- While preparing the final draft of this
email, I emailed it to myself and it mysteriously took 50 minutes to come
back to me and it usually takes mere seconds. But then, the content
of this email is for them to hide from, not you or me. It is nice
to know that the folks at AT&T and NSA are still spying on Americans
and reading their email.
-
- They are circling the wagons by trying
to transfer all FBI field agents with more than five years experience in
counter terrorism to Washington, DC.
-
- http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/local/states/florida/
counties/broward_county/14407242.htm?source=rss&channel=
miamiherald_broward_county
-
- My read on this is they know that the
9-11 Official Lie is going to be exposed for the world to see and that
is more likely if they have agents with information in the field that are
loosely controlled by Mueller and the FBI headquarters. They need
all of these agents under their boot heels in Washington, DC.
-
- They have yet to release to the public
any of the many tapes that would show what hit the Pentagon. They
have also evaded answering the question of how they were at the CITGO confiscating
those tapes in less than 15 minutes after the "thing" hit the
Pentagon.
-
- One of the things a person can rely on
if they are involved in 9-11 Truth is the bashers, trashers, and naysayers
come out in droves for any information that is found and provided to the
public. Some of them are just keyboard rattling idiots, some are
agenda players that do not like the Democrats being exposed too (election
year 2006 and 2008), and some of them are government plants to disrupt
and keep any progress from being made.
-
- The two emails last week on the Pentagon
drew out about 50 bashers that I have never heard from before who mysteriously
had all kinds of information they had not shared with the public. Some
of those 295,000,000 opinions without an action plan. I advised them
that if they have so much to say that is valid go public and see how their
information fares under public scrutiny.
-
- Such people are tiresome and waste a
lot of time, so today, I am going to approach this differently. I
am going to share with the world some photos extracted from the video that
Deborah and I found and worked in two different ways to get before the
public. They were posted at one time on my website but were taken
down for reasons we will elaborate on in the future.
-
- I am also providing government exhibits
from the ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI trial, the fall guy for 9-11 to help keep the
Official Lie intact.
-
- This is an exam that the detractors (and
any email list members that wish to do so) have to pass or they will be
ignored from now on. Folks that serve no useful purpose are just
that, no useful purpose.
-
- The Part 1 assignment for those naysayers
and evidence bashers is simply this:
-
- 1.From the photographs it is easy to
determine within 3 feet of exactly where this photographer was standing.
That is Point A. Remember to factor in for his height to determine
the position of the camera as part of the base of a triangle.
-
- 2.From the photographs, maps and the
physical location, it is possible to determine within a foot or so of the
distance from Point A to the base of WTC II directly below the center of
impact about 81 floors above. We have calculated it but the bashers
can come up with their own figures for grading as to whether they pass
or fail. I do not work for them nor do I answer to them. That
determines Point B and the A-B base of the triangle.
-
- 3. From the photographs and government
exhibits it is easy to calculate the height of the impact and determine
the distance between Point B (base of WTC II) and the point of impact as
Point C. Use the Center of the plane, center of impact to determine
Point C. When you finish that you will have the B-C height of the
triangle. The photographer is about 6 feet tall so that is the amount
to deduct from the height (Point B to Point C).
-
- 4. Then calculate the A-C hypotenuse
of the triangle to get the distance from the camera to the jet that hit
WTC II.
-
- Part 2 of this analysis requires that
the students (bashers and trashers) assume that the position that the photographer
is standing is the centerline of a 767 and orient the 767 outline to match
the angle of approach to WTC II of the jet that actually hit the building.
There would be with width of fuselage (to compare what was really
in the sky) to consider and a total wing span of 156 feet and one inch.
There are many more seats on a 767 so the fuselage is much wider
than a 737 that has 6 seats and the aisle within its width. The width
and length of the fuselage is just as important as the wingspan.
-
- Think three dimensionally. You
have a 767 outline at ground level and you want to compare it to what you
see in the sky, factored for distance.
-
- To conceptualize the preceding paragraph
two paragraphs, on the ground from the center of the photographer's stance
there will be 78 feet and one-half inch wing span extending to the left
(west) and right (east) of the photographer aligned with the plane you
see in the sky. The photographer will be standing on the exact centerline
of the fuselage, which is much wider than a 737. The 767 outline
will be full scale at the level the photographer was standing and then
distanced factored for the exact distance to the jet in the sky.
The hypotenuse is the distance to the impact point on the building but
it can be adjusted to the South for each photo of the airplane.
-
- AutoCad and TurboCad make this exercise
much easier to get it accurate and right.
-
- These folks have started off in the right
direction but were looking at the wrong plane by assuming what they saw
in CNN or other news network footage was what really hit. At least
one of them came to the conclusion that Flight 175, a 767 from Boston Logan,
did not hit the South Tower. It will not take that person long to
pass this test.
-
- http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/second.html
-
- http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/pod.html
-
- The wing fairings are much larger and
more pronounced on the 767 than the 737. That is simply due to it
being a much larger plane and much greater wing span, greater wing area
for lift, much heavier and more powerful engines, and even some differences
in how and where the landing gear folds up. That is another
hint in solving this problem.
-
- It is a little more difficult, but the
distance to the jet airplane and the actual angle of approach can be calculated.
The distance to the airplane affects the apparent size so the wing
tips on the ground have to be factored for distance to the object and adjusted
for the angle of approach. It is a technique of perspective but when
the three points of the triangle are known the vanishing / projection point
for the perspective can be determined too. The point of view of the
camera can be adjusted and known to provide a very accurate, adjusted for
distance, overlay of the airplane you see in the sky.
-
- The photographer was standing almost
due south of the WTC North Tower so the differences in centerlines for
each WTC building will be very close calculating the exact POV of the camera
and the angle from the camera to the jet in the sky. Projecting from
the tops of those buildings back to the center of the camera is possible
on these photos. The photographer is standing just slightly to the
left of being aligned perfectly with the west face of the north tower by
several degrees. By that I mean, if you project a line towards the
tip of Manhattan on the exact same line as the west side of the North Tower,
the photographer was standing to the west of that line and not that far
from it. The photographer was standing in the range of 6:31 to 6:34
south of the North Tower. If you treat this as a compass exercise,
with North being "0" and South being "180", he was
standing in the 181 to 184 area and at a distance from the building that
can be calculated.
-
- The point of this exam is to overlay
the 767 on that photo and see the results, factored for distance.
Once this test has been completed anyone will see why I do not buy the
Official Lie of what happened on 9-11.
-
- Folks, this is the plane that hit the
South Tower. This film was not under control of any government and
two video labs have verified that it is the real thing. Submission
of all calculations is required so those who fudge results will be exposed
just as a word of caution.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- There have been some that have tried
to disprove these photos because of the color variations. We slowed
this video down to 1/100th frame per second on a very large screen and
the color variations were easy to understand and even see. VHS and
Beta tapes are merely a magnetic iron oxide that flakes off over time and
multiple uses, multiple runs of the tape. That is one of the reasons
that tape drive heads have to be cleaned periodically.
-
- When the color was not coming through
true it was merely where the iron oxide had flaked off and was not recording
at the same density or resolution on the tape. When we slowed down
the tape and used in effect a track ball to advance it the places where
the iron oxide had flaked off could easily be seen as well as the changes
in color due to refraction of the light. It was not a blue screen
effect to overlay the plane into the tape. Two labs that have far
more competence and experience in such matters have shown that this tape
is authentic and what hit the South Tower is before your eyes in the photos
above.
-
- When blown up these photos do not show
an United Airlines paint job, nor do they show a rocket launching pod mounted
underneath the jet.
-
- The effects of light and shadow help
rather than detract on these photos.
-
- What is evident is a compression cloud
that literally comes and goes from frame to frame and is enhanced by a
structural feature of a 737 jet fuselage. The wing fairings shown
below create compression against the air and flying low and fast makes
compression clouds. When we showed that, some bashers came out and
said that it was flying too low to create compression clouds. That
has nothing to do with altitude and they shut up when we showed them a
jet car on the Bonneville Salt Flats at 530 mph creating compression clouds
off the car at ground level in a desert with virtually no humidity.
-
- The compression clouds were streaming
along both sides of the plane right along the bottom of the fuselage protrusion
you see below. What made it easy to determine what they were was
due to them being intermittent, there, gone and back again. Remember,
we have 37 photos of that jet that were extracted from the film starting
with when the nose of the airplane first entered the field of view.
The still photos go to the point that the jet has completely penetrated
the South Tower and even the last several frames show some evidence that
disproves the 9-11 myth. That matter will be addressed in a separate
email update and is not part of this exercise.
-
-
-
-
-
- The photograph below is what most people
had to work from in trying to analyze what was shown on TV and various
people who did get video. The problem with the video is it was all
provided by news media sources that are in fact under control of our government.
That is the same government that wants the Official Lie to remain the Official
Story.
-
- Those are CFM-56 jet engines, the same
type of jet engine found at the corner of Church and Vessey Streets just
northeast of the World Trade Center complex. There are several ways
to tell but that is up to the bashers and trashers to sort out. Pay
attention to the left engine and the 767 photo below that.
-
-
-
-
- Note in the photographs recovered from
the video Deborah and I found the bottom of the plane is not painted in
United Airlines fashion. The bottom of the jet is silver to light
gray, not dark blue, not a medium blue gray.
-
-
-
-
- The photographer was standing at the
southeast corner of the building just above where it says "Floors"
on the map below. His point of view to WTC I was almost due north,
slightly NE to WTC II. If these maps are good enough to try to convict
and sentence ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI to death, they are good enough to use in
this discussion since what is on trial is the Official Lie put out by our
government. He was within one to two degrees of being aligned exactly
with the west side of WTC 1. That is another fact needed to pass
the test and come up with the right calculation and answers.
-
- As some of you work your way through
this, you will understand why this photographer got the best, closest and
least distorted photos of the airplane that hit WTC II. The jet flew
almost right over him. He accidentally got enough footage to extract
37 stills of the airplane.
-
- In fact, he was standing just to the
right of the table overlaid on the map below about 25 to 30 feet south
and slightly southeast from the building.
-
-
-
-
- The point of impact was the 78 through
84 floors according to the United States government and the center of the
fuselage was almost dead center of the 81
- st floor. Some may have to dig
deep to figure out the floor to floor dimensions of the WTC towers but
that is not an unfathomable figure; 1,362 feet and 110 floors is close
but not close enough. Such large buildings required considerable
space for heating and cooling equipment.
-
- Of the 110 stories, eight were set aside
for technical services (mechanical floors), in four two-floor areas evenly
spread up the building. All the remaining floors were free for open-plan
offices.
-
- In short, 4 of the floors were two stories
high each and that will effect getting the actual height from B to C.
-
- Note the right wing of what hit the South
Tower in the graphic below. The photographer was standing at the
northeast corner of that "U" shaped street far enough to the
east to get a clear shot of the North Tower that was already burning.
-
-
-
-
- Since the buildings and evidence were
destroyed, the following photograph is provided so the distance from the
street can be accurately determined and not out in the middle of the large
gaping hole that is now Ground Zero (the Point A to Point B base of the
trianble). The building the photographer was standing next to is
just off the photograph to the lower left.
-
-
-
-
-
- We will send this out to more than just
the regular email update list. The Scholars for 9-11 Truth will receive
copies as well as the bashers that like to rattle their keyboard keys.
-
- This is not that hard a test but it will
separate the doers seeking 9-11 Truth from those that just like to mouth
off with their unsolicited opinions and facts that support the government
story. For those that pay very close attention to details, there
are considerable differences in how the engines are mounted to a 767 and
737. Look at the photos again and pay very close attention.
-
- This test is voluntary and those members
of the email list are not asked to solve it. This is for the folks
that like to disrupt all efforts regarding 9-11. It is time for them
to put up or shut up.
-
- I want to see an explanation from the
US Government how this column got cut (thermite cutter charge) and they
claim the burning jet fuel delivered by the wily Arabs in a 767 did the
deed.
-
-
-
-
- That is not evidence of a structural
sheer or cutting torch. There are very few things that will melt
steel like that. I am referring to the column right above the fireman's
head.
-
- Yes, it is time for a Grand Jury.
-
- Best regards,
-
- Karl
|
