- The much publicized allegation that the man named as
the ringleader of the September 11 terrorist attacks met with an Iraqi
intelligence official in Prague was a lie, and the Czech president told
the Bush administration so, according to an article appearing in the New
York Times October 21. Yet top administration officials have continued
to insist upon this phony Iraqi-Al Qaeda connection in order to bolster
their case for war.
-
- According to the Times report, Czech President Vaclav
Havel warned the Bush administration early this year that there existed
no evidence that Mohamed Atta, who piloted one of the passenger airliners
into the World Trade Center, met with Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, an official
at Baghdad's embassy in Prague.
-
- The conduit for the purported Czech intelligence report
was the country's former Prime Minister Milos Zeman, a politician known
more for bluster and demagogy than intelligence. He provoked outrage earlier
this year by comparing Palestinian leader Yassir Arafat to Adolph Hitler
and urging the Israelis to deal with the Palestinians the way Czechoslovakia
dealt with the Sudeten Germans after World War II, when 3 million of them
were expelled.
-
- Dubious reports of the alleged meeting first surfaced
approximately one month after the terrorist attacks, with leading Czech
political figures quickly relaying them to the Bush administration as fact.
According to Czech intelligence, their source was a single Arab émigré,
who came forward with the information only after photographs of Atta had
appeared in the local press along with a report that he had previously
been in Prague.
-
- The claim was that Atta and the Iraqi official had met
in Prague on April 9, 2001. The meeting was cast by the Bush administration
as a final planning session before the September 11 attacks.
-
- Problems with the story quickly emerged, however. US
intelligence agencies pored over records of Atta's travels and concluded
that during the period in question he was in Virginia Beach, not in Prague.
An earlier trip that he had made to the Czech capital in 2000 was apparently
for the purpose of obtaining a cheap airfare to the US.
-
- "We ran down literally hundreds of thousands of
leads and checked every record we could get our hands on," FBI Director
Robert Mueller said in a little reported speech in April. The conclusion:
Atta was never in Prague on the day of the alleged meeting and there was
no evidence that he ever met with Iraqi intelligence.
-
- Czech intelligence officials attributed the report to
a restaurant owner anxious to discredit a rival by claiming he catered
to terrorists. They likewise found that the Iraqi diplomat in question
regularly met with a friend, a used car dealer, who bore some physical
resemblance to Atta.
-
- None of this has dissuaded those who have played the
most direct role in crafting the Bush administration's strategy of "preemptive
war" as a means of asserting US world hegemony. Even after the Czech
government warned Washington that the Prague meeting never happened, these
officials continued to raise it as a justification for war.
-
- Typical of the method employed by these officials were
the lies and innuendo offered up by Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Defense
Secretary and a key advocate of a war to establish US domination of Iraq.
In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle in February, he was asked
about allegations of a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Wolfowitz replied:
-
- "We also know there are things that haven't been
explained ... like the meeting of Mohammed Atta with Iraqi officials in
Prague ..."
-
- Q: "Which now is alleged, right? There is some doubt
to that?"
-
- Wolfowitz: "Now this gets you into classified areas
again. I think the point which I do think is fundamental is that, the premise
of your question seems to be, we wait for proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
I think the premise of a policy has to be we can't afford to wait for proof
beyond a reasonable doubt. That is a way in which any number of terrorist
regimes have, over the last 20 years, gotten away with doing things that
I think encourage more behavior of that kind."
-
- What is perhaps most significant about Wolfowitz's comments
was the way in which he upheld the veracity of a report that by then he
and the entire administration knew to be a lie. First, he cited "classified"
information that cannot be shared with the American people. One can rest
assured that if such "classified areas" existed, they would quickly
be declassified and plastered onto every newspaper front page and television
screen in the country. The claim that it is classified means simply that
it does not exist.
-
- Then Wolfowitz ridiculed those asking for such information
as lawyerly pedants who want "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"
when the nation is facing imminent danger of terrorist attack.
-
- Precisely the same arguments and even phrases have been
used by Vice President Richard Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld,
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice and others in the administration
when defending unsubstantiated charges that Iraq has developed "weapons
of mass destruction," the other major pretext for a US war against
the Arab country.
-
- A report in Newsweek cited a meeting in which Wolfowitz
berated agents in charge of the Atta investigation over their failure to
provide "evidence" substantiating the non-existent meeting in
Prague. When one agent insisted that no such evidence existed, Wolfowitz
continued pressing him until he would admit that such an encounter was
"technically possible," as the FBI could not provide a full account
of Atta's whereabouts on April 9.
-
- "Evidence of a meeting in Prague between a senior
Iraqi intelligence agent and Mohamed Atta, the Sept. 11 ringleader, is
convincing," wrote Richard Perle, the chairman of the Defense Policy
Board and a key figure in the administration's war planning, in an Op-Ed
published by the Times last December.
-
- Perle went even further last month, telling Italy's business
daily Il Sole 24 Ore that Atta had gone to Baghdad before September 11
and met with Saddam Hussein. "We have proof of that, and we are sure
he wasn't just there for a holiday," declared the defense official,
adding that, "the meeting is one of the motives for an American attack
on Iraq." Perle's "proof," like the "convincing evidence"
of the meeting in Prague, has yet to be disclosed. Curiously, this "smoking
gun" of a meeting between Atta and the Iraqi president has been mentioned
nowhere else.
-
- Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Times on August 5 cited an
unnamed "senior Bush administration official" as saying that
evidence of the phantom meeting in Prague "holds up." He added
that the administration intended "to talk more about this case."
-
- Similarly, in May, William Safire, the right-wing New
York Times columnist who has waged a relentless crusade to portray the
fictional Prague meeting as fact, also cited an unnamed "senior Bush
administration official."
-
- "You cannot say the Czech report about a meeting
in 2001 between Atta and the Iraqi is discredited or disproven in any way,"
the official told Safire. "The Czechs stand by it and we're still
in the process of pursuing it and sorting out the timing and venue."
-
- By the time this statement was made, the Czech president
had formally told Washington that the report was false. Czech intelligence
officials had long before discounted it; and the FBI and CIA had concluded
after an exhaustive investigation that there was no evidence whatsoever
to back it up.
-
- Safire improbably attributes the debunking of the alleged
Prague meeting to a joint CIA-Justice Department plot aimed at covering
up their own intelligence failures. He also explains why he and top administration
officials continue to peddle the story, despite all the evidence that it
is a fabrication: "If the report proves accurate, a connection would
exist between Al Qaeda's murder of 3,000 Americans and Iraq's Saddam. That
would clearly be a casus belli, calling for our immediate military response
..."
-
- In other words, faced with mounting skepticism over its
claims that the regime in Baghdad poses a grave threat to the US and growing
popular opposition to an unprovoked war on Iraq, the administration has
desperately sought to utilize the phony Atta-Iraqi connection as a means
to stampede the American people into supporting military action. It is
cynically attempting to exploit the grief, fear and anger engendered by
the September 11 attacks in order to further long-standing strategic plans
for a second US war in the Persian Gulf aimed at securing control of the
region's rich oil reserves.
-
- The Prague story has now been publicly exposed as a fraudulent
piece of war propaganda. It is, however, only one of many lies. Just as
the tale of Mohamed Atta and the Iraqi diplomat was conclusively proven
a fraud, it can be anticipated that other pretexts that are now being advanced
for war on Iraq will be similarly debunked.
-
- Should the US military, as now appears virtually inevitable,
invade Iraq and subject its people to a bloody slaughter, one can predict
that within a year or so it will emerge somewhere in the press that the
imminent threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction-now being cited by
the White House and the US media to whip up popular fears and terrify the
public into supporting war-is another cynical concoction by the Bush administration.
-
-
- See Also:
-
- Wall Street/Washington insider spills the dirty secret
of Iraq war:
- "Getting control of that oil will make a vast difference"
- [16 October 2002]
-
- The war against Iraq and America's drive for world domination
- [4 October 2002]
-
- Copyright 1998-2002
- World Socialist Web Site
- All rights reserved
-
-
- http://wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/atta-o23.shtml
|