. Jews and Catholics - to arms!
 
Shaftesbury juxtaposed in this collection of letters, an idea of happiness as an unstoppable natural force, sublime and unalienable, implanted by God within each individual human soul as a geometrically and poetically pre-ordained desire, expressed individually and politically through something which Shaftesbury calls virtue in his closing letter. The Catholics, their cardinals dripping in crimson and gold, and depending on the impotence of a stale Pope and his ring, that they might profit all the more from sales of indulgences, by a Pope more perfect than Christ, to Venetian pedophiles, freaked out - but, who would substitute brutish loyalty, and the offense of a mafioso of indulgences and popish substitutions, to the virtue of living human happiness. Shaftesbury's idea of a scientifically pre- destined happiness, also freaked out the Russian ashkenazi, white trash with a "free-will," whose free-trade extortion rackets demand total loyalty to their laws of revenge and of the nomadic vendetta - but, should Heaven then gain its merit, when Jews stab daggers into the momentary eyes of their enemy.
 
Leibniz read Shaftesbury as soon as his letters were published, and concluded that much of his (Leibniz') work on the Theodicity was unnecessary in the wake of Shaftesbury's letters. He even offered that much of his Theodicity had already been treated by Shaftesbury, and better said. Leibniz did not, and indeed could not have, for reason of a dull binding within his internal poetic, the word-space of his mind being somewhat "flattening" in its poetic energy, identified happiness as a force of nature in as forceful a way as the more poetic Shaftesbury had. This may be because the languages native to the original formations of Leibniz' mind, namely German, French and Latin, sadly, do not have a word anywhere in them, which rings with any good equivalence to the English word "happy" as Shaftesbury, Hale and Kepler used it. Thus, while Leibniz might write about what happiness was, as he later tried to do in the poetically mechanical Monadology, Shaftesbury's writing is itself, still today a happy nesting of almost endless paradoxes within paradoxes, and poetry within poetry, by which the very sovereignty of his happy paradoxes destroy the crude and superficial philosophies of Locke and Hobbes, and thus of Marx and Freud, and thus also of Jews and Catholics.
 
The Jews and the Catholics dreaded Shaftesbury's idea that happiness could be defined in a politically scientific way, as a "concourse of Atoms" where each Atom if you will, contributes its own God-given sovereignty and unalienable geometric authority to progress. (Jefferson's original word was "UNalienable rights" (a right springing from a natural authority), and his use of UNalienable was poetically very significant, as it cannot be mispronounced by Jews and Catholics, who corrupt Jefferson's idea by speaking of inalienable rights, which they carefully pronounce as "EN-alienable rights.") Add to that idea, individuals organizing sovereign governments, financing their futures from within, by their own national bank, and Shaftesbury's idea became something which no Catholic or Jew can allow. And thus, their attacks against Shaftsbury. For, if the Pope is to keep his throne as the center of a universe of human needs, from which our notions of infinity might be madly spun, on a center of the Universe protected by four huge twisted black pillars, then, this contrarian idea, or "Protestant" idea of a Christian citizenry organized as a concourse of Atoms would simply have to be suppressed. Even Locke, though ostensibly anti- Papist, still preferred the Pope's idea of happiness, where a good contract is one written on a cheaper man.
 
Quoting from a paragraph in Characteristics of Men ("Soliloquy: or Advice to an Author") - "We are now in an age when Liberty is once again in its ascendant. And we are ourselves the happy nation [whoa, now there's an idea] who not only enjoy it at home, but by our greatness and power give life and vigour to it abroad [the colony of Massachusetts] and are the head and chief of the European League [he was admired by Leibniz], founded on this common cause [of defeating Catholic-Venetian and Russian-Khazarist usurpations]. Nor can it, I presume, be justly feared that we should lose this noble ardour, or faint under the glorious toil, though, like ancient Greece, we should for succeeding ages be contending with a foreign power [he mentions the foreign wars used to corrupt his grandfather's idea of a bank], and endeavouring to reduce the exorbitancy of a Grand Monarch [the Bourbon king, Louis, for the Jews, or, the Pope, for the Catholics]. 'Tis with us at present as with the Roman people in those early days, when they wanted only repose from arms to apply themselves to the improvement of arts and studies. We should in this case need no ambitious monarch to be allured, by hope of fame or secret views of power [a preview of Gen. Washington's farewell speech?], to give pensions abroad as well as at home [Marc Rich, Russian Khazar, pardonned for corrupting American politics?], and purchase flattery from every profession and science [Al Gore and the purchase of scientific truth, and his flattery on global warming]. We should find a better fund [uh oh] within ourselves, and might, without such assistance, be able to excel by our own virtue and emulation."
 
Published as a book in 1711, and still hated and suppressed by Jews and Catholics today, are still revolutionary words. "Protestant Christians," scream the Catholic Venetians and Russian Khazars then and now in their rage, "the white slaves who for 700 years of our glorious Romantic past, god-damned slaves! who built our roads and our aqueducts opening their own bank, hah! and emitting their own credit for development of their own nation! No damn way buddy ..." says the Catholic Prince and the Jew, "
this means WAR!"
 
You would hear similar cries today, from the same Jews and Catholics (and their amalgam, called Episcopalians, in the Federal Reserve), were the inner city "Blacks" in America to dare to open their own bank, and start emitting their own credit and currency, to build their own infrastructure and civilization. Former slaves, daring to open their own bank, is always cause for War.
 
Shaftesbury's entire book is devoted to the idea of organizing a scientific but sublime and pre-ordained, geometry of national happiness, unleashed by virtue, and his idea of the pursuit of happiness, through the sovereignty of "a better fund within ourselves," as opposed to one borrowed from Venetian free traders, as opposed to one financed by sales of human indulgence by a remunerated Pope, and by Marxist tributes extorted by Russian Khazars (Episcopalians), that "we might excel by our own virtue and emulation [of Hale's concept of a happy concourse of Atoms.']"
 
So, in a way, Shaftesbury's book, now suppressed for two centuries, represents the philosophical core of the birth of America. It is in a way a raillery against a takeover, by the intrigues of a foreign power, of a Protestant effort by a small "cabal" to preserve a humanist concept of Christianity and to launch a new nation on principles of scientific labor, called to happiness by reason and compassion. That same foreign power, an operation by totally corrupt Khazars and Papists, by clinging Jews and gnashing Catholics, who by their thousand-year allegiances to Nietzschean power at any means and to suppressing the most powerful physical force in the universe human happiness are now fast at work to destroy America, and with it, all memory of Shaftesbury the "Protestant."
 
Following closely in the footsteps of Shaftesbury, along comes Hamilton and Jefferson, and they set up a system in America which, like Shaftesbury's is again premised on small government and sovereignty, and on science and honesty, and on not paying tribute to the Jewish - Catholic overlords who run the world into the ground from London. So, the Jews and Catholics funded a small think tank for Adam Smith, who by his study of "fawning dogs" tried to re-establish the ancient Russian - Marxist - Khazarist system of free trade (from each "fawning dog" according to his ability to produce, to each master (Khazar, Jewish - Catholic priest, as heathen commizar) according to his ability to usurp) and the other usurpations upon which Marx' philosophy of dialectical political fraud depends. Add to that Adams' writings, every July 4th, wherein he repeatedly referred to America as the City on the Hill, and often used the word "Zion" directly. Then, along came Lincoln, who defeated the Southern infestation of redneck Zionists, calling themselves "Southern Evangelical Christians," e.g. Russian ashkenazi, Russian peasant-thieves as "American white trash."
 
The Russian mongoloids, who were blue-eyed, white skinned and racist as hell, and who emigrated from some unknown grasslands beyond the horizons of outer Siberia, but who are now embraced as "the authenticated Jews," to the exclusion of the original Semitic Jews, who came from North Africa and were dark-skinned, freaked out. Being heathen existentialists, who will adopt any convenience in order to conceal their system of theft, the Royal mongoloids decided to create Israel with the name of "Zion," in order to steal Adams' idea of America as a City on the Hill, so as to prevent the "Protestant" American principles of sovereignty and honesty from spreading any further across the Asian continent. (In Lebanon, on the western shores of Asia, and in China on its eastern shores, missionaries from a successor to Hamilton's Christian Constitutionalist Society, organized as the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, began launching new nations on the Asian continent in the American mold. By 1860, under leadership from the American University, Lebanon had suddenly sparked into a very successful Christian nation, with sovereignty in banking, and with proposals for development of railroad infrastructure and the like. Similarly, in China, a student of Hamilton and Lincoln named Sun Yat-sen proposed establishing in effect, a Christian republic in China, again, with sovereignty over its own currency and banks, and with interior development of railroads, and the like. The Jews and Roman Catholics in London FREAKED! Christianity was breaking out! The idea of a sovereignty higher than that of the Pope had to be crushed, or else the Pope would to sell other than his indulgences. Similarly, the Venetian - Khazars would not be able to destabilize the value of money, and operate their hedge fund frauds, usurping the principle of the general welfare. The Jews and the Catholics, operating as Royals in London, under cover of their Episcopalian Church, which is really an amalgam of Khazarist - Catholic usurpations, saw that this could only be stopped by World Wide War.
 
It took two of them.
 
From their need to contain this world-wide breakout, was born the need for the Federal Reserve, which was put into place by assassination of McKinley, whereupon power was shifted over to America's first Marxist skinhead - Teddy Roosevelt - who then opened up the Bull Moose Party to put Woodrow Wilson, a KKK - homosexual prettyboy from Georgia, in power, who, while under control of Bernard Baruch, yet another Russian Klansman, and Marxist "Jew," set up the Federal Reserve System, so that American's might borrow their currency from Russian - Marxist Jews.) From the Fed, came its companion fraud, called the Bank of International Settlements (much as the Fed proclaims that its fiat usurpations are valid domestic "debts," the BIS proclaims, from thin air, that its overnight "settlement loans," required to "close" totally private exchanges made across international borders, are lawfully national debts, for which interest is to be paid only in gold, thank you. Thus, a Walmart retailer in Arkansas (a private outfit) makes a deal with its Walmart factory in China (again, a private outfit), and by existence of this so-called "trade" within Walmart, the BIS declares that you and I and the rest of the populations of the world are in debt, payable only in gold, for the fictitious overnight currency that they "just had to create for us," for its fictitious midnight settlements of "trade deficits" between private individuals. It is pure chimera! - that's a modern definition of a hedge fund).
 
The Second World War and its aftermath must be understood as an effort to check the onrushing spread of American-System economics and "Protestant" Christianity within China, Russia and Europe. Consider how the dictatorial powers of Bertrand Russell's songbird, Chairman Mao, were put into place. The careers of both Kim Il-sung, the Marxist leader of North Korea, and Ho Chi-minh, the Marxist leader of North Vietnam, were launched under guidance of two Russian Khazars, a Grigory Mekler from Moscow, and a young Phil Graham from Washington, D.C. The two "half-wars" on the Asian continent, that is the "Korean War" and the "Vietnam War," were both decades long 9-11 type psy-ops operations run against the Chinese people, creating a constant "terrorist threat" by which Chairman Mao was able to consolidate his Jew-loving, Christ-hating dictatorship. All the while, the populations of China would really have preferred the leadership of the staunch Christian, Chiang Kai-shek, who often proclaimed, "To my mind the reason we should believe in Jesus is that He was the leader of a national revolution," and "The only thing Oriental about me is my face." The Chinese peoples were ready to take on the Jews and the Catholics, but, under constant pressure of America's 9-11 boogie-man operation, run from London through Washington and Moscow, they finally surrendered to Chairman Mao's dictatorship, a dictatorship whose ideology and whose banking was controlled by very Russian Jews and Roman Catholics that Chiang Kai-shek, Gen. Douglas MacArthur (who was fired) and Gen. James Patton (who was assassinated), wanted to run out. It was the Truman administration, specifically, who launched the careers of Kim Il-sung and Ho Chi-minh, by giving them their first supplies of heavy military equipment, from the U.S. reserves intended for the land invasion of Japan. They were then able to win their first major military "victories" and launch their political careers, which then launched the two "half-wars" which consolidated Chairman Mao's dictatorial powers. Behold! as soon as Chairman Mao had exterminated all vestiges of Hamiltonian-Lincolnian "Protestant" Christianity from mainland China, the London Jews and their Roman Catholics "missionaries" launched the economic ideology free trade, and the CEOs of Jewish- and Catholic - owned American companies began to move their factories over to Communist Red China, where they pay
taxes to fund the privately owned (that is Russian - Khazar - Roman
Catholic owned) People's Army of Communist China.
 
That's how hedge funds work.
 
So, the Fed is about to implode on its own frauds (even the move- along nomads know that their frauds can't last forever) and with it, the BIS will also implode - so the mongoloids have set up another system of control, which we now called "the Hedge Funds," which now control the "free trade" in currencies between nations, while they abandon their castles in England and America, and build new ones in the mountains outside Peking, where they will be protected by their privately owned army, namely the People's Army of Communist China. (Imagine that, in America, the Republicans had their own army, and the Democrats had their own army. Pretty soon there would be only one army, owned either by Republicans or by Democrats. There would be no party for the nation state, serving both. That is what the People's Private Army of Communist China is like.)
 
So that's a brief summary of the history of the hedge funds. It's an ongoing story, which began long, long ago.
 
The semitic Jews, who are real humans, and who gave us Christ, whose mother was from Marowe, now Dafur, whose skin was so dark and whose mind was so radiant, it would probably frighten most American "Blacks," and, the semitic Jewish wannabes, are known to their usurpers, the Khazars (Shakespeare making a joke of the hard-K in his play, Julius Caesar, with its haha soft and mellifluous-C) as the 'llumin-notties, since the flake that falls off their skin does not glow in the dark.
 
Our problem is simple. We can either choose to understand through reason that human happiness, is, as a concourse of Atoms in the physical world, provably God's most sublime but unstoppable force in nature, or, we can continue to gladly offer our children as tribute- food to indifferent reptiles, whose ancestors long ago crawled out of the poop chute of a UFO. Believe it or not, the scales that flaked off the skins of their hedge-fund ancestors, did not actually glow in the dark.


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros