- In 1095 AD, Urban II, bishop of Rome, made a call for
a Holy Crusade in order to take Jerusalem from Jews and Muslims in the
name of Christianity. When they captured Jerusalem, they embarked on a
merciless killing spree. They burned Jews alive within their Synagogues.
They slaughtered Muslims. And to add insult to injury, they made their
captive Muslims clean up all the blood and body parts that littered the
Ninety-two years of decadence and savagery against Jews and Muslims followed,
until Saladin and his Muslim armies sent the bastards packing on October
2, 1187, and freed the Holy Land from European occupation. Unlike the genocide
of the Crusaders a hundred years earlier, there were no scenes of senseless
slaughter after the European surrender. Saladin even allowed Richard to
take home the relics from the Church of the Sepulchre.
In 1189, Pope Gregory VIII issued a Papal Bull that prompted the Third
Crusade. The idea was to take back Jerusalem from Saladin's armies. During
this Crusade, the man we know today as Richard the Lionhearted showed the
true Lion's Heart of a Christian.
Over a failed negotiation, Richard ordered the slaughter of all his Muslim
prisoners 2700 men, women, and children, in full view of Saladin's army.
The fact that we still refer to him as "the Lionhearted" today
says a whole lot about Western values, doesn't it?
In any case, the Crusade was a failure. They never took Jerusalem.
The next great assembly of European Knights, Crusade number four, was in
1202. Again, their Crusade was a flop. They never even made it to Jerusalem,
and only a handful made it as far as Syria.
By 1217, Pope Honorius III had forgotten about the shellacking the Church
had taken in previous years in the Middle East, and wanted to go back for
more. He wanted revenge. Honorius put Pelagius in charge of the Fifth Crusade.
And Pelagius, greedy for land and power, ended up with neither.
At one point, the Muslims offered to surrender Jerusalem to the invaders
along with a thirty-year truce, if only the Europeans would leave occupied
Egypt. Pelagius refused, and laid siege to Damietta. They captured the
city, but lost it to the Muslims two years later.
And they never took Jerusalem.
Ten years later, they were ready for more. The Sixth Crusade began in 1227.
But this time, the Crusade was led by Emperor Fredrick instead of the Church.
And Frederick just happened to be out of favor with the Church at the time.
Pope Gregory had excommunicated him for falling sick at the start of the
Crusade. Despite this, Frederick pressed on, and decided to try something
original - diplomacy without the blood and genocide.
And guess what? He negotiated a deal which gave Christians control of Jerusalem
from 1229 till 1244 when the Turks and Egyptians kicked them out.
In 1249, Louis IX embarked on the Seventh Crusade to try and win back Jerusalem.
Again, the Muslims offered a deal which would have given Christians control
of Jerusalem. Again, the greedy vicious Crusaders refused to make a deal,
preferring genocide and slaughter to sitting down and talking things out.
It was their downfall.
After capturing Damietta, they were ambushed on the way to Cairo. Two hundred
and ninety Knights Templar, each the equivalent of a modern day Abrams
Tank, entered Mansourah. Only five made it out. ALL the English knights
And they never made it to Jerusalem. On top of that, Louis IX, Queen Margaret
and their newborn baby were taken hostage, and had to pay a King's Ransom
AND give back Damietta in exchange for their lives.
It's funny how time seems to diminish the memories of our most colossal
fuckups. By 1270, Louis IX was ready to try again. On the Eighth Crusade,
Louis's army made it as far as Carthage before Bubonic plague put an end
to 185 years of attempted genocide against Jews and Muslims by Europeans.
Looked at from an overhead perspective, one must conclude that these Christian
Crusaders got their asses kicked good and proper. That's what happens when
you have bad intentions for others, and think with your fists instead of
your brain. You get out-thunk.
All of that blood, thunder, and wasted life.
Greed. Face value. Pride. The family name.
For the Church, a Pope who could call for a successful Crusade would be
elevated in the historical pecking order. And he'd have a lot more political
For the Kings, Princes, Dukes and Barons, there was plunder. Elevated status
within the military, and domestic props for helping the Church, which in
the 12th century, also happened to be the largest "campaign financier"
on the planet.
The Crusades were pure aristocratic politics. The same kind of politics
George W Bush is engaged in today. And Bush has the same flair for bloodshed
over diplomacy as Richard the Babykiller.
There's one more similarity between Bush and the Crusaders. Lying for posterity.
Here's an example of what liars the Bushlickers truly are. Cunning linguists
every one. The text below is Donald the Lionhearted on TV this weekend.
Donald Rumsfeld, CBS Face the Nation, March 14, 2004
SCHIEFFER: Well, let me just ask you this. If they did not have these weapons
of mass destruction, though, granted all of that is true, why then did
they pose an immediate threat to us, to this country?
- Sec. RUMSFELD: Well, you're the--you and a few other
critics are the only people I've heard use the phrase `immediate threat.'
I didn't. The president didn't. And it's become kind of folklore that that's--that's
what's happened. The president went...
- SCHIEFFER: You're saying that nobody in the administration
- Sec. RUMSFELD: I--I can't speak for nobody--everybody
in the administration and say nobody said that.
- SCHIEFFER: Vice president didn't say that? The...
- Sec. RUMSFELD: Not--if--if you have any citations, I'd
like to see 'em.
The Center for American Progress has posted downloadable video of Rummy's
statements on Face the Nation. Click on the link below to watch it.
Now, take a look at what Donald Rumsfeld said six months before the invasion
Donald Rumsfeld, September 19, 2002 before the Senate Armed Services Committee
"There are a number of terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction
-- Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, just to name a few -- but no terrorist
state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people
than the regime of Saddam Hussein and Iraq"
"We do know that Saddam Hussein has been actively and persistently
pursuing nuclear weapons for more than 20 years. But we should be just
as concerned about the immediate threat from biological weapons. Iraq has
Still not convinced that Donald Rumsfeld is a lying sack of shit?
Watch him say "immediate threat" for yourself on CSPAN's Realplayer
feed. Click the link below then click on "Defense Sec. Donald Rumsfeld
testifies on U.S. Policy in Iraq"
The first quote is just after the 21 minute mark. The second is just after
the 31 minute mark. Listen for yourself. He who has ears, let him hear.
How bout we cite you the middle finger salute, Mr. Rumsfeld?
By the 12th century, most of the European monarchies had married into Charlemagne's
bloodline. It gave them legitimacy. Many of the prominent Crusaders had
Charlemagne's blood in their veins. If one takes a look at Burke's Peerage,
one will find that the same holds true for America's founding fathers,
and in fact, for the majority of US Presidents.
"This web of interrelated presidents exists because in the early days
of the republic most of the white male population which made up the electorate
descended from a handful of well-documented 17th-century immigrants to
New England or one of the other 13 colonies along the eastern seaboard.
Indeed so small was the ruling class in the late 18th century that one
can trace family links between George Washington and (1) Lord Cornwallis,
his opponent at Yorktown, (2) both the men who came to dominate Europe
militarily in the decade and a half after Washington's death - Napoleon
and the Duke of Wellington, (3) Presidents Madison, Monroe, Van Buren and
Taylor and beyond them Jefferson, Tyler, William H. and Benjamin Harrison,
through the last two of whom one can reach Presidents Jackson and Polk."
The ruling class in Europe and North America share a common history, and
a common ancestry. Many of these individuals take great pride in their
stock. They see great esteem to be had in "one-upping" their
predecessors by achieving things which their fathers or forefathers could
Just look at Bush Jr. clumsily trying to do what his father stopped short
of doing in Iraq in 1991.
These people take family history very seriously. To the point where they
lie about their achievements in their biographies, as both Bush 41 and
43 have done so liberally.
Symbols are also very important to these people. The Crucifix. Family Crests.
Flags. A picture of George Bush in a flight suit. The soon to be launched
aircraft carrier, the George H W Bush. They want to leave a lasting impression
on history, one which portrays them in a powerful, grandiose light.
They have history, and long memories. Long enough to launch wars of vendetta
for a century or three in the name of family pride errr in the name of
the Church, and the "security" of Europe, of course. Yeah, that's
Right about now, you're probably thinking, "ok, what's the point of
all this history? What's he getting at, because I'm getting bored of this"
Well, the point is this: when these people build a symbol, they don't do
it haphazardly. They do it with an intended purpose, knowing full well
the meaning behind the symbolism. A flag with 13 stars, for the 13 states,
each a constellation within a greater Union. A dollar bill that says, "An
Undertaking Favored by God - New World Order".
Well, ok. It's in latin. Annuit Coeptis. Novus Ordo Seclorum. But you get
On September 11, 1990, George H W Bush made his "Toward a New World
Order" speech. January 16, 1991, he launches his war in the Middle
East. Twelve years later, thanks to a US and UK enforced sanctions regime,
nearly two million Iraqis are dead, half of them children under the age
It is a war crime that puts the First Crusade to shame.
Keep in mind, this is a family whose political speeches are rife with Biblical
phrase. A family whose bread and butter is the vote of the Christian Coalition.
George W Bush even credits the Billy Graham CRUSADE for his Christian rebirth.
Surreal, isn't it?
How did America get here?
After the American Revolution, despite the protests of George Washington,
a group of American aristocrats founded the Washington National Monument
Society to build a monument to the original G Dubya. They hired a Freemason
named Robert Mills as the architect.
Construction on the Washington Monument began in 1848, and was completed
in 1884. We've all seen pictures of video of it. It's that giant white
Egyptian Obelisk inside a circle that stands at one end of a huge lake.
You can see some pictures of it by using the link below.
As an aside, the man who designed the street layout of Washington DC, Pierre
Charles L'Enfante, was also a Freemason. There are occult symbols all over
Washington DC. Take a look at a road map some time.
The first question that comes to mind when one looks at the Dollar Bill
and the Washington Monument is, "If the USA was meant to be a Christian
nation as the Christian Coalition claims, then what's with the pagan idolatry
on the dollar bill and in Washington DC?"
Clearly, these symbols have a purpose. They're meant as a symbol of something,
and meant to send SOME kind of message. I don't think anyone can disagree
But what message?
For that answer, we must travel to Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of
- ISLAM AND THE HAJJ PILGRIMAGE
Part of being a Muslim involves a pilgrimage to Mecca, to participate in
the Hajj rituals. Every Muslim who is able to do so is expected to make
the pilgrimage at least once in their lifetime. The pilgrimage involves
fasting, cleansing of one's body and spirit, and following in the footsteps
of the Prophet Mohammed.
It's believed that doing this will bring the faithful closer to their Prophet.
And for most, it has precisely this effect. It is an awesome experience
for the faithful, millions of whom make the trip each year. It's gotten
so busy these days that every year, people get trampled or asphyxiated
by the mesmerized sea of humanity.
Most of us know of the press to circle the Kaaba stone seven times. Muslims
in Mecca circle the stone, touch it, and then work their way back out of
the press of bodies. Take a look at the sea of humanity we're talking about
by clicking the link below.
Another lesser known part of the Hajj pilgrimage involves throwing stones
at Satan. The pilgrims collect 49 or 70 stones. They're supposed to throw
seven stones at each of three "pillars" to cast out Satan.
So they collect their stones, and go to a place called Mina where the "pillars"
stand. Mina is supposedly where Abraham, on his way to sacrifice his only
begotten son as per God's command, met Satan on the road. But rather than
be taken in by Satan, Abraham threw seven stones at Satan, as per the Archangel
Gabriel's advice, and in doing so cast out Satan.
Throwing stones at Mina is meant to symbolize one's own battle with Satan.
It's a form of spiritual cleansing. You can see a partial view of one of
the pillars at Mina by clicking the link below, which takes you to an MSNBC
story about the Hajj.
Note how closely the MSNBC image is cropped. They don't give you a wide
shot of the pillar. But don't worry, the international media outside the
USA will show you what the American ruling class hides from the people.
Take a look at the pictures of the "pillars" at Mina by clicking
on the link below.
The highest act of devotion in the Muslim faith, the Hajj, involves throwing
stones at Satan, symbolized by an EGYPTIAN OBELISK INSIDE A CIRCLE.
It's the fucking Washington Monument.
Perhaps now you understand a little more clearly why it's so easy for many
Muslims to accept that the United States of America is "the Great
A symbol is a powerful thing. And the symbol of the American Revolution,
to Muslims, is literally a manifestation of the Serpent of Eden. The Devil.
Shaitan. The Great Satan.
And the guys who built the Washington Monument chose this symbol ON PURPOSE.
Are any of us truly so naïve as to think that the direct descendants
of the original Crusaders, men whose arch-enemy has always been Jews and
Muslims, didn't realize what they were doing when the chose this symbol
to be the Washington Monument?
There's a point here that I want to make clearly. There are a great many
retards out there like Graham Jukes who want to blame what white guys are
doing and have done on Judaism and Jews. Well, the Washington Monument
wasn't chosen as a symbol and erected by Jews. It was a choice made by
white guys. White men chose these symbols: the obelisk, the eye of Ra,
They are symbols of Egyptian monarchy that Jews ran away from, and that
Muslims despise. Symbols that are anathema to BOTH groups of Semites. America's
symbols declare it to be diametrically opposed to the Semitic peoples.
Zionism in America has ten times as many Christian supporters as Jewish
ones. And what is Zionism, if not the colonialism of Palestine by the descendants
of European Crusaders?
The largest Christian group in America supports Zionism, and they're not
Jewish. The majority of its Jewish supporters are themselves white Europeans,
with no Semitic blood. They're Russian Ashkenazis for the most part. White
people who converted to Judaism in the 9th century.
In fact, most of the Jews settled in Gaza and the West Bank, 2/3 of whom
hold US Citizenship, are the descendants of white people, and are not descended
But despite these facts, the retards insists there's a "Jewish"
conspiracy going on. Never mind that the vast majority of profit in Iraq
and on arms sales to Israel is being made by white Christians. Never mind
that the economic woes in America have been brought on by Reagan, Bush,
Clinton, and Bush: four white Christians. Never mind that every shooting
war America has entered into since Korea has been about profits for white
In the eyes of the retards, "Jews" are to blame. Blame a religion,
and not the European gene pool, even if there are ten times as many supporters
of the Ideology who are Christian. Blame the religion, even though the
religion itself calls for a Jewish Diaspora. Blame the religion, even though
Zionism is a 19th century creation which came three thousand years after
Judaism, and has been in the control of White Christians since the early
20th century. Blame the religion, even though Christianity has been responsible
for hundreds of millions more murders than Judaism. Blame Jews, even though
belief in Zionism and belief in Judaism have nothing to do with one another.
I've seen this story before. Germany, 1933. Those opposed to Hitler were
"in league" with the Jews.
I guess it's easier for the retards to blame others than to accept responsibility
within their own social demographic. For them, DENIAL ain't just a river
One last point on this issue. Many people insist that I'm wrong about Ashkenazis
being Caucasian. Many insist that they are, in fact, Semitic/Negroid in
- Well, if that's so, then how come the Aryan Brotherhood
accepts Ashkenazis in their ranks? Anyone who's spent time in an American
prison can tell you that this is so.
The AB accepts Ashkenazi Jews because the Ashkenazis are WHITE GUYS. Caucasian
Europeans. Plain, simple, historical fact.
The whole purpose of the Crusades was the European conquest and rule of
Palestine. Jerusalem in particular. And what European Aristocracy could
not achieve by force nine hundred years ago, they have now achieved by
way of military might and deception.
Sure, it was the Brits that began the Mandate of Palestine on September
11, 1922. But it was an American, Harry Truman, that forced UN Resolution
181 through the United Nations, creating the state of Israel. It's American
military and "humanitarian" aid to Israel that fuels the occupation.
It's American settlers from Brooklyn that occupy most of Gaza and the West
Bank. It's American Veto power at the UN that ensures the occupation continues,
and the settlements expand.
America's aristocracy is simply trying to accomplish what European aristocracy
could not, for profit, for posterity, and in order to divide and conquer
the Semitic people.
It's important to note, to the point of belaboring the point, that the
vast majority of the Jewish settlers in Palestine are of Russian Ashkenazi,
and not Semitic, descent. They're the descendants of Caucasian/European
converts to Judaism, and not indigenous people to the land of Canaan. Think
of them as "Stealth Crusaders". And these Settlers, who now cry
"anti-Semitism" when one criticizes them, even though they're
not Semitic, have managed to bring Jerusalem back under European control.
Well, half of Jerusalem anyway.
If the Christian Coalition and Jewish Extremists have their way, we're
in the final days of the Last Crusade. Each is using the other to try and
bring on the apocalypse according to their own ideology. The Christians
are expecting the Second Coming of Christ, and the Jews are awaiting the
Coming of the Messiah.
When the Messiah comes, he's supposed to save all the Jews in one fell
swoop, and wipe out all their enemies, ushering in a Utopian era for the
Jewish people. But before the Messiah can come, Jews have to rebuild the
Temple of Solomon at the Temple Mount - the place Muslims call Al-Aqsa,
or the Dome of the Rock.
Sounds simple, right? Go build the thing, and you're one step closer to
the Messiah come to earth. Well, not so fast. First, a kosher Red Heifer
must be born, then sacrificed. Then the Jews must use the ashes of the
heifer to purify themselves so they can enter the holy ground at the Temple
Mount without bring a nasty curse down upon themselves.
Rather than wait for a very rare Red Heifer to be born naturally, the crazies
in Israel and America, white Christians and white Jews working together,
have been trying to genetically manufacture a kosher Red Heifer. For real.
They already birthed one, but it failed to pass the tests, so they're still
Consider that if the Jews are right, the Messiah will wipe out all the
Muslims and Christians and save only the Jews. So why on earth would the
Christian Coalition help these Jewish extremists to do this?
Because in the Christian version of the apocalypse, the Jews rebuilding
the Temple of Solomon has to happen before the Second Coming of Christ,
in which Jesus will kill all the Muslims and Jews who won't convert to
Christianity, and save all the Christians.
This is why Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson are supporters of Israel. They
want to bring about the forcible conversion of Jews to Christianity by
divine power, or see them all dead if they won't convert. Well, ok, supporting
Israel helps their Defense Stock portfolios too. But seriously, they have
tens of millions of people believing this stuff, as ridiculous as it sounds.
On the Muslim side of things, Ayatollah Khomeini is considered a Prophet
by Shiites. Osama Bin Laden is trying to create conditions in which he
could be seen as the Mahdi: a harbinger of the Muslim version of the Apocalypse.
Personally, I think the 5.9 billion of us who don't subscribe to any of
this rubbish need to get smart, and turn the guns on ALL the monotheistic
idiots who are running this dog and pony show, before they start a nuclear
war over Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa.
What's funny is that all three groups overlook some simple facts.
The pillars at Mina weren't made by God. They were made by men. Same goes
for the Washington Monument, and the Temple Mount. There's nothing divine
about any of them. They're just stupid pieces of rock carved by Masons,
paid for by the ruling classes who wanted a symbol to unify their people
so they could make war on the other guys.
Same goes for the books. Not a one was written by a god. All of them were
written and edited by human beings, Prophet status notwithstanding.
Belief is a dangerous thing. Blind faith in the most ludicrous stories
written by people ignorant of evolution, physics, and basic scientific
principal is even more dangerous.
Giving a nuclear panic button to a guy who represents 30 million of these
idiots is the stupidest thing and most dangerous thing any group of people
have done since the beginning of recorded history. Especially when that
individual is a pathological liar with a shockingly low IQ.
I mean come on, think about this for a minute. The President of the United
States is the most powerful leader on the planet. He holds at his fingertips
the power to end all human life on earth within an hour.
Given that a POTUS has this type of power, shouldn't the fact that an individual
is capable of believing a silly story at face value without any concrete
proof automatically DISQUALIFY that person from holding high office?
A guy like that might even end up believing that Saddam had weapons of
Thanks to the Bush family, we're living in a freakin' movie. Texas George
and the Last Crusade. A movie where an Empire falls into bankruptcy, and
the entire world goes to war to avoid being crushed by George Bush's Crusade.
He flat out called his war a Crusade on September 19, 2001, for those of
you who don't remember. After all, he wants his place in history as a Holy
Of the three factions, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, ONLY the Muslims
have their Nuclear weapons out of the hands of religious extremists. General
Pervez Musharraf staged a military coup to get those nukes AWAY from people
with ideological views that mirror those of the Christian Coalition and
Israel's National Religious Party.
And yet we say it's dangerous to allow Muslims to get nuclear weapons.
Please. They're the only ones who are safeguarding their weapons from Religious
Ariel Sharon's coalition government would not have a majority without the
Jewish extremists, which puts them in the driver's seat. George Bush would
not be in the White House without the support of his Christian Extremist
voting base. They are the two most dangerous men on earth, and the greatest
danger to human life this planet has ever known, because both electoral
bases are Hell-bent on kicking off Armageddon for religious reasons.
I really do think that some level headed Generals in Israel and the USA
should be looking at General Musharraf right now. They need to borrow a
few pages from his playbook, and get those weapons OUT OF THE HANDS OF
RELIGIOUS FANATICS and those who do their bidding.
It was a lot less complicated when the biggest weapon man possessed was
a catapult. Today, the actions of these religious idiots, descendants of
the rock-tossers, affect the entire planet. It's not just a game anymore.
There are serious consequences to nuclear war, and nuclear war is precisely
what we'll get with Bush and Sharon in power.
But it's not too late to abort this Crusade. If a different man is in the
White House in January 2005, there's a glimmer of hope. If the Gaza pullout
drives a rift between Sharon and the looney tunes crowd, there's even more
If Bush can be defeated in Iraq, bogged down and harassed to the breaking
point so he don't have the resources to expand his war for oil and reconstruction
contracts under the pretext of faith, America's might can be broken like
the Soviet Union was smashed fighting the immovable Mujeheddin in Afghanistan.
Debt fueled spending for war is Bush's Achilles heel. The cost to benefit
ratio will not allow him to fight prolonged wars AND maintain several occupations
at once. It costs millions of dollars for each confirmed kill. Conversely,
each kill only costs the Iraqis or the Taliban a few bucks in bathtub chemicals.
Our course is not predetermined. Nothing is writ in stone. It's up to WE,
THE PEOPLE, to decide the future. Look at what the Spaniards did yesterday.
They acknowledged that Bush, Blair and Aznar lied, and that there was no
cause for war in Iraq other than ego and profit. They turned out in record
numbers to vote against the government, and elected people who promised
to get the Spanish army out of Iraq by June 30.
No more Crusades for the Conquistadors. They've learned their lesson.
Are we going to continue to allow ourselves to be manipulated by political
aristocrats who wrap themselves in the Church and the flag while they profiteer
from our stupidity, or are we going to wake up and DO SOMETHING?
Last Crusade, or the beginning of an era of peace, and true international
That choice is up to you, on the second Tuesday in November.
- I have to correct Mr. Lee on one point -- Christian prophecy
does not teach that Jesus Christ will return in the Second Coming to "kill
all the Muslims and Jews who won't convert to Christianity, and save all
the Christians." Most Christians do not view the Second Coming this
way, either. It was Jesus himself who said, while prophesying of the last
days and his Second Coming, that "were those days not cut short, no
flesh would be left alive; but for the sake of the elect those days have
been cut short." The Second Coming has two purposes, neither of which
involve the wholesale slaughter of Jews or Muslims by Christ. The first
is to put an end to all human struggle and usher in everlasting peace and
justice. The second is to obliterate the human war machine forever. Hsing
Lee, like many, has confused Armageddon with the Second Coming. Armageddon
is a very specific battle that never actually takes place because the returning
Lord Jesus puts an end to it (and puts an end to the Man of Sin who leads
the world into it). This is an act of infinite mercy. He will, at his coming,
destroy all the armies of the world which will be gathered together at
the place called Megiddo (hence the name, Armageddon). Everyone else on
earth is spared. Christ puts an end to the end of the world, he doesn't
bring the end of the world! He will then judge the nations... all people.
He will dispense perfect justice. As for Jesus returning to kill Jews,
nothing could be further from the truth.
- The prophet Zechariah (chp 12-14) tells us that the Lord
will cut off (kill) 2/3 that are in the land of Israel (this is happens
by way of war breaking out in the region, for the land will be filled with
violence and the nation will be mislead by a great false prophet), but
that 1/3 will be spared, as a special remnant of the Jewish people, and
safely brought through the conflict by the Lord, and established in great
honor forever in the Kingdom of God. The prophets tell us in that day they
will see him, see his wounds and mourn as for an only son, and their hearts
will be turned to him. Not that he will destroy them all. As for the Muslims,
the prophets tells us that the Jew and Arab, who are brothers, will embrace
one another in complete harmony and brotherhood forever after. There's
nothing about killing off "non-converts." The issue of "conversion"
becomes rather moot once the Lord has appeared, coming upon clouds of glory
with angels, indeed rescuing earth from demise at the hands of Satanic
government which at that time will have reached total power. It will be
obliterated in a moment of time. I think these twisted views of what Christians
believe come not from people like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, but
those who are clearly anti-christ like Hsing Lee, who do not understand
and do not care to understand Christianity or Christians in their hatred
for all things religious or spiritual.
- As Hsing says, "Personally, I think the 5.9 billion
of us who don't subscribe to any of this rubbish need to get smart, and
turn the guns on ALL the monotheistic idiots who are running this dog and
pony show, before they start a nuclear war over Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa."
Ah, Yes, all the world's ills are due to monotheism and people of faith,
and someone would just have the guts to kill us all off, the world would
be a better place.
That is precisely the teaching of the anti-christ to come.
Name Witheld By Request
- Dear Mr. Lee:
- I just read your latest posting on www.rense.com on Texas
George and the Last Crusade. There was one thing that you left out. Not
only is the Masonic religion straight out of the bowels of Pharonic Egypt
(where the official religion was state mandated Satanism) but what we currently
know of as Judaism is too. Modern day Judaism is what Jesus referred to
as The Tradition of the Elders, an oral Torah that according to the Rabbi's
man made religion is supposedly superior to the written one. Jesus condemned
this oral traditon and the people who spread it in the strongest possible
terms. This oral tradition had its beginning in Egypt. The Kabballa, a
mixture of blasphemy and black magic which is also central to the modern
day Jewish faith is from this same ancient Egyptian source.
- See Michael Hoffman's web site at www.revionisthistory.org
for more on this.
- One good point you made is that the modern day Jews would
not have even a small fraction of the power they do if it was not for the
Christian Zionists that support them. Christian Zionists or Judeo-Christians
are a contradiction of terms, a pairing of the opposites straight from
the bowels of Hell.
- A Post Script To Texas George
- From Hsing Lee
- Well, I certainly seem to have stirred up a Hornet's
80% of you are cheering me on, and 10% want me silenced or in Camp X-Ray.
Many of you who've written me have complained about Jeff Rense posting
Alton Raines comments about my article, saying Jeff should never have posted
such a silly comment at the bottom of my post.
Before moving on to the other stuff on my plate, I want to address this.
Thanks for standing up for me guys, but I don't believe in Censorship of
I send my stuff to Jeff for a reason. I send stuff to him because Jeff
allows ALL sides to be heard on any given issue. It would be wrong of him
NOT to have posted negative feedback, especially negative feedback which
was as well crafted as the comments left by Alton Raines.
- And ultimately, Raines WAS right, and I was wrong regarding
the specificity of End Times Prophecy.
Unlike Mr. Bush and Rumsfeld however, I can say I was wrong, and stand
I DID screw the pooch. In my rush to write the rant, and with my bad habit
of not proof reading what I write unless it exceeds 20 pages, I DID mix
up my end times prophecies.
So get off Mr. Raines, and Jeff's back, ok?
The man had a point, and he made it. Kudos to Alton Raines.
And kudos to Jeff Rense and James Neff for allowing BOTH sides to make
Wrong is wrong, people. Even when they guy whose facts are wrong is someone
you like. And in this case, I was in factual error. I COULD have mocked
monotheism without making this error, had I been more careful. And for
that, I'm sorry.
You should also note that Mr. Raines did NOT take issue with anything else,
except for my own rant about turning guns on the 100 million idiots, Christian,
Jew and Muslim alike, who are fighting this Holy War against the other
side, and have us all caught in the middle.
And he makes a valid point. To actually do what I suggested would just
be another form of Totalitarianism. To say it makes me the anti-Christ,
well, that's his opinion. And he's entitled to it. And I'll fight for his
right to keep that opinion of me, and to speak it from the highest mountaintop.
And I APPLAUD Jeff for having the balls to post BOTH my rant, and Mr. Raines
comments. This is what free speech is all about. Some of you haven't figured
that out yet.
As Kim Campbell said on Bill Maher the other night, "If you don't
see something in your community that offends you, you're not living in
a free society."
It's not about being right. It's not about making the other side look stupid.
It's about having an open forum for debate, where the KKK can call me Chink,
I can call them Cracker, the Christians can call me anti-Christ, and I
can call Colin Powell a House Nego, without anyone having to answer to
the thought police.
When we lose that right to free speech, and the "Left" is MORE
guilty here than the "Right" in terms of stifling controversial
political speech, THAT is when we're screwed.
This is about each of us having an opinion, and a place to speak that opinion.
I would not be sending my stuff to Jeff if he wasn't acting as a guardian
of free speech. And I'm confident that so long as the law permits, Jeff
Rense's site will be one of the few places on the internet where we can
ALL be heard.
So please, while I appreciate the support, there's no need to go after
Mr. Raines for calling me the anti-Christ. He's entitled to his opinion,
and considering the way I treated monotheists in my rant, he had every
right to use the language he did. In fact, had it been me on the receiving
end of my rant, my language would have been far stronger, and more colorful,
than Mr. Raines.
Stifling opinions and free speech is wrong, no matter what that speech
is. And while I stand by my belief that holding belief in something which
cannot be proven should disqualify someone from holding public office,
that doesn't mean I want to silence these people. They have as much right
to beef as I do, as loudly as they want.
That said, I want to move on to the other paragraph people seemed to take
"Personally, I think the 5.9 billion of us who don't subscribe to
any of this rubbish need to get smart, and turn the guns on ALL the monotheistic
idiots who are running this dog and pony show, before they start a nuclear
war over Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa."
From a couple of emails I received, I realize I should have expounded on
this a little. Fair enough. It DOES sound kind of harsh.
For the obtuse who don't understand what's implied in the above statement,
what I'm saying here is this: there are six billion people on this planet.
5.9 billion of us are being held hostage by 30 million Christian Coalition
retards, 2-3 million insane Jewish extremists, and 50-60 million Wahabbi
and Shiite whack jobs who are ALREADY involved in a shooting war with one
another, while the rest of us are caught in the middle.
And because they're already at war, guns in hand, figuratively speaking,
I feel those guns should be turned around on those doing the fighting.
Those of us who want no part in their Crusades need to find out voice,
and get these nutballs out of positions of power, and take their WMD away
I'm also speaking in self defense. Pat Robertson, in a dehumanizing, Hitler-like
statement, has called for a "Holy Fumigation" of those who don't
think like him and his flock. Osama has more or less done the same. So
has Effi Eitam, head of the National Religious Party. Observe Mr. Robertson's
statement for yourself:
"It is interesting, that termites don't build things, and the great
builders of our nation almost to a man have been Christians, because Christians
have the desire to build something. He is motivated by love of man and
God, so he builds. The people who have come into (our) institutions (today)
are primarily termites. They are into destroying institutions that have
been built by Christians, whether it is universities, governments, our
own traditions, that we have.... The termites are in charge now, and that
is not the way it ought to be, and the time has arrived for a godly fumigation."
- - Pat Robertson, New York Magazine, August 18, 1986
So this blowhard jerkoff who has his own TV station can call for me and
all non-Christians to be fumigated and exterminated like insects, but it's
not ok for me to want to save myself from his genocide by wanting to fight
What kind of hypocritical bullshit is that?
And take a look at Billy Graham's hypocrisy, from the Nixon Tapes:
- Billy Graham: "...the country is caught in a stranglehold
of Jews in the news and entertainment business. This stranglehold's got
to be broken or the country's going down the drain,"
- NIXON: "You believe that?"
- Billy Graham: "Yes sir "
- NIXON: "Oh boy," replied an elated Nixon, "So
do I. I can't ever say that, but I believe it."
- Billy Graham: "No, but if you get elected a second
time, then we might be able to do something."
- Billy Graham: "a lot of the Jews are great friends
of mine. They swarm around me and are friendly to me. Because they know
I am friendly to Israel and so forth. They don't know how I really feel
about what they're doing to this country."
And let's not even get into Jerry Falwell. A man who made his career by
fighting against equal rights for black people, and against equal rights
for women. Take a look at these quotes from the Three Stooges: Osama, Jerry,
- It appears that America's anti-Biblical feminist movement
is at last dying, thank God, and is possibly being replaced by a Christ-centered
men's movement which may become the foundation for a desperately needed
national spiritual awakening.
- -- Jerry Falwell
- Your nation exploits women like consumer products or
advertising tools, calling upon customers to purchase them. You use women
to serve passengers, visitors and strangers to increase your profit margins.
You plaster your naked daughters across billboards in order to sell a product
without any shame. You have brainwashed your daughters into believing they
are liberated by wearing revealing clothes, yet in reality all they have
liberated is your sexual desire. After all this you say that you are the
nation that supports women's freedom. - Osama Bin Laden, 2002
- "There will never be world peace until God's house
and God's people are given their rightful place of leadership at the top
of the world. How can there be peace when drunkards, drug dealers, communists,
atheists, New Age worshipers of Satan, secular humanists, oppressive dictators,
greedy moneychangers, revolutionary assassins, adulterers, and homosexuals
are on top?"
- - Pat Robertson, The New World Order, p. 227, Word Publishing,
- ·Your nation encourages drinking alcohol in all
its shapes and forms i.e. production, trading and usage. On the one hand,
you have made selling and using some drugs illegal, yet you so often turn
a blind eye to this vice. Is it any surprise that your country has the
largest drug addiction problem? - Osama Bin Laden, 2002
- Bill Clinton created an epidemic of oral sex in our nation's
High Schools - Jerry Falwell
- Who can forget your previous President's immoral acts
committed in the Oval office? After that you did not even bother putting
him on trial and instead allowed him to wriggle himself out of the situation
without reprimanding him in any way. History will remember you for all
of this. - Osama Bin Laden, 2002
- Peas in a fucking pod, the lot of them.
And sorry, but I have every right to want to fight back against such bollocks.
If they have the right to express an opinion saying they want me exterminated,
I have just as much right to say the same about them.
It's only hate speech when it's not true, and is unprovoked.
We're living in difficult times. Of that, there's no doubt. But stifling
free speech and open dialogue, whether that speech is mine, Alton Raine's,
Osama's, or Jerry Falwell's, is just plain WRONG.
One last point. Mr. Raines calls me the anti-Christ. Well, that's his opinion.
For my part, I follow the teachings of Jesus as found in his own language,
from his own time, in the Gospel of Thomas and the other Nag Hammadi transcripts.
So go ahead and call me the anti-Christ if you want. I know it's not true,
so he can say what he likes. It really doesn't matter to me. I'd be more
upset if people WEREN'T getting defensive and lashing out to defend their
beliefs, because that would mean fear is winning over free speech.
- And we must NEVER allow that to happen. So slime away
guys, I'm a big boy. And I have no business dishin' it if I can't take
it in return. Fair's fair.
So thank you, Jeff, for having the courage and the moral character to post
what I write, and to post what others write about me. Especially when I
make an error, and the person with an opposing view points out that error.
Lying is wrong, and by speaking incorrectly, what I said about the End
Times Prophecies amounts to a lie.
And we should never tolerate lies.
TRUTH, above all else, should be God.