- Excerpts: "A very large majority, 22 member states,
rejected proposals to lift these national bans. We were able to give a
clear message to the European Commission," Luxembourg Environment
Minister Lucien Lux told a news conference.
-
- "The European Commission asked for more guidance
from the member states and they got it," said Adrian Bebb, GMO campaigner
at environmental lobby group Friends of the Earth Europe.
-
- FoE GM campaigner Emily Diamand said: "...the actions
of the UK today have been appalling. It is bad enough that Elliot Morley
should ignore public opinion on this important issue, but it is outrageous
that he should try and prevent other countries saying no to GM. His actions
will do nothing to improve the UK's battered reputation on this issue,
or help its poor image in Europe."
-
-
- EU Ministers Uphold Sovereign Right To Ban
GMOs
-
- By Jeremy Smith
- 6-24-5
-
- LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - EU
environment ministers dealt a blow on Friday to efforts to get more GMO
crops grown in Europe as they agreed to uphold eight national bans on genetically
modified maize and rapeseed types.
-
- The vote was a sharp rebuff for the European Union's
executive Commission, which had wanted the ministers to endorse an order
to lift the bans within 20 days. EU law provides for national GMO bans
if the government can justify the prohibition.
-
- It was also the EU's first agreement on GMO policy since
1998, when the bloc began its unofficial moratorium on approving new GMO
foods and crops -- lifted last year by a legal default.
-
- "A very large majority, 22 member states, rejected
proposals to lift these national bans. We were able to give a clear message
to the European Commission," Luxembourg Environment Minister Lucien
Lux told a news conference.
-
- The ministers' decision plays into the hands of the United
States, Canada and Argentina, whose suit against the European Union at
the World Trade Organization alleges that EU biotech policy harms trade
and is not founded on science.
-
- The EU's 1998-2004 biotech ban, they say, was illegal.
The WTO is now expected to issue its initial ruling on the GMO case in
early October, postponed from August, officials say.
-
- Between 1997 and 2000, Austria, France, Germany, Greece
and Luxembourg banned specific GMOs on their territory, focusing on three
maize and two rapeseed types approved shortly before the start of the EU
moratorium.
-
- For the Commission, the votes were a setback, especially
in its WTO defense, but it was still "business as usual."
-
- The EU executive now has several options, including returning
to the ministers with the same proposals for lifting the bans, though at
a later date, or changing them radically.
-
- "The EU is under considerable pressure at the WTO,
and not only due to the lack of action (on national GMO bans) in previous
years. And further delays would weaken our position at the WTO," EU
Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said.
-
- "This does not call our regulatory framework into
question...(which) is the strictest in the world. We are going to apply
the existing framework and we are obliged to do so."
-
- GREENS ECSTATIC, INDUSTRY ANGRY
-
- Spain was the only country to uphold all eight bans,
despite the fact that its farmers grow one of the maize types, the Bt-176
strain made by Swiss biotech giant Syngenta .
-
- Spain is one of the few countries that grows GMO crops
extensively in Europe, where much of the public view them as "Frankenstein"
foods despite industry assurances they are safe.
-
- Green groups were ecstatic that the EU had finally agreed
to slap down not just one of the national bans, but all eight.
-
- "The European Commission asked for more guidance
from the member states and they got it," said Adrian Bebb, GMO campaigner
at environmental lobby group Friends of the Earth Europe.
-
- "Countries today have demanded the sovereign right
to ban genetically modified crops if there are questions over their safety,"
he said in a statement.
-
- Apart from the Bt-176 strain, the other maize types in
the national bans are MON 810, made by U.S. agrochemicals giant Monsanto,
and Bayer's T25 maize.
-
- There are also two rapeseed types, both made by Bayer.
-
- But Europe's biotech industry was incensed by the decisions.
-
- "This is the unacceptable and hypocritical face
of EU politics," said one Brussels-based biotech industry source.
-
- "Some member states continue to show their disregard
for laws which they themselves put in place while on the other hand they
call for support of the EU legislative system."
-
- GMO DEADLOCK ELSEWHERE
-
- Even though the EU has now lifted its six-year unofficial
moratorium on approving new GMO products, national governments have consistently
clashed over biotech policy.
-
- The EU's member states have now ended meetings in deadlock
14 times in a row on whether to approve new GMO products, usually for use
in industrial processing or as animal feed.
-
- The latest occasion was also on Wednesday, when the ministers
failed to agree on authorizing another Monsanto maize known as MON 863,
modified to resist the corn rootworm insect.
-
- The Commission will now take up the dossier and most
likely issue a rubberstamp authorization in the next few months, officials
say. This process kicks in when EU ministers fail to agree after three
months on whether to authorize a GMO or not.
-
- "We weren't able to get a qualified majority for
or against," Lux said. "It will be up to the European commission
to take a decision. There was a simply majority against this proposal but
not a qualified one, which is what we need."
-
- Monsanto's requested use was for processing into animal
feed, not for growing or for consumption as human food.
-
-
- EU Governments Maintain GM Crop Bans
-
- By Geoff Meade
- Press Association Europe Editor, in Brussels
- 7-24-5
-
- European governments defied the Brussels Commission today
by voting for the right to keep bans on genetically-modified crops and
food.
-
- Five member states - Austria, Luxembourg, Germany, France
and Greece - were under pressure to give up their current bans because
of a trade dispute in which the US claims they are illegal.
-
- The Commission, backed by the UK, recommended giving
up the bans ahead of an expected World Trade Organisation ruling this summer
which might outlaw them anyway.
-
- The bans were imposed in the five countries between 1997
and 2000 on safety grounds, but Washington says they are an unfair trade
barrier.
-
- The Commission had urged all EU governments to support
its proposal requiring the five to lift the bans within 20 days.
-
- Refusal to do so signals a "significant" shift
in position across the EU against Commission's GM policy, according to
Friends of the Earth (FoE).
-
- FoE GM campaigner Emily Diamand said: "Today's vote
to allow EU countries to maintain their bans on GM food and crops is a
vote for commonsense, and a victory for European consumers, who are overwhelmingly
opposed to GM food."
-
- She added: "But the actions of the UK today have
been appalling. It is bad enough that Elliot Morley should ignore public
opinion on this important issue, but it is outrageous that he should try
and prevent other countries saying no to GM. His actions will do nothing
to improve the UK's battered reputation on this issue, or help its poor
image in Europe."
-
- http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=4737383
|