- The American public was amazed (yet again) recently by
the Bush Administration's "revelation" of photographs of the
"final plunge" of the American Airlines airliner into tht Pengagon.
There should, of curse, be no real reason for amazement, unless, of course
it is the total disdain for the intellegence of the Americal people shown
by it's elected (?) leaders. For over a year, bits and pieces of obviously
contrived "evidence" has been coming out, peacemeal, as the need
for whipping up "war fever" waxes and wanes. Now, with the attack
on Iraq seemingly imminent, there is once again a need to reinforce the
"necessity" of this action. Therefore, it is now expedient for
yet another piece of outright fiction to be invented to support the Bush
Administration's war, not against "Terrorism" but for oil, the
New World Order, and the benefit of it's masters in Israel.
-
- Over and over, a complacent and brainwashed public has
had it's intellegence insulted by what, to any observer, let alone a truly
skeptical one, is obviously contrived and falsified... delberately misleading,
outright propaganda. We need not examine it point by point. It is only
necessary to point to the series of photos, immediately previous to this
current masterpiece in the forgers art, to show the inconsistencies in
the entire presentation, as a whole. The now-famous photo of the wreckage
in front of the Pentagon speaks volumes for itself. Not only was the entire
area free of debris, except for a large and well placed section of an airliner,
plainly showing the lettering and color of American Airlines... the piece
of wreckage in question was from the wrong side of the airliner, with respect
to impact, and showed no signs of fire, which would have absolutely followed
impact of an airliner with fuel on board.
-
- The current exhibit in this ongoing travesty shows an
airliner, literally plunging into the Pentagon, but... a physical impossibillity
given the actual angle of entry into the building... and a near physical
impossiblity for an aircraft of that size. Once again, the preceeding photos...
showing a simgle portion of the airliner, is completely free of debris
in other areas, and completely free of any sign of human remains, which
would have certainly been present... a gory reminder of the human cost...
of what was obviously a plan implemented, from it's inception, by the very
government now attempting to lay the blame on "Islamic Fundamentalists".
-
- Now... let's forget about airliners... and "fundamentalists"...
and look at a far more likely scenario.
-
- First of all, let's set the stage. The Pentagon, the
"headquarters" of the United States Military, is one of the most
heavily fortified, by way of it's actual constructio, buildings in the
world. It is literally built like a fortress, and the likelihood of an
airliner, even at top speed, which is physically impossible at low altitude,
smashing it's way through not one, but six, fortress-like walls, is simply
not even a consideration. That being the case, what actually happened?
Since there actually was damage... since something obviously hit the Pentagon,
if it was not an airliner, what was it?
-
- The answer, is fairly obvious. It is even more obvious
in light of the current war preparations and all the talk of the last "dance
in the desert" conducted by United States Forces... under the direction
of Papa Bush, back in 1991. The dameage to the Penatagon, and the actual
debris present... not the planted piece... is consistent with the flight
pereameters and chacteristics of a United States Navy "Tomahawk"
Land Attack Cruise Missile.
-
- Think back to 1991... Films of Navy ships launching Tomahawk
cruise missiles in the Persian Gulf were almost daily fare from the military.
Tomahawk missiles, called TLAMs, can be launched from either a submerged
submarine (most likely scenario, in this case) and surface warships.
These weapons systems have a 2,000 pound warhead of conventional
explosives (they are capable of delivering nuclear weapons, as well), and
are designed... that's right... designed to penetrate naval armor.
-
- The Tomahawk missile is subsonic, flying at approximately
the same speed as a conventional airliner, and are guided by onboard computers
that match prerecorded terrain maps, shifting left or right as landmarks
are spotted. In optimun cases, they fly only a few feet above the surface
of the water, or the land terrain, until just before their "attack",
at which time, they "pop up" to altitude, and "plunge"
downward into their target. These missiles may also be guided manually
by an "operator" onboard the launch vessel, utilizing an onboard
television eye which gives him a live feed of what the missile is actually
"seeing" in flight, and allowing pinpoint targetting of specific
areas.
-
- A Tomahawk missile strike will leave very little, if
any debris of the actual missile, as it is relatively small by aircraft
standards, and designed to use remaining onboard fuel to "enhanse"
the effect of it's warhead. Since the primary construction is aircraft
aluminum and plastic, most of the structural parts are consumed in the
blast, or by the fire which accompanies the initial blast (Didn't know
aluminum would burn? Ask any Vietnam Vet who has ridden in an M-113 Armored
Personel Carrier...). Ths same strike would also loeave no human debris,
no open and battered suitcases, no shoes and scattered clothing, as is
common with the crash of an airliner... and most importantly... no bodies...
as the Tomahawk is, of course, unpiloted and unoccupied.
-
- This type of attack would be absolutely perfect for he
purpouses of an Administration bound and determined on war... In view
of it's execution it would be a flawless, untracable attack. The submarine
which most likely launched the missile would be located several miles offshore,
in the Atlantic, unseen by the public, and the crew would be bound to secrecy.
It is entirely possible that the crew of the submarine, with the exception
of the Captain and Weapons Officer were completely ignorant of what they
were doing, thinking that the launch was a simple test exercise. It is
entirely possible that the Captain and Weapons Officer were completely
unaware of the nature of their deed. Keep in mind, Tohahawk TLAMs can be
pre-programmed, and the usual flight perameter is set by an onboard computer.
Nor... keep in mind... did the missile necessarilly have to be fired by
a United States Warship... Several NATO nations, and... guess who... Israel...
have been equipped with the United States designed and built Tomahawk...
All of them have submarines in their fleed, and the Tomahawk can be launched
through a torpedo tube, with no special launching device necessary.
-
- In any case, the small, low flying Tomahawk would be
unobserved by radar, and although relatively slow by aircraft standards,
would pass over too quickly for the average ground observer... a civilian...
keep in mind... to identify it as a missile. TLAMs actually look like small
aircraft, with wings which "pop out" and deploy immediately after
launch.
-
- There is also an air launched version of the Tomahawk,
which can be deployed by an F-111 Fighter Bomber, a B-52, B-1B, B-2 or
any other aircraft of similar size and capabillty. The air launched version
has a sligtly longer range than the naval version, but otherwise, the same
characteristics. Once again, this missile has been provided, by the United
States, to several NATO nations... and... Israel.... Still, in view of
the "stealth" requirement for the "mission", it is
far more likely that the naval variant was used.
-
- This leaves us with a single question... rather two...
-
- Firstly, would the Government of the United States attack
itself or cause itself to be attcked, and secondly, if so, why?
-
- The answer to the first question is obvious. Read a good
history of the Second World War. Pay close attention to the attack on Pearl
Harbor and the battles surrounding Bataan and Corrigador, Wake and Guam.
Look at the Gulf ot Tonkin. Look at the U.S.S. Liberty. When you have done
so, ask yourself the same question... "Would the Unted States attack
itself, or allow itself to be attacked?" The answer is obvious. Of
course it would, if the motivation, or perceived motivation were sufficent
to warrant it.
-
- The answer to the second question is just as obvious.
Keep in mind the Baby Bush needs this war. First of all, he has been ordered
to persue it by his controllers in Israel. Secondly, he is using the current
"War Fever" to mask a chronically flawed domestic policy and
a rapidly collapsing economy.
-
- There are those who will say that this is simply another
"conspiricy" theory. There are those who will call me a paranoic
and a cynic... There are those who will call me a traitor. I've been called
all of those things before, and worse. The fact is, I cannot possibly be
the only one who has seen this. I cannot possibly be the only one who has
noticed.
-
- For over a year, bits and pieces of obviously contrived
"evidence" has been coming out, peacemeal, as the need for whipping
up "war fever" waxes and wanes. First it was the tragedy of the
World Trade Center Massacre. There is no longer any doubt that the United
States Gocernment... both the Clinton and Bush Administrations... knew
that it was coming. Then came the Pentagon Hit. Then came Anthrax and various
and sundry other "threats" that never materialized. Then cane
the Sniper... Each event built upon the other to provide fuel for Baby
Bush's fire... The passion of a man who has never served in the Military
(Yes, I know what his "image makers" say, but look at the record,
folks...) and those around him, who likewise have never answered, or even
heard their country's call... to go to war for the sake of oil, the New
World Order, and their masters in Israel... Now, with the attack on Iraq
seemingly imminent, there is once again a need to reinforce the "necessity"
of this action. Bill Clinton never wore his country's uniform, but is willing
to "die for Israel". Baby Bush made a mockery of his country's
uniform while others were dying in the rice paddies of Viet Nam... and
now... he is willing to send our sons to "die for Israel". The
American people, who have born the brunt and paid the price of hollow victory
in every war of this century (except for Viet Nam... which was intended
to be the ignoble defeat that it was... ) are now being called on, yet
again, to die for foreign intrests, which are alien to that which they
hold dear, and ultimately destructive to their society. Once again, America
is being led down the path to war by it's own leaders... and ultimately
to tyrany... by those who should hold American interests first, but do
not... cannot...
-
- Maybe I am a paranoic. Maybe this is just another "conspiracy"
theory.. but... it makes sense, doesn't it? The final question is this...
What wil be next? We're still a step or two away from the brink. When,
where and how will the nest "terrorist act" come... and... who
are the real "terrorists"? Does the "evil" Sadam Hussein
have Tomahawk TLAMs? Does he have a fleet or aircraft to deliver them?
|
