Rense.com



Bush Criticized For Policy
Disarray On Iraq

By Lori Santos
9-2-2

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Already under fire from abroad, the Bush administration was criticized across the political spectrum at home on Sunday for an Iraq policy in disarray, with top advisers seemingly at odds.
 
The latest apparent split came as Secretary of State Colin Powell seemed to differ with Vice President Dick Cheney over the need to get U.N. inspectors back into Baghdad, and President Bush came under attack for failing to get his team in line.
 
"There have been nuanced disagreements from day one ... and they should be brought under control," said former Secretary of State Alexander Haig, a Republican. "He's got to lead, he's got to unify, he's got to ... start speaking with one voice."
 
Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under President Bill Clinton, said the Powell comments, coming after Cheney last week twice made high-profile pitches for action against Iraq, pointed out the administration's inability to articulate a policy. The U.S. threats against Iraq have sparked widespread opposition overseas.
 
"It's more of a summer of public disarray by the administration," Holbrooke told "Fox News Sunday."
 
Former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, who served under the president's father, former President George Bush, told NBC's "Meet the Press," "There is a disconnect here and I don't understand it."
 
The new chorus of criticism on the Sunday television talk shows surfaced after another week of intense debate over whether the United States should act on Bush's stated desire to oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein because he is rebuilding weapons of mass destruction.
 
Iraq's deputy prime minister, Tareq Aziz, said Cheney had provided no evidence to support pre-emptive action.
 
"They are telling wrongly ... that Iraq is reproducing weapons of mass destruction," Aziz told CNN. "That's not true. We are ready to prove it."
 
In pressing for action against Baghdad, the White House has brushed off unease among European allies, Muslim states and broader world opinion. While polls show Americans continue to back an attack on Iraq, support has fallen in recent months.
 
Twice last week, Cheney took the lead in making the case for a pre-emptive military strike, arguing that the return of weapons inspectors should not be the key objective.
 
Powell said in a BBC interview released on Sunday that getting U.N. inspectors into Iraq "as a first step" was a priority, stating, "The president has been clear that he believes weapons inspectors should return."
 
The arms experts left Iraq in December 1998 on the eve of a U.S.-British bombing raid and have not been allowed to return. White House spokesman Scott McClellan, speaking as Bush returned to Washington from a month-long Texas vacation, insisted there was no difference between Powell's comments and the Bush administration position that demanded "unfettered" inspections of Iraq's capability for producing chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.
 
"It's what we've been saying all along," McClellan said.
 
CHORUS OF CONCERN
 
But the administration plan for Iraq has been anything but clear, as evidenced by the rash of conflicting comments and unrelenting chorus of concern expressed at home and abroad.
 
Haig said Powell's British television comments were simply "a little conscious ambiguity ... to try to shore up an important ally in the process of getting ready to do what, unfortunately, we're going to have to do."
 
A long string of current and past officials in both Republican and Democratic administrations have weighed in recently, urging more consultation both at the United Nations and on Capitol Hill before any action is taken.
 
Like many, Holbrooke argued the administration had to approach the U.N. Security Council for another resolution for action against Iraq -- whether the United States won or not.
 
"They're undermining their own case, first by the disarray ... and, secondly, by their failure to recognize that they must seek international approval," Holbrooke said.
 
Haig, a former NATO supreme commander, said Washington should simply "inform the United Nations in a very formal way that we intend to enforce those resolutions in the face of repeated violations."
 
Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican and Bush's 2000 presidential campaign rival, wrote in Time magazine that he was unconvinced "that the large U.S. force contemplated for the operation is the best or only option" to oust Saddam.
 
But Bush "should seek congressional support soon -- before staging large numbers of troops in advance of hostilities."
 
Terry McAuliffe, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, told CBS' "Face the Nation" the president needed to better make his case at home.
 
"People are very perplexed about where we are. I think when the president comes back this week he needs to talk to the country ... to the members of Congress."
 
Republican National Committee Chairman Marc Racicot said differing views were the result of open debate.
 
"There's no mystery here," Racicot said. "It's just exactly what it appears to be."






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros