Rense.com



Russian Experts Say US Sub
May Have Hit, Destroyed Kursk -
US Denies Inspection Request
http://www.russiatoday.com/news.php3?id=200140
9-17-00
 
 
MOSCOW (Agence France Presse) - The Russian defence ministry said Saturday that the theory of a U.S. submarine clashing with the fated Kursk was strengthened by Washington's refusal to allow a Russian inspection of two U.S. submarines.
 
U.S. Defence Secretary William Cohen's rejection of the request from his Russian counterpart Igor Sergeyev "only strengthened the case that the Kursk clashed with another underwater vessel," the defence ministry told Interfax.
 
An investigation by Russian military experts into the cause of the August 12 explosion on the Kursk nuclear submarine, which killed 118 crew members, resulted in several possible explanations, including one that the Kursk had collided with a U.S. or British submarine.
 
The U.S. Toledo and Memphis and the British Splendid submarines were located in the Barents Sea at the time of the accident but have ruled out any collisions with their vessels.
 
The U.S. military, which believes the explosion originated inside the submarine, admitted that they had monitored the explosion and later provided Russia with a sonic report of the accident.
 
However, Cohen refused the inspection request explaining that "he did not think it was important or appropriate for the inspection to take place," a Pentagon official told ITAR-TASS on condition of q1relations between the two defence agencies led us to hope that Washington might have met us halfway," an official told Interfax. ((c) 2000 Agence France Presse)

Possible Collision Kursk And US Sub Showing How All Kursk Escape Routes Were Damaged
 
 

 

Damage To Kursk
Substantiates Major Collision
http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws002/kursk001.htm
 
 
In the interview to the "Trud" newspaper (9-12-00), Gen. Valery Manilov confirmed the reports of the signs of a collision found by Russian divers on the hull of the Kursk. In particular, Gen. Manilov said: "...our submarine was surfacing. The other submarine was traveling in the opposite direction at the depth of about 18 meters. It could have hit the "K-141" [Kursk] with its reinforced keel, which ripped through the light external hull and punctured the hard hull of our submarine. This theory is not a speculation. It is based on facts. On the right side of the Kursk's external hull we found characteristic marks formed during a dynamic collision of two objects. And another fact: the edges of the internal hull near the point of impact are bent inward. It is clear that there was an impact from the outside. Further, the elements of the superstructure atop the fin of the Kursk have been shaved off and the release mechanism of the detachable rescue vehicle has been jammed. On the seabed we found what looks like the fence from the fin of another submarine. This object was not yet raised to the surface because of its size: the submersible vehicles we have right now at the scene cannot lift this object. The suspicious object will be raised once more powerful underwater systems arrive to the area. It is quite possible that this object will tell us a lot." (Trud, Sept. 12, 2000)
 
Once again Gen. Manilov rejected the friendly fire theory as being utterly ridiculous. He also said that Russian specialists investigating the Kursk accident believe that the foreign submarine involved in the collision might have easily survived the accident, although it probably did sustain considerable damage.
 
 
Diagram of Kursk Showing Escape Systems...All Damaged

 

As of Sept. 11, 2000, Russian investigators believe that Kursk collided with the USS Memphis of the US Navy. This submarine is an experimental platform used by the US Navy to test new weapons and other systems. It was manufactured in 1977 and modified for special-purpose operation in 1989 and again in 1994. There are clear signs of a collision on the damaged part of the Kursk's hull. This information was formally confirmed by the top Russian military officials.
 
The collision was registered by Norwegian and Russian seismologists as a weak "seismic event," which was followed by a powerful explosion 2 minutes 15 seconds later. There is a number of scientifically-valid explanations as to how a collision could have caused an explosion aboard Kursk 135 seconds later. The exact mechanism of such a process is now being studied. One possible explanation is the explosion of the air-hydrogen mix produced as the result of seawater flooding the electrical battery compartment located near the torpedo section. Such an explosion could have sank Kursk or it could have detonated the torpedoes.
 
The USS Memphis was detected by the Russian nuclear cruiser Peter the Great at the bottom of the sea not far from Kursk. The American submarine released a communications buoy and transmitted a coded emergency radio signal on NATO frequencies, requesting an emergency entry to a Norwegian naval base. The USS Memphis was able to recover from the collision (it was not as heavily damaged as Kursk, because the collision did not result in any explosions aboard the American submarine) and, after pulling down the rescue buoy, left the scene of the accident. The submarine's departure was also registered by the Russian cruiser.
 
The USS Memphis was initially tracked by a Kamov antisubmarine helicopter based aboard Peter the Great. Later, two Il-38 antisubmarine aircraft, piloted by Lt. Col. Dergunov and Lt. Col. Dovzhenko, deployed hydro-acoustic buoys and detected the USS Memphis traveling at only 5 knots. The submarine was continuously tracked by Russian vessels, aircraft and satellites until it reached the Norwegian port in Bergen. During the last reconnaissance flight of an Il-38 on August 18, the aircraft's pilot - Lt. Col. Dergunov - was unable to detect the submarine due to strong EM and hydro-acoustic interference from NATO defenses. Later that day the USS Memphis docked in Bergen.
 
The Russian Military Prosecutor General's office announced that they are prepared to charge the senior crew members of an unnamed vessel that collided with Kursk in accordance with the Article 263 of the Russian Criminal Code. The name of the vessel is know to the investigators but has not been made public. It was mentioned that the Pentagon has denied the official request by the Russian government to inspect the outer hull of the USS Memphis. After staying in Bergen in a dock for a short period of time the USS Memphis left for a British naval base. Again, the American submarine was tracked by the Russian Navy and by satellites.
 
Even the most furious opponents of the collision theory are bewildered by the Pentagon's refusal to allow an external visual inspection of the USS Memphis. This old submarine has been seen at public events, photographed, videotaped and at least its external features ceased to be a secret many years ago. Clearly, if the USS Memphis did not collide with Kursk, even a brief inspection of its hull would be quite enough to lift any suspicions. Such an inspection could have been carried out quickly and easily, because the USS Memphis was sitting in a dock in Bergen. The Americans refused a simple and reasonable request from Russia. This is viewed by many as a de facto admission of guilt. The situation is aggravated by the fact, that the Pentagon officials lied about the number of American submarines observing the Russian Navy exercise in the Barents Sea: the US military officials stated that there were two submarines, while there were three submarines.
 
Many Russians, who support the collision theory, are now concerned that the Russian government may try to avoid an open confrontation with the US by not naming the vessel responsible for the collision. A similar situation had place in 1986, when on October 8 a Soviet K-219 (Type 667AU) submarine collided with the American USS Augusta. The collision led to an explosion in one of the missile launchers. The crew could not put out the fire and the submarine sank to a depth of around 5 kilometers near Bermuda islands, taking the lives of 4 crewmembers. At the time the Soviet government had its hands full with Chernobyl. In addition to that, Gorbachev did not want to put any additional strain on the improving relations between the USSR and the United States. The entire matter was suppressed and the official explanation for the accident was an unexplained explosion of a missile aboard the K-219.
 
At this moment, Russian prosecutors base their conclusions on four major facts:
 
1.The is a history of collision between American and Russian submarines in the Barents Sea. 2.Three US Navy submarines were present in the area of the Northern Fleet's exercise at the time of the Kursk accident. 3.Immediately after the sinking of Kursk, one of the American submarines left the Barents Sea to dock in Norway for repairs. The submarine was followed by Russian reconnaissance planes and made an attempt to elude them. 4.NATO officials refused an official request from the Russian government for an objective inspection of the external hull of USS Memphis.
 
 
 
For more extensive coverage of the Kursk tragedy, go to: http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws002/kursk001.htm


MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros