Rense.com



UN Inspectors Open Talks
With Iraq After US Move
By Louis Charbonneau and Caroline Drees
9-30-2

VIENNA (Reuters) - U.N. weapons inspectors opened talks with Iraqi arms experts on Monday just days after the United States proposed tough new U.N.-imposed rules for their work, backed by the threat of military force.
 
Chief weapons inspector Hans Blix led the United Nations team in the talks in Vienna, seen as a first test of Iraq's cooperation since Baghdad agreed on September 16 to let the inspectors return after a nearly four-year gap.
 
The United States has since then proposed a draft United Nations Security Council resolution setting deadlines and tightening rules for U.N. searches for any Iraqi nuclear, biological or chemical weapons -- flatly rejected by Baghdad.
 
In a serious setback to its plans for getting Security Council approval for the resolution, Washington ran into determined fresh opposition from Russia and France.
 
Russia rapped the United States for sending its warplanes to strike a southern Iraq target on Sunday, while France slammed the threat of military force contained in the U.S. draft text. Both states have veto powers in the Security Council.
 
China, which like the United States and Britain also holds a veto given to the five permanent members in the 15-nation Security Council, remained skeptical of the U.S. proposal.
 
Beijing repeated its wish for a political solution after an envoy from Britain, Washington's closest ally in its Iraq campaign, handed the draft to officials in the Chinese capital.
 
Amid the diplomatic war of words, Blix said he expected unlimited access to sites on any return of his team to Iraq.
 
"The atmosphere is businesslike...We are moving along nicely," said Mark Gwozdecky, a spokesman for the U.N.'s Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, after a two-and-a-half hour session. The IAEA is hosting the talks.
 
"If the Security Council decides to issue a new directive or resolution, of course we will follow that," he said, when asked about the U.S. draft. "In the meantime, we have these practical arrangements that we need to see eye-to-eye on with the Iraqis."
 
NO LIMITS TO INSPECTIONS
 
Speaking to reporters before the talks to work out details of the U.N.'s return, which Iraq has agreed unconditionally, Blix was asked if there would be any limitations on the sites open to inspectors.
 
"No, not that I'm aware of," he said, adding he would report to the Security Council on Thursday.
 
The Iraqi delegation is led by President Saddam Hussein's technical adviser General Amir al-Saadi, but an Iraqi official in Baghdad said Iraq's sovereignty had to be respected and raised the sensitive issue of searches at Saddam's palaces.
 
"This issue concerns respect to Iraq's sovereignty and current talks between Iraq and the inspection teams will discuss this issue," said Salim al-Kubaisi, head of the Arab and Foreign Relations Committee at the Iraqi parliament.
 
U.N. inspection teams left Iraq in December 1998 on the eve of a U.S.-British bombing raid intended to punish Baghdad for allegedly not cooperating with the inspectors.
 
The administration of President Bush, whose policy of "regime change" in Baghdad means toppling Saddam, has proposed in the draft U.N. resolution that Iraq be given one week to accept demands to disarm and 30 days to declare any weapons of mass destruction programs.
 
The draft text threatens military action if Iraq fails to comply and France reaffirmed its opposition on Monday, warning such an approach could threaten international stability and that "regime change" would violate international law.
 
"We do not want to give carte blanche to military action... That is why we cannot accept a resolution authorizing as of now the recourse to force without (the issue) coming back to the U.N. Security Council," Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin told Le Monde newspaper.
 
France has proposed two resolutions, with the second one paving the way for action if Baghdad hindered the inspectors allowed in under a first resolution.
 
AIR STRIKES
 
Russia criticized the United States and Britain on Monday for launching air attacks on Iraq at the weekend.
 
"The surge of activity by allied aviation, which has come at a time when representatives...prepared to go to Vienna to discuss procedures for renewing U.N. inspections in Iraq, causes regret," the Foreign Ministry said.
 
"Anglo-American bombing raids in 'no-fly zones' not only deepen the complicated atmosphere around Iraq but create obstacles in the search for a political-diplomatic settlement of the Iraq question."
 
U.S. Undersecretary for Defense Douglas Feith responded that the U.S. and British planes had only attacked after being fired on. "I think that criticism is completely invalid," he told reporters during a brief visit to Italy.
 
In a flurry of diplomacy in Turkey -- a key player in any U.S.-led war against Baghdad -- the United States and Iraq both sought to secure the support of the key Muslim NATO member, which publicly opposes any such strike on its neighbor.
 
Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz said on arrival in Ankara: "These (U.S.) threats are not only threats to Iraq but to the whole region and especially for Turkey."
 
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Elizabeth Jones said after talks in Ankara with Foreign Minister Sukru Sina Gurel that Washington was working hard with Turkey and other countries to agree a Security Council resolution on Iraq.
 
In Britain, Prime Minister Tony Blair faced a revolt from rebel members of his ruling Labour Party over London's hawkish stance on Iraq. A motion put forward by the anti-war faction at Labour's annual conference challenged Blair "to reject armed action, and...not to support military intervention in Iraq."
 
In Brussels, European Union foreign ministers stressed the U.N. must be the driving force behind efforts to disarm Iraq. Several slammed U.S. demands for a "regime change" in Baghdad.





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros