In-Home Prayer Forbidden By Connecticut Town Government
Family told they cannot pray with anyone except family members in their home. - Hartford, CT - The American Center for Law and Justice announced today it has filed a federal lawsuit in Hartford, Connecticut against the Town of New Milford, Connecticut charging that the Zoning Commission has issued an order prohibiting a family from holding prayer meetings inside their private residence.
"This is clearly a case where the zoning authorities have overstepped their authority by determining that our clients cannot use their private residence for weekly prayer meetings," said Vincent McCarthy, Senior Counsel of the ACLJ who is representing the family. "To issue an order prohibiting a family from using their private residence for prayer is not only one of the worst forms of religious discrimination, it represents a direct assault on our client's constitutional rights. We are asking the court to declare the actions of the zoning authorities unconstitutional and to issue an injunction to clear the way for the family to resume the prayer meetings in their home."
The ACLJ filed suit December 1st on behalf of Robert and Mary Murphy, residents of New Milford who have been holding weekly prayer meetings and Bible studies at their single-family home since 1995. The complaint contends the prayer meetings, which are attended by no more than 25 people, do not violate any town regulations and are in full compliance with all applicable law.
The lawsuit contends that the problems began after they received the proper zoning and building permits to add a family room and a garage to their home this year - new space that is not used for the prayer meetings.
As the Murphy's attempted to add a driveway to their property, the complaint contends the town rescinded a permit to complete the driveway because they Murphy's used their home for prayer meetings.
The lawsuit states that the Murphy's received a letter from town's zoning enforcement officer on November 29th ordering the Murphy's to suspend the prayer meetings at their home - saying the zoning commission has determined that such activity is not permissible. The letter also states that the town will take legal action against the Murphy's if they continue to hold the prayer meetings at their home.
McCarthy said: "It is very troubling that a local government body would censor the religious expression of a family who only wants to use their own private residence for prayer. The town's reasoning and actions are not only flawed but send a disturbing signal that the government can be used as a kind of 'prayer police' to censor the legal and lawful religious expression of our clients."
The lawsuit charges the defendants with violating the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution as well as provisions of Connecticut law. The complaint contends that the actions of the town violate the Murphy's constitutional rights of free speech and freedom of assembly by restricting and inhibiting religious expression.
The lawsuit names as defendants the Zoning Commission of the Town of New Milford and its members.
The suit requests the court declare the town's action invalid and unconstitutional and asks the court for an injunction to prevent the town from continuing its discriminatory action. The ACLJ is an international public interest law firm that specializes in constitutional law. The ACLJ focuses on pro-liberty, pro-family, and pro-life issues. The ACLJ's web site address is

Hi, Jeff:
I enjoy Rense quite abit and visit frequently.
I happen to live in New Milford, Ct. , the town mentioned in the piece about outlawing prayer at home by anyone other than family members.
This community is an example of much of what is so terribly wrong in *pretty little communities* everywhere.
Our town government is corrupt (with ethics charges routinely filed)...we made the national press and a suit now moves forward regarding the sex survey which was given to middle schoolers in which various sexual acts were described ...without parental consent. (the Rutherford Institute is involved in this....we made the press as one of our police officers was the first officer EVER to be tried for MURDER. He shot an un armed young black man who was subdued by the officer and lying face down on the ground...AT POINT BLANK range in the back of the head. The officer was found guilty of murder, now on appeal AND the citizens of New Milford were and continue to be outraged at the officers conviction of murder.
Now this. I am not surprised . New Milford has become a soul less community; driven by economic greed and self interest. I hope that someone shines a SPOTLIGHt on this community as being the bad citizen that it is.
I will be moving within the year.
I was very glad to see that Rense picked up this story. It's the tip of the iceberg.
MK Cuthbert
This Site Served by TheHostPros