FBI Grabs Fox UFO Video -
Expert Certifies Object Genuine

Preliminary NUFORC statement regarding the footage captured by FOX 23
television in Albany, NY, on Sunday, October 20, 2002.
By Peter Davenport
Director, National UFO Reporting Center

Video Clip (approx. 2.9 megs, cross-platform Quicktime)
you may need to add .mov to the end of the file name to play the clip

Albany, NY Fox TV UFO Case
At 07:30 hrs. (Pacific) on Monday morning, October 21, 2002, the National UFO Reporting Center received a telephone call from a television news reporter, Mr. Dan Bazile, with FOX 23 news (a Clear Channel Communication-owned station), who apprised us that one of their photographers had inadvertently captured brief footage of a very bizarre object streaking across the sky near Albany, NY. He described that one of their photographers had been out on Sunday afternoon, October 20th, photographing aircraft at a nearby airport, and that the peculiar object had been detected in the news studio when the footage was being examined at slow speed.
From that first telephone conversation, NUFORC was not left with a clear understanding of the nature of the object and its appearance, but Mr. Bazile offered to forward to NUFORC still images from the tape. NUFORC offered to help identify the object, if possible, and to put the station in touch with photo analysts, who might be able to assist in further analysis.
In a second conversation with Mr. Bazile on Tuesday morning, October 22, he apprised NUFORC that the original video tape of the object had been forcibly "confiscated" from the "young photographer" by "four FBI agents," from the Albany, NY, FBI offices, a statement which now is in question. (Please see paragraphs below.) Mr. Bazile went on to describe how the agents had invited the photographer outside the station, and that the agents had then "taken" the "original" tape from the photographer, who had it on his person at the time of the meeting with the FBI personnel. When NUFORC suggested that such an act, in the absence of a court warrant, might be illegal, Mr. Bazile averred that he agreed with that assessment. However, he stated that the station still had in its possession several copies of the original tape.
When NUFORC asked Mr. Bazile whether FOX 23 was planning to do a news report on the incident with the FBI, he responded that the station was "considering" that possibility, but such a decision was out of his hands. He then stated that in order to answer that question, he would like first to speak with his "supervisor" about the matter, and that he would call back "in a few minutes."
After approximately 45 minutes had elapsed, NUFORC telephoned FOX 23 and requested to be put in touch with Mr. Bazile. After a short period of time, he came on the line, but after only a very short conversation he said he would like to put his supervisor, Mr. Dave Brown, Station News Director for FOX 23, on the line.
During our 7-minute conversation with Mr. Brown, he stated that a copy of the tape had been provided to the personnel from the FBI by his station voluntarily, because his station "willingly co-operated with members of law enforcement." He added that he personally had provided the video to the FBI, that it had not been "taken" by them, as had been suggested by Mr. Bazile. Mr. Brown stated that he had arrived at work on Sunday evening "at about 8 or 9 o'clock," and that FBI personnel had been photographed in the station while they watched the tape, and that that footage had been aired by the station on Sunday night as a news report. Mr. Brown implied that this fact illustrated that there had been no "mystery" surrounding the FBI's interest in the footage, and that, in his opinion, no impropriety surrounded the transfer of the tape to the FBI personnel.
Mr. Brown also added that he did not know whether the original tape had been provided to the FBI, or whether they had received a copy. However, he said that with digital tape, it really did not matter, since very little fidelity was lost in a copied tape.
When asked how many representatives from the FBI had been present at the station on Sunday night, he said that he did not know, but there were at least two representatives from that office present. He said there might have been more, but he could not be certain, since "there were so many people present in the station that night."
Mr. Brown closed the conversation with the statement that FOX 23 would not be devoting any more news coverage to the footage, suggesting that the story was now old news, and that, in his opinion, it did not warrant any further attention by his station.
Following our conversation with Mr. Brown, NUFORC contacted the FBI offices in Albany [(518) 465-7551]. We spoke with Lisa Massaroni, a public affairs spokeswoman, who apprised us that to the best of her knowledge, the FBI office did have a copy of the tape, that their personnel were planning to analyze it, but that she did not know the status of the investigation. She directed us to her supervisor for any further questions, and added that he would be out of his office until October 24th.
NUFORC also was contacted by a gentleman from Birmingham, AL, Mr. Brian Huff, a forensic video analyst, who had captured the video from the FOX 23 website, and who has analyzed the tape. We provide elements of his video analysis with this statement. Mr. Huff has stated to NUFORC that, based on his analysis of the footage, the object is genuine, and that it is not a superimposed image. He also stated that the object is on the other side of the clouds, which provides some perspective as to the size of the object, and its velocity, which Mr. Huff concludes is considerable. We extend our gratitude to Mr. Huff for sharing his analysis with NUFORC and Jeff Rense.
Prepared by Peter B. Davenport, Director, National UFO Reporting Center on
October 22, 2002.
Peter B. Davenport, Director
National UFO Reporting Center
P. O. Box 45623 University Station
Seattle, WA 98145
Reporting Hotline: (206) 722-3000
Forensic Video Analyst Certifies Object Is Genuine
Note - The following data is from Mr. Brian Huff as sent to Peter Davenport...
From Brian Huff
Birmingham, Alabama
3d Forensic Graphics, Video editing, production and verification, Virtual crime scene 3d walkthoughs, Expert Witness and Consultant. Specializing in verification, visualization. and re-creation.
Goal 1 - Verify authenticity of video with respect to object as an original embedded component.
Goal 2 - Clarify shape and size for analysis and comparison.
Goal 3 - Establish that object is not of the nature of a small "close proximity "rod" (as identified in the research of Jose Escamilla -ed) or insect illusion.
Object Verification
Direct color inversion of non-enhance video still. Objects in the atmosphere generally reflect the color of their environment-and appear somewhat as monochromatic images.
Direct color inversion is useful for detecting overlays, pasting, chromakey, and other methods used to "fake" photo and film.
An authentic image should invert to an alternative pseudo-monochromatic color scheme, with no obvious foreign colors or anmalies-sharp lines, etc.
Object Definition---light source
Object defined by contrast increase 61% and brightness reduction of 18%.
Object Definition-Shape Visualization
Reveals overal edges, suggests "capsule shaped" appendages.
Object Definition
Similar to traditional techniques of sharpening images, but appling sharpening to each pixel irrespective of that pixels "nearest neighbor" pixelation.
Advanced Object Definition (proprietary)
Further suggests "capsule shaped" appendages.
Un-enhanced Magnification of Object.
Was It A Missile?
From John LeFrancois
In reference to your story: 
FBI Grabs Fox UFO Video - Expert Certifies Object Genuine,
the object in the video looks very much like a surface-to-air missile. In would be interesting to discover who was in the plane that was flying over at the time. It might be possible to find some indication locally of where it landed or if there was an unexplained detonation sound around that time.
Could this have been a botched pseudo-terrorist event? Or perhaps someone like Senator Paul Wellstone was in one of the planes flying over or landing at that time?
Apparently there are hundreds of variations of such missiles.
Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles
Tube Launched, Optically Tracked, Wire Guided (TOW) Missile Weapon System
Surface to air missile non-comparision table
UK Guided Weapons Projects
NASM rockets and Missiles
John LeFrancois
From Conway Costigan
The analysis is interesting, but I tend to differ in it's conclusion that it may be a surface to air missile.
Surface to air missiles (SAMs) tend to have a very visible rocket exhaust, the footage showed none. Thus unless it was launched by a rather large catapult or slingshot, it is not a missile.
Conway Costigan Analyst/Consultant


This Site Served by TheHostPros