Rense.com

 
Angry British Motorists
Destroy Roadway
Surveillance Cameras
The National Post - Canada
with files from The Daily Telegraph
8-21-1

LONDON - Fed up with Big Brother peering over their shoulders on the highway, British motorists are taking out their anger on the cameras that increasingly record their every movement.
 
In recent months, drivers have attacked four surveillance cameras on a 25-kilometre stretch of highway in Gloucestershire, western England.
 
In three of the cases, the cameras appear to have been rammed by vehicles, while the fourth had its pole bent, using a rope or chain. Damage was set at $90,000.
 
"There can be no doubt that these cameras were deliberately wrecked so we are probably looking for motorists who regularly use this stretch of road and have had enough," a police spokesman said.
 
Two years ago, it was estimated Britain had more surveillance cameras per capita than anywhere else in the world, with one million of the devices, often installed in city centres and stores.
 
Their extension to the open road and the countryside is upsetting motorists and motoring organizations, especially as their proliferation is seen as more of a cash grab than a safety device.
 
Last week, the government announced a plan to install 6,000 more cameras, bringing the number in use in Britain to 9,000.
 
This could triple the number of speeding fines issued each year. The fines will also kick in at 55 km/h, down from the previous trigger point of 65 km/h.
 
In addition, police forces will be allowed to keep the revenue from speeding tickets, provided they spend it on new cameras or maintaining existing ones.
 
Ken Williams, the chief constable of Norfolk and chairman of the traffic committee of the Association of Chief Police Officers, said the object of the initiative was not to issue as many tickets as possible, but to change drivers' attitude to speeding and improve road safety.
 
He said the number of people killed or seriously injured had dropped by 7% in the eight areas where the cameras had been tried out.
 
In an attempt to allay camera rage, the new devices will not be concealed. They will also be brightly painted and warning signs will advertise their presence.
 
"We need to be very public about where the cameras are going to be, and make them bright and visible," Mr. Williams said.
 
The Department of Transport's existing guidelines states that cameras must be "visible" and sited only at locations where accidents have previously occurred.
 
Some authorities have painted fixed cameras orange, with mobile camera vans in similarly bright shades. They also publicize their whereabouts on the Internet and local radio.
 
The Automobile Association said that driver support for speed cameras was waning. It added that police forces must be as open as possible about funding, signposting and siting.
 
The Automobile Association has also found increases in the number of drivers wrongfully accused of speeding.
 
Its cases include a vicar who was supposedly spotted speeding in London, while delivering a sermon in Wales. In another example, a Scottish dairyman received numerous tickets for speeding in his milk cart.
 
link
 

MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros