- Did you know there's a war game played by Air Force types
that posits a situation where the United States in the year 2017 conducts
a preemptive first strike on China by using a next-generation space shuttle,
which swoops down and annihilates strategic targets before booking back
up to the Space Station? This is followed by the total destruction of China
by a spaced-based laser, which the Pentagon humorously calls the Death
Star.
-
- I learned of this gut-wrenching scenario by watching
a video titled "Arsenal of Hypocrisy," a frightening array of
future probabilities compiled by Gainesville, Florida filmmaker Randy Atkins
(http://www.cfvs.com) detailing a shocking portrait of America's militarization
of space. This film features the commentary of anti-nuke legend Bruce Gagnon,
social critic Noam Chomsky, and former astronaut Edgar Mitchell, as well
as former president Dwight Eisenhower, and provides such a chilling view
of the future that it simply blew all the current news right out of my
brain as my jaw dropped open and stayed that way for a few hours.
-
- I mean, what's the point of speculating about what really
happened on 9/11 or the sinister butchery of innocents in Iraq when a plan
for total domination of the earth through calculated American violence
is already in place and inexorably evolving toward its ugly conclusion?
-
- The game is over. Nobody can oppose this war machine.
It doesn't matter if we find out that no planes were actually used in the
9/11 deception, that it was all holograms and film. What court, what cop,
is going to act on our discovery? They're all bought and paid for. And
so are the "peace-loving" Democrats who are now clamoring to
bestow their own version of American totalitarianism on the people of the
world.
-
- "Whoever controls space will win all the wars on
the earth," says Gagnon in the film. "There is no challenger
on this earth able to stand against us.
-
- Gagnon, coordinator of the Global Network Against Nuclear
Power and Weapons in Space and organizer of many demonstrations at the
Kennedy Space Center, goes on: "We have 7500 nuclear missiles, China
has 20. We are going to manage China." He explains that the deployment
of U.S. forces in Central Asia are principally about encircling China,
including "deploying theater missile defense systems off the coast
of China."
-
- He concludes: "They don't want the American people
to understand the depth of the plans for moving the arms race into the
heavens ... we shouldn't have any illusions anymore about our country ...
our democracy is under the control of corporations."
-
- At least watching the film took my mind off the depressing
load of e-mails I face every day. These e-mails are certainly just as enlightening
as Atkins' film, and one from my pal Hazel the other day got me thinking
that even the brightest among the people I have come to know and respect
on the Internet are still pretty much in the dark as to what is really
going on.
-
- The story, now widely circulated (http://www.rense.com/general45/wh.htm),
involved a fellow named Michael Meiring, who happened to blow his legs
off last year while constructing a bomb in the Philippines. The theory
is that Meiring, operating under the cover of being a "treasure hunter"
(a common CIA occupation), was instantly whisked out the country by American
agents to presumably a secure and secret location.
-
- Hazel reported he was "a CIA operative and had spent
10 years on assignment associating with Islamic groups, Abu Sayef, MNLF,
Moro Islamic Liberation Front, and other Philippine based Islamic groups,
supplying them with US counterfeit notes (courtesy of US intelligence)
and bomb making materials so that they may create terrorist mayhem within
the Philippines, giving the US a pretext to move in and "help,"
just like in Indonesia " just like nearly everywhere else these Mafia-like
thugs can plant their terror and, "protection" racket."
-
- The story set off alarm bells with me. I have long insisted
that al-Qaeda is nothing more than a CIA/Mossad strategem, useful in creating
havoc when the U.S. military wants to respond to a threat. Got a place
you want to invade? Have al-Qaeda blow something up, and we'll respond.
It's a policy very much on the order of the Israeli formula, which creates
terror to respond to whenever it wants to instill its repression of those
whose land it wants to steal.
-
- So now that everytime I hear about al-Qaeda doing some
dastardly deed, I simply assume it is U.S.-Israeli operatives committing
some "false-flag" operation in order to achieve some other, devilish
purpose, just as we saw in Istanbul, Turkey the other day.
-
- I wrote about this earlier (http://www.worldnewsstand.net/03/John_Kaminski/25.htm)
in a piece called "The perfect enemy" which was widely circulated.
The point being, an enemy under your complete control which you can deploy
at your own whim is the perfect vehicle to keep the war machine making
money, and Meiring is one of the best examples of that formula.
-
- The so-called Muslim insurgency in the Philippines (and
in a gaggle of other countries) is nothing more than a false-flag operation
provoked by the CIA/Mossad construction named al-Qaeda in order to provide
a justification for further military action and expenditures on armaments,
not to mention that new cash cow, rebuilding countries the U.S. has destroyed,
using American corporations with close ties to the Bush Administration.
That's really the growth industry you should be investing in, if you're
a murderous pig with absolutely no conscience about who you kill and what
you destroy.
-
- Istanbul was the most recent example of one of these
false flag operations, as was Riyadh in Saudi Arabia, and, a little while
back, the explosion in Bali, meant to exascerbate tensions and repression
against Muslims in Indonesia.
-
- Of course the granddaddy of all these provocations was
9/11, where the money men blasted the most famous American corporate landmark,
made billions on savvy stock transactions and insurance claims, and created
for themselves the perfect pretext to spread their population-reducing
and profit-producing mayhem all around the globe, not to mention put all
the American people in prison by means of Patriot Act and other repressive
legislation.
-
- And speaking of 9/11, I have been involved in the most
fascinating round-robin conversation among absolutely the best, most conscientious
researchers in the world. I would like to share some of this debate (but
not all) with you, to maybe get your opinions on an apparent schism among
the group, and also alert you to some very portentous developments.
-
- This debate was essentially triggered by the curious
revelations of Mike Ruppert, certainly the most well-known (and deservedly
so) of those proposing an alternative view of what happened on 9/11. I
term the revelations curious because what should have been page 1 news
among the 9/11 research community was buried near the bottom of an otherwise
pedestrian column about old JFK news and the issue of when the world's
oil supplies will run out.
-
- Ruppert admitted as a person that he believed the WTC
towers were not brought down by the jetliners that crashed into them, that
he believed the buildings were destroyed by demolition charges. He also
said he believed no airliner hit the Pentagon, and that something else
was responsible for the death and damage there.
-
- This was a change in his basic policy of reporting, and
the curious part of it was that he published his admission so unobtrusively.
The admission, however, sent shockwaves through the 9/11 research community,
and opened up whole new areas for renewed debate.
-
- Because ... if the so-called top 9/11 researcher anywhere
had revised his opinion, and now believed that the towers in New York were
NOT felled by airliners, and that the Pentagon was NOT really hit by an
airliner, it not only gives all those websites and researchers who have
been insisting these very things all along a lot more credibility in the
public eye, but it also astronomically increases the chances that the general
public will begin to believe that George W. Bush's official version of
what happened on 9/11 is an absolute lie, and that our country and the
world are in much bigger trouble than most people have been willing to
believe.
-
- Ruppert's admission significantly increases the likelihood,
in the public mind, that 9/11 was an inside job, meant to create a police
state atmosphere within the United States, and also meant to create a pretext
for bombing any country Bush says is harboring the terrorists who did 9/11.
-
- BUT ... if the Twin Towers were demolished, and the Pentagon
was hit by something other than a hijacked airliner ... well, you have
to ask: how could Arabs in a cave in Afghanistan have pulled that off?
Hmm? Wouldn't you agree?
-
- And if Arabs in a cave in Afghanistan didn't do the dirty
deed, who did?
-
- Of course, the shocking part of contemplating that question
is that it can't help but shatter the whole world view of whomever has
the courage to confront it. I mean, we're talking about the president of
the United States condoning the killing of American citizens, a lot of
them, right in the middle of America's biggest city.
-
- It's not an easy assertion to consider, for any of us.
Because it means that everything this country has stood for, and been built
upon, has been a lie, or at least is now a lie. It means that our leaders
were willing to sacrifice thousands of its own citizens simply to facilitate
a more aggressive and lucrative geopolitical agenda.
-
- It is perfectly understandable to all how the mind of
a loyal American would recoil at that idea, declare it preposterous, and
consign advocates of such a theory to the loony bin.
-
- And yet one of the top researchers of 9/11 in the world,
Mike Ruppert, has admitted that he has been convinced of the truth that
the WTC towers were demolished, and that the Pentagon was not hit by an
airliner.
-
- And now the choices are clear for every American. You
can either hide your head in the sand, and continue to believe that the
government of the good old USA would never do such a thing to its own people,
or you can confront the evidence. I think now the choice has come down
to confronting the evidence or not taking care of your own life.
-
- Which leads me to the little matter of the schism among
9/11 researchers, precious few of whom (and those who do now fall under
a glaring spotlight of suspicion as to their motivations) believe that
jetliners felled the WTC towers or that a jetliner hit the Pentagon.
-
- The schism is a matter of what constitutes political
realism. Of what is possible under the circumstances.
-
- I have long advocated the immediate arrest, on the basis
of probable cause for obstruction of justice, of the president and all
his staff and Cabinet. I'd prefer this order extend to most members of
Congress as well. More detailed charges of conspiracy to commit mass murder,
and conspiracy to commit treason, could be developed after the suspects
were incarcerated and not able to do any more damage to innocent people
all over the world.
-
- Among 9/11 researchers, I am not in the majority, clearly.
Though I'm not alone, either.
-
- What is happening now is that several high-profile investigators
want to make a movie about 9/11 and the sham that the official government
probe has become. When this was announced, a number of us worried that
the film could become another layer of the coverup if the right questions
weren't asked.
-
- We seem split into two camps: those who believe the crime
must be punished and the perpetrators - whomever they may be - arrested
and prosecuted, and those who believe (as Ruppert and others do) that the
American government must be maintained, that we must go through channels,
work within the system, and achieve the best results we can given the political
realities we confront.
-
- So what's your call? Should we let the killers slide
in the interest of maintaining the decorous, storied infrastructure of
the American hierarchy, or should we really go after the real murderers
of all those innocent people with everything we have in our guts?
-
- Next time you read anything about 9/11, or the Patriot
Act, or the exterminations now ongoing in Iraq, or government scientists
developing the famous 1918 strain of Spanish flu, or white-haired Americans
being clubbed by Miami police, try to keep this question in mind.
-
- You do know, my friends, which side I'm on.
-
-
- John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy
Report," a collection of his Internet essays. See http://www.johnkaminski.com/
For more of his work, also see http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
-
-
-
-
- Comment
From Ecopilgrim
12-1-3
-
- Dear John and All,
-
- This is an excellent article and I commend you for it.
-
- But let me present another view here. It's one of a father
and mother taking their young children out for an ice cream treat at Ben
and Jerry's.
-
- These parents are unaware that Ben and Jerry's ice cream
was tested for dioxin content and found to contain, per serving, 1500 times
more dioxin than is found to be safe for release into the environment as
industrial waste. (Food Revolution: John Robbins, Founder, EarthSave Foundation)
-
- Do you know how many people die from the foods they eat
each year simply because they don't know what's killing them; but on the
other hand, the information is available if one cares to take the time
to find out. Then let's take that automobile that they drove to Ben and
Jerry's in. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists driving is the
number one most polluting factor contributing to global warming. That factor
is well known, yet who is doing anything about it. Ford Motor Company makes
60% of its profit from SUVs and if we weren't buying them they sure couldn't
produce them. As an interesting aside here, Henry Ford, who got us into
this mess with gas guzzling polluters, that you can't drive more than 5
mile an hour averaage today when you count the downtime in peak hour traffic,
was one of the major supporters of Hitler in WW II, along with General
Electric and George Bush's Grandfather Prescott, among others.
-
- I also notice that 40% of us, at least, are still rushing
to the ballot box to vote in the same sick kind of system that lends its
façade to our so-called democracy when its becoming ever and every
more obvious that the government has no power but owes its life to the
Global Monetocracy System and those who have designed it. What I'm saying
here is that the American public is killing itself and its children everyday
at a rate greater than the incident of 9-11 accomplished, and acting in
complicity with a fake government. So why all the hype about 9-11? What
is so different about 9-11 than what we are cooperating in doing with the
government to ourselves? And the examples above are but just the tip of
the iceberg. Maybe it is just about 'the level of the game' because death
is death in whatever way it arrives, and killing is killing. What appears
is that there are those who want revenge for 9-11. What I'm asking is why
don't we want revenge against those who are feeding their children Ben
and Jerry's ice cream? Why don't we want revenge against Ford Motor Company
for producing the cars that are killing us with their toxic levels of pollutants?
Why are we still supporting this corrupt system of government?
-
- And let me ask you. What is accomplished even if the
whole cabal should by some miracle be found guilty? Won't others just like
them take their place? Will anything have really been resolved? Will any
changes be made either by ourselves or our government? Will it help us
stop killing ourselves in myriad other ways and acting in denial that we
are doing so? Perhaps seeing someone else receive punishment, for a crime
in which we have all participated to some extent or other, will alleviate
the guilt. What appears is that we are a very, very sick society, and George
Bush and cabal are only symptoms of what ails us all. What I think we need
is a mass healing so that we can all grow up and call the game.
|
