- The flagrant practice of State Terrorism
perpetrated by Israel, replying to terrorist acts with terrorism, can only
be counter-productive. If Tel Aviv thinks that destroying civilian infrastructures
will being Cpl. Shalit back, it is right in a body bag.
-
- If the UK had replied to terrorist acts
by the IRA by massacres of civilians in Belfast, the whole world would
have shouted out in horror.
-
- When Moscow launches an operation to
liquidate terrorist elements or to exterminate bandits in Chechnya, a hail
of criticism falls on Moscow from those countries which protect the leaders
of the "rebels" or "freedom fighters", the international
terrorists whose main aim is to destabilise the State of the Russian Federation.
-
- When the Russian authorities acted in
Beslan to free the children being held by these pigs, the European Union
even asked for explanations. Yet when the State of Israel massacres Palestinians
enjoying a picnic on the beach or when great destruction is caused to free
a hostage, the world is quiet.
-
- How can Tel Aviv expect to win the propaganda
war, claim the moral high ground and win the hearts and minds of the international
community by destroying civilian infrastructures in Gaza with military
hardware, namely an act of State Terrorism? However wrong, criminal and
unacceptable the kidnapping of Corporal Gilad Shalit was, an action carried
out not by "militants" as some say but rather by terrorists,
it is equally unacceptable to target bridges and power stations with military
hardware.
-
- This is a war crime and it is State Terrorism
However Tel Aviv will never figure on the US State Department's black list
on terrorism basically because Tel Aviv does what it wants. It is one of
the foundations of the New World Order, where disrespect for the law seems
to be a rule and not an exception.
-
- http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/28-06-2006/82622-israelterror-0
|
