Real 911 Science For PM -
The ST Airliner Photo

From Jon Carlson

After uncovering the only scientific investigation of 9/11 photos 9/11 Timeline webmaster Paul Thompson sent the following email exposing the South Tower airliner photo:
From: Paul Thompson
Date: Tuesday, June 24,2003
Subject: Watched 911 DVD last night
Too bad you couldn't get good frame captures. Thanks for trying. Here's a really interesting new thing:
(DEAD LINK: now at
Very spirited discussion about it here:
Paul states: (see previous link)
A very curious article has just come out in La Vanguardia, one of the biggest and most respected newpapers in Spain. If what the article says is true, it may provide verifible evidence that 9/11 was a MIHOP (make it happen on purpose) plot using remote control.
In the frozen images of various film shots of the final run of United Airlines flight 175, there are three strange shapes discernible, which the aeronautical experts consulted find difficult to explain. They consist of two long shapes located underneath the fuselage, one towards the bow and the other towards the stern of the plane. There is a third, seemingly pyramidal in shape, on the underbelly, almost in the center of the plane.
Various aeronautical engineers at official Spanish centers have found no clear explanation for the reflections or shapes which can be observed on the hijacked plane. However, a contour-detection digital analysis of the stills, carried out at the Escola Universitària Politècnica de Mataró, concludes that the "objects discerned cannot be due to shadows caused by the angle of incidence of the sun upon the plane as they always appear as the same shape and size, although their luminosity varies."
More at
Pentagon: NO COMMENT
We are not interested in contributing to the many conspiracy theories regarding the events of that tragic day. In regard to the one item on your list that relates directly to the Defense Department, all responsible authorities concur that terrorists hijacked AA Flight 77 and flew the aircraft into the Pentagon.
My colleagues inform me that you have a video you would like to show us regarding Flight 175. I have looked at the site you suggested, as well as the UK-based site, The Truth Seeker, that features your writing. Neither I, nor any of my colleagues or UAL executives wishes to see the video.
When La Vanguardia asked Boeing's head office in Seattle about the strange forms to be seen in the photographs, the company spokesperson offered to cooperate fully in clarifying the matter. However, after studying them for several days, Boeing (whose engineers are taking part in the official investigation) declined to give an opinion citing reasons of national security.
Failure of FBI investigation of the South Tower airliner 'bulges' has led to speculation that missiles or bombs were attached to the bottom of the aircraft. Premier 9/11 website,, has made an outrageous, tongue-in-cheek, speculation that certainly is not true or is it?
In the hardest hitting journalism since 9/11, THE POWER HOUR RADIO SHOW has totally revamped and added new analysis to an earlier video. 911 IN PLANE SITE, The Director's Cut. Visit to order. A quote from their South Tower airliner video analysis: "...there was some sort of incendiary or explosive that would serve as a match to ignite the enormous amount of fuel (when the plane hit the ST.)"
This screen capture from that video shows some possible attachments for the South Tower airliner.
Would somebody tell Popular Mechanics?
KARL SCHWARZ has the big Pentagon picture in more hard-hitting analysis
Visit for the big 9/11 picture and more.
PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole
PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago
Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo?
Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified?
Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos



This Site Served by TheHostPros