- POTSDAM, Germany - The Allied
occupation of Germany began 58 years ago this month and in the eyes of
many Germans has not yet ended. Foreign armies are still based on German
soil and Europe's largest and most prosperous "democracy" still
lacks a constitution and a peace treaty putting a formal end to the Second
- For Germany, World War II, like the conflicts in Iraq
and Afghanistan, lacks formal legal closure because a peace treaty has
never been signed between the Allies and Germany.
- The stated goal of the Anglo-American forces in Iraq
is to liberate the Iraqi people and establish democracy. However, if the
U.S. and British occupation of Iraq follows the pattern set by the Allied
occupation of Germany, a sovereign democracy in Iraq is not likely to appear
in the near future.
- Although President George W. Bush's much ballyhooed victory
speech from the deck of an aircraft carrier was meant to look like the
end of the Iraq conflict, it was not, and if the German model is repeated
in Iraq, there may never be a formal end to the war in Iraq.
- While the partly reunified German nation is considered
a modern European democracy, it has no constitution other than the temporary
Basic Law (Grundgesetz) originally written in 1948 under the guidance of
the U.S. military occupation forces and originally meant only to apply
to the western parts of Germany under U.S. control. One of the Basic Law's
final articles says it is to be replaced when Germany obtains a constitution.
- Article 23 defining the legal jurisdiction of the Basic
Law was removed at the request of former Secretary of State James Baker
at a Paris conference of the Allied powers and the two former German states
on July 17, 1990. The two German states were legally abolished at this
conference and their foreign ministers were only informed of the changes
after it had been done. As a result of these changes, the Basic Law does
not legally apply to the reunified German state, according to some legal
- In any case, the Basic Law is incomplete and contradictory
and, therefore, cannot serve as a proper constitution. For example, Article
139 states that "legal provisions" concerning Nazism and German
militarism are "not affected" by the Basic Law. This article
indicates that the numerous Allied occupation laws and proclamations remain
in effect in spite of the Basic Law.
- "Article 139 is a little contradictory," Christian
Tomuschat, professor of German constitutional law at Berlin's Humboldt
University, told American Free Press. Despite the obvious problems with
the temporary Basic Law, which has never been ratified by a vote of the
people, Tomuschat says it is a valid German constitution in his opinion.
"The Grundgesetz is the constitution - it just has a different name,"
- There is no movement in Germany towards creating a constitution,
according to Tomuschat, who says a proper constitution is not as important
as the unemployment problem: "Jobs are now more important than a constitution,"
Tomuschat told AFP.
- The fact that the flawed and temporary Basic Law serves
as Germany's de facto constitution is unacceptable to Wolfgang Gerhard
Günter Ebel, Germany's provisional Reichskanzler. Ebel heads the provisional
government that claims to be the legal successor to the Second German Reich,
which was replaced by Adolf Hitler's illegal Third Reich (1933-45).
- "Germany rests on the 2nd Reich" and on the
constitution of the Weimar Republic created on August 11, 1919, Ebel told
- In 1987, the Allies requested that Ebel submit a copy
of the 1919 original Weimar constitution of the German Reich, which he
did. This is the only legal constitution for Germany, according to Ebel,
until a peace treaty is signed.
- The Allies recognized the legal boundaries of the German
Reich from December 31, 1937. These borders include the occupied German
lands of East Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia, the final status of which
was meant to be determined in a peace settlement.
- This peace settlement never happened. The so-called Final
Settlement of Sept. 12, 1990 called for the existing border between Poland
and Germany to be confirmed and for Germany to relinquish any territorial
claims in the future. The status of East Prussia and the capital city of
Königsberg, which was occupied and renamed by the Soviet Union in
1945, is not mentioned in the Final Settlement.
- According to the provisional government, the Final Settlement
is not valid because it was negotiated and signed by the foreign ministers
of the two German states, the BRD and the DDR, both of which legally ceased
to exist after the Paris conference of July 17, 1990.
- "The German government is illegal," Ebel told
AFP, "and what they do has no basis in law." Asked how it could
be that the German people are unaware of this situation, Ebel said: "The
German media is still under the control of the Allies. The entire media
- "The Second World War has not ended, because a peace
treaty has not been signed between Germany and the Allies," "
Ebel says, "The peace contract is the most important thing that we
need and want."
- Because there is no formal peace treaty between Germany
and the Allies, headed by the United States, German sovereignty is compromised.
"Until we have a peace treaty, Germany is a colony of the United States,"
John Kornblum of the U.S. State Dept. told Ebel on Oct. 20, 1985. Kornblum
is now employed by Lazar Bank in Berlin, according to Ebel.
- Some 80,000 U.S. military personnel are permanently based
in Germany and Britain also continues to base troops and military equipment
in the western German zone they formerly occupied. It is not uncommon to
see British tanks on the streets of the area near Münster in Westphalia.
- U.S. occupation laws handed down by the Supreme Headquarter
Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) are still in effect, Ebel said. The
first law, Proclamation No. 1, making General Dwight D. Eisenhower supreme
authority in the areas under U.S. control was signed on Feb. 13, 1944.
Allied authorities have informed Ebel that these SHAEF laws will remain
in effect for 60 years from the date of signing and apply to all of Europe.
- Calls to the U.S. State Department in Washington and
the U.S. Embassy in Berlin concerning the validity of SHAEF laws and U.S.
occupation proclamations in Germany were not returned.
- "When there is a peace treaty - when the wound is
healed - many things will change," Ebel says, "not only for Germany,
but for the whole world.
- "The United Nations is also provisional - if there
is a peace treaty between Germany and the Allies [primarily the United
States] - the UN will cease to exist as we know it," Ebel said. The
UN organization was founded in 1945 and originated with the 26 nations
that had joined the anti-Nazi coalition in 1942. By 1944 the coalition
had grown to include 47 nations.
- The UN Charter contains "enemy state clauses"
[Articles 53 and 107], which were established because of Germany and name
it as the "enemy state."
- "The Bundesrepublik Deutschland (the former West
German state) is not the legal successor or inheritor of the Second German
Reich," according to Ebel. For this reason a legal peace treaty cannot
be signed by the current German government in Berlin, he said.
- "Until the real government is established and voted
by the people," Ebel said, the provisional government is necessary
to "fulfill the role of the legal German government."
- The Allies have authorized Ebel to serve as head of the
provisional government, he says. A civil servant with the German railroad,
Ebel was born in Berlin in 1939 and is a citizen of the German Reich, having
never held citizenship of either German state that resulted from the Second
World War. Berlin was a separate zone and "has never been part of
the BRD or DDR," Ebel said.
- Ebel was first appointed by the U.S. Military Court in
Berlin to serve as Rechtskonsulent for Prussia on Sept. 23, 1980.
- On Jan. 9, 1984, the U.S. State Department in Berlin
appointed Ebel to serve as the head of the German railroad (Reichsbahn)
in West Berlin. Exactly forty years after the German military (Wehrmacht)
surrendered, on May 8, 1985, Ebel was appointed as Transportation Minister
for the German Reich by the U.S. High Commissioner in Germany, who he says
was then U.S. Ambassador to West Germany (BRD) Richard Burt.
- Finally, on Sept. 27, 2000, Ebel was appointed chancellor
of the German Reich (Reichskanzler) by Ernst Matscheko, a representative
of the U.S. Dept. of Justice. Matscheko reportedly asked Ebel to name a
Reichspräsident and a special ambassador to the United Nations.
- The U.S. Embassy in Berlin will neither confirm nor deny
the claims made by Ebel, for which he presents documents as evidence. A
spokesman at the U.S. Embassy told AFP: "We are not responsible for
what they [the Reich's government] claim."