- [The CFR has accelerated its plans for Hitler-like emergency
rule, through manipulated conflicts and "national security" pretexts
at home and abroad. The weekly Executive Intelligence Review, founded by
Lyndon LaRouche, is going all out to stop this. For a free copy of this
week's 80-page issue, please call 1-888-347-3258, and say you "saw
it on Rense.com."]
- During the past days, the New York Council of Foreign
Relations (CFR), a bastion of such notables as China specialists Henry
A. Kissinger and Winston Lord, has unleashed its efforts to manipulate
the leadership succession of the government of China. The featured element
of this onslaught has been the unveiling of what are alleged to be authentic
records, which it calls "The Tiananmen Papers," allegedly secret
records from circles of the China leadership from the period of the celebrated
1989 student demonstrations in Tiananmen Square. This release, published
in the January/February edition of CFR's Foreign Affairs, has already been
a featured subject of a major, cold-war-style propaganda barrage in the
- By the nature of the subject-matter, it is clear, that
if the CFR's documents contain any new truths at all, those facts were
already known to the U.S.A., British and other intelligence communities
more than a decade ago, and could have been published at any time during
that interval, but were not. Whatever the degree of truth and untruth in
the CFR documents themselves, the publication of this dubiously conveyed
material, is clearly intended to signal war-like changes in the policies
of the incoming U.S. Administration of President-elect George W. Bush.
- Thus, rather than be lured into a tiresome debate over
what are, at best, merely alleged to be top-secret documents which had
been withheld over about a decade or more, let us not be fools. Let us
focus on the most crucial fact about this CFR release; let us focus upon
what is clearly not in doubt, the circumstances under which CFR has munificently
elected to bestow these alleged pieces of learning upon us.
- In short, the question whether there is any truth, or
none, in any of this published CFR material, has no relevance for the discussion
of current strategic implications of CFR's choice of conduct in this affair.
- I, too, have lately dredged up afresh some well-documented
past material on the relationship of Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler to the
grandfather of President-elect George W. Bush. The legitimate question
would be, why do I bring up such absolutely truthful facts about the past
now? As everyone should know, I have squarely met my obligation to meet
that challenge; in the case of the so-called "Tiananmen Papers,"
CFR and its fellow-Confederates have not.
- Unfortunately, CFR being what it is, we would be fools
to expect a truthful response to that challenge from that quarter. Fortunately,
we have much other evidence which accounts for the present circumstances
of CFR's present actions in this matter.
- For those who know the present world economic situation,
the circumstances of the CFR actions are well known. The incoming Bush
administration is doomed even before it is sworn in. It is doomed, by everything
it has heretofore asserted to be its economic and social principles, probably
doomed, that by its own errant will, to be cast up as wreckage on the shores
of the presently onrushing, greatest financial crash in modern history.
- By no stretch of the imagination, could the already doomed
Alan Greenspan provide a President Bush a "soft landing."
- Were that incoming administration to come to its senses,
abandon those principles which would doom it, and accept a reasonable alternative,
the new administration could survive the coming crisis rather well. What
if it chooses not to make such imperative changes in its profile? Then,
it is doomed to a undergo a catastrophe of its own making, and that soon.
In the case that the new administration prefers to cling desperately to
the policy-anchors of its presently sinking policy-ship, what else might
it carry down, besides our United States, with that lost ship? This brings
us directly to the context in which the CFR's latest crisis-management
stunt has been staged.
- First, let us clear up the often hotly-debated issue
of CFR itself. Then, the relevant points of CFR's relationship to Kissinger
and the Bush Administration are clear. Then, we shall consider the kind
of crisis-management orientation which an unredeemed Bush administration
would find itself more or less inevitably doomed to follow, as a course
of strategic action over the period immediately ahead.
- Elliott, Kissinger & Brzezinski In short, the New
York Council on Foreign Relations is a product of the aftermath of both
the assassination of the patriotic U.S. President William McKinley and
Teddy Roosevelt's and Woodrow Wilson's leading the U.S.A. into World War
I. In short, the assassination of McKinley, turned the U.S.A., whose principal
historic adversary, until that time, had been the British monarchy, into
a virtual associate member of what was to become the Queen's own British
Commonwealth of today.
- One of the more notable figures who bridges the period
of the early 1920s, when CFR was formed to perform such an agent-of-influence
role, was the notorious neo-Confederate, Nashville Agrarian, and Harvard
Professor William Yandell Elliott, the "Dr. Frankenstein" who
created, among others, the monsters Henry A. Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski.
It was Elliott, as an in-fact agent of influence of the British intelligence
community, who played a leading role in pushing for such a British Commonwealth.
It was through Elliott, that Kissinger rode, on a Rockefeller checkbook,
to training in the London Tavistock Institute, and returned to the CFR
to serve under George Franklin, and, more notably, ACDA's John J. McCloy
and McGeorge Bundy, as part of the team dedicated to establishing world
government through the threat of nuclear-missile barrages.
- Typical of Kissinger, were Elliott's affinities to the
proverbial "Lost Cause" of the slaveholders' Confederacy, and
Kissinger's repeatedly avowed affinities for the anti-Americanism of the
Holy Alliance's Prince Metternich, Britain's Bloody Castlereagh, and Franklin
Roosevelt's war-time ally and foe Winston Churchill. Those features of
the Kissinger profile have been massively documented, by me and my associates,
from overwhelming sources, including Kissinger himself, over the course
of more than a quarter-century.
- Elliott's Confederates Kissinger and Brzezinski began
to play the significant role for which they are known today, in association
with CFR circles, in the aftermath of the assassination of President John
F Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon's 1966 launching of the same pro-racist
Southern Strategy which took top-down control over the Republican Party's
national machine, and which also took top-down control of the Democratic
Party machinery under CFR operative Brzezinski's choice, President Jimmy
- Thus, like the Nixon, Carter, and George H.W. Bush, Sr.
administrations, Kissinger and Brzezinski typify the forces gathered around
the mass political base of the pro-racist Southern Strategy. They typify
the "American Tory" circles and the policies which have dominated
U.S. domestic and foreign policy, that increasingly, during the recent
- Kissinger's Allies The common outlook of both the New
York side of the CFR circles and the neo-Confederates, such as Senator
Trent Lott and former Democratic National Chairman Don Fowler, of the Southern
Strategy's base, is their hatred of precisely those social elements of
national economic policy which have repeatedly supplied the economic strength,
and rise to world leadership of our United States. Like Elliott and the
rest of that mint-julep-propelled pack of ultra-decadent Nashville Agrarians,
they hate "Yankee" as they define "Damn Yankees." They
hate the technologically progressive independent family farmer. They hate
the industrial operative and entrepreneur. They hate infrastructure. They
hate the idea of devotion to fundamental scientific and technological progress.
- Thus, through their power, rallied around such themes
as "free trade," "deregulation," and other attributes
of Nashville Agrarian utopianism, they, beginning with Nixon, continuing
with Carter, set into place a national matrix of economic policy- shaping
which has transformed the overall successful U.S. economy of the 1933-1965
revival of our national prosperity, into the calamitous state of bankruptcy
which engulfs it more, each passing day. That once-great economy has been
- Under the influence of such a cabal of power, which has
reigned over our nation during the greater part of thirty-five years, and
through the unleashing of "globalization" during the period since
1989-1991 dissolution of the former Soviet power, not only have the mismanagers
of our national economy, such as Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker
and Alan Greenspan, wrecked the U.S. economy almost beyond repair, but
a similar perilous state of economic affairs prevails throughout most of
- Thus, like the pagan Caesars before them, those who are
merely typified by Kissinger and Brzezinski today, have brought their empire
to its brink of self-imposed economic doom.
- President "Miniver Cheevy" Bush President-elect
George Bush, as he stands, up to this moment, suggests a Broadway parody
of the Classical model for an emperor who enters office to bring the waiting
doom upon his empire. He assumes the office of President in a republic
which, although facing the greatest crisis in its history, and that rather
immediately, could be saved, unless George, like Shakespeare's Hamlet of
the Third Act soliloquy, refuses, out of intellectual cowardice, or a
fair imitation thereof, to choose to change his course of action in accord
with the requirements of the office he has come to occupy.
- In short, were Bush's administration to react according
to established profile, his administration is soon doomed to collapse into
a global catastrophe. So, the great empires of the past collapsed, in fragments,
into the dust of the destiny, like that of the Biblical Nineveh, awaiting
them. There is no possible way, in which the combination of the economic
policies, social policies, and strategic outlooks which the new President
carries into office, would not doom his administration, and our nation,
to early destruction, by its own hand.
- This prospective spectacle has been savored in the British
press. The Bush administration, and its current choice of economic policy-outlooks,
is a something, like President Jimmy Carter before it, better suited to
"Tobacco Road" than Washington's Pennsylvania Avenue. Yet, the
British, while invidiously relishing the self-humiliation of the U.S.A.,
on the one hand, know that the five-nation bloc of the United Kingdom,
Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the U.S.A. could not survive to rule
the world, if the U.S. were simply to go down into the economic and social
ruin which the incoming Bush administration promises to bring about very
- Thus, in this circumstance, the lessons of the Hitler
administration are recommended, as discreetly as might be mentioned, to
the relevant hoary veterans of the crisis-management circles from the Nixon,
Ford, and Carter White House. Their inclination will be, to use covert
methods to create the "who me?" crises, to which they will then
respond vengefully, to keep the world off balance: that is the rule for
the kind of impossible situation which a President Bush's own foolish policies
will create for him. In such occasions for crisis-management diplomacy,
these were the methods followed by Hitler, and by such U.S. circles, too.
- In other words, during a period in which the U.S.A.'s
friends in Europe and Asia are tending to seek an alternative to a U.S.-led
financial and economic collapse in Eurasian cooperation, how shall the
Anglo-American Five keep themselves together, and their former allies and
satrapies in line? Crisis-management.
- In the strict sense, such crisis-management alternatives
will do about as much good for the people of the U.S.A. as Hitler brought,
in the end, to Germany. In any case, the U.S. were doomed. If it simply
follows the Bush-Republican line, as presently given, the U.S. is soon
finished as a nation. If it resorts to global crisis-management as a way
of trying to keep a dying Anglo-American world-rule temporarily in place,
then the entire planet faces a prolonged new dark age for all humanity
for perhaps decades yet to come.
- The problem with a regime such as Bush's has set out
to be, is that they are so enamored of their fanciful self-image of the
role they intend to play on the mere stage of their historical fantasies,
that they will do nothing to avert the real-world doom which acting out
that fantasy imposes upon them. Thus, those who would play Olympian Zeus
bring upon themselves the awful twilight of such self-anointed gods.
- The dirty game by CFR and others, with the current Tiananmen
Papers," is a harbinger of the early unleashing of but one among a
wide-ranging series of Hitler-like crisis-management operations abroad.
- If the members of the Congress, notably of the Senate,
continue to placate the recent trend, then we shall all go virtually to
Hell in this life, together, I to Heaven and heathen John Ashcroft to his
well-earned racist's cranny in Hell.
- These are the stakes for which we, of all nations, are
all playing, unless we change the game.
- 1. The author of this is a declared candidate for the
Y2004 U.S. Presidential nomination of the Democratic Party
Site Served by TheHostPros