Democrats Sending Bush A
Deeply Covert And Subtle Message
Not To Strive For A Second Term

By Joseph B. Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.

This weekend's news shows gave us enormous support for interpretations long made and held by Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. The following is highly important from our respectful point of view:
1. While Richard Clarke's interviews were quite damaging to the Bush administration, the most important thing he said is something generally overlooked by the media and others. Clarke said that Clinton could not get the CIA and FBI to deal with terrorism issues. This is directly supportive of our analysis that when Bush 41 lost in his re-election bid it was imperative under the N.W.O. agenda to make sure that Clinton didn't eliminate Saddam for he was the bogeyman serving as the future platform for the intrusion into the Middle East for oil. The oil cabal surely had no intention on seeing Clinton reap the windfall of an attack and victory over Iraq. They had no intention on seeing him and his own cabal, Democrats no less, in the oil business. Thus, this confirms what we knew all along: that Clinton was directed to deal with Saddam in a manner where he would remain the latch key for what unraveled as 9-11, the final required predicate for the Middle East invasion.
2. Clarke noted his surprise and dismay over Cheney failing to speak out against Al-Qaeda. When you understand that there are inside agendas and then there are deeper inside agendas, you will easily understand and see how all the pieces fit together.
3. The most important thing Clarke said to foreshadow Bush's upcoming woes is his remarks on Condolezzaa Rice, which parallel our own perceptions. He said no NSA was ever closer to the President of the United States than in her relationship with President Bush. He described it as an unusually close relationship with Bush. When we featured the interpretation inserted immediately below, we had concluded that Condy Rice was George Bush's true Achilles Heel. Although highly educated and well positioned with experience, there is a dark side to her role in the White House. We want to say no more than her service to President Bush sends a mocking message to Bill Clinton and one that regretfully truly mocks us the citizens of the USA and our government. However, suffice it to say, Clarke verified that she seemed to not even recognize the dynamics attendant to Al-Qaeda and there is no question that she operated as the most ignorant NSA ever to publicly serve the President. The truth of it as she and other deep insiders know: she is not the NSA and thus her dread and refusal to appear under oath in public especially if PUBLICLY questioned UNDER OATH as we said by the counsel for the Democratic side of the 9-11 Commission. Thus, as far as we can see, Kennedy and others, have moved to have Bush agree to throw the election for the good of the country (similar to what took place on several dimensions after Jack Kennedy's assassination), but it seems to date that Bush is resisting, stubborn as he is, and thus more and more is being leaked until he gets the point that he has no choice. As we said, what Bush 43 doesn't fully know, is that even his N.W.O. backers have covertly and very silently agreed not to support his re-election. There is no way the Democratic insiders and others are going to tolerate his continuing on, with not only the degree of global alienation, but more importantly his continuing to fail in his missions including the one where he was supposed to be from the get go in Syria and Iran and now his fumbling Madrid.
License To Lie
NSA employee Rice is trembling about 9-11, admitting to standing without knowledge about terrorists planning to deploy airplanes against buildings. She didn't lie to the media under the intense first spotlights of 9-11. It would have been prima facie evidence that someone so stupid could hold such an important post. Thus, if she didn't lie, and otherwise didn't know, why is she in every central photo next to the President of the United States, including the one where the President was kept waiting for Jiang Zemin's arrival at his Crawford ranch? She looks as though she has a central role, and is ever present as though she has a central role, but how can someone in such a central role not know what she should have known as NSA and now stands afraid to testify before the 9-11 commission, which exists to whitewash 9-11 (unless she's not privy to that either)? She has an important role. But what is it?
Someone really detests this nation and we are quite frankly upset that the American people tolerate the way this country is being demeaned and defaced instead of built to its great potential because of people who have concluded that it must be abandoned and left as a weak, maimed country with a globally perceived depraved people incubated and nourished by television programming standards that increasingly become the central focus of daily life for the vast majority of American people. This country's heritage is too precious to squander as this generation seems all to willing to do. What purpose is education if the American people act lame, blind and stupid? How much longer will the American people sit and allow themselves to be so disgraced by those carring absolutely no respect for them?
4. Clarke's most apparent and open damaging remark from where we sit is that Bush will be recorded and seen by history as the President who among other failings spurred on a new wave of emerging elevated terrorism. President Bush, Clarke asserted, was a living recruitment poster boy for Al-Qaeda and he did specifically note that if Bush were to move against Syria and Iran to ultimately move to undermine the Saudi Regime, one would shudder to think of the consequences. Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. has said and concluded that the window that he missed was during the initial invasion against Iraq. Our exposition details that the Pentagon had two levels of high confidence: that Saddam would use it during the invasion against Iraq and if incredibly as it sounded then if he did not that they would use the back stop: it's discovery. The most important event and dynamic of this time (which should be tacked on to Arafat turning down Clinton and Barak's offer of Jerusalem and the West Bank) is the fact that Saddam did in fact dispose of all of it and there were no WMD to be found. Now, in this regard, there is an earth-shattering article that appeared on the Internet - so earth shattering that we reproduce it in full. It says there was a black op agenda by the shadow government to plant WMD as a double backstop concurrent with the invasion. However, when the team of 100 assigned to the task confronted the opportunity of loading the plane with cash, billions of it from Iraqi banks and Saddam's art collection, they fumbled the mission in terms of WMD. When collected together in Iraq it seems, from what we can glean from the article, asserting that they all died from friendly fire, Cheney or another (Tenet perhaps) misdirected two bunker buster bombs for them.
US Tried To Plant WMDs And Failed - Whistleblower
Daily Times Monitor
According to a stunning report posted by a retired Navy Lt Commander and 28-year veteran of the Defense Department (DoD), the Bush administration's assurance about finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was based on a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plan to "plant" WMDs inside the country. Nelda Rogers, the Pentagon whistleblower, claims the plan failed when the secret mission was mistakenly taken out by "friendly fire", the Environmentalists Against War report. Nelda Rogers is a 28-year veteran debriefer for the DoD. She has become so concerned for her safety that she decided to tell the story about this latest CIA-military fiasco in Iraq. According to Al Martin, "Ms Rogers is number two in the chain of command within this DoD special intelligence office. This is a ten-person debriefing unit within the central debriefing office for the Department of Defense." The information that is being leaked out is information "obtained while she was in Germany heading up the debriefing of returning service personnel, involved in intelligence work in Iraq for the DoD and/or the CIA. "According to Ms Rogers, there was a covert military operation that took place both preceding and during the hostilities in Iraq," reports Al Martin, an online subscriber-based news/analysis service which provides "Political, Economic and Financial Intelligence".
Al Martin is a retired Lt Commander (US Navy), the author of a memoir called "The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider," and is considered one of America's foremost experts on corporate and government fraud. Ms Rogers reports that this particular covert operation team was manned by former military personnel and "the unit was paid through the Department of Agriculture in order to hide it, which is also very commonplace". According to Al Martin, "the Agriculture Department has often been used as a paymaster on behalf of the CIA, DIA, NSA and others". According to the Al Martin story, another aspect of Ms Rogers' report concerns a covert operation which was to locate the assets of Saddam Hussein and his family, including cash, gold bullion, jewelry and assorted valuable antiquities. The problem became evident when "the operation in Iraq involved 100 people, all of whom apparently are now dead, having succumbed to so-called 'friendly fire'. The scope of this operation included the penetration of the Central Bank of Iraq, other large commercial banks in Baghdad, the Iraqi National Museum and certain presidential palaces where monies and bullion were secreted." "They identified about $2 billion in cash, another $150 million in Euros, in physical banknotes, and about another $100 million in sundry foreign currencies ranging from Yen to British Pounds," reports Al Martin.
"These people died, mostly in the same place in Baghdad, supposedly from a stray cruise missile or a combination of missiles and bombs that went astray," Martin continues. "There were supposedly 76 who died there and the other 24 died through a variety of 'friendly fire', 'mistaken identity' and some of them-their whereabouts are simply unknown." Ms Rogers' story sounds like an updated 21st-century version of Treasure Island meets Ali Baba and the Bush Cabal Thieves, writes Martin.
"This was a contingent of CIA/ DoD operatives, but it was really the CIA that bungled it," Ms Rogers said. "They were relying on the CIA's ability to organise an effort to seize these assets and to be able to extract these assets because the CIA claimed it had resources on the ground within the Iraqi army and the Iraqi government who had been paid. That turned out to be completely bogus. As usual." "CIA people were supposed to be handling it," Martin continues. "They had a special 'black' aircraft to fly it out. But none of that happened because the regular US Army showed up, stumbled onto it and everyone involved had to scramble. These new Iraqi "asset seizures" go directly to the New US Ruling Junta. The US Viceroy in Iraq Paul Bremer is reportedly drinking Saddam's $2000 a bottle Napoleon-era brandy, smoking his expensive Davidoff cigars and he has even furnished his office with Saddam's Napoleon-era furniture.
This is an incredible event and one that signifies to the N.W.O. the operation of forces of a heavenly nature against their schemes and designs. They are being sent continual messages but as arrogant and stubborn as they are, they are accustomed to prevailing and they don't want to read the handwriting on the wall. We endeavor to tell those complicit in such greed that they will be held to account. What is incredible to us is that they who have such wealth, wealth for several lifetimes, just have no conscience in moving for more of it and stand willing to do the evil they do to obtain it seeking permanent control of the planet's resources to boot.
5. Richard Clarke was pushed out since he was out of the loop and too aggressive and open in questioning the many things that dismayed him when he sat in on terrorism issues and questions. He further noted that what disturbed him was that he sensed post 9-11 that the event was the platform for political benefits and decisions. No doubt about it. The one thing he would not say otherwise apparent from what we all know is that the Bush administration at the ultimate high levels, meaning the President and those truly backing him, with select military, were complicit in 9-11. Either Bush has to agree to pass on re-election (covertly of course), or else the Democrats will open the gateway to the truth of it all via their involvement in the 9-11 Commission. Thus, the Commission stands operative as insurance that Bush will do as he agrees. The problem however we note is that he has not agreed to date. Bush 41 ultimately will have to paint the obvious for his son. Thus, under any construction our November 19, 2003 interpretation that Bush would not be supported by his own people (including his father) for re-election unravels as an accurate assessment.
Bush's Mission: Expecting the Second Platform of Moral Outrage
Regime and Culture Change Unmasked
6. Condy Rice wrote an Op-Ed piece for the Washington Post and we do not intend to pick on her but she keeps on burying herself big time. She asserts in the first paragraph of her Op-Ed that the U.S. government worked hard prior to 9-11 to counter the Al-Qaeda threat. She has the gall to say under the complicity of this administration in 9-11 that "The seriousness of the threat was well understood by the president and his national security principals." She is the same person telling Chavez after the coup attempt to respect Constitutional principles, when the US directed that Venezuela's Constitution be revoked and a dictatorship imposed. More relevant is that she is the person who announced to the general public that the administration had no idea that Al-Qaeda had any plans to use planes for terrorism by directing them into buildings (when there were already some three reports in that very regard in the intelligence pipeline).
7. What Senator Kennedy emphasized on Meet the Press was Bush's dismal failing in his "No Child Left Behind Program." The very sad reality my fellow citizens is that they both, Democrats and Republicans, have failed in education and in allowing drugs to become mainstream and available to everyone including our children. Thus, the very sad point is that the contest between the two parties is which group will control the crime in place against America and the American people. Those deep insiders in the Republican party connect with the agenda in Recapturing America, and their design to abandon us, when the now confirmed, this past week, new admitted reality that Whites ultimately will be a minority in the USA when it turns into a Black Hispanic country. Not to be overly cynical, one of the myriad of reasons the Hispanic people were allowed to flood into the USA was not to make it a manifest future BLACK AND WHITE issue. Thus, this allowed us to recognize plans way back when to weaken the military for when the country is abandoned they did not intend to leave it with the world's foremost military machine and THUS OUR ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE THE TRUTH BEHIND THE EMERGENCE OF THE NEW ALTERNATIVE TO NATO POST THE IRAQI INVASION -- A NATO WITHOUT THE INCLUSION OF THE U.S.
All the pieces fit and increasingly so. Our point is that we did not set out to be right but to make you aware that your future was going to be dim dire and dark. The entire bull market during the Clinton tenure was for you to wallow in your own greed and wealth, while this country's true wealth was being stripped away from it layer by layer - your allowing the covert shadow government to emerge and implement their evil design primarily attested and seen by the events of 9-11. When Israel sat stupid and silent after the assassination of its Prime Minister, it opened the portal to its destruction. History will surely show that if the US sits equally stupid and silent regarding 9-11, that it will join Israel in the slide into the deeper and darker levels of the abyss.
Joseph B. Ehrlich
Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
March 22, 2004



This Site Served by TheHostPros