Two Faces, No Brain

By Hsing Lee

Remember this from the recent State of the Union Address?
"Our first goal is clear: We must have an economy that grows fast enough to employ every man and woman who seeks a job.
After recession, terrorist attacks, corporate scandals, and stock market declines, our economy is recovering yet it is not growing fast enough, or strongly enough. With unemployment rising, our Nation needs more small businesses to open, more companies to invest and expand, more employers to put up the sign that says, Help Wanted."
That was G W Bush on January 28, 2003.
Help wanted. There's twice as many unemployed as there were under Clinton, and the numbers grow daily. And notice how he says the 'economy' is recovering, when what he really means is rich people are starting to recover some of their losses while everyone else suffers.
Herr Bush says America needs small businesses. Americans must open small businesses, but not Bush or the GOP.
For THEIR labor, they go to New Delhi...
Bush's Party To Raise Funds Via Noida, Gurgaon
By Bipin Chandran in New Delhi
Business Standard
January 31, 2003
The US Republican Party now has a band of young and enthusiastic fund-raisers in Noida and Gurgaon.
HCL eServe, the business process outsourcing arm of the Shiv Nadar-promoted HCL Technologies, has bagged a project to undertake a fund-raising campaign for the US Republican Party over the telephone.
This is the first time such a project has been handed out to a company outside the US. The market research and public relations companies engaged by the party usually undertake such projects.
HCL eServe has put in place a team of 75 people to work on the project out of its call centres in Noida and Gurgaon. According to industry sources, the number of seats could be ramped up depending on the success of the campaign. These operators are required to call up people in the US seeking their support for President George W Bush and a donation for the Republican cause...Ó
They did this LESS THAN THREE DAYS after telling Americans to do everything they can to create jobs in the Fatherland. I was going to write something clever here, but there are no words to describe the assholiness of this move on the part of the GOP.
And then there's Israel, which just formed its government weeks behind schedule, because no sane person wanted to be associated with Ariel Sharon. In case you haven't been watching, Sharon's been stepping up the violence a couple of notches of late. He's killing with the same frequency as before, but with a lot more double digit days.
Despite Sharon's escalating the violence, increasing settlements, and diverting of money in the budget from domestic programs to the settlements, he wooed the Labor Party's Mitzna and Peres to once again come join him for episode two of 'Assassinations with Ariel'.
He's promised them the world, or so it seemed.
"Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, hoping to lure the rival Labor Party into a new unity government, has offered to remove settlements and accept a Palestinian state alongside Israel, according to accounts reported in the press here..."
"...The newspaper Ma'ariv reported yesterday that Mr. Sharon told the Labor leader he intended to achieve a "real peace" with the Palestinians. He reportedly said he was prepared to remove settlements as part of a final agreement and that he fully embraced the peace outline envisioning a Palestinian state advocated by President Bush.
The report said he also accepted, at least in part, Mr. Mitzna's demand that significant budget allocations be shifted immediately from settlements to economically deprived areas within Israel..."
"...In his meeting with Mr. Mitzna, he reportedly reiterated his intention not to negotiate with Mr. Arafat, whom he described as a terrorist leader. He has, however, met with other Palestinian leaders since his re-election..."
Sharon thought he was being really sneaky and clever here. If you read the article carefully, the only thing he really promised is to shift some budget allocations.
Nonsense, you say? Well, please find me the part of the article where he said he intends to cease building NEW settlements. And find me where he said he intends to pull out of Gaza and the West Bank. In fact, the opposite is true. The article admits that even as he's saying these things, he sent the IDF in to kill more poor people.
The other thing that's bogus here is that two weeks ago, the Bush administration announced it wasn't going to release a peace outline until after a new government had been formed in Israel. So either Sharon's the one who's going to write the peace outline which is why he's confident he backs it, or he's blowing smoke because he can't be tied to a peace outline which doesn't yet officially exist.
The problem with previous peace plans like Oslo is simple. A hundred Indian reservations surrounded by Jewish settlements and IDF soldiers is NOT A PALESTINIAN STATE. If you take a look at the Oslo maps instead of taking Israel and the US State Department's word for what the Oslo offered to Palestine, the truth of the so-called 'deal of all deals' becomes clear. Clinton and Barak were trying to get the Palestinians to accept conditions similar to those facing First Nation's people in the Americas.
But we really shouldn't take this news report at face value anyway. It comes from the Washington Times, which unto itself is a mind-boggling story. Remember the Moonies and Sun Yung Moon? They were a religious cult that brainwashed people and made them into slave workers for the Moonie cult.
Well, the Moonies own the Washington Times. Everybody on the Beltway knows this. It's public record. But for reasons unclear to me, people actually pay money for this paper on a daily basis. Go figure.
Sharon has fnally formed a government. His government consists of hard line religious nuts who've been calling for Ethnic Cleansing for a long time now. Their mandate is an Eretz Israel, a Greater Israel, consisting of all land from Egypt to the River Jordan to the Lebanese Border. A land with no Muslims or Christians.
One of these men is the leader of the National Religious Party, Effi Eitam.  Another is the racist anti-Semite leader of Shinui, Yosef Lapid, who has openly made racist remarks directed at Shephardic Jews.
Labor was smart to stay away from Sharon. But this new government is the equivalent of having Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and Franklin Graham as Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Vice-President. It's a religious fanatic's wet dream, and everyone else's worst nightmare.
I cheered out loud when I read this next piece from South Africa...,6119,2-7-12_1322546,00.html
South Africa with its rich mineral resources could become the next victim of "unilateral" action by the United States, African National Congress secretary-general Kgalema Motlanthe warned on Wednesday.
"The primary crime of Iraq is the fact that it floats on oil," he told thousands of anti-war protesters outside the US embassy in Pretoria.
"Because we are endowed with several rich minerals, if we don't stop this unilateral action against Iraq today, tomorrow they will come for us."
Protesters advocating for peace in Iraq marched on the embassy from the Union Buildings, carrying posters reading: "For (US President George W) Bush, oil is thicker than blood", and "Bush is a terrorist".
According to one placard the acronym USA stood for "The United States of Arrogance", while another went further to state simply: "Fuck Bush".,6119,2-7-12_1322546,00.html
South Africa's had terrorism problems of its own for months. Oh, excuse me, bombings. Check out this series of articles...
Bomb Blasts Rock Soweto
Nine bombs go off, but it's not terrorism. It's bombings by suspected right wing extremists, who happen to be white people bombing mosques.
Violent Threat From SA White Right
The next day, it's a VIOLENT threat from the 'white right', but not a terror threat. Another thing here which bears mention: the term 'white right' is pure neuro-linguistic programming, isn't it?
Conservatives are the Right. Nazis and Fascists like these white terrorists in South Africa are the far Right, or the extreme right. Right is the opposite of Left, but it's also the opposite of Wrong, which is the opposite of Correct, which is the opposite of Incorrect.
So Nazis are extremely correct, and to be opposed to them is to be wrong? They're 'right', and I'm not? English sucks. It's a white supremacist mindf*ck.
S Africa Police Seize "Ton" Of Explosives
So now, six weeks later, they catch some white guys with 1,000kg of explosives. But they're 'right-wing extremists', not terrorists. In fact, the only mention of the word terrorism in the article is to describe what the South African government is charging the men with.
Now look at this December 21 article. Two months after the attacks, finally BBC acknowledges there's terrorism in South Africa. But the way they go about writing the article is just bogus.
Britons Warned Of SA Terror Risk
Not once do they mention that the terrorists are white guys. They mention the blowing up of a Buddhist temple, and then go on to show similarities to the attacks on Bali and Kenya, backhandedly implying the people doing the bombing are Al-Qaeda like people, when in reality they're white Christians. Err, well, actually, they kind of are the same, aren't they?
Then the kicker. At the end, they say, "In an unconnected move, the Foreign Office has advised Britons to leave Venezuela because of growing civil unrest."
If it's unconnected, why put it in this article? To try and imply that Chavez is a terrorist? To try and imply the terrorists in South Africa are something other than what they really are? Leftists and not extreme-right wing Bush buddies?
That protestor in Pretoria with the sign had the right idea, but we should apply it to someone other than Bush here.
F*ck you, BBC.
And F*CK YOU to the entirety of the US media, who haven't even bothered to report on the large number of terrorist attacks on black South Africans by white Nazis.
We end with a follow up to a scam that went on fifteen months ago which right now, with all that's gone on, seems like a lifetime ago.
Remember the Anthrax attacks? Remember the media and the White House pushing Bayer's Cipro on people as protection from Anthrax, even though there are several antibiotics just as effective against Anthrax that cost one tenth as much?
Instead of telling people to buy penicillin, Bush goes and pushes a failing product from the company that patented and sold us Heroin as a wonder cure. Small wonder, considering that Bayer was part of IG Farben, Hitler's war machine conglomerate, who were also partners with the Bush family. IG Farben provided Jewish slave labor for the Bush family, so the Bushes could make steel for the Nazis for use against Allied soldiers.
Anyone who doubts this, do a Google on 'Vesting order 248'
Why push Cipro? Could it be as a favor to Bayer, to get one last big payday for their failing antibiotic? According to CNN, in a study done on Cipro's effectiveness from 1994 to 2000, Cipro is losing its effectiveness at an alarming rate.
What I'd like to know is how long Bayer, the NIH, and HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson have known Cipro is a rapidly fading drug. And if they knew this, why the Hell were they pushing it over drugs one tenth the price that do as well as Cipro against Anthrax?
I think you know the answer already. Top to bottom, this administration is made up of lying, two-faced bastards.
Now I know why Janus was so popular in Greece. There's a whole lot of two-headed monsters out there.



This Site Served by TheHostPros