Rense.com



Is Bush's Alleged High
Approval Rating For Real?
By James G. Wieghart
TheHill.com
9-29-2


LAKE, Mich. -- The big mystery out here in the land of woods and lakes is: Who are the pollsters polling when they keep coming up with such high numbers for President Bush's approval rating?
 
The people I talk to around here -- farmers, insurance salesmen, factory workers, food service employees and retirees -- have very little good to say about the president's performance thus far.
 
In general, they regard him as a lightweight, out of his depth, a show-and-tell president who scares them with his constant talk about widening the "War against Terrorism" and his repeated assurances that the economy is basically sound when it is obviously in the tank.
 
This is not partisan carping either. While Bush failed to carry Michigan in 2000, mid-Michigan is hardly a Democratic stronghold. It is an area that voted solidly for our outgoing three-term Republican governor, John Engler, and has consistently elected Republicans to Congress and the state Legislature.
 
Like most Americans elsewhere, people around here rallied around the president and his War on Terrorism after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon. But serious questions are now being raised as to the pace and scope of that war, and the effectiveness of the steps taken thus far to make Americans more secure from terrorist attacks.
 
Despite all the hoopla about beefed up security at airports, nothing much has changed except longer lines at airport security checkpoints and random checks of passengers that most often single out women with children, elderly couples and business travelers rather than suspicious-looking characters. Apparently, the administration shies away from racial or ethnic profiling at airports, but shows no inhibitions about wholesale national roundups of Muslims and holding some of them indefinitely without charge.
 
The disquieting thought is that our only new defense against terrorists using planes as bombs is that U.S. fighter jets can now be quickly scrambled to shoot down commercial airliners that have been purportedly taken over by terrorists. This is not reassuring to frequent flyers like me.
 
Out here, Bush's rhetoric about Iran, Iraq and North Korea as "the axis of evil" and his drumbeat for widening the war by attacking Iraq sounds a bit hollow. Bush has already sent troops to the Philippines, assisting in the long running war against communist and Muslim rebels there, and is talking about joining forces in the Indonesian government's fight against terrorists. But many experts contend that these rebellions are indigenous and are not directly related to al Qaeda.
 
What frightens people around here most of all is Bush's obsession with expanding the war into Iraq, a move that our European allies, except Great Britain, and all of the Arab countries strongly oppose. No one doubts that Saddam Hussein is attempting to build an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. But the fact that he is surrounded by others who have already developed such weapons, including Pakistan, India, Israel, China and Russia, not to mention the nearby naval forces of the United States and Great Britain, makes this presumed threat sound a bit feeble.
 
So the War on Terrorism, which was such a political plus to Bush a year ago, now threatens to become a liability. Meanwhile, the stock market is in the sewer, the economy is shaky, unemployment is up, job creation is down, and the federal budget has gone from surplus to deficit. The predicted long string of budget surpluses that premised the multi-year Bush tax cuts of 2001 have evaporated and we are now looking at red ink federal budgets as far as the eye can see.
 
The real test of the public's view of the Bush presidency will come in November when the people who really count, the voters, go to the polls to elect a new House and one-third of the Senate.
 
And from here in the heartland, it looks as if the Democrats will not only keep control of the Senate, but win control of the House as well.
 
-- James G. Wieghart is former Washington correspondent and editor of the New York Daily News and former national political correspondent for Scripps Howard Newspapers.
 
 
http://www.thehill.com/issues/091802/op_ed_wieghart.shtm





MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros