- China, China, China VII
- Our interpretation that President Bush has no choice
but to attack Iraq is being confirmed by the same type of media which preceded
President Bush Sr.'s attack a decade back. However, as we said, China and
Iraq, Iran, and Syria are all well aware of the agenda and thus it is somewhat
arrogant for the US to believe that they can circumvent a defense whether
affirmative or otherwise to the US plan.
- President Bush not coincidentally will be in Crawford
all throughout August. Moreover, Musharraf is meeting with Zemin August
2nd. August is the Bush month for attacking Iraq. President Bush has lost
the Middle East and critical oil for the future and needs to intervene,
and the US admits openly that it wants to seize control of the Iraqi oil
fields and put in a caretaker government.
- If President Bush and his administration do not think
that this will invoke an affirmative defense not only by Iraq but also
by Syria, Iran and China, then they are dreaming. President Bush thus is
looking for Iraq to use weapons of mass destruction and odds are high they
will be deployed against Israel. Iraq has all this time to implement their
use and Saddam Hussein in view of President Bush's admission that he is
going to install a caretaker government and run the Iraqi oil fields as
he wishes, is going to find a lot of sympathetic ears and hands to implement
their use against Israel.
- Moreover, WMD will be used no doubt against American
and British interests overseas. This will commence a regional war, where
the US strategists are hoping that Israel carries most of the ball and
the blame. However, it is crystal clear that President Bush is pushing
this agenda having convinced Sharon or Sharon convincing him that regime
changes are essential to any hope of peace. The only hope that will be
served is that of those who are willing to allow the use of weapons of
mass destruction and will result in so many deaths that it is something
we need not discuss but to say that it could result in a minimum of 100,000
deaths and as much as a million or more (probably the latter) In Israel
alone. While this may be hard to fathom, when Israel was lost the first
time, the losses suffered were proportionally far greater.
- The only secular argument we can accept is that those
advising President Bush are saying that it is better to confront China
now rather than ten years down the line. However, the dire mistake the
US is making is that when it has proven itself to be a country unable to
understand the foreign mindset, it completely discounts the preparations
in effect throughout the world for this preemptive strike against three
countries, not to primarily serve peace but to secure back control of the
Middle East, captured by China. The US knows China has prevailed and it
is essentially going out and saying we taking it back like it or not and
if don't like it we are ready to see what you are going to do about it.
This represents nothing higher than adolescent logic and thinking.
- Now, in the hope that we can put a little fear into those
who are pushing this agenda, let us tell you what we interpret can take
- China will advise Iraq to probably lace all highly probable
areas of US troop movement with devastating explosive weapons, the degree
of which we don't want to guess. This is why President Bush will keep the
media from reporting casualties: US troops will be killed on a large scale
basis in trying to capture key infrastructure locations, which will be
rigged on probably three dimensions with explosives of varying designs.
- Whether the Iraqi government will give the people adjacent
to those critical areas the prerogative of leaving the area before it deploys
them is speculation. The US thinking that it has considered this affirmative
defense will use new weapons to neutralize in their minds the use of any
triggering devices and the like. However, there is nothing more devastating
than sending troops into an area where the enemy knows for certain they
will be sent. This again may be the same mindset that connected to 911
(it is ironical that the S&P today closed at 911).
- The US will first send troops into the oil fields to
secure them from being destroyed by Saddam Hussein. The US strategists
knowing that the Hussein NWO opposition people -- tomorrow's caretaker
government -- needs the oil to prosper from the ordeal, will do everything
to get the people of Iraq to understand the need of Americans to protect
the fields, simply underestimate the Islamic mindset. The Islamic people
will now, based on the perceived arrogance of the US in proclaiming that
they will install caretaker governments and take control of the oil, carry
the same deep hatred invoked during the accident and death of Princess
Diana, another event in history tying into today's date.
- What we believe the US has not appropriately assessed
is that not only Iraq but Iran and Syria with China's strategists have
set up an affirmative defense in random areas where they can cause havoc
for Americans whether domestic or international when they are convinced
that the US is ready to launch the attack against Iraq.
- Such an affirmative defense may require that the US reallocate
troop and weapon resources to some other area and shift focus away from
Iraq and any commitment to spending time and resources there. This is important
to understand. The US has always taken the step of saying we are going
to get you, we are going to send in troops and we have allocated three
months, six months, to get the job done. Nothing has ever happened to uproot
the US Middle East plan in the past. The planners having no experience
with a counter offense have not properly prepared we believe for such contingency.
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. believes that the US in
going out and saying we are going to take over the oil fields and put in
a caretaker government, everyone knowing that it holds the same plans for
Iran and Syria, is undertaking a course of insanity consistent with biblical
warnings for this period of time.
- The new world order agenda is ultimately anti-American
and anti-G-d. The soot and ash surrounding the collapse of the World Trade
Center buildings foreshadowed what the world might wind up looking as once
the threshold is crossed of the use of nuclear weapons or other weapons
of mass destruction. SenderBerl believes that they will be used; that those
seeking world dominance under an agenda never disclosed to the American
people -- as Israel under the Oslo process never told their citizens a
word of the full truth of what it represented -- will take us to a dark
future which may officially start with the President's ill advised invasion
of Iraq (mandating a concurrent attack by Israel against Syria under the
pretext or reality of an attack against Israel from Syria/Lebanon).
- The leadership is acting as though it is desperate. This
is usually the nexus to a major mistake. They affirmatively refuse to consider
the only genuine solution, the religious solution. As we feared, if we
are proven right, there will be no satisfaction at all in having been correct
all along. The thing to do is to stop and think long and hard before undertaking
- Let us further say, that if reality proves that the US
has successfully implemented an overthrow in Iraq, it will not be what
it appears to be. When General Bar-Kohabbah sent out troops against the
Romans, initial victories went to him. Thereafter, death and devastation
prevailed against him. Again, those seeking to move the region away from
G-d will never prevail. It would be an affront to G-d. With that dynamic
in play, SenderBerl is highly confident that its analysis in such regard
will prove as accurate as those we have been detailing for nearly a decade
in terms of the Middle East. In early 1983 we advised the Reagan administration
that Japan was our enemy and not our friend and was out to undermine the
US dollar and economy. It took President Reagan and then VP Bush, Sr. 3-4
years to perceive the truth of it. SenderBerl on 9-11 pointed to China
behind the total collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.
- One of our clients, told us what happened in China post
9-11. A student in a major university felt compelled to stand up with her
entire class and applaud with her teachers and the administration over
the successful attack on America. The student thereafter carried serious
guilt in feeling that she had to applaud when she in her heart disagreed
with her fellow Chinese students.
- We are only saddened to see that man just as he did in
the past, pays idle lip service to the correct course, and in doing so
fails to recognize and/or admit to the Chinese biblical role, and thus
willingly if not knowingly undertakes the path assuring death and destruction
of increasing historic proportion.
- Joseph Ehrlich
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
- July 31, 2002
- Some excerpts from our recent E-mail:
- The new world order agenda wants to resolve the Islamic
issue (oil and nuclear) and China (the only real threat today to the one
world government agenda). China is dead set against the one world government
and has captured the Middle East and consequently in time control of oil.
The United States cannot allow this to take place....
- July 21, 2002 Major Analysis
- ,,,,Until the US recognized that without taking out the
regimes, which it in any event wanted to do, in Iraq, Syria and Iran, that
any move back to 1967 borders by Israel was a suicidal gesture by Israel
because after forfeiting strategic lands the Arab nations in the hands
of the current leaderships ultimately would again militarily attack.
- July 21, 2002 Major Analysis
- Moreover, when President Bush on June 24th made the irrevocable
error of openly admitting that he wanted to install hand selected leaderships
in the Middle East to fashion the countries into the image of the new world
order, he made a costly error, no doubt by G-d's design. The United States
has now irretrievably lost the Middle East, leaving it no alternative now
but to move militarily against those in the declared axis of evil. Now,
realizing that the Islamic nations are in cooperation with each other in
not giving President Bush any reason to launch a military attack in the
region, the United States is desperate and the EU notes the same and rejects
President Bush's announced agenda of a pre-emptive strike against Iraq
(which would also mandate an attack of Syria by Israel) all opening a possible
portal to Armageddon.
- July 21, 2002 Major Analysis
- ...Now that the US realizes that China has captured the
Middle East and that China is against the new world order agenda, it has
to decide how to deal with China, and the government is releasing first
official word platforming a future declaration against China.
- July 21, 2002 Major Analysis
- President Bush is approaching obsessive in moving against
Saddam Hussein, not to follow up for his father but in terms of the unraveling
reality that the U.S. has lost the Middle East. Once he moves against Iraq,
whether right or wrong from the EU point of view, Israel WILL move against
Syria and two of the three threats are eliminated.
- E-mail 7-28-02
- All we can further add is that for some reason August
is a favorite month of the Bush people to strike Saddam Hussein. Thus,
odds are that President Bush will move against Iraq in August for otherwise
he will not only lose the Middle East but the Congress as well in the November
- E-mail 7-28-02
- SenderBerl: The problem with the Bush administration
is that it is deploying the rest of the Bush the first strategy where the
entire power platform in the Middle East and Asia has it all figured out.
You can't deploy a design ten years old. Perhaps it is time that those
behind the new world order face the reality that the entire agenda was
not to serve the world but themselves.
- E-mail 7-28-02
- SenderBerl: The New York Times reports:
- The "inside-out" approach, as some call this
Baghdad-first option, would capitalize on the American military's ability
to strike over long distances, maneuvering forces to envelop a large target.
Those advocating that plan say it reflects a strong desire to find a strategy
that would not require a full quarter-million American troops, yet hits
hard enough to succeed. One important aim would be to disrupt Iraq's ability
to order the use of weapons of mass destruction.
- SenderBerl: The US intends to use weapons unknown to
the American public. These weapons can literally neutralize all electronic
systems within a large radius and moreover disorient everyone within its
boundaries as well. A smaller version of the weapon in fact was part of
the missile which was used to take down TWA Flight 800 taking out its electronic
systems thus SenderBerl knowing that the missile was NOT part of a terrorist
- While of course the strategy is bold it is also risky
and in our respectful opinion will open a gateway which President Bush
does not want to really open. Wihtout question those suggesting it are
saying that its effective use will scare the daylights out of the Islamic
world and thereafter everyone will fall into place.
- This may be the case short term, but we doubt it. Moreover,
we continue to watch if President Bush will in fact deploy it and more
importantly what China intends to do to now that
- a. it has disrupted the peace process in the Middle East
- b. offset Musharraf politically
- c. gained the upper hand in Nepal.
- Of course, China is waiting for the US to make its move.
It is also smiling at how many points it has gained in the Arab/Islamic
world, everyone seeing Israel in a quagmire which it cannot find a solution
out of (Israel waiting for the US to pursue its covert promise to proceed
against Iraq to start the chain in the change of regimes).
- August is around the corner. If President Bush strikes
it will be within two weeks in our best estimation. He certainly has to
do something because the US and Israel wither domestically and internationally.
- Joseph Ehrlich
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
- Early morning July 29, 2002
- SenderBerl: The article below supports SenderBerl's contention
that China has backed a PLO strategy which causes Israel to collapse from
its own weight. First, tourism has been destroyed. Second, requiring Israel
to call up reserves taking men out of the economy to reoccupy the West
Bank. Israel recently has become aware of this Trojan Horse strategy but
despite knowing about it, seems on the slipper slope and does not know
how to escape.
- Email 7-29-02
- SenderBerl: The articles below evidence that the war
against terrorism all along has been a war against CHINA. Now that Jiang
Zemin intends to stay in power, the US is escalating matters by telling
the world the last thing China wants to hear: that the US intends to maintain
a long term presence in China's domain. Let us be the first to tell you
that this is interpreted as HIGHLY NEGATIVE. Will China now put its troops
into the Middle East? Will China now proceed against Taiwan? Things are
unravelling as we feared they would and we can only confirm again that
we are in the most dangerous times in world history.
- Today's News Stories which say a great deal!
- Iran Tells Its Forces To Prepare For US Attack
- TEHRAN, Iran (Reuters) - Iran's army chief said on Wednesday
his forces had been told to make preparations for a possible attack by
the United States on the Islamic Republic, which Washington has accused
of supporting terrorism.
- US Says Raising Oil Reserves Not Linked To
- By Tom Doggett
- WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) - The U.S. Energy Department
said on Wednesday it will seek to boost the U.S. emergency crude stockpile,
but a spokesman said the move should not be interpreted as a precursor
to a possible attack on Iraq.
- The department said it will accept bids next Tuesday
from energy companies to supply 40,000 barrels per day (bpd) of oil to
the stockpile in exchange for crude drilled in the Gulf of Mexico.
- A department spokesman said the additional oil is part
of the administration's plan announced last year to fill the emergency
reserve to its 700 million-barrel capacity by 2005, and should not be interpreted
as being part of a plan to attack Iraq.
- Bush Drumbeat Leaves Key Questions On Iraq
- By Charles Aldinger
- WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) - Despite increasing threats
from the White House to get rid of Iraq's President Saddam Hussein's regime,
analysts and lawmakers do not expect any U.S. military attack against Iraq
- There are no outward signs of a U.S. military buildup
in the Gulf. But a drumbeat of warnings from U.S. President George W. Bush
that Saddam must be deposed has triggered deep concern in the Middle East,
Europe and world markets over any new war with Baghdad.
- Insight on the News - World
- Issue: 08/19/02