Professor Jones Teaches
Tucker About 911

By Jon Carlson
On Monday, 11/14/05, Tucker Carlson welcomed Brigham Young University Professor Steven Jones to the 'Situation.' Steven Jones, a professor of physics, believes that the hijackers may not have brought down the towers by themselves (Actually he said Moslems didn't do the WTC demolitions).
Tucker explained: (For)The two towers (collapse). The explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed down upon the next in a pancake fashion, and they imploded in on themselves. That's essentially, I think, what people think.
This photo shows the 'reported' South Tower 'Towering Inferno" on the left shortly after the impact:
Prof Jones: (One hypothesis, or possibility, is FIRE caused the collapse while) The other (hypothesis) is that EXPLOSIVES in the buildings may have caused the collapse. And so, then we analyze and see which fits the data better, and I've done that in my 25-page paper.
Paper LINK:
Prof Jones wanted a video of the WTC7 collapse shown that he had sent Tucker but THAT VIDEO was too hot to handle. 'Commander-in-chief' Bush approval ratings, now sinking through the 30's would drop off the scale! Another Jones, Alex, interviewed attorney Stanley Hilton about court documents that Bush ordered 9/11:
Tucker thought a fuel tank was the cause. However, Prof Jones pointed out as seen in this photo the KINK characteristic of a building demolition:
Prof Jones concludes: ...all scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel, so what is this (Ground Zero) molten metal? It's direct evidence for the use of high-temperature explosives, such as thermite, which produces molten iron as an end product.
These LIDAR Images show the hot spots in the DEBRIS PILES, not the ground itself As WTC7 was a conventional demolition job NO hot spots surround it. WTC1 (North Tower) and WTC2 (South Tower) are a considerable distance (300 feet) away from WTC7 implying no connection to the WTC1 and WTC2 demolitions and thus the WTC7 demolition was a separate event.
OBVIOUSLY Tucker failed the Professor's tests showing poor preparation but so would many Americans. Tucker concludes: Professor, we are going to have to leave it to our viewers who are interested enough to follow up to do just that. We appreciate you coming on, even if I don't understand your theories, we appreciate you trying to explain them. Thanks.
Just so Tucker is better prepared for the next Prof Jones interview, video captures from the NBC 9/11 archive should be studied. With 17 minutes between crashes NBC must have had Intel that 9/11 was coming down to position a news helicopter in the WTC airspace in that 17 minute window. This photo shows the South Tower crash:
This photo shows the military helicopter that remote controlled the Boeing 737 into the South Tower. It could only wait 59 minutes as fuel was running low before setting off the cutter charges that demolished the South Tower:
In this photo the hollowed out area left of the TV mast may have been caused by the propwash of the military helicopter:
This photo was also shot from the NBC helicopter. Note the military helicopter to the right
Another NBC photo of the military helicopter killing time just after the South Tower crash:
This photo shows the military helicopter above the smoke plume to the left:
For those who would like a close-up view of the Bell212 military helicopter::
This photo shows the military helicopter finishing its mission and heading for the aircraft carrier, USS George Washington anchored off Long Island:
Tucker is an avid fisherman. For those moments when the fish aren't biting he is assigned for homework the RENSE article, German Intel Agent von Bulow Solves 9/11:
When their country called Tucker and Prof Jones stood up and were counted while the NY Times and the Democrats hide in the bushes and cover for the Bushes. Please email Tucker at and congratulate him for bringing 9/11 Truth to Americans.
2008 Presidential Candidate Karl Schwarz also has some lessons for Americans:
DON'T MISS more 9/11 analysis and photos that the NY Times finds NOT fit to print:
German Intel Agent Von Bulow Solves 9/11
Positive ID: The 9/11 South Tower Airliner 'PODS'
FBI Claims 84 Videos Show NO Flight 77 Impact

9/11 Flight 93 Passengers 'Lost'
The 9/11 Pentagon Engine Story
The 911 North Tower Demolition Explained
The Rest Of The 911 Flight 93 Story
South Tower Exit Wounds Tell 9/11 Tale
Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed
Bush Responds To 911 Fireworks
Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9/11
WTC 7 Smoke & Mirrors On 9/11

CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed

911 CNN Reports Boeing 737s Struck WTC
Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes
The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story
NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet
On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School
WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767
Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified
Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM
WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible
Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo
PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole
PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago
Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo?
Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified?
Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos



This Site Served by TheHostPros