Rense.com

 
War With Iraq - A Bad Idea
By Charley Reese
11-28-2

Paul Begala, the Democratic Party's chief wit, came up with a good line the other day. Commenting on the fact that Iraq had gassed its own people more than a decade ago, invaded Kuwait 12 years ago and attempted to kill George Bush's daddy nine years ago, he said, "President Bush must watch the History Channel and think he's watching Headline News."
 
There is truth in his wit. The state of Iraq has done nothing in the past nine years that would in any way justify the United States in making war against it. The president's sudden interest in enforcing United Nations resolutions is hypocritical. There are many countries that ignore U.N. resolutions, most especially Israel, just as there are many countries that have weapons of mass destruction, including Israel. Furthermore, it was not Iraq that "kicked out" the U.N. inspectors in 1998. They were withdrawn so the United States and Great Britain could bomb Baghdad. Since that inspection team was riddled with spies and had made it clear that no matter what Iraq did, the sanctions would not be lifted, it is no surprise that Iraq refused to re-admit them.
 
Furthermore, the fact that Saddam Hussein is a dictator should be of no concern to us. We have neither the moral nor legal right to go around the world deciding who should and should not rule other countries. I hope no American is so naive as to imagine that the leaders of China are democratic choices; in that case, we have literally crawled into bed with a government that has a record of having murdered more than 60 million people. Still, if the world is to live in reasonable peace, it is absolutely essential that the sovereignty of other nations and their people be respected.
 
The one aspect of terrorism that the president has consistently ignored is the question of why anyone would wish to attack the United States in the first place. People do not do things, especially important things, for no reason at all. Any sensible and honest person, confronted with terrorism, must ask: What is the motivation for these attacks?
 
The president's juvenile claim that we are attacked because others are jealous of our freedom is, on its face, nonsense. He knows well why we were attacked ó because of our policy in the Middle East. The whole world knows that the U.S. government has allowed itself to become the puppet of Israel and that the Israeli government has politically gone mad. When the leading choice for leaders is either Benjamin Netanyahu or Ariel Sharon, there is not a ghost of a chance for peace with the Palestinians. Both men foolishly believe that they can annihilate the Palestinians with brute force. This policy, and our unquestioning support for it, is what fuels hatred for the United States in the Arab world. Like it or not, that's the truth.
 
Furthermore, it is Israel that fears Iraq and more importantly Iran. The U.S. attack on Iraq is just the first stage in attacking Iran and probably Syria. The American people have no idea what their government is about to lead them into, and since most of the corporate press in America is the lapdog of the government, they probably won't find out until it's too late.
 
America was once admired and respected by most people in the world because we minded our own business and believed that the best way to spread liberty was by example. Now, we have become an imperial power that arrogantly assumes the right to tell the rest of the world's people what they must and must not do. That's hubris. We don't have that much power. We are going to find that out the hard way unless we can find some American leaders who would rather revive our republic than attempt to resurrect the Roman Empire.
 
 
© 2002 by King Features Syndicate, Inc. http://reese.king-online.com/Reese_20021127/index.php
 







MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros