Rense.com



Effect Of War On Iraq Will
Haunt West For Years
By George Gelber
10-15-2


Ordinary people in Iraq are in utter dread of war - and, with every speech that President Bush makes, they become more convinced that it is inevitable.
 
They have experienced two wars in the recent past -- the bloody war of attrition against Iran and, 10 years ago, the Gulf War, so they know only too well what war is like and its terrible cost.
 
They know that smart bombs are fallible, and only as smart as the human intelligence that guides and programmes them, and that surgical strikes are never as accurate or as surgical as they are made out to be.
 
Most observers agree that a new war in Iraq, relying heavily on aerial bombardment, will exact a high price in civilian casualties.
 
The phrase "regime change" is a misnomer: "regime removal" would be a more accurate term because, since there appears to be no coherent plan for the rebuilding of Iraq, politically and socially as well as economically after a "successful" war.
 
The Gulf War was followed by 10 years of economic sanctions that have made life a grim struggle for survival in a country that was once rich and prosperous.
 
Water-borne diseases are rife because sanctions have starved the country of the resources it needs to maintain and repair pumping stations, water mains and sewage systems.
 
Now only 41 per cent of the Iraqi population has access to clean water. Up to 800,000 children are chronically malnourished.
 
There has been an upsurge in cancer, attributed to the use of depleted uranium munitions during the Gulf War, but Iraqi hospitals, starved of the drugs and hi-tech equipment that they need to treat cancer, are unable to offer more than palliative care.
 
Four-and-a-half million people have left Iraq as refugees in the past five years. They will be joined by hundreds of thousands more.
 
There are already three-quarters of a million displaced people within Iraq -- within a country with a total population of 22.4 million.
 
Hospitals and civilian medical facilities will be overwhelmed by thousands of civilian casualties. And there are real possibilities of civil strife, with Iraqi social networks weakened by sanctions and divided along religious lines between Shia and Sunni Muslims and a tiny minority of Christians.
 
There have been positive developments amid the talk of war. The Iraqi government has said that the weapons inspectors can return unconditionally to Iraq, opening the door to the possibility of a peaceful resolution of the dispute over weapons of mass destruction, and President George W. Bush has been persuaded to take his case to the United Nations -- for the time being.
 
Such has been the belligerence of Bushís rhetoric, however, that most Iraqis believe it is only a matter of time before the bombs begin to fall.
 
The humanitarian consequences of a war aimed at "regime change" should be a central issue.
 
All the available evidence suggests that in a highly urbanised country like Iraq -- with three-quarters of its people living in towns and cities -- the toll of civilian lives and injuries would be very heavy.
 
Civilian casualties should not be pushed to the margins of the debate with that chilling phrase "collateral damage".
 
Indeed, failure to take account of the humanitarian impact of war will come back to haunt policy makers since it will dominate Iraqi and Arab perceptions of the United States and its allies for years to come and will shred their vision of a peaceful, stable and prosperous Middle East.
 
 
George Gelber is head of public policy at the Catholic Agency for Overseas Development (CAFOD). Originally a lecturer in political science in Chile in the 1970s, he has worked in development for many years. He has been with CAFOD since 1989.
 
 
 
http://www.alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/530406?version=1





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros