London is World
Terror Headquarters

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
[This updates "Bush, Bin Laden Serve Same Master" originally posted Nov. 25, 2002.]
Getting pulverized is the price populations of the West will periodically pay for their complacent acceptance of the central bankers' phoney war on terror. This price could escalate from isolated bombings to biological attacks and plagues to possible nuclear war.
The "War on Terror" is an all-purpose gimmick used to advance the world police state (i.e. "world government") and justify endless war. The London bombings Thursday will advance calls for a "security union" of the US and Europe.
Random terror is always designed to influence popular opinion. Right-on-schedule, the banker-owned mass media is conjuring up parallels with the glory days of the WW2 London blitz. The comparisons with that phoney banker-inspired war against the nation state and humanity are more apt than they know. Churchill had to goad Hitler into bombing London by first bombing Berlin many times. (See David Irving, Churchill's War (1992))
Genuine terror is never random. It is directed, as in the Israeli policy of targeted assassination. If the London bombings were genuinely Muslim in origin, they would have been bombed Chatham House (home of the RIIA), the Bank of England or MI-6.
The headquarters of "Islamic terrorism" is the City of London where the Anglo-American Establishment sponsors the radical "Muslim Brotherhood."
In a comprehensive online report, the perceptive Hawaii-based researcher Peter Goodgame concludes: "Osama bin Laden is not, nor has he ever been, the leader of the international Islamist movement which is directed by the International Muslim Brotherhood."
Goodgame continues: "Osama bin Laden has been used effectively as a figurehead for the Brotherhood's militant branch to take responsibility for its atrocities, but he is not the mastermind... By the same token, the Muslim Brotherhood is a tool by the British-based Globalists whose main objective is to overthrow the established world order and create a new one-world system of global governance."
Goodgame cites former British Intelligence Officer, Dr. John Coleman, who says the Muslim Brotherhood is a secret freemason order set up by the great names of British Middle East Intelligence, T.E. Lawrence, Bertrand Russell and St. John Philby to "keep the Middle East backward so its natural resource, oil, could continue to be looted."
The Muslim Brotherhood has been used to check nationalist movements led by such figures as Nasser, Bhutto and the Shah of Iran who tried to develop their countries. Without the British, "radical Islam would have remained the illegitimate, repressive minority movement that it has always been, and the Middle East would have remained stable and prosperous," Goodgame says.
The Muslim Brotherhood is now a powerful faction in the global oligarchy. Goodgame cites Robert Drefuss, author of "Hostage to Khomeini" (1980):
"The real Muslim Brothers are ... the secretive bankers and financiers who stand behind the curtain, the members of the old Arab, Turkish, or Persian families whose genealogy places them in the oligarchic elite, with smooth business and intelligence associations to the European black nobility and, especially, to the British oligarchy.
And the Muslim Brotherhood is money. Together, the Brotherhood probably controls several tens of billions of dollars in immediate liquid assets, and controls billions more in ...everything from oil trade and banking to drug-running, illegal arms merchandising, and gold and diamond smuggling. By allying with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Anglo-Americans are not merely buying into a terrorists-for-hire racket; they are partners in a powerful and worldwide financial empire..."
By fabricating a bogus war between Islamic fundamentalism and the West, the globalists are able to attack their real enemy, humanity. Pulling the strings, they will ensure that both Western and Muslim states are degraded and finally completely subjugated to their odious rule.
The globalists have long been using wars to subvert, demoralize and destroy Western civilization. They backed the Nazis and the Soviets in World War Two. They created the Punch and Judy show that was the Cold War. They tied U.S. hands while backing Ho Chi Minh in Vietnam.
Who are they? Also called the illuminati, they represent a recrudescence of the alliance of Rothschild finance and European aristocracy secretly coordinated by a Satanic dogma hidden in freemasonry.
They plan a new feudalism that will impoverish the middle classes, depopulate and enslave the masses, and leave only the rich served by a technocracy. The whole world will resemble a repressive third world country governed by the IMF, UN and World Bank.
The globalists are centred on the Rothschild-dominated Bank of England, MI-6 and the secretive Round Table society, which spawned the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The American branches include the Council on Foreign Relations, CIA and the Rockefeller foundations which all ensure the American people continue to finance and enforce one-world tyranny. The Bush family has owed its prominence to this cabal ever since grandfather Prescott Bush helped arrange financing for Nazism.
Zionism is supposed to represent the "West" in this sham war with Islam. Americans are being groomed to become like Israelis, victims of daily acts of "Muslim terror." When a suicide bomber struck in Jerusalem, Benjamin Netanyahu said, "Whether the explosion takes place in Bali, Moscow, New York or Jerusalem we are all united in a war against a common terrorist enemy." Right on schedule Friday, the media was saying "we are all in Afghanistan now."
According to Swiss journalist Richard Labeviere ("Dollars for Terror: The United States and Islam" 2000 ) radical Islam is an essential "complementary enemy" to Zionism, which also seeks regional hegemony. According to the "Yinon Memorandum" (1982) Israel intends to splinter the Arab countries into several small cantons along ethnic lines. None of these will be able to challenge Israel, which, like the US is a disposable implement of the globalist agenda. (207)
The Palestinian terrorist "Hamas" movement is a product of the Muslim Brotherhood. According to Labeviere, it serves the interests of the Israeli right wing, and has received secret financial support from the Israeli "Shin Beth." (203-205). Thus, Palestinian suicide bombers play straight into Ariel Sharon's hand.
Meanwhile, back in the USA, "Muslim terrorist attacks" are an excuse to lay the foundations of a police state. These attacks might serve as a pretext to declare martial law, suspend elections and round up dissidents, i.e. anyone who is not buying the lie.
This may seem incomprehensible to Americans now when the economy is still being propped up. Once the US has done the globalist's dirty work, interest rates could rise and debt ridden Americans could be stripped of their assets, as they were in the Depression.
The Homeland Security Act is designed to control all US law enforcement agencies so that elements in the CIA and Mossad can target Americans with impunity, like they did on Sept. 11. American agencies were designed to remain independent so they could serve as a check on each other.
The Act is also designed to allow George W. to place his henchmen in positions of control. Remember, he is a product of a secret Satanic cult, the "Skull and Bones." This sounds gruesome but the Twentieth Century provided many precedents. The illuminati was behind both Nazi and Communist mass slaughter and terror. Our position is akin to the European Jews who disbelieved warnings of the holocaust.
There is even a provision in the Homeland Security Act against whistle blowers. Why? Another provision allows mandatory vaccinations while giving vaccine manufacturers immunity from prosecution. Why? The "Total Information Awareness" program will "red flag" troublemakers by monitoring all personal communications and financial transactions, even your library records. You didn't attack the WTC. Why are you targeted?
What is the justification for this destruction of freedom, which Bush supposedly protects? In 46 months since Sept.11, 2001, there has been not one Muslim terrorist attack in the US despite the bloody American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
If "Al Queda" were capable of pulling off Sept. 11, don't you think it would have planned an encore? Don't get me wrong: I am grateful to the Mossad and CIA for sparing us. But Americans simply don't deserve freedom if they accept this obvious ruse and its ominous consequences.
In conclusion, mankind is in the clutches of a diabolical multi generational conspiracy. A Satanic, criminal cartel has subverted all social institutions and is slowly crafting a brutal global dictatorship. Our political and cultural leaders are witting and unwitting pawns. They are fabricating a phony war between Islam and the West in order to accomplish the subjugation of both.
Alton Raines

When you say there has not been one Muslim terrorist attack in the US since Sept. 11, you quickly forget Richard Reid (real name Tariq Raja
), who in December, 2001 tried to blow up American Airlines Fight 63 with 193 passengers headed for Miami, and was re-routed to Boston after he was physically restrained by flight personnel after attempting to detonate over 10 oz. of C4 plastic explosives hidden in his shoes! There have been other incidences as well, all thankfully caught ahead of time or stoppped just in time. Repeating this mantra of no Muslim terrorist attacks since 911 in the US is bullshit. I'm surprised to hear such Orwellian double-speak clap-trap coming from you, Makow.
It could very well be that the reason we have not seen another terrorist attack on the scale of the trade centers bombing in the US is because it is a lot more difficult to pull off here in the States with heightened security and they may be well aware of the heightened sensitivity which too many attacks here on US soil would create for Muslims; as it is now, they are freely able to maneuver with only moderate suspicion. Too many bombings would rachet that attention on Arabs and Muslims up 1000% and then getting anything done would be extremely difficult. Even further actions might see the mass internment of Muslims nation wide... that's the last thing they want.

The war between radical Islam and the 'west' is not "phony." It's quite real. Real people are dying. Real bombs are exploding from both sides. The powers that be may indeed push and pull the strings of action and reaction, but at the core radical Islam is an enemy to all mankind and people damn well better wake up to this fact. It seeks the death of every "infidel" -- including those who claim to be Muslims who do not adhere strictly to Shariah law. It is simply disinformation to spread the lie that radical Islam is not a genuine threat, on
its own, apart from any and all "world powers" which might be active in the affairs of men.

Steve Lackey
To use your word - bullshit. Richard Reid was yet another brainless patsy, easily duped into doing something stupid and getting caught. If there were actual terrorists with 1/4 the intelligence that they are being given credit for, the US would be subjected to many more attacks. With borders more porous than your average sieve, it would be child's play for them to bring whatever equipment they could desire into the states to create terror here on the home front.
As an example, if a terrorists organization really wanted to create an uproar here in the states, they would simply have to bring 10 Stinger missiles that we so thoughtfully provided them back home via Mexico. Two Missiles each to five cities to be fired at five aircraft on take off or decent on the same morning would shut down aviation here in the states for days (or weeks?), with all the terror your average neocon could wish for. It wouldn't even require suicide on the part of the attackers. Pull up in a van fire them off, and get out - 2 minutes tops along the approach to a major airport somewhere and you have a monstrous event, a butchers bill that even Areal Sharon would envy, and unprecedented chaos around the country. Imagine a major airliner crashing (being shot down) in Atlanta, Houston, LA, Chicago and Baltimore all at the same time. The powers that be don't want an actual attack right now though - they are getting what they want on the imagined threat alone. There is no need to disrupt things to that extent at this point. If more of the American people start catching on, and start making noises, then maybe something nasty will be needed again.
No, you can't claim that the reason that we haven't seen more attacks here in the states is that the US Storm Troopers are on the ball. Not with 10K illegals flooding across our borders on a daily basis, with no checks on their movements, and no efforts by our government to stop them.
IF terrorists actually existed as our government wished us to believe, and have half the brains and resources that we are led to believe - we would be suffering more attacks. Period. End of Story. IF those nasty Al Queda folks (that nobody has managed to capture, with the exception of the Mossad Cell in Palestine that was posing as Al Queda) actually existed, and IF they actually were that determined to do us harm, and IF they actually had the resources to do it, don't you believe that they would? IF they don't exist, OR they really are not all that determined to do us harm, OR they don't have the resources to do us harm, then they really are not all that much of a threat, and we don't need all the draconian police state crap that we are being subjected to.
No, that we are not being attacked currently just shows that it doesn't serve the governments agenda to have anything of this type actually happen right now. When the mere threat of terror is no longer sufficient to cow the American people, we will get another example of why we should fall into line - but not until then.
Finally, before you start spewing about "Islam", perhaps you should actually look at what is taught by both the Qu'ran and the Talmud. I would guess that you have never actually read either of them, or your tune could be different Evangelical christians are no better you know. Muslim, Jew, Christian - each just as blood thirsty as the other, and each just as justified in their own minds - and all of them dead wrong. How does your desire to wipe out all of the Muslims make you any different from your claim that they desire to kill every infidel? How does that make you more "moral" or "better"? It puts you in the same league to my mind.
Steve Lackey
Alton Raines
Reply to Steve Lackey
Now, here is a perfect example of someone who clearly did not read what I wrote, but reacted based on a preset mind condition to the issue.
Where did I say "(my) desire to wipe out all of the Muslims"?! On the contrary, I think I made it very clear that we're talking about a radical fringe element in Islam, not Islam itself. You're deliberately trying to polarize the issue -- another form of fear mongering. Make the other guy look utterly insensitive, the same way the Bush administration wants every American to think that if a Muslim isn't licking the boot of the Coalition it's a terrorist cell in the making. Most thinking people know better.
All this propaganda has to stop. It's stupid. And where did I pit Islam against the virtues of Christianity or Judaism? I didn't... your own mind has set paradigms for these arguments which it cannot escape in order to deal with the real details. And that's dangerous. I gave several reasons why we haven't seen attacks on US soil, not just the one you quoted. You isolated it to one, and the least important one, in my view. And yes, I have read the Q'uran and the Talmud and the Bible. I would agree, in many ways, they are equally bloodthirsty, in as much as they are equally inspirational. Organized religion with earthly goals will always be corrupt in this way.
It's not that ez to get stinger missles over the border, much less hide them until the time is right. And like I said, probably one of the factors has to do with what effect more terrorist attacks in the US would cause on the Muslim population here -- they want to be able to move freely. That would come to a halt. In the blink of an eye, the US Gov't would convert stadiums and old military bases (and some appear to be in re-fabrication right now) into internment camps for Muslims. Talk about a frightful and horrible outcome!

It doesn't matter if Richard Reid was a brainless patsy! Most of the suicide bombers are brainless/brainwashed patsies. Hamas has been caught in Palestine using the retarded and even a disfigured young girl to carry out their suicide bombings. They don't have to be masterminds to slaughter innocent people. Just some poor schmuck who truly believes that on the other side of that fiery detonation is eternal paradise and Allah's praise. It is radical Islam that must be met and overcome. Even moderate Muslims agree with this. This is as much a real war and real challenge as any other.

I agree, we do NOT need the "draconian police state crap that we are being subjected to" -- I am not supporting the Bush administration or their sleaze-ball tactics. They are using this radical fringe force however they can, even magnifying it with the whole Iraq debacle. But if we don't face the reality that this radical force in Islam does indeed exist and has deadly designs against people in the west, even our whole way of life, and have the funding of the Saudi's (among others) to get it done, we're fools -- whether our gov't is corrupt and using the situation to its advantage or not. That's a whole different problem. But you don't do the people any service by minimizing the threat of radical Islam. If the Bush Admin wasn't around, you'd still see this coming to a head. Jihad of this kind has been in development for a long time. But the way things are being distorted now, we could have terrorist cells in the states kidnapping and beheading civilians and some of you would still be so far up a river called denial that you'd be blaming Bush, and not the terrorists.



This Site Served by TheHostPros