Rense.com



Can The Scientific
Community Be Trusted?
By John Gillanders
The Lantern - Ohio State University
7-21-00
 
 
 
COLUMBUS, Ohio (U-Wire) - The scientific community has always been quick to dismiss any kind of alternative viewpoint that threatens to throw the 'accepted' knowledge of the world into question. Sometimes this scurry to explain the unexplainable leads to leaps in logic that can only be described as laughable. This is the case with the latest report on new developments in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.
 
While browsing the magazine section at a local convenience store I happened to stumble upon a headline that deeply disturbed me. Right on the cover of the July issue of Scientific American appeared the declaration: "Alien Civilizations: if they exist why aren't they here?" I was intrigued. I just had to investigate the logic that would lead someone to make such an uninformed statement and get it published in a supposedly scientific publication.
 
What I found was one of the most deliberately one-sided pieces of journalism I have encountered in my short existence.
 
In the article entitled, "Where Are They? Maybe we are alone in the galaxy after all," Ian Crawford, University of London astronomy professor, briefly illustrates popular scientific research and viewpoints regarding this controversial issue.
 
Throughout the piece he reviews data based on the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence program's new findings and astronomical data regarding the existence of planets outside of our solar system. In his opinion, he maintains, that based on these new findings the human race must face the possibility that we are the most advanced civilization in the galaxy.
 
He bases much of his argument on the famous scientific 'paradox' voiced in 1950 by Enrico Fermi. Fermi's paradox basically states that if alien civilizations existed in the universe, their presence would be obvious. Crawford argues that since these new scientific findings don't point to any obvious presence of an alien civilization, they simply might not exist. He further goes on to suggest that we should continue expansion of the SETI program to find some obvious evidence.
 
OK, this is ridiculous. No obvious evidence, who are they kidding? I'm no expert on the topic, but I do know that UFO sightings and reported alien abductions have been permeating our culture for nearly 50 years.
 
The questions raised by these phenomenons are numerous and the answers don't exist. The number of people, pilots in particular, who have reported UFO sightings is enormous. In addition, nearly 1.5 million people in this country from all walks of life have reported supposed abductions, the psychological influence of which is easily measured. This is not to mention the fact that the military possesses literally thousands of pages of information regarding the existence of aliens, which they refuse to declassify to the general populace.
 
It would be one thing to write an article of this nature and systematically discount these claims or argue against them with some type of reasoning. To simply ignore them and pretend that they don't exist is completely irresponsible and insulting to the general populace.
 
Those who are putting their faith in the scientific community to save the world should take note: these people can't be trusted.
 
(C) 2000 The Lantern via U-WIRE


 
 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros