Rense.com



Dean's Urban Legend
By Robert Novak
TownHall.com
©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
12-11-3

WASHINGTON -- It was bad enough when Howard Dean, interviewed on National Public Radio Dec. 1, spread a conspiracy theory that George W. Bush ignored Saudi Arabian warnings of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It was worse Dec. 7 on "Fox News Sunday," when the Democratic presidential front-runner neither apologized nor repudiated himself for passing along this urban legend.
 
None of Dean's frantic opponents for the nomination immediately took him to task, not wanting to defend the hated Republican president. A week later, however, they contemplated whether the doctor posed too easy a general election target for President Bush. Al Gore's surprise endorsement boosts Dean among Democrats but surely does not make him more electable.
 
A half-hour after Dean alarmed party regulars over television Sunday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on NBC titillated worried Democrats by hesitating at closing the door for 2004. Although her prospects of being nominated for president remain minimal, normally sober Democrats are looking toward Mrs. Clinton in 2004 because of apprehension about what Dean could do to the party.
 
Unlike George McGovern in 1972, Dean's core problem is not ideological. It is loose lips: fabricating the story of a patient impregnated by her father, seeking support from pickup truck drivers with Confederate flags, and seemingly exulting in his draft deferment for a bad back. Nothing so worries old-style Democratic politicians, however, as proclaiming the apocryphal warning from Saudi Arabia.
 
In his Dec. 1 interview on NPR's "The Diane Rehm Show," Dean was asked about allegations that President Bush is suppressing information that he was warned about the 9/11 terrorist attacks. "The most interesting theory that I have heard so far . . . ," Dean responded, "is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis." This received scant media attention (except for Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer), but Democratic politicians shuddered.
 
Dean was given a chance to back off six days later by Chris Wallace, debuting as "Fox News Sunday's" moderator. "I don't believe that," the candidate said, then added: "But we don't know, and it'd be a nice thing to know." He concluded: "Because the president won't give information to the Kean Commission, we really don't know what the explanation is." After playing to Bush-haters who listen to National Public Radio, Dean repeated the same canard to Fox's Sunday morning mainstream viewers.
 
None of Dean's opponents raised the issue during Tuesday night's debate in Durham, N.H., but moderator Scott Spradling of WMUR TV did. Dean still defended publicizing what he now called a "crazy" theory.
 
Where did Dean pick it up? A Dean spokesman told this column it was "out there." A rival Democratic candidate's campaign suspected it came from "some blog." The Russian newspaper Pravda published reports that Jordan's and Morocco's intelligence -- not Saudi Arabia's -- gave the CIA advance knowledge. The World Socialists circulated a story that the Saudi royal family knew of the attack in advance. Somehow, the urban legend penetrated Dean's mind.
 
"It's McCarthyism in reverse," one 35-year Democratic political veteran told me. "Dean doesn't understand that he's accusing Bush of something worse than an impeachable offense. It's treason." He and several other Democrats that I contacted all expressed the fear that Bush's political operatives will shred an opposing presidential candidate that undisciplined.
 
As worries about Dean's nomination rise inside the Democratic establishment, hopes of stopping him diminish -- particularly after the Gore endorsement. To slow Dean even temporarily, Rep. Dick Gephardt must stop him in the Iowa caucuses Jan. 19. That's why these worried Democrats were stirred by Hillary Clinton Sunday on "Meet the Press."
 
After an impressive performance answering Tim Russert's policy questions, the former first lady would not flatly promise to turn down a presidential draft. "The nomination -- it's not going to be offered to me," she insisted. "But if it did happen?" asked Russert. "You know, I have, I am -- ," she stammered. "I think the door is opening a bit, Senator," Russert concluded. "Oh, no, it's not," Clinton shot back. Finally, when pressed to say she would "never" accept the 2004 nomination, she said, "I am not accepting the nomination."
 
That was ambivalent enough to intrigue Democratic worriers. It's a slender reed, but still reason for them to think that Hillary Clinton might be there if Howard Dean self-immolates by next summer. They are thinking such thoughts because their prospective nominee is spinning wild conspiracy theories.
 
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20031211.shtml
 
 
Comment
From JW
12-12-3
 
Dean's Urban Legend
(Who besides you consider it a legend and why?)
Robert Novak
(Are you a Freemason per chance?)
December 11, 2003
 
WASHINGTON -- It was bad enough when Howard Dean, interviewed on National Public Radio Dec. 1, spread a conspiracy theory that George W. Bush ignored Saudi Arabian warnings of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
 
(Why is it so terrible when so many MILLIONS also believe the same "conspiracy theory" to be true? Why do you reject and deride the thought that any card carrying member of the Skull and Bones would do such a thing to America?
 
If you had done any serious objective reading on the subject you would easily conclude that the 911 attack trick HAD TO BE AN INSIDE JOB. The United States Air Force Stood Down. There is no way intercept should not have been ordered and accomplished within minutes just as with the airplane of Pane Stewart?
 
Why is it that you don't mention that 7 of the supposed 19 "highjackers" are proven to be alive. Do some research into the "conspiracy" theories. Who is keeping the American public from even investigating the 911 attack but expects every American to give every piece of information about their lives just to get on an airplane now?)
 
It was worse Dec. 7 on "Fox News Sunday," when the Democratic presidential front-runner neither apologized nor repudiated himself for passing along this urban legend.
 
(Why should he? He knows what should have happened. And there are more unanswered questions than there are answers by "official" statements. He is likely no better than any of the other bribable political scum that run our government but you are in their pocket bigtime. Sure as hell.)
 
None of Dean's frantic opponents for the nomination immediately took him to task, not wanting to defend the hated Republican president.
 
(Well you do have that right. He is and should be hated. He has lied to us for years and stole the election. But the other reason is because millions including congresspeople and democrats know the whole 911 incident is highly suspicious and reeks of subtrafuge.)
 
A week later, however, they contemplated whether the doctor posed too easy a general election target for President Bush. Al Gore's surprise endorsement boosts Dean among Democrats but surely does not make him more electable. A half-hour after Dean alarmed party regulars over television Sunday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on NBC titillated worried Democrats by hesitating at closing the door for 2004. Although her prospects of being nominated for president remain minimal, normally sober Democrats are looking toward Mrs. Clinton in 2004 because of apprehension about what Dean could do to the party.
 
(Party, party, party, what about the people? When will we get someone who will give it to America straight?)
 
Unlike George McGovern in 1972, Dean's core problem is not ideological.
 
(Nice smear job comparing straw man.)
 
It is loose lips: fabricating the story of a patient impregnated by her father, seeking support from pickup truck drivers with Confederate flags, and seemingly exulting in his draft deferment for a bad back. Nothing so worries old-style Democratic politicians, however, as proclaiming the apocryphal warning from Saudi Arabia.
 
(It really doesn't matter. The money powers will control whomever is elected or appointed. Maybe they will heal the wounds between America and the world. I doubt it. They are blinded by greed and power as are you and your pen.)
 
In his Dec. 1 interview on NPR's "The Diane Rehm Show," Dean was asked about allegations that President Bush is suppressing information that he was warned about the 9/11 terrorist attacks. "The most interesting theory that I have heard so far . . . ," Dean responded, "is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis."
 
(Well take one look at his reaction when informed and decide if this was a reaction of suprise Mr. Novak. Then he kept reading goat stories for 20 minutes more. A real man of action our George huh?)
 
This received scant media attention (except for Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer), but Democratic politicians shuddered.
 
(I would shudder too if I could be blackmailed into submission and I am afraid to speak the truth. Who keeps the leash on you Mr. Novak? And it is because "everyone" shudders at the thought of opening the door to a shitstorm. The truth of what has gone on the last 200 hundred years in America is shameful.)
 
Dean was given a chance to back off six days later by Chris Wallace, debuting as "Fox News Sunday's" moderator. "I don't believe that," the candidate said, then added: "But we don't know, and it'd be a nice thing to know." He concluded: "Because the president won't give information to the Kean Commission, we really don't know what the explanation is."
 
(Nope. We don't know anything but what guys like you are spoon feeding to the American sheep. Have you actually taken the time to look critically at the whole incident? Do it in light of the well documented FACT that FDR was also warned about the attack on Pearl Habor and told the military to "stand down" so we could be dragged into the Wall Street, Brown Brother's Harriman financed for Hitler, World War Two. Don't you read anything besides "government pronouncements?")
 
After playing to Bush-haters who listen to National Public Radio, Dean repeated the same canard to Fox's Sunday morning mainstream viewers.
 
(There's switch. A piece of truth on Fox that isn't used to make the people believe the government line.)
 
None of Dean's opponents raised the issue during Tuesday night's debate in Durham, N.H., but moderator Scott Spradling of WMUR TV did. Dean still defended publicizing what he now called a "crazy" theory.
 
(It isn't "crazy" if one actually looks at the evidence, and history and is not a part of the coverup as you are a paid pawn of the moneylords. It is "crazy" if they actually thought they could get away with it without every Amrican paying the price of their "leader's" actions in karmic retribution)
 
(Lord Acton said, "The truth will come out when powerful people no longer wish to suppress it." Since Sept. 11, more and more people are turning to the "conspiratorial" or "suppressed" view of history for explanations.
 
In 1891, Cecil Rhodes started a secret society called the "Round Table" dedicated to world hegemony for the shareholders of Bank of England and their allies. These priggish aristocrats, including the Rothschilds, realized they must control the world to safeguard their monopoly on money creation) as well as global resources. The same folks control the U.S. Federal Reserve and other major central banks. http://www.savethemales.ca/260602.html
 
They were united also by a commitment to freemasonry, which at the top, is dedicated to the destruction of Christianity, the worship of Lucifer, and the building of a pagan temple in Jerusalem. They see most of humanity as "useless eaters" and they pioneered eugenics to decrease population and weed out inferior specimens. The eventual annihilation of non-Zionist Jews was rooted in this English movement.
 
One night, probably in 1880, John Swinton, then the preeminent New York journalist, was the guest of honour at a banquet given him by the leaders of his craft. Someone who knew neither the press nor Swinton offered a toast to the independent press. Swinton outraged his colleagues by replying:
 
"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.
 
"There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty_four hours my occupation would be gone.
 
"The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?
 
"We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
 
(Source: Labor's Untold Story, by Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, published by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)
 
Where did Dean pick it up? A Dean spokesman told this column it was "out there."
 
(Out there hiding in plain sight. History is repeating itself. The Nazi's used the Riechstag fire to suppress dissent and start a war. The Bush/Nazi cabal didn't die off after WW2. They just fell back and regrouped learning more lessons as they continue to strive for world control.)
 
A rival Democratic candidate's campaign suspected it came from "some blog." The Russian newspaper Pravda published reports that Jordan's and Morocco's intelligence -- not Saudi Arabia's -- gave the CIA advance knowledge. The World Socialists circulated a story that the Saudi royal family knew of the attack in advance. Somehow, the urban legend penetrated Dean's mind.
 
(So who the hell made all those put option orders Mr. Novak? Funny we have NEVER tracked down any of those names or people. Somebody with a lot of money and connections knew it would be successful. Somebody with good Wall Street connections and a network of financial shells with which to hide behind.)
 
"It's McCarthyism in reverse," one 35-year Democratic political veteran told me. "Dean doesn't understand that he's accusing Bush of something worse than an impeachable offense. It's treason."
 
(I am sure he knows exactly of what he is accusing the treasoness Bush and his cabal. He should be tried as soon as possible as should Ariel Sharon should be tried for war crimes.)
 
He and several other Democrats that I contacted all expressed the fear that Bush's political operatives will shred an opposing presidential candidate that undisciplined.
 
("Undisciplined?" Just exactly what does that mean Mr. Novak? Sounds just like a jack-booted thug threat to Mr. Dean to keep his mouth shut.)
 
As worries about Dean's nomination rise inside the Democratic establishment, hopes of stopping him diminish -- particularly after the Gore endorsement. To slow Dean even temporarily, Rep. Dick Gephardt must stop him in the Iowa caucuses Jan. 19. That's why these worried Democrats were stirred by Hillary Clinton Sunday on "Meet the Press."
 
(Keep the devisiveness going for a good distraction Mr. Novak. Most understand it is all a side show to begin with. Do you attend the Bilderberg meetings?)
 
After an impressive performance answering Tim Russert's policy questions, the former first lady would not flatly promise to turn down a presidential draft. "The nomination -- it's not going to be offered to me," she insisted. "But if it did happen?" asked Russert. "You know, I have, I am -- ," she stammered. "I think the door is opening a bit, Senator," Russert concluded. "Oh, no, it's not," Clinton shot back. Finally, when pressed to say she would "never" accept the 2004 nomination, she said, "I am not accepting the nomination."
 
(Oooo, the excitement of having another CIA agent in the whitehouse. Great Mr. Novak. Do you know exactly how Bill and Hillary met in Russia? And don't forget Bill is a Rhodes Scholar. Do you know what the charter of the Rhodes trust says about America? Do a little research Mr. Novak.)
 
That was ambivalent enough to intrigue Democratic worriers. It's a slender reed, but still reason for them to think that Hillary Clinton might be there if Howard Dean self-immolates by next summer. They are thinking such thoughts because their prospective nominee is spinning wild conspiracy theories.
 
(No, you are spinning questions that are impossible to get anwers for into "conspiracy theories." When all else fails call it a "conspiracy theory." Why is it we are to believe that the governments version of the 911 "conspiarcy theory" is the right one when they won't let it be investigated? Why did two buildings made to withstand a jet crashing into them really fall down just like they were in a controlled demolition? Why do you believe that jet fuel which burns at 1100 derees can melt steel which takes 1900 dgrees to melt? Why were no jets scrambled when standard operating proceedure dictates that planes off curse more than about 5 minutes are INTECEPTED? When will you take a real look at what the government of this country is doing to America?)
 
©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
 
(Creators all right. Creators of pablum.)
 
Disclaimer

 


MainPage
http://www.rense.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros