Is Iraq The Start Of
The Third World War?
Perspective Provided by World War II
By Henry Makow, PhD

In a letter dated August 15, 1871, Albert Pike, a Satanist and practitioner of the occult, said the Illuminati would need to engineer Three World Wars to bring about the New World Order. (
Pike, who was Grand Commander of US Freemasonry from 1859-1891, said the first war would establish Communism in Russia. The second would take advantage of the differences between "the Fascists and the political Zionists" and would weaken Christendom while empowering Communism and Zionism.
The Third World War would take advantage of the differences between Zionism and Islam and would ensure that both destroy each other. After World War Three, the people of the world will embrace Lucifer:
"Without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, [the people] will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view."
Is Iraq the beginning of World War Three, as Pike projected?
I hope not. I prefer to see it in the context of Panama, Yugoslavia and Afghanistan, as a "police action" designed to eliminate leaders that are too independent. None of these countries mounted significant resistance and I don't expect Iraq to.
However Ariel Sharon represents a wild card. If he uses the war as a pretext to drive the Palestinians west of the Jordan, it's possible that a larger conflagration might occur. For example, Egypt, Syria and Iran might attack Israel, which might use its nuclear arsenal.
Since Pike speaks of destroying both Islam and Zionism, this may indeed be the Illuminati agenda. Certainly, worldwide shock and revulsion would provide an excuse to further entrench world government in the same way as the first two wars allowed the creation of the League of Nations and the United Nations.
The origins of the Illuminati's Second World War provide a useful perspective on the possible third. I don't pretend to be an expert but I have developed the following hypothesis:
In the Treaty of Versailles (1919), the international bankers dictated punitive terms to Germany, thereby ensuring a rematch. Then, they used Communist Russia to help Germany rearm in contravention of their own treaty. The plan was to prepare Germany to challenge Britain and America, exhausting all three so Russia could emerge dominant.
Meanwhile they encouraged "right wing" elements in the U.S. and Britain to help Germany rearm, as a bastion against Russia. British and American investment created a formidable Nazi war machine.
In the late 1930's, England and Russia each wanted Germany to engage the other. However, according to William Guy Carr's "Pawns in the Game" (Ch.16 is on line) Hitler regarded Communism as a greater threat to humanity and proposed an alliance with England. Hitler believed that Communism represented a conspiracy by Jewish international bankers to enslave humanity in order to maintain their monopoly on credit.
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain was receptive to Hitler's view. This is the true meaning of "the policy of appeasement" so successfully derided by (the world-banker-run) mass media and universities. However the bankers were able to block this alliance and ensured that the original fight card (Germany Vs. England) prevailed. Thus Hitler and Stalin made a pact on Aug. 24, 1939; the invasion of Poland took place Sept. 1. Britain declared war two days later.
After conquering France, Hitler paused at Dunkirk and allowed the 350,000-man British army to escape. He still hoped to make a deal with England against Russia. Chamberlain remained receptive and didn't bomb Germany.
The eight-month period between Sept. 3, 1939 and May 11, 1940, (when Churchill became PM) was full of intrigue. Churchill and Roosevelt, both puppets of the bankers, conspired behind Chamberlain's back to make certain England's "phony war" became real. Churchill was First Lord of the Admiralty at the time.
Tyler Kent, a 29-year-old code clerk at the US embassy in London read the FDR-Churchill correspondence.
Kent had served at the US embassy in Moscow from 1934 to 1939. Fluent in Russian, he " took the opportunity to meet and mingle with ordinary Russian citizens and learned first-hand the beastly nature of Bolshevism, realizing what it would mean if this oriental barbarism were to spread further." (See "The Roosevelt Legacy and the Kent Case" Intro. By Mark Weber, which is on line.)
Kent writes: "My awareness grew also of the worldwide ideology of the soi-disant "liberals," who gushed over what they called the "new civilization" of the Soviet Union. I began to see, dimly, the power of Jewish propaganda in the United States, which harped constantly on the alleged brutalities of the new National Socialist regime in Germany while simultaneously completely ignoring the far worse brutalities in the USSR. Yet the latter had antedated the Nazi regime by more than a decade. The reasons for this distorted and lop-sided picture soon became clear. In Germany, the burden of state action was falling upon Jews whereas in the Soviet Union, the secret police (NKVD) was almost entirely in Jewish hands until the very late 1930s. The administration of the gulags ("labor camps" which were virtually extermination camps) was wholly Jewish and thus the Jews could wreak their vengeance on their age-old adversaries among the Russian people."
In 1936, Congress had enacted stringent neutrality legislation that prevented FDR from advancing the bankers' plan to embroil the US in another European war. US polls showed 83% favoured neutrality. Only the Jewish community, 3% of the population, actively campaigned for US intervention.
Tyler learned that FDR covertly had given the England and Poland promises of US intervention. Without that, the British would never have guaranteed Poland's sovereignty (the causis bellum) and Poland would have been more conciliatory.
Churchill was desperate. Despite his bluster, Churchill told Roosevelt the British were finished unless the U.S. became involved. In an attempt to reprise the Lusitania sinking in 1915 by a German U-boat, Churchill sunk the American liner Athenia on Sept. 4, 1939. Thirty Americans drowned; Churchill blamed the Nazis.
Tyler gathered this evidence of Churchill and FDR's duplicity to pass along to isolationist American Senators. But a week after Churchill became Prime Minister, Tyler was arrested and charged with treason.
His rebuttal: " A government employee takes an oath to 'support the laws and Constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.' The Constitution reserves the power to make war and peace exclusively to Congress. But with brazen contempt for the will of the people, the law and the constitution, President Roosevelt conspired with a small circle of confidants to incite war in Europe and bring the United States into the conflict. He broke his oath to 'preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.'"
Tyler's diplomatic immunity was waived. He was tried in secret by the British and sentenced to seven years. He was released and returned to the US in 1945 after serving five years. Although Tyler was never accused of giving any documents to the Nazis, he is routinely described in the world banker media as a fascist, anti Semite and Nazis spy. To oppose the world banker agenda is to be an anti Semite.
Churchill imprisoned about 1200 "fascists" accused of a traitorous and dangerous conspiracy to assist the enemy. These were associates of Tyler Kent who tried to alert Chamberlain to the Illuminati's secret agenda. They included Capt. Archibald Ramsay, M.P., his wife, Mrs. Christbel Nicholson (wife of an admiral) and Admiral Barry Domvile, a former chief of Naval Intelligence.
One of Churchill's first deeds in office was to bomb German population centers. This provoked Nazi retaliation and the Battle of Britain.
As I have said before, I am an assimilated Canadian Jew who believes in Christ's message. My family suffered from Nazi persecution and I have no fondness for Hitler. I had been left-leaning most of my live until I discovered that feminism is being used in place of Communism to shred the social fabric and create the New World Order.
I don't have the whole picture. I don't know whether the world bankers and the Illuminati are identical but they certainly work together. The Illuminati seem to use minorities, unwitting Jews, Zionists, Freemasons, Communists, feminists, and homosexuals to further their diabolical agenda. These tools are always liquidated when they have served their purpose.
In my view, the Illuminati perpetrated the World Trade Centre atrocity to again manipulate Americans into declaring war. Again political Zionism is the biggest domestic factor. I don't believe that Muslim fundamentalists represent a genuine threat to the U.S. They are used to justify Israeli expansion, and the further subjugation of Muslims, and indeed all of humanity.
At the rate we're going, human civilization is doomed.
Real religion and real civilization are based on knowing God. To know God is to experience His love for humanity.
The New World Order is based on knowing the devil. Depopulation. Murder. Mayhem.
God's Plan is Heaven on earth; the devil's is living hell.
This is the choice.
Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the board game Scruples and the author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles on feminism and the New World Order are collected at his web site He welcomes your comments at


This Site Served by TheHostPros