New Indicting Evidence
Of The 911 Coverup
From Craig T. Furlong

The following information was emailed tonight, 07/25/06, to Drs. Fetzer and Jones with Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
Hello, Drs. Fetzer and Jones,
Thank you for all your efforts and hard work in getting at the real truth about 9/11.
I discovered last night information I think you should see. It is about the discrepancy in the precise times of the airplane impacts into the Towers:
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University vs the 9/11 Commission Report.
The bottom line (I am a corporate controller) is that according to the differences, the seismic readings happened before the planes hit.
Last night and tonight I sent two posts to Liberty Forum about this, and so I am copying and pasting them here for you (as they tell the entire matter; or at least enough to get you thinking).
I have looked high and low, but can not find this new information anywhere on the internet.
Post to Conspiracy 911 7/24/06
WTC7 must be the focal point to exposing the govt's coverup...HOWEVER I'd like to take a sharp turn if I may and give you something else to think about:
The official 9/11 Commission Report (your tax dollars wasted) states the following:
Impact time, AA Flt 11: 8:46:40 a.m.
Impact time, UA Flt 175: 9:03:11 a.m.
the official data readings from Lamont-Doherty give the following seismic events:
time 8:46:26: 0.9 Richter, signal duration 12 seconds [reported as first impact, WTC1]
time 9:02:54: 0.7 Richter, signal duration 6 seconds [reported as second impact, WTC2]
Two notable seismic events occurred before the planes ever hit the towers and were so close timewise to the actual impacts of the planes that Lamont-Doherty reported them as the impacts. The logical conclusion (which coincides with many eyewitnesses in the basements, e.g., William Rodriquez) is that these were explosives detonated to coincide with the aircraft hitting the towers. They were very close to getting the timing right. This is one time I'm going to believe the gov't; I think their times are correct, down to the second!
And, oh yes, getting back to WTC7, it did have quite a conflagration of fire that day on the south side of the building, and yes, it did have fairly large damage to the south face from debris of WTC1 hitting it...HOWEVER, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that these caused it to collapse IN NEAR-PERFECT SYMMETRY EXACTLY LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION; there is also no evidence to back a claim that support trusses for the floors 5 through 7 were damaged so as to cause the building to collapse.
Putting hypotheticals and conjectures aside (which are not evidence), we do have the fact that WTC7 fell in near-perfect symmetry at free-fall speed, exactly like a classic controlled demolition, and this is for all the world to see.
ONE OTHER THING: if you view the video "Eyewitness 9/11", you will see indisputable evidence by scientific sound analysis of the collapse of WTC1 that shows massive explosions occurred before the tower began to collapse; and, as would be expected, the first notable came from the basement.
A real investigation is needed NOW, and not like the first disgraceful one that didn't even resemble one.
Post to Conspiracy 911 7/25/06
Hiya, SlackerSlayer,
I read it differently. Here is what the Commission wrote about its task:
"The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, an independent, bipartisan commission created by congressional legislation and the signature of President George W. Bush in late 2002, is chartered to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks. The Commission is also mandated to provide recommendations designed to guard against future attacks."
They failed miserably in the "full and complete account" part.
(see David Ray Griffin: "9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions")
BTW, I can't find evidence anywhere on the internet about the information contained herein this post, about the discrepancy of time of plane impacts [Lamont-Doherty vs the 9/11 Commission Report].
I discovered this last night when I thought it funny that Lamont-Doherty could even pickup seismic data from airplane impacts 80 floors up in the air. I thought that most of the energy would be absorbed by the building before it got down to the ground, so how could Lamont-Doherty pick up a seismic reading? That's when I noticed the time of impacts were precise and thought, "Hmm, I wonder what the official government times are for the impacts?...and are they precise also?...and, what if they're different?"
OK, I admit it; I was hoping I could find more evidence of duplicity and coverup.
So, I ended up with this: The seismic readings happened before the planes hitHow could this be? What does this mean?
I can only come up with one conclusion: VERY LARGE EXPLOSION(S).
The Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University has its data precise to plus or minus one second, and just now I found that the 9/11 Commission based their times on FAA radar data and air traffic control software logic. (see note 130 in this link):
Actually, it was you who got this going, SlackerSlayer! You were questioning the claim from the skeptics that it took 18 seconds for WTC7 to come down in, and I knew they were referring (deceptively I might add) to the Lamont-Doherty data because I had seen it last week. When I went back to that data is when I found this huge discrepancy that leads directly to government coverup.
Thanks for your efforts, my friend.
FYI, I am forwarding this to the Scholars immediately because they have the best group going right now, and we are all in this together whether we like it or not.
Craig T. Furlong
Huntington Beach, California



This Site Served by TheHostPros